From our old friend Greg Bacon's redoubtable Goon Squad blog:
Friday, January 20, 2012
Zionist American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Gawker reported today that Andrew Adler, the owner and publisher of the weekly newspaper the Atlanta Jewish Times, wrote in a January 13 column about what options Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Neyanyahu might have if he receives a report that Hezbollah is about to attack with thousands of rockets and Iran has “reached nuclear launch capabilities.” In this hypothetical scenario, Adler says that an Israeli diplomat will have informed Nethanyahu that he “cannot expect much help from the United States due to its newly implemented military budget and the administration’s never ending ‘Alice in Wonderland’ belief that diplomacy is the answer.”
One option (Option three), according to Adler, would be for U.S.-based Mossad agents to assassinate the President of the United States.
Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.
“Yes, you read ‘three’ correctly,” Adler says, “Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?”
Source
Making a crazed comment like the one above is against the law--class D felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. The offense is punishable by five years in prison, a $250,000 fine--and usually gets the person arrested. But since the mad man is a 'Chosen One,' no arrest will be made. Why, that would be 'anti-Semitic' and the sadistic bastards that own and control the 'United States of Israel' won't allow one of their psyop agents to be put behind bars.
In a statement today, the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) condemned Adler’s editorial:
“It is the height of irresponsibility to make the horrific suggestion that the State of Israel should assassinate the President of the United States of America,” [NJDC President and CEO David] Harris said. “To dare to give such despicable ideas space in a newspaper — no less in the words of the paper’s owner and publisher, and a Jewish newspaper at that — is beyond the pale.”
Sure, I believe the above statement, but I also believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny:)
"... is beyond the pale.” Nice tie in there National Jewish Council, to use that phrase that's associated with the term given to a region of Imperial Russia, in which permanent residency by Jews was allowed, and beyond which Jewish permanent residency was generally prohibited.
Always the victim card is played again, to divert the masses from the real news that Israel wants to murder an American president.
Yes, it was irresponsible to suggest that the murderous thugs in charge of Apartheid Israel murder the president, but only because it was put down in writing and made it into the media.
Israel has shown time and again it has NO problem with murdering anyone they think might be an 'existential' threat. No trial or evidence needed, just a bullet to the head.
If President Kennedy was still around, you could ask him about the loonies in charge of the world's #1 terror state, Israel, but he was murdered for wanting to remain neutral in the ME and m aide a comment to one of his aides that Israel would get nuclear weapons over his dead body.
JFK's dead and Israel has nukes, some of which were built from fissionable material stolen from the USA.
Read up on Israel's brutal, savage and unprovoked attack against the USS Liberty, which the sorry IDF SOB's were so blood thirsty, they even machine gunned survivors trying to escape in life boats.
Fast forward to the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB of 9/11 and you're only allowed one guess as to who was the prime perp in that attack against the USA.
Add in the lies the Zionist owned, Jewish run MSM told about Iraq, a country that was NO threat to the USA, but Israel wanted destroyed and it doesn't take a genius to know that Israel's MOSSAD probably already has plans ready to assassinate Obama, then in their usual false flag style, have their Zionist MSM put the blame on another Muslim nation, either Syria or Iran and off we go again, killing for Israel.
Will this madness never stop?
Arrest the GOY, but leave the 'Chosen Ones" alone:
Man Arrested, Convicted of Threatening President Due to ‘Burning Bush’ Remark
Humphreys will be convicted and sentenced to 37 months in prison.
Here's another example of the Secret Service checking out a high school kid for making a political cartoon about President GW Bush, but it did not advocate his assassination.
In 2005, a teacher instructed her senior civics and economics class to take photographs to illustrate the rights contained in the United States Bill of Rights. One student "had taken a photo of George Bush out of a magazine and tacked the picture to a wall with a red thumb tack through his head. Then he made a thumb's-down sign with his own hand next to the President's picture, and he had a photo taken of that, and he pasted it on a poster." A Wal-Mart photo department employee reported it to police, and the Secret Service investigated.
"I'm definitely pro-Israel to the max."--Andrew Adler
Then by all means traitor, move to the land where you'll be among others like your ignorant self, Apartheid Israel, a rogue state that loves war--as long as someone else, like the USA, is doing the fighting and dying--and recoils in horror at the "P" word, Peace.
MOSSAD death in Lillehammer part 1/2 (Video)
P.S. Sorry, you 'Kosher Kommadoes' from the Jewish Internet Defense Force,' that despite all your efforts to slow down and fuck up my research on this story, you weren't able to stop this very newsworthy piece from being posted.
Comments
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
I've taken a couple of classes in communications, one in communications law.
I believe the editor MAY be able to get away with this one - since it is written as an "opinion piece" (editorial} and opinion is protected speech in the US.
Legally, an opinion is different from a statement. It's the difference between saying "X murdered Y" and "In my opinion, X murdered Y". The first is legally actionable, the second is not.
I cannot for the life of me imagine any editor in their right mind coming up with something like that and having the utter gall to print it.
As for the kid, I think he should sue.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Sue you say? Like these folks:
Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Suit Seeking Accountability for Guantanamo Torture
December 14, 2009—Today, the United States Supreme Court refused to review a lower court’s dismissal of a case brought by four British former detainees against Donald Rumsfeld and senior military officers for ordering torture and religious abuse at Guantánamo. The British detainees spent more than two years in Guantanamo and were repatriated to the U.K. in 2004.
US Supreme Court Refuses to Allow Abu Ghraib Torture Victims to Sue Military Contractors
With what can only come across as cynical timing, the US Supreme Court on Monday, the day after the UN International Day in Support of the Victims of Torture, declined without comment to take up a lawsuit filed on behalf of 250 Iraqis — formerly prisoners at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad.
Quaint notion, I'm afraid. Yes, the goy can go to jail for 3 years for a joke, or an Iraqi-American doctor can get 22 years in jail for sending money to Iraq, but the Jew(s) is/are above the Goyim's Laws. The filthy Talmud says so.
I like the adjective Jew. It reminds me of days of yore when we had not completely capitulated and were not entirely slaves to Jewish "sensitivities." Call me juvenile or call me Juvenal, but let me know when the censorship has begun here.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Actually, the second is legally actionable, by means of a civil suit for slander or libel, regardless as to whether it is presented as an opinion or not.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
I like the adjective Jew.
It's a noun. And it cheapens the site when you do that.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
I really couldn't care less about Jewish "sensitivities" any more than other "sensitivities", including yours!
Censorship has most certainly not begun here, but I and others are feel free to comment on your posts, and if you don't like that, that really is just too bad. If you are attempting to dissuade others from commenting on your use of language, you are the one trying to censor.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Actually, the second is legally actionable, by means of a civil suit for slander or libel, regardless as to whether it is presented as an opinion or not.
Is that true of the US, or are you speaking of the UK? Apparently the UK has stricter standards on buyer feedback (Ebay, etc) than does the US. I am talking about law in the US - this is not universal.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Yes, I am talking about British and or Irish law, which I also realise is not universal. However, I'm surprised that in the US you can give a potentially defamatory opinion on another person that could perceivably have an impact on their quality of life and they have no legal recourse.
Re: American Jew Editor Says Israel Should Assassinate Obama
Speech in the US is a First Amendment issue.
In the US, if you identify your statement as opinion, as
"In my opinion, xxxx", then you will more likely avoid court battles over whether what you said was opinion or not. Editorials are considered opinion pieces and the titles are usually prefaced with "Opinion".
Asking a question is not considered the same as making a statement. You cannot be sued for asking a question. However, in a courtroom setting judges can rule whether a question by an attorney to a plaintiff / defendant is allowable.
Public figures have fewer protections against libel / slander than private individuals - that glitch in the law goes back to the 1700's.
Obscenity is not considered free speech, however, what constitutes obscenity has been fought over so much in the courts (especially by pornographers like Al Goldstein) that virtually anything is now allowable (save kiddie porn).
It gets complicated.