You are here

Israeli Snipers Killing U.S. Troops in Iraq?

Awesome analysis. Please visit the original website for more articles ;)


November 10, 2006

Israeli Snipers Killing U.S. Troops in Iraq?

Filed under: Jews, Israel, Neocons, Muslims, September 11 — joannafrancis @ 12:30 am

Anderson Cooper of CNN showed this video (without the rifle info) of snipers killing U.S. troops in Iraq on his October 18, 2006 show. CNN says it obtained the video from a “representative” of an unnamed “insurgent leader.”

Bear in mind that Anderson Cooper used to work for the CIA.

Richard Wilson’s hypothesis: Israeli soldiers and/or Mossad agents are killing our soldiers in Iraq in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter continues.

Proof: At the very beginning of this video clip, you see a rifle with a video camera attached to it. This weapon is made by the Rafael company, an Israeli arms manufacturer, that also makes IEDs. If you watch the video all the way through, it explains how this rifle works.

CNN stated that the camera used to film these shootings was not a mounted rifle camera. But as you watch the video, you see that with each shot fired, the camera recoils. That would only happen if it were mounted on the rifle.

Why is this significant? Because this kind of rifle-camera is extremely sophisticated and not available to your average Iraqi insurgent. I mean, it’s not exactly an easily obtainable Saturday night special!

Something this sophisticated points to Mossad. Mossad is a master at false flag operations, e.g., Oklahoma City, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, the July 7, 2005 London bombings, the 9-11 attacks in New York, the assassination of the Prime Minister in Beirut, the stoking of Muslim riots in France last year, the bombing of the Hassan al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, Iraq, etc.

Israelis freely move among US and UK troops in Iraq, and have access to top-level US intelligence. Until July 2003, the head of all US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan was General Tommy Franks, a Zionist Jew. (He is now on the board of directors for Bank of America.)

On November 7, 2006 another Zionist Jew became a principle liaison between Mossad and US forces in Iraq: Major General Richard F. Natonski of the Marine Corps. His title is Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations.

Because of this access, the “insurgents” (i.e., Mossad agents) know exactly where US vehicles will be and who will be inside them. This allows them to target for maximum false flag effect.

For example, on July 23, 2005, a detachment of 19 female US Marines was sent to Fallujah to check Iraqi women for bombs. An IED blew up their truck. Two of the young American women were killed, five were critically wounded, and four were captured.

The bodies of the four captured women turned up later in a garbage dump with their throats cut. Americans were outraged. Islamic clerics insisted that only Israelis could be so cold-blooded.

And who was in charge of US forces in Fallujah at the time? None other than Major General Natonski, the Mossad liaison. Americans are supposed to believe that rag-tag “insurgents” use IEDs powerful enough to kill three US troops per day, on average. An American soldier even set up a blog on how “Intel” is betraying and targeting US troops.

But sometimes Mossad bomb-makers accidentally blow themselves up in Iraq. According to Richard Wilson, Israeli sniping and IEDs are false flag operations. He says that on March 28, 2005, Americans arrested 19 Mossad agents who fired twice on a US Marine checkpoint.

The Marines beat up the Mossad agents and tore off their Star-of-David necklaces. (The US media incorrectly said the agents were Americans.) The Mossad agents said they were employees of Zapata Engineering, which helps the CIA conduct interrogations, and also manages US ammo dumps and US motor pools in Iraq.

IEDs in Iraq are powerful enough to flip over a 70-ton tank. Some of the models shoot depleted-uranium projectiles, and are triggered by electronic devices surreptitiously planted on US armored vehicles. Zapata Engineering (which employs Mossad agents) makes this exact kind of trigger, and oversees some of the US motor pools.

Rumsfeld says the IEDs come from Iran, but Richard says they come from Mossad, and are not “improvised” at all. The Israeli company, Rafael (see above), makes IEDS, which are buried in the middle of a road. Beside the road is a device which emits a laser or radio signal. This device is manufactured by firms like Zapata Engineering, which is controlled by Zionist Jews.

The IED mine, manufactured by Israel, is inert until a US vehicle (secretly planted with a triggering device) rolls over it.

Whenever Mossad carries out these false-flag operations they produce a videotape or a recording from an “unnamed source” that is “close to al-Qaeda.” Sometimes they say “the claim was posted on an Internet website, but its authenticity could not be verified.”

