You are here

Home » Blogs » Fester's blog

Jew Lawyer Opposes "Dirty, Sword Carrying Catholic Beasts"

published by Fester on Thu, 2012-01-19 12:31

Judaic Anti-Catholic Bigotry Covered Up from the Maurice Pinay Blog

A search of Google News for the reports of this story which have been scrubbed indicates that it is being suppressed, particularly in the local press.

The irony of this story is that no nominal Catholic can sustain a career in the legal profession today without maintaining a sufficiently high degree of philojudaism. The 'staunch traditionalist Catholic' Antonin Scalia who regularly speaks at conferences on Talmudic law is a major case in point.

Given the very conspicuous names, I'm going to go ahead and say what the Wall St. Journal did not say, this is a case of Judaic anti-Catholic bigotry.

‘Catholic Knight Witch Hunter’? Judge Weighs Response to Epithet

Joe Palazzolo - Wall St. Journal Law Blog

Dec. 8, 2011

A federal bankruptcy judge in Minnesota wants to know why she shouldn’t fine a debtor and counsel up to $10,000 each for calling her, among other things, “a Catholic Knight Witch Hunter.”

This name-calling came in a motion to vacate, of all things, a continuance order by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Dreher. Attorney Rebekah Nett and her client Naomi Isaacson, a Minneapolis woman who is president of Yehud-Monosson USA, which owned gas stations and convenience stores, also targeted another bankruptcy judge, the bankruptcy trustee and the U.S. trustee. Isaacson, a lawyer herself, and Nett both signed the pleading.

Dreher, in her order to show cause, highlighted a few excerpts that she found particularly offensive. Like this one:

Across the country the court systems and particularly the Bankruptcy Court in Minnesota, are composed of a bunch of ignoramus, bigoted Catholic beasts that carry the sword of the church. Judge Dennis O’Brien is a Jesuit, Judge Nancy Dreher is a Catholic Knight Witch Hunter, U.S. Trustee Colin Kreuziger is a priest’s boy, and the infamous Chapter 7 Trustee Nauni Manty is a Jesuitess.

And this one:

Given what these dirty Catholics are capable of and particularly since there is no law to protect the minority, Debtor is concerned about what their secret plans are for the December 6, 2011 hearing. Catholic deeds throughout the history have been bloody and murderous.

Reached by phone, Nett told Law Blog, ”I can’t talk to you right now” and hung up. Dreher said in her order possible sanctions, in addition to a fine, could include requiring Nett to attend at least 30 hours of ethics training at her own expense.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press and the ABA Journal have more here and here. Dreher’s Dec. 7 order to show cause is embedded below.

Bankruptcy

Tags: 
JUDAISM
TALMUDISM
KVETCH
ANTI SEMITISM
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
CHUTZPAH
ZIONIST OCCUPIED GOVERNMENT
ARROGANCE

Comments

Submitted by andie531 on Thu, 2012-01-19 17:36.

Is there some reason you are using Jew (noun) in the title instead of Jewish (adjective) when an adjective is called for?

Submitted by Heydrich on Fri, 2012-01-20 14:47.

“The irony of this story is that no nominal Catholic can sustain a career in the legal profession today without maintaining a sufficiently high degree of philojudaism.”

Yes, and the hypocrisy is nauseating. If someone spoke about Jews the way these Jews speak about Catholics, there would be an international scandal. Jew bitch Nancy Dreher refers to a judge as a “Jesuitess.” Suppose someone called Dreher a “Jewess”?

I’m not defending Catholics. After all, in addition to being philo-Semites, Catholics are philo-elitists. To explain (if I may go off on a tangent)…

In all major organized religions worldwide, church leaders maintain power by allying with moneyed elites. That’s why church leaders are targeted during socialist revolutions (e.g. Russia). In Mexico after the 1910 Revolution, Catholics and the moneyed elites mounted a counter-revolution that led to the Cristero War (1926 to 1929). The war was extremely bloody, but masses won it, such that the Catholic church no longer had control over politics and public education in Mexico. In Germany the Nazis let churches remain, but banned church leaders from participating in politics, since the leaders (especially Catholics) were allied with Germany’s enemies. In Venezuela today, Catholics oppose the Hugo Chavez government, since the church  – as always – is allied with the moneyed elites. In the USA, “staunch traditionalist Catholic” Antonin Scalia is not only philo-Semitic; he is pro-elitist and pro-corporate.

In rare cases where a Catholic leader espouses “liberation theology” (i.e. favors the masses over the elites), he is attacked by the Vatican, and eventually assassinated (e.g. Archbishop Óscar Romero, who was liquidated in El Salvador 24 March 1980 the day after he gave a sermon calling on Salvadoran soldiers, as Christians, to stop participating in the US-sponsored death squads). Then the Vatican covers this up by praising the liquidated target as a “martyr.”

Meanwhile, most idiotic Americans regard populist opposition to churches as “religious persecution.” It’s all politics (i.e. competition for power) with religious claptrap as camouflage. The medieval Crusades were a competition between European and Middle Eastern power interests. “Christianity versus Islam” was mere camouflage.

And again, this applies to all organized religions, not just Catholics. “Islamists” don’t care about Islam. They just want power, and will ally with anyone (including Muslim-hating Jews) who can bring them power. In Palestine, orthodox Jews ally with moneyed interests. In India (I lived in India twice) it’s the same with Hindus vs. Muslims. In Myanmar the monks are allied with the West, and oppose the anti-Western government. It's always the same. It's always politics.

One time I attended a funeral for a distant relative. I had never met this relative, but I thought it might be interesting to meet members of my extended family for the first time (second and third cousins and whatnot). They treated me like shit, which made no difference to me, but this distant relative turned out to be Catholic, and the eulogy focused on the need to support the “war on terror.”! Ten seconds into this filth I walked out, feeling an urge to shout, “Fuck all of you!”

On a different topic, philo-Semitic Andie531 has a problem with anyone who uses “Jew” instead of “Jewish.” Personally I use “Jewish” to connote someone who professes to be a religious member of the Chosen, while a “Jew” is anyone of the “chosen” who acts like a Jew. A non-Jew who acts like a Jew is simply a "maggot," "idiot," etc.

Submitted by Heydrich on Fri, 2012-01-20 14:58.

C O R R E C T I O N

I mis-read the article.

Judge Nancy Dreher is not a Jew, and the "Jesuitess" is Chapter 7 Trustee Nauni Manty.

Unfortunately I can't correct a comment once I hit the "save" button.

Submitted by andie531 on Fri, 2012-01-20 19:45.

On a different topic, philo-Semitic Andie531 has a problem with anyone who uses “Jew” instead of “Jewish.

I'm more than philo-Semitic.  I tend to like anyone who isn't a complete asshole, Jewish or not.  Why do you keep using that term "Semitic" by the way, since it isn't very accurate?

"Jew" this and "Jew" that turns some people off from reading futher - it sounds and looks like some goofball adolescent illiterate wrote it. It is designed to incite a problem.  "jew world order" as a pun is understandable.  This is going a step further than that. 

There is no need for it, since you can use the term Jewish.  It's that simple. 

Submitted by Fester on Fri, 2012-01-20 21:03.

Andie, as you say, "Jew this and Jew that" might turn some off.  However, some might be provoked to look further.  Hard to say.  Political correctness would seem to not be a winner, IMHO.

In my youth, I heard with some frequency the verb "to Jew."  Almost always "to Jew down" but I can't say for sure.  I wonder at the variety and frequency of these and other forms a generation or three before that.

Given the nature of scope of the crimes perpetrated upon us, I really don't see the need to abide by the rules of etiquette that have been set for us. Seems that that has been part of the problem leading to undeniable general idiocy and maggot infestation.

As for "semite" and "anti-Semite," their inaccuracy are symptomatic of our brainwashed and dead situation.  We didn't insist upon them but merely had them bullet-fed down our gullets like pate-geese.  Strictly bullshit but handy at times. A very minor quibble.

Submitted by andie531 on Sat, 2012-01-21 22:14.

Seems that that has been part of the problem leading to undeniable general idiocy and maggot infestation.

Rules of etiquette have less to do with this than does the common sense issue of staying away from obvious bigotry. I am not much in favor of modern day PC, but I have enough brains to stay away from making statements that detract from the information.  Stating the facts is usually enough.  There is no need for juvenile "editorializing", and that's all this is, no matter how you're trying to dignify it.  Using that language contributes to "general idiocy" it does not lead away from it. 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer