Obama’s solution for the Depression is supply-side economics, whose champions claim that if the government cuts taxes on the wealthy, then the wealthy will invest in new factories, and hire new workers, thereby producing tax revenue.
Nonsense!
Supply-side "theory" is a lie. It is based on the false claim that if you give money to a person, then the person will invest it in productive ways. Nothing forces a person to do that, and the wealthy have never really done that anyway, since the function of business is not to create jobs, but to make money. A business will only create jobs if there is no other way to get money. A business will not create jobs if it can get money via government handouts and bailouts.
Thus, handouts and bailouts prolong depressions. And businesses will never reform as long as they are considered “too big to fail,” and are rewarded for not reforming.
Whenever a business can accumulate capital without the use of employees, it will do so. The U.S. government assists this by rewarding businesses for automating, for moving overseas, or otherwise firing Americans.
Today’s politicians claim that businesses, not governments, create jobs. Bullshit! Did businesses create the politicians’ jobs? Anyway, no business will create jobs in this market unless the government forces it to.
When a politician claims that tax breaks to businesses will create jobs, he is lying. He is providing businesses with another means to extract money from the masses without having to deal with the masses. The capital acquired by businesses in this way will be added to the pile already collected. Why would a business want to jeopardize that pile by spending it to create jobs?
Business do not acquire capital in order to spend it. Business acquire capital to accumulate it, and will only spend capital if there is no other way to accumulate more capital.
Capitalists go to where they can acquire more capital, not to where they can hire more workers. During the California Gold Rush, merchants went to the camps when gold was discovered, and vanished when the gold petered out. They did not use the capital they had acquired from the miners to open productive businesses to provide jobs to the now jobless prospectors.
This is the nature of our capitalist system. The horrors of England's 17th Century economy are the horrors of today. In the 1600s most people were impoverished. Most of the wealth was held by the few. There was homelessness, hunger, unemployment, underemployment, and degrading employment. Human dignity was crushed. Common people fought wars to enrich the plutocracy. Government served only the wealthy.
Since those days there have been short-lived periods when the people were led to believe that their prospects were improving, but these periods have regularly ended in economic collapses that wiped out any gains the common people had acquired.
The history of Western capitalism is exemplified by the following historical vignette…
On January 24, 1848, James W. Marshall discovered gold at Sutter's Mill in Coloma, California. Vast numbers of people rushed to California, put up a camp and staked claims. Merchants flocked to the camps and set up business to sell everything imaginable. Miners lived in tents, shanties, and deck cabins they had removed from abandoned ships. Each camp had its own saloon and gambling house / brothel.
Hydraulicking became the prevalent means of extracting gold. This caused large amounts of gravel, silt, heavy metals, and so on to pollute streams and rivers. (Many areas still bear the scars of hydraulic mining, since the resulting exposed earth and downstream gravel deposits are unable to support plant life.)
Half the prospectors made a modest profit. The other half made little, or ended up losing money. Merchants made far more money than did miners. The wealthiest man in California during the early years of the Gold Rush was Samuel Brannan, a tireless self-promoter, shopkeeper and newspaper publisher.
By 1855 the economic climate had changed. Gold could no longer be profitably retrieved except by medium-to-large groups of workers, either in partnerships or as employees. The people who made money were those that owned these gold-mining companies. When the gold petered-out, the merchants abandoned the sites faster than the miners. The gold rush was over.
At first, the gold was simply "free for the taking." Disputes were often handled personally and violently. Later, when gold became increasingly difficult to retrieve, Whites blamed non-Whites for everything. They banded together to attack non-Whites, and drive them out, particularly Latin Americans and Chinese.. The CA State Legislature passed a foreign miners tax of twenty dollars per month.
Whites also drove Native Americans out of their traditional hunting, fishing and gathering areas. Some Natives responded by attacking miners, who retaliated with genocidal counter-attacks. Natives who escaped were unable to survive, and starved to death. Natives also succumbed to smallpox, influenza, and measles in large numbers. The Act for the Government and Protection of Indians, passed by the California Legislature, allowed settlers to capture and use Natives as slaves, particularly young women and children. This was carried on as a legal business enterprise. Native American villages were regularly raided to supply the demand, and young women and children were carried off to be sold.
The toll on the White American immigrants was also severe. One in twelve people of the Gold Rush perished from accidents, crime, and vigilantism.
The point here is that capitalism is fundamentally immoral. When we champion capitalism to the exclusion of all other systems, we champion immorality. Our God becomes Satan, and our role models become Jews.
~~~ Adapted and paraphrased from an article by Prof. John Kozy
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26639
Capitalism, cannot be “reformed,” since it is incorrigibly avaricious. It is based on the need to maximize profit at all costs. It compels us to be greedy and petty. It takes what the Greeks called pleonexia—an endless hunger for more and more—and transforms it from a tawdry and dangerous vice into the central virtue of the system.
Conscripting us into an economic war, capitalism turns us into soldiers of fortune, indifferent to casualties and collateral damage, ransacking the earth to fill banks with plunder. Capitalism make us value money more than people. It systematically cultivates injustice and predation. No amount of goods can compensate for this deliberate indulgence of our vilest qualities.
Even those who have opposed capitalism have often fallen for its illusions: the ideal of “growth,” the mythology of “progress,” the cipher of “innovation.”
What needs reinvention is not capitalism, but our moral and spiritual imagination.
Comments
David Stockman on Supply-Side Nonsense circa 1985
Stockman was sacked for telling the truth and has continued. Appears to actually give a shit of some sort.
What Stockman Said
The remarks that forced Office of Management and Budget Director David Stockman to offer his resignation to President Reagan appeared in a 24-page article in the December issue of the Atlantic Monthly. Among Stockman 's striking comments:...
On tax cuts: "The hard part of the supply-side tax cut is dropping the top rate from 70 to 50%—the rest of it is a secondary matter. The original argument was that the top bracket was too high, and that's having the most devastating effect on the economy. [However] to make this palatable as a political matter, you had to bring down all the brackets. But, I mean, Kemp-Roth was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate. .. It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle-down,' so the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle-down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."
On the Administration's budget estimates and economic forecasts: "None of us really understands what's going on with all these numbers. You've got so many different budgets out and so many different baselines and such complexity . .. people are getting from A to B and it's not clear how they're getting there. It's not clear how we got there. [One deficit estimate was reached] "by hook or by crook, mostly the latter."
On defense spending: "The whole question is blatant inefficiency, poor deployment of manpower, contracting idiocy .. . Hell, I think there's a kind of swamp of $10 to $20 to $30 billion worth of waste that can be ferreted out if you really push hard. [But the Pentagon] got a blank check . . .they got so goddamned greedy that they got themselves strung way out there on a limb."
On Congressional reception of tax cuts: "Do you realize the greed that came to the forefront? The hogs were really feeding. The greed level, the level of opportunism, just got out of control. [The Administration's] basic strategy was to match or exceed the Democrats, and we did."
On what was achieved by the Administration's spending reductions: "There was less there than met the eye ... Let's say that you and I walked outside and I waved a wand and said, I've just lowered the temperature from 110 to 78. Would you believe me? What this was was a cut from an artificial CBO [Congressional Budget Office] base. That's why it looked so big. But it wasn't."
On his recommendations for cuts in Social Security benefits: "Basically I screwed up quite a bit."
Re: Supply-Side Nonsense
Fester, thank you for reading and commenting. You are extremely sharp.
OMB director David Stockman admitted that “Supply side economics” is merely a cover for the “trickle-down” theory, which we all know is a TOTAL LIE.
The government is saying, “The rich own us. Therefore we must beg them.” (TRUE.) The only way we can create more jobs is to make the rich richer.” (FALSE!)
Business exists to make money. Period. Business will only hire people, and will only innovate, if business can make money through no other way. Business will not hire anyone if business can get money via tax cuts, bailouts, subsidies, financial speculation, breaking unions, breaking pension contracts, etc.
David Stockman has been a lifelong champion of “supply side economics” (i.e. making the rich richer). In 1981 he accepted Reagan’s invitation to become head of the OMB, but was exposed by the Atlantic’s article “The Education of David Stockman” (Dec 1981). The Reagan regime spent the next four years in damage control.
In August 2003 Stockman installed himself as CEO of Collins & Aikman Corporation, a Detroit-based manufacturer of automotive interior components, and drove the company into ruin. (It filed bankruptcy on 17 May 2005). On 26 Mar 2007 he was indicted for ripping off that company – but of course the prosecution went nowhere.
“Supply side economics” is not a “theory.” It is political propaganda by the rich. (Paul Krugman has been saying this for 20 years.) It is given a veneer of “legitimacy” by the so-called “Austrian School,” which is based on “supply side economics” (i.e. letting the rich control the planet). It is also legitimized by worship of Ronald Reagan.
Tax cuts and handouts for the rich cause debt and deficits, which the rich use to increase their tyranny over the masses even more.
Result: Depression.
Re: Supply-Side Nonsense
Heydrich, thanks for the updates on Stockman's activities. I had only see him commenting on O'Bullshit's plans and offering some valid criticism.
I have the sense that there were several important "changes" in our system starting in the 1970s. The merger and acquisition parasites were unleashed, quarterly profits became the most important yardstick according to the "media" and the "experts", culiminating in the banking dereg legislation Phil Gramm whored through Congress for Bill Clinton to cheerfully sign. All basically under the "Globalization" meme, but I'm guessing there were significant baby steps that were taken.
Any input much appreciated.