But Israelis would never kill anyone in cold blood, would they? After all, the USS Liberty massacre was “an accident!” [Thanks, Richard.]


Great to see this great new blog is getting up to speed... Those dogs have been doing our boys ever since we've been there, running the whole sorry show. Now we ALL know. How does it feel, that knife in your back, America ?

Now we ALL Know?


Sorry! Not enough of us know YET.

Believe me, there are still lame brains out there with their heads in the sand.

For me, the USA is waking up too slowly.

Ellendra, aren't you the one who inquired about IED's a little while back ? I hope the above article fills you in better than I did. You may also be interested to note that this "Rafael" Company ( how quaint and biblical ) involved in producing these IEDS is also referenced in an adjacent post here under Israel's New Immigrant F-22 Stealth Bomber, in reference to a mammoth contract just approved by Israeli Defense Ministry for an upgraded "state of the art" Defense System. I'm sure you will find the connection intriguing, to say the least. It is mentioned toward the end of the post. Did you see the Cooper Video ? It's a small miracle that anyone did, but "much too slowly" is still better than not at all...

Book of John 8:44, KJVB.

The first blog to insistently state that the Zionists are working together as Israeli mercs behind the maiming and murder of American/British soldiers and slaughter of Iraqi civilians is this web site...I don't know what its actual title is.

I've also seen the videos of the murders shown on cannot be the warring Iraqis. It is most definitely the Zionists in their wild turkey shoot rampage.

Zionism is a sick ideology that must be purged from the Earth, as well as Neoconservatism (exploitative interventionism), Neoliberalism (exploitative banking cartel & control of media) and other forms of extremist factions.

As I said repeatedly before, Israel's destruction will come in the near future. It is a monstrous parasite that must be quarantined for termination should they continue to commit further horror that will give a cause to the human civilization the best reason to annihilate the source of great misery.

Yo ! Nepos Libertas ! Thanks for your great posts, and I hope you get some new visitors at your own blog, which is excellent, and very tight. The website you linked above is JUDICIAL INC, and, unfortunately, it is essential for all the rotten news nobody wants to know about, if you can get past the lousy grammar. Now you have really let the skunk out of the bag ! Viva la Revolucion !! ( Have you ever been accused of NEPOtism ? )

Yes Mr. JFK that was me asking about the IED. As for the Cooper Video, I didn't see it. Would you provide a link or show me where it is?


Ellendra; Simply go to the link at the very top of this post, and click on for the original article, where you will find a THIS VIDEO link, also right near the top. Let me know how you make out.

Thanks Mr. JFK, I just viewed it. I absolutely believe it.

I gather that these are the Death Squads I have been reading about (from other sources): THe Mossad and CIA monsters creating exceptional violence and fatalities in Iraq by creating more insurgents while murdering more of the moderates:

American Soldiers
Iraqi police
and so on...

Yeah. The truth most Americans are in the dark about.

But you are right. Better slow to learn than not at all. I hear you.

Now go tell all the students, scholars, scientists and soldiers that YOU know, about WHAT you know, and before too long, we will ALL know !

JFK, I do not make any excuses for myself. I speak to whoever I can speak to. I send as much info to friends and strangers as I can.

I do not regret the loss of a "friend" because she had the sick nerve to tell me that "israel" has the right to defend itself.

Quite a HEATED debate in a Tim Hortons coffee shop that I was not expecting. I walked away and never looked back.

I lost another friend.

I sent her all kinds of articles and videos. I actually thought the 'Palestine RIP' and 'Death In Gaza' videos would actually open her eyes. I thought I would at least get some kind of response. Nothing. I got nothing. Do I care? Do I give up? No. And I never need that kind of "friendship".

I am amused at the stunned looks I get from some people when I tell them how much aid money 'israel' receives from the USA taxpayer dollars alone.

But I do have to be careful. There ARE a lot of brainwashed people out their who can get mighty hostile over the "love" of their precious 'israel'.

With all that said, I do not need you to tell me what I OBVIOUSLY need to do. Unless you have a BETTER idea of how to get the message across, I am all ears.

I am not stupid. I do what I can with what resources I have available.


Have you talked to any scholars or scientists lately?

I don't think JFK meant to be sarcastic - but I could be wrong. I can see how you might read sarcasm in what he said.

thanks for sharing your experiences - that's happened to me too. I have lost who I thought was a good friend over the state of israel.

Apparently, she didn't think that she could get along with me anymore once she discovered that I wouldn't toe their murderous line. And worse yet - I intend to call them into account for every drop of blood they shed and every lie they spread.

Anyway, it takes a lot of effort to keep up the job, here at the blog. But, it takes infinitely more courage to speak your mind personally with the people you work with and see everyday.

Keep it up!Laughing



"Money" has no value - people do.

My last remark was never meant to impart any sarcasm whatsoever. I was only trying to tie it back in to your original inquiry of "Now We ALL Know ?" by suggesting another way that the word can keep getting around. I regret to hear of the loss of your, and qrs' friends, though I also regret to tell you that it goes with the territory...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So please be careful with what knowledge you have, but never be afraid to spread it around where you can. The hour grows late, and this is probably the most helpful thing you can do, even for a friend you lost because of it. Please, forgive me, Ellendra.

This thread on this website is just TOO AWESOME!!! You gotta check out the original link. It's very thorough and full of valuable infomation. Even if you can't read it in one go, save the webpage and store/save it for later!

Here's just "part" of the webpage since its quite long ;)

Cheers, and enjoy!

WASHINGTON, March 20 (UPI) -- Two of America's top scholars have published a searing attack on the role and power of Washington's pro-Israel lobby in a British journal, warning that its "decisive" role in fomenting the Iraq war is now being repeated with the threat of action against Iran. And they say that the Lobby is so strong that they doubt their article would be accepted in any U.S.-based publication.

Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, author of "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" and Professor Stephen Walt of Harvard's Kenney School, and author of "Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy," are leading figures American in academic life.

They claim that the Israel lobby has distorted American policy and operates against American interests, that it has organized the funneling of more than $140 billion dollars to Israel and "has a stranglehold" on the U.S. Congress, and its ability to raise large campaign funds gives its vast influence over Republican and Democratic administrations, while its role in Washington think tanks on the Middle East dominates the policy debate.

And they say that the Lobby works ruthlessly to suppress questioning of its role, to blacken its critics and to crush serious debate about the wisdom of supporting Israel in U.S. public life.

"Silencing skeptics by organizing blacklists and boycotts -- or by suggesting that critics are anti-Semites -- violates the principle of open debate on which democracy depends," Walt and Mearsheimer write.

"The inability of Congress to conduct a genuine debate on these important issues paralyses the entire process of democratic deliberation. Israel's backers should be free to make their case and to challenge those who disagree with them, but efforts to stifle debate by intimidation must be roundly condemned," they add, in the 12,800-word article published in the latest issue of The London Review of Books.

The article focuses strongly on the role of the "neo-conservatives" within the Bush administration in driving the decision to launch the war on Iraq.

"The main driving force behind the war was a small band of neo-conservatives, many with ties to the Likud," Mearsheimer and Walt argue." Given the neo-conservatives' devotion to Israel, their obsession with Iraq, and their influence in the Bush administration, it isn't surprising that many Americans suspected that the war was designed to further Israeli interests."

"The neo-conservatives had been determined to topple Saddam even before Bush became president. They caused a stir early in 1998 by publishing two open letters to Clinton, calling for Saddam's removal from power. The signatories, many of whom had close ties to pro-Israel groups like JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) or WINEP (Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy), and who included Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Bernard Lewis, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, had little trouble persuading the Clinton administration to adopt the general goal of ousting Saddam. But they were unable to sell a war to achieve that objective. They were no more able to generate enthusiasm for invading Iraq in the early months of the Bush administration. They needed help to achieve their aim. That help arrived with 9/11. Specifically, the events of that day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course and become strong proponents of a preventive war," Walt and Mearsheimer write.

The article, which is already stirring furious debate in U.S. academic and intellectual circles, also explores the historical role of the Lobby.

"For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with Israel," the article says.

"The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to spread 'democracy' throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized not only U.S. security but that of much of the rest of the world. This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the U.S. been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?" Professors Walt and Mearsheimer add.

"The thrust of U.S. policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics, and especially the activities of the 'Israel Lobby'. Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. interests and those of the other country - in this case, Israel -- are essentially identical," they add.

They argue that far from being a strategic asset to the United States, Israel "is becoming a strategic burden" and "does not behave like a loyal ally." They also suggest that Israel is also now "a liability in the war on terror and the broader effort to deal with rogue states.

"Saying that Israel and the U.S. are united by a shared terrorist threat has the causal relationship backwards: the US has a terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel, not the other way around," they add. "Support for Israel is not the only source of anti-American terrorism, but it is an important one, and it makes winning the war on terror more difficult. There is no question that many al-Qaida leaders, including Osama bin Laden, are motivated by Israel's presence in Jerusalem and the plight of the Palestinians. Unconditional support for Israel makes it easier for extremists to rally popular support and to attract recruits."

They question the argument that Israel deserves support as the only democracy in the Middle East, claiming that "some aspects of Israeli democracy are at odds with core American values. Unlike the US, where people are supposed to enjoy equal rights irrespective of race, religion or ethnicity, Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given this, it is not surprising that its 1.3 million Arabs are treated as second-class citizens."

The most powerful force in the Lobby is AIPAC, the American-Israel Public affairs Committee, which Walt and Mearsheimer call "a de facto agent for a foreign government," and which they say has now forged an important alliance with evangelical Christian groups.

The bulk of the article is a detailed analysis of the way they claim the Lobby managed to change the Bush administration's policy from "halting Israel's expansionist policies in the Occupied Territories and advocating the creation of a Palestinian state" and divert it to the war on Iraq instead. They write "Pressure from Israel and the Lobby was not the only factor behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical."

"Thanks to the lobby, the United States has become the de facto enabler of Israeli expansion in the Occupied Territories, making it complicit in the crimes perpetrated against the Palestinians," and conclude that "Israel itself would probably be better off if the Lobby were less powerful and U.S. policy more even-handed."


Mearsheimer replies to the irate "Israel Lobby"

Letters - The Israel Lobby - From John Mearsheimer & Stephen Walt.

We wrote 'The Israel Lobby' in order to begin a discussion of a subject that had become difficult to address openly in the United States (LRB, 23 March). We knew it was likely to generate a strong reaction, and we are not surprised that some of our critics have chosen to attack our characters or misrepresent our arguments. .... Must Read !!!

Mr. JFK,

Yes, you are right. Telling people the truth [the truth you hold near and dear to your heart (while it is breaking)] can elicit a nasty response sometimes.

But for me it was worth it. I don't mind the scratches. I would have hated myself if I had kept my mouth shut and not sacrificed a building argument and then the loss of a friend of 10 years.

That's just the way it goes.

So there are better friends to make and to have. And who knows JFK, maybe, just maybe one day she'll choke on her words.

And maybe one day, the other 'friend' will acknowledge the content of the videos and articles I sent to her 3 months ago.

In the meantime, I love to come to this blog to learn everything that I can.

I am ashamed to say that before the invasion of Lebanon July 12, I hardly knew how bad the situation was in the M.E.

Now I am reminded of a story of Vanessa Redgrave, the actress. She was on a trip in Paris (mid-70s) and met some Palestinians through friends of hers. During dinner this Palestinian couple told her how bad life was for their people in the Territories.

She was so moved that she sold one of her houses and used the money to make a film called THE PALESTINIANS.

She hired the director, script writers and actors and shot the film in Lebanon. Naturally this film was banned in the USA, but it played in England and other parts of the World.

To make a very long story short, Vanessa has made many contributions for the acknowledgment of the suffering of Palestinians.

Anyway, thank you, Qrswave and Mr. JFK, for being kind, after all.


Thanks Revealer for the new item. I'll will read it right now.

I need all the ammo I can get for my heavy debate with those monster israelis on the other blogs.

No problem, here's another great source.

Apparently, somebody read your request/thread and submitted a link already, but hey, REPETITION is one of the greatest way to learn!


is the direct link to the MP3 on the history of the Illuminati and the notorious Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) -- i.e. the CFR is the "organization" that dictates/starts WARS...

Anyhow, BOTH the Illuminati and the CFR are CREATIONS of the Ashkenazi Khazars, or more commonly known as "jews".

Some readers may be curious to why I put so much emphasis on the Rothschilds and the Ashkenazi Khazars....

... quote:

"If you want to truly erradicate a problem, its best you attack the ROOT of the problem."

Her blog no longer appears on Does this mean all her writing at that site is gone forever? And all the comments too?

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer