- Japanese Journalist Accuses Israel of Fukushima Sabotage
- Atzmon: Norway-- More About the Jewish Right Wing Connection
- US MILITARY KIDNAP VICTIM: Who's Afraid of Aafia Siddiqui?
- Not Anti-Semitism but Anti-Communism
- IDF Flotilla Massacare - Kawther Salam - Rense - 100608
- New Zundel Interview
- Israel's First PM: "Father of Terrorism in the M.E.? In All The World!"
- Fukushima Holocaust: No Warnings, No Damage, No Questions?
- Case Closed: Lockerbie False Flag Documentary
- Sorosistan: Junk Bonds & “Teflon Guy” Behind the Revolutions
- Now Alex Jones says "Folks! I've done the research! 9/11 Hijackers Were Protected by Mossad!"
- Russia No. 1 - 1919 British White Paper on Jewish Terror
- Fukushima as Fabricated Terror
- ISRAEL DID 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED
- Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna, SD) shares Norway killer's views "Massacre result of Multiculturism"
You are here
Jim Stone Interview: Fukushima Demonstration of Nuclear Blackmail
This interview and description are from James A. Jancik's site.
Tonight's guest has worked for the National Security agency with an above top secret clearance specializing in Electronic Warfare. He also has extensive experience in automated industrial control systems, as well as an extensive background in computers and advanced electronics. He has dedicated his life to exposing the works of the elite from a technology standpoint and has achieved a unique status which enables him to commit a vast amount of time to research complex and demanding subjects.
He is here tonight to discuss his study into the events leading up to the disaster at Fukushima, and to offer a well researched opinion on what the future holds for Fukushima, Japan, and the rest of the world.
1)- The Earthquake was not 9.0 but 6.2, as reported by all station.
2)- Reactor #4 was disassembled in repair, so, how could it explode/meltdown?
3)- Rectors were huge and case hardened, but, were completely destroyed by a supposed hydrogen blast?
4- The automatic backup systems were told to stand down and needed no power to work (being powered by steam!).
5)- There was NO earthquake damage from the largest quake ever to hit Japan before the Tsunami hit.
There is SOOOO much more... ending with proof they were destroyed by a nuke NOT the earthquake or Tsunami. Follow along from his webpage as Jim shows step by step proof, this was not an act of nature, but, and act of war.
The Jim Stone website is loaded with information. His main link on this story is Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50? Start with the interview.
Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
Mails from Japan, the true perspective
This picture shows the area after the "quake" which was supposedly 100X stronger than the Kobe quake of 1995. 19 Arabs with boxcutters anyone?
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer
Comments
Re: JIm Stone Interview: Fukushima Demonstration of Nuclear ...
Where is the proof for this? Stone doesn't provide it. As far as I can recall it was initially reported as a 9.0 and then downgraded to 8.9.
Maybe because the spent fuel stored at the top of the reactor building became dislodged from its housing, lost coolant and went into prompt super-criticality?
The colour of the smoke and flames I've seen indicates that hydrogen explosions were not the cause, but lets assume it was. While some claim that hydrogen can not detonate, but rather will deflagrate, this is not actually true. Hydrogen can detonate if a deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) occurs. Stone maintains that the venting systems were designed to prevent build-up of hydrogen, which is true, but only if they were still functioning properly in the aftermath of the earthquake/tsunami.
Back to the colour of the smoke. The yellow-brown mushroom cloud in the case of reactor 3 strongly suggests the presence of plutonium and transplutonium metals, which could either come from the mixed-oxide fuel rods used in reactor 3 or from the spent fuel rods, which again could have gone into prompt super-criticality.
The backup systems were not steam-powered! This is nonsense! The backup generators were diesel-powered and located in the basement area of the reactor building (in keeping with the flawed GE design). This left them extremely vulnerable to flooding.
There was quake damage but it was limited. However, this is nothing new. You can compare damage from any two quakes of the same magnitude and find very different outcomes in terms of damage. There are many factors influencing the amount of damage, the most significant being the focus depth of the earthquake. In general, the shallower the focus depth, the more severe the destruction. In the case of the 1995 Kobe quake (cited by Stone) the focus depth was 16kms whereas the 2011 Tohoku quake had a focus depth of 32km.
In both cases, the quakes are shallow focus, but the difference in focus depth could go some way towards explaining the variance in damage patterns. as could the distance from the epicentre, as well as geological, geostructural and geomorphological conditions in the region. It is also notable that most of the buildings suffering serious damage in Kobe were pre-code designs. I haven't confirmmed it, but it is possible that the area affected by the 2011 earthquake had fewer such buildings.
Re: Jim Stone Interview: Fukushima Demonstration of Nuclear ...
Stone has this list of seismic readings. The far right colum is the seismic intensity.
The readings came from Ibaragi (IBR), Iwate (IWT), Myagai (MYG), Tochigi (TCG), Chiba (CHB), Fukushima (FKS), and Gunma (GNM) and none are above 6.67
This wiki article lists the
foreshock at 7.2,
main shock at 9.0,
aftershocks on 3/11 of 7.9 and 7.7
and 3 more from 4/7 to 7/10 ranging from 6.6 to 7.1.
That's a whole lotta shakin' going on!
This is the Hanshin Expressway which "was designed to be earthquake proof, so it did not break up, but toppled onto its side." Not so earthquake proof. Breaking up might have hastened the removal (should have called Urban Moving)
Stone's readings appear to come from prestigious Tskuba University, which puts him on solid ground.
A 9.0 is roughly 100X stronger than this. Stone is right to ask, "Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?"
Stone has this diagram explaining the steam back up system. I can't say much except that there was about zero coverage of the failure of the "backups."
Stone's page on the event is detailed. He claims to be an expert on nuclear control systems. He's certainly got the goods on the Israeli hoof prints. If he's right on the seismic readings, then we've got an Orwellian "official" story which certainly fits a pattern
Re: Jim Stone Interview: Fukushima Demonstration of Nuclear ...
Fester, these measurements are in the Shindo scale and not in Richter. The maximum on the Shindo scale is 7. Stone is full of shit, I'm sorry to say.
There was coverage of the failure of the diesel backup generators. The High Pressure Coolant Injection system is powered by the diesel generators, it is not self-powering. As the diesel generators failed, the HPCI never activated.
I suspect an Israeli involvement in the form of Stuxnet. Stone's work is full of disinformation at the very worst and fundamental errors at best. A case of well-poisoning?
Re: Jim Stone Interview: Fukushima Demonstration of Nuclear ...
Sullivan, I appreciate the input. I'm still trying to sort the Shindo-Richter comparison. Also, trying to find photos of damage from places like Sendai.
Apparently, the Kobe 1995 quake was the first use of the Shindo scale: "It was the first time that earthquake tremors in Japan were officially measured at seismic intensity (shindo in Japanese) of the highest Level 7 on the scale of Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)."
It's the wiki, but they say that the Kobe Quake was a Shindo 7 yet only a Richter 6.8. That leaves Stone's basic contention intact, no?
if they say Fukushima was a 9.0 on the Richter, that's 100X more intensity than the Kobe quake, so it's gotta be well beyond a 7 on the 7 point Shindo scale.
However, the problem I see is that Stone's Tsukuba list of seismic readings averages out to Shindo 5.85 which suggests that it was considerably weaker than the Kobe quake despite a Richter 100X greater. Something seems awry.
100X is a real challenge to even concieve of. 2X? 5X? Ok. 100X??? Those tsunami shots should have shown a lot more chaos, damage, and the reaction of the videographers seems to not right.
Israeli involvement is like being a little pregnant, no? If they had a motive to punish Japan, the means, and opportunity, I'm going to think they did until I get something certain the other way.
If you've got sources for the backup system info and #4 (the link goes to some twitter thing), I'd be grateful. Many thanks.