You are here

Israel Lobby takes Credit for Nixing Kids Art Exhibit

From the Stop AIPAC blog:

The Tweet above is from the Jewish Federation of the East Bay organization and its success in censoring a children's art exhibit that was scheduled to be shown at the Museum of Children's Art in Oakland, California later this month. They would like to represent themselves as being "the" voice of the Jewish community of the East Bay, but in fact they are often the voice of anti-Palestinian extremism that is not representative of the whole Jewish community. This is yet another example of the efforts of that anti-Palestinian lobby censoring Palestinian cultural expression.

Here is a press release from Middle East Children's Alliance, that was working to bring this art to the people of the Bay Area.

 

Oakland Museum of Children's Art Shuts Down Palestinian Children’s Exhibit

Media Advisory

For Immediate Release

Berkeley, CA— The Museum of Children’s Art in Oakland (MOCHA) has decided to cancel an exhibit of art by Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip. The Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA), which was partnering with MOCHA to present the exhibit, was informed of the decision by the Museum’s board president on Thursday, September 8, 2011. For several months, MECA and the museum had been working together on the exhibit, which is titled “A Child’s View From Gaza.”

MECA has learned that there was a concerted effort by pro-Israel organizations in the San Francisco Bay Area to pressure the museum to reverse its decision to display Palestinian children’s art.

Barbara Lubin, the Executive Director of MECA, expressed her dismay that the museum decided to censor this exhibit in contradiction of its mission “to ensure that the arts are a fundamental part of the lives of all children.”

“We understand all too well the enormous pressure that the museum came under. But who wins? The museum doesn’t win. MECA doesn’t win. The people of the Bay Area don’t win. Our basic constitutional freedom of speech loses. The children in Gaza lose,” she said.

“The only winners here are those who spend millions of dollars censoring any criticism of Israel and silencing the voices of children who live every day under military siege and occupation.”

Unfortunately, this disturbing incident is just one example of many across the nation in which certain groups have successfully silenced the Palestinian perspective, which includes artistic expression. In fact, some organizations have even earmarked funds for precisely these efforts. Last year, regrettably the Jewish Federation of North America and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs launched a $6 million initiative to effectively silence Palestinian voices even in “cultural institutions.”

The free exhibit, co-sponsored by nearly twenty local organizations, was scheduled to open on September 24, and featured special activities for children and families, including a cartooning workshop and poetry readings.

The Gaza Strip, which has a population of 1.6 million, has been under siege since Israel imposed a blockade against it in 2006. The United Nations and many human rights organizations across the world have condemned the blockade as an inhumane and cruel form of collective punishment.

“Even while the children in Gaza are living under Israeli policies that deprive them of every basic necessity, they managed through art, to express their realities and hopes. It’s really very sad that there are people in the U.S. silencing them and shredding their dreams,” said Ziad Abbas, MECA’s Associate Director.

MECA is disappointed in the museum’s decision to deny Bay Area residents the opportunity to view Palestinian children’s art, and is committed to seeking an alternative venue.

“We made a promise to the children that their art will be shown and we are going to keep that promise,” said Lubin.

For media requests, please contact:
Leena Al-Arian
Communications Coordinator, MECA
Leena@mecaforpeace.org

510-548-0542
http://www.mecaforpeace.org

This is Not Over.
First, this art will be exhibited. MECA says it will be either inside or, if need be, OUTSIDE the museum. Even if the anti-Palestinian fearmongers see the kids art as an "existential threat to Israel" or whatever it is they are claiming, they will ultimately fail to prevent an exhibition of this art, and to an audience much, much larger than was originally envisioned. Stop AIPAC will work hard to expose the heavy-handed tactics of the groups that oppose any expression of dissent against Israel. We are already gearing up for protests of aipac in December, during their "membership meetings" in the Bay Area. This would be a good time to make a donation to make this bigger than ever.

Comments

THE POGRAMMING PROCESS

The average person is most open to Jewish filth between birth and the end of puberty. After puberty, most people become self-absorbed, such that holocaust indoctrination remains possible, but becomes problematic. After age 25, holocaust indoctrination becomes almost impossible to begin. In Mexico, one male I spoke to (age 27) had never heard of the “holocaust.” When I explained it to him, he laughed and dismissed it as comically ridiculous.

Therefore Jews target pre-adolescent children, since their minds are open and vulnerable. In this way, Jewish lies become a central part of people’s personalities. After Jews implant a victim, the victim regards any questioning of Jewish supremacy as a direct personal attack on himself or herself. 

Jews are fully aware of all this, and have refined it to a science. Here is their programming process in American public schools... 

Grade               Age            

 4                      9-10             Requirement: Children are shown holo-hoax  pictures, and are asked to comment in words and images (i.e. by drawing their own pictures).

5                      10-11            Requirement: Children read short simple blurbs about the holo-hoax.

6                      11-12            Requirement: Children enter puberty, and read excerpts from the “Diary of Anne Frank”

7                      12-13            Requirement: Children read the entire text of the “Diary of Anne Frank”

8                      13-14            Requirement: Movies like “Schindler’s List” are shown in the classroom. Students must research the holo-hoax and write papers about it.

9                      14-15            Requirement: Puberty complete. Programming complete. Further programming is at the discretion of the local school district.

Thus, holo-hoax programming is most intense during puberty, which generally happens from age 11-14 (the age group that Jewish holo-hoax “survivors” usually speak to when they visit public schools).

By age 14-15, children enter adolescence, whereon holo-hoax programming begins to taper off – although some school districts may order further programming.

For this reason, Jews cannot afford to let pre-adolescent children see any pro-Palestinian materials or exhibits in museums.

My own city has two museums for children and youth, who are brought in by bus from the public school system. (“Field trips.”) Neither museum has ever had a pro-Palestinian exhibit.

Incidentally the MOCHA director, Hilmon Sorey, has a one-page item (.pdf) on the MOCHA web site explaining his capitulation to Jewish militants. It’s total garbage.

http://mocha.org/forms/MOCHA%20Open%20Letter.pdf

I sent Sorey an e-mail in which I stated (falsely) that I have an ex-wife in Oakland with two little girls. I said that my (fictional) “two daughters” have been to the MOCHA museum several times during school field trips, and my (fictional) ex-wife asked me to send her a few extra dollars in child support to donate to the MOCHA museum, but I refused because of this incident.

I said there are many other parents who feel the same way I do, and they also will not donate.  

I sent Sorey an e-mail in which I stated (falsely) that I have an ex-wife in Oakland

You could have raised an issue without resorting to making up a story. 

And you could have made your point without snarky criticism. I did not “resort to making up a story.” My message was calculated. I used that story because the MOCHA relies on municipal funding and on private donations from parents. Complaints mean nothing to them. Money means everything. 

If I made an error, it was to presume that you would understand this.

And you could have made your point without resorting to self-righteous criticism. The MOCHA depends on municipal funding, and on donations from parents. Complaints mean nothing. Money means everything.

My error was to presume you would understand this.

I did not “resort to making up a story.”

Yes - you made up a story.  It is not "self righteous" or "snarky" to point it out.  It weakens your position.  There is no need to do that.

I would not make an assumption re: which complaints they pay attention to. They did pay attention to the Jewish Federation.  Why is not certain. 

There may have been people connected with the JF who could pull strings to get the museum's funding cut - we don't know.  I don't live in Oakland.  So their reaction may have been sensible, given the circumstances.

My response got posted twice, with different wording.  The first one I did not want to send, since it sounded too truculent. I thought I delted it. Apologies for that.

Oh well.

By the way, I did nothing to "weaken my position" as you claim. I could further critique your comments, but I'm not interested in debating this matter with you any further.

Therefore you may have the last say. Go for it.

I did nothing to "weaken my position" as you claim.

All I or anyone has to do is email this exchange to MOCHA and that automatically nullifies the email you sent them.  Fabrications always take more energy to prop up than does the truth - I never consider it good policy to engage in them. 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer