You are here

Home » Blogs » Fester's blog

Economic Reality: Daryl Bradford Smith & Muhammad Rafeeq

published by Fester on Sun, 2012-11-04 19:34

Grim material as the disaster deepens.  Smith and Rafeeq back in action for two excellent programs:

Saturday 27th October12

Saturday 13th October12

Tags: 
AUSTERITY
BANKING
PARASITE
ZIONIST OCCUPIED GOVERNMENT
SLAVERY
RESISTANCE
EUROPEAN UNION
USURY

Comments

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Thu, 2012-11-08 10:17.

Would this be the same Daryl Bradford Smith who features a section on Jewish financing of the Nazi party on his site and who openly disavows any connection with Nazis/Fascists/etc? Its strange how you as a National Socialist seem to be amongst his most loyal followers, at least judging by your contributions to the most popular threads here, but you rag on Rivero for doing exactly the same as DBS does.

Submitted by Fester on Thu, 2012-11-08 23:31.

TD, let me try to figure out your questions and answer them in order.

1. Yes, it would be the same DBS.

2. When did I join the National Socialists?  Does admiring Hitler's identification of the central problem and his successful cleaning of house make me a party member? 

3. I can disagree with Smith's take on the NSDAP and still value his other work, can't I?  Smith has identified the central problem of Jewish control and has loads of excellent sources.  I consider our differences on Germany to be a minor quibble since his other work is so good

4. I consider Mikey Rivero to be an absolute disinfo shill.  He is Jonestein Lite.  Lots of smoke and bullshit about "fascism," "Nazis," "money junkies," and "the corporate media."  Never a mention of the 800 lb. Talmudic Rabbi in the room. 

5. You're far too perceptive to need the above explanation.  What gives?

Submitted by Junis on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:26.

To Fester: Well said. DBS is a VERY reliable source of accurate information and research. He's one of the few people who is both a   true anti-racist AND AN anti-Zionist. His distractors will try to smear his reputation by pointing out his irrrelevant imperfections. In light of the fact that Zionist Jewish bankers are extremely powerful, it is likely they were also behind the rise of Hitler. Ask yourself: Could Israel exist without Hitler? Answer: No, it could not. It is also telling about many far right-wing European movements that they are mysteriously quiet about Zionism. David Duke was extremely late in pointing out that Zionist Jews could have been behind 9/11. The leader of the BNP has no problem that Israel exists so long as Jews are not in Europe.

The following 4 traits can indiciate whether someone is distrustfull or not. If they tick any of the following, they are distrustfull:

1. They appear regulary on television;

2. They act as if the official version of 9/11 is true i.e. that it was perputrated by Muslims;

3. They are never arrested or brutalised by the police even though they are outspoken;

4. They act as if billionaires are respectable or usefull to local, national and international economies.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:42.

It seems as much of the attempted smearing of reputations comes from DBS as it comes from his detractors. Earlier today I posted a link to a DBS audio where he attempted to besmirch those who frequent this site, myself included and encouraged people not to visit this site. Are his listeners children that they need to be told what sites should and should not be visited? Up to now I've had no problem with Daryl, but my belated discovery of this audio is pushing me towards reconsidering that position.

Submitted by Poseidon on Sat, 2012-11-10 20:46.

That DBS audio was from July 16, 2007, when Hufschmid was running Daryl's iatw.com site and was claiming that Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, Mike Piper, Fred Toben, Willis Carto, Mark Glenn, Hesham Tillawi, etc., were Zionist shills. And they were promoting Bollyn, a year after he called the police out to his home, got himself into trouble, and then made out that the incident had been a plot to attack him because of his "work", which included such gems as the government took down the Columbia space shuttle, and Sam Danner saw a Global Hawk hit the Pentagon. At that time I suspected DBS because of his association with those two, who both independently have connections to Rupert Murdoch's family.

It turned out I was right about Hufschmid and Bollyn, but wrong about DBS. They were using him to promote themselves, whilst damaging his reputation. And DBS was wrong about Hufschmid, although he's said he knew Bollyn was a bad 'un as soon as he met him. (And Hufschmid had persuaded DBS to go along with Hufschmid's "Bollyns were kidnapped by the Zionists" nonsense.)

Daryl was calling Rivero a shill and a liar, so it's not surprising if Rivero stopped linking to him. Maybe the rivalry between DBS and Rivero has to do with both of them having lived in Hawaii?

There are plenty of obvious shills such as Gordon Duff, who has admitted that he makes up 40% of his material. And there are still people who defend Duff; they must be fools or liars.

DBS is one of the good guys, and so is Rivero. As I said, Rivero's emphasis is news, whereas DBS goes for the historical stuff. Going for the news option is bound to give Rivero's site more hits and a better Alexa rating. Daryl could increase his traffic if he were to post more news items, but the increase in people looking at the historical material about International Jewry would still be relatively small. And one option would be for Daryl to have people join his site and post their own news, although then he'd have less control. I don't agree with DBS' (and Rivero's) dislike of Hitler, but that doesn't make them shills.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:26.

Poseidon, don't think the Hawaii angle is the issue.  Smith did say he was iirritated and dumbfounded that Rivero wouldn't link to his site.  So am I.  News is great until one finds out that there's a very large and important historical record that illuminates our current situation.  Rivero's refusal to bring this info to his readers/listeners is a serious issse as is his continued regurgitation of mainstream history about WWI, WWII, Communism, McCarthy, and other issues which would collapse if he did the right thing.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:48.

Poseidon, don't think the Hawaii angle is the issue. 

I didn't know that DBS was in Hawaii. Three's a crowd, or so they say.

Smith did say he was iirritated and dumbfounded that Rivero wouldn't link to his site.  So am I.

Rivero stopped linking to IATW after Daryl went off on one, labeling Rivero as a shill. Why does that leave you dumbfounded?

News is great until one finds out that there's a very large and important historical record that illuminates our current situation. 

Yes, and the news can be found in one place and the historical record in another. What's the problem with that?

Rivero's refusal to bring this info to his readers/listeners is a serious issse as is his continued regurgitation of mainstream history about WWI, WWII, Communism, McCarthy, and other issues which would collapse if he did the right thing.

He has one perspective on these issues and you another. His perspective is hardly a regurgitation of mainstream history and it is extremely disingenuous to suggest otherwise. I don't share your perspective on these issues, even though I admit that you may be right. To me, there just isn't enough hard evidence to back up your claims, but I respect your right to hold those opinions. But who died and elected you as God, that you feel you have the right to determine what others should say/believe/think?

Submitted by Fester on Sun, 2012-11-11 00:22.

Sullivan, so you're saying there isn't enough evidence to make the case against organized Jewry? 

If so, then Mike's euphemisms and total lack of interest look a lot shinier.   I kind of thought that we'd all reached that conclusion some years back. 

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sun, 2012-11-11 09:01.

Sullivan, so you're saying there isn't enough evidence to make the case against organized Jewry? 

Is that what I said? I don't remember saying that at all. Perhaps you are putting words in my mouth?

Submitted by Fester on Sun, 2012-11-11 19:31.

One more time:

Rivero niether links to the historical record nor does he mention the Jewish role on air when explaining the global disaster unfolding.  As a former and long-time sidekick ofAlex Jones, he instead relishes such kosher-approved terminology such as "Money Junkies," "the corporate media," "Nazis," "US foreign policy" etc.

You, Sullivan, always a stickler for "nailng one's colors to the mast" make excuses for Rivero such as "he focuses on news" or "it's a personal choice" or "who appointed Fester God."  Are you still gathering evidence?  Sharpening Bill's Razor? 

Or do you think that Aj and his ilk are far too valuable as news sources to be criticized?  I confess to being dumbfounded.  Maybe "money junkies" is sufficient detail for the public...is that it?  Maybe you're with Mikey in believing we don't want to be like "Nazis and blame an innocent religious minority". (from the WhatAlmostHappened radio show off last week some time)

By the way, just so I don't put words in your mouth again, what are your thoughts on the role of Organized Jewry on Planet Crime Wave?  Not a particularly well-worded question, but I trust you'll give it a nice clear response so we don't have to go round the mulberry bush so often.

In the future, I'll try harder not to "play God" with the elusive facts of the matter or miss the obvious in my Inquisitorial Zeal (.pdf). Honest.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sun, 2012-11-11 21:36.

Rivero niether links to the historical record nor does he mention the Jewish role on air when explaining the global disaster unfolding.

Why does he have to link to the historical record, which (for now at least) is only available at Daryl's site? Once again, I have to ask (banging my head against the wall as I do) what is wrong with Rivero hosting the up-to-date stuff and Daryl hosting the historical stuff? Rivero does mention the Jewish role on air, but as you are probably aware, radio broadcasts are subject to the whims of the FCC, so it pays to be circumspect if you want to stay on air. What is it about that you find so terrible?

As a former and long-time sidekick of Alex Jones, he instead relishes such kosher-approved terminology such as "Money Junkies," "the corporate media," "Nazis," "US foreign policy" etc.

See above.

You, Sullivan, always a stickler for "nailng one's colors to the mast" make excuses for Rivero such as "he focuses on news" or "it's a personal choice" or "who appointed Fester God." Are you still gathering evidence? Sharpening Bill's Razor?

Gathering evidence? Quit trolling already!

Submitted by Fester on Sun, 2012-11-11 22:36.

Sullivan, have no idea which version of Rivero's show you're listening to but it's all "money junkies" and "corporate media" all the timeo on RBN.

It is true that he's getting more and more callers who use the taboo J-word.  So far, Rivero has been pretty nimble in the quick seizure of the topic and the cut off, but I suspect he's in for more and more unpleasantries.  Facts are stubborn things.

Again, Rivero does NOT address the role of Organized Jewry in world affairs and peddles lots of Kosher Canards about WWII, Russia, McCarthy, the media, and global finance. 

Stadtmiller read ZCF's devastating historical summary in toto on the air.  Extremely powerful show, so Rivero's addiction to euphemism is due to some other problem.

For at least the umpteenth time, the historical record is widely available so the exceedingly tired Smith Insulted Rivero Hence the Blackout canard don't fly. 

The issue was never Smith but information that needed wider circulation, but that brings us back to my question which you decided not to answer.

Submitted by Poseidon on Mon, 2012-11-12 00:22.

On his RBN shows, Piper frequently talks about the Jews rather than using euphemisms, so it seems that such honesty is indeed not totally prohibited at RBN. Then again, Piper was fired from there early in 2011, but they brought him back.

Rivero's Sephardic heritage must influence his choice of words, so whereas someone like Piper will revel in talking about Jews and saying how such discussion is going to lose him listeners, Rivero will prefer to use euphemisms. But Rivero puts out plenty of good information, e.g., in September 2011 he linked to my page about the "Dancing Israelis" FBI report. (I found the evidence in my logs, but I don't see it in looking at his 911-tagged entries around September 11, 2011.) If he was working for International Jewry I think he'd be leaving out the factual stuff and inserting nonsense about holographic planes or the WTC taken down with 150 kton nukes, or the Arabs running Hollywood.

Submitted by Fester on Mon, 2012-11-12 01:36.

Poseidon, Rivero's fine on 9/11 and the Israeli angle.  What he refuses to do is go beyond ~1947.  To do so would expose the long running and undeniable role of organized Jewry in global crime and warfare. This site has been focused on all of that for years.  He can talk contradictory crap out of both sides of his mouth, one minute saying "the US uses Israel to do its dirty work" and the next minute he will admit that Israel controls our Congress.  He's started to admit that Hitler took on the same bankers currently strangling the plante, but he'll quickly revert to spewing crap about "Nazi world takeover" etc. 

What he never gets around to is WHY Israel controls things.  IF he considered the historical record, he'd have to acknowledge that the "Money Junkies" and "the Corporate Media" are JEWISH. 

With Stadtmiller's performance, Spingola, Piper, and others, Rivero's as naked as his old buddy, Alex "Germanic Death Cult" Jones.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Mon, 2012-11-12 05:34.

IF he considered the historical record, he'd have to acknowledge that the "Money Junkies" and "the Corporate Media" are JEWISH.

Ah, now I get it. The only abusive, greedy and manipulative people in history have been Jews. Everybody else has been lily-white pure in motive and deed.

Submitted by Fester on Mon, 2012-11-12 07:21.

Sullivan, you may or may not get it, but the straw and dung man you've tossed up isn't cutting it.

At the risk of "putting words in your mouth," you clearly don't think it's important WHO owns the banks and the media. 

Whether is a Jesuit-Lizard-Queenie-Money-Junkie combination or a Jewish Cabal is a minor issue for you.  So why do we make fun of AJ?

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Sun, 2012-11-11 11:39.

I didn't know that DBS was in Hawaii. Three's a crowd, or so they say.

So DBS and Rivero are two, so who is the third? Or should that be "turd"?

Submitted by Fester on Sun, 2012-11-11 19:41.

TD, Smith was in Hawaii at some point years ago.  Rivero is there now.  I have been there off and on.  There are a FEW others but mostly it's just Robinson Crusoe and Friday.  It's a poweful thesis and comes with a all bean burrito. 

By the way, glad to see your interest in Talmudic Judaism.  If you find any that isn't, please pass it on.  Shahak was right but apparently nobody inside Judaism concurred.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:36.

DBS is one of the good guys, and so is Rivero.

I wish DBS would have held fire before blackening the name of an entire site.

As I said, Rivero's emphasis is news, whereas DBS goes for the historical stuff.

Its not that I disagree. Whether Rivero is "wrong" for not having the same emphasis is what's at issue here.

Going for the news option is bound to give Rivero's site more hits and a better Alexa rating. 

I wouldn't worry too much about Alexa. Its ratings come from those who have the Alexa toolbar installed - a minority of web users and a tiny minority of those who would be likely to value their privacy.

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Fri, 2012-11-09 07:24.

Both produce lots of "smoke and bullshit" about fascism and Nazis. So the NY Jew Daryl is "kosher" but Mikey the NH Jew is not? Now I get it.

Submitted by Fester on Fri, 2012-11-09 08:14.

TD, I don't think you're sincerely trying or perhaps you're tired.

It's this simple:  Rivero fails to talk about who is repsonsible.  Daryl has discussed this, the essential question, from the start.  It's International Jewry as Henry Ford and other eminent Goyim knew in the days before Tee-Vee.

Unsurprisingly, many detractors pop up to attack Smith.  Nothing substantial.  Chickenshit.  He drinks, he swears, he's not a believer in Jesus, he's wrong about Hiter.....snore.  See previous paragraph.

When Rivero finds out that "the corporate media" and "the money junkies" are Jewish and have been for at least a century, he'll go way up in my book.  He might start posting the things Smith has archived years ago. 

Rivero might launch his Rangers on a Crusade against the Talmud and Noahide Laws and Jewish infiltration of Christianity.  

He posts Ben Freedman's speech every couple of years.  Maybe someday he'll read it and face the truth of the situation.  Wilson "Kept Us Out of War" until Baruch and the boys decided to trade American goy cannon fodder for the Balfour Declaration. 

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Fri, 2012-11-09 08:49.

Many detractors pop up to attack Smith? It seems Smith is pretty damn handy at being a detractor himself, falling not that far short of declaring himself the way, the truth and the light. At least here Smith can answer his detractors. The same can't be said for Smith's cowardly attacks on others on IATW. That alone says a heck of a lot.

I'm not here to defend Rivero but I would say this much, there isn't much difference between him and DBS in terms of their output. It seems you want Rivero to be a clone of DBS, which is really pointless. One person declaring themselves to be the only source of truth is enough. We don't need two.

I notice you ignored my comment re:DBS's Jewishness. Is that an admission that I am correct? 

By the way, your loyalty to DBS is very touching. I hope he throws you a bone once in a while.

Submitted by Fester on Fri, 2012-11-09 17:15.

TD, there's an essentail difference between DBS and Rivreo's output.  I don't really give a fuck if DBS is Jewish or not. It's really just a question of whether someone is telling the whole truth or covering for International Jewry. 

Your repeated failure to grasp to obvious main point is fascinating.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 10:09.

Poseidon put it very succinctly in an old comment.

Daryl Smith has historical information at his site and Rivero has news items, so anyone who wants the historical stuff can go to TFC and anyone who wants news can go to WRH.

It appears your problem is that Rivero doesn't (read: no longer) links to IATW. If I was the target of as much of Smith's vitriol as Mike Rivero was, then I would probably stop linking to his site. You seem to think this is strange, which in itself is very odd. I have no problem with either Rivero or DBS, despite the latter's disgraceful attack on this site (at 2:15 in the video) some time ago. I have only discovered this video recently and I'm saddened by its content.

If you have a problem with the content of Rivero's site you can always join and contribute that content yourself instead of lamenting about its absence here. As TD has pointed out earlier, you can't do that on IATW.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:19.

Sully, you've made this comment before...I can't remember how many times and I give you the same answer.  I don't care if he links to Smith's site or not. 

What matters is that Rivero links to the information and gives it the attention it deserves.  You can find the things at www.iamthewitness.com in other places.  The problem is that Rivero doesn't link to this stuff. 

The "Money Junkies" are Jewish and the historical record proves it.

The "corporate media" is Jewish and the historical record proves it.

"U.S. foreign policy" is Jewish and the record proves it.

That's why he is so loath to deal with whether it is sourced from Smith or anybody else.  This is not a difficult point to grasp.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:32.

The "Money Junkies" are Jewish and the historical record proves it.

The "corporate media" is Jewish and the historical record proves it.

"U.S. foreign policy" is Jewish and the record proves it.

That's why he is so loath to deal with whether it is sourced from Smith or anybody else.

Having listened to his shows, I disagree. Where he may differ is the extent to which he deals with it. Whether or not he links to your prescribed reading list is neither here nor there. I can't help but wonder who died and made you arbiter of what constitutes approved material.

This is not a difficult point to grasp.

Ooooh, touchy!  I notice you failed (again) to address my point that you can join Rivero's site and rectify what you perceive to be a failing. You can't do the same with IATW.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:14.

Sullivan, Rivero posts nothing on the historical problem.  Rivero is a shil.  I won't be signing up.  There's no need to do so at IATW as this shit's already there.  Snore.....

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:41.

Rivero is a shil.

So you say. Something tells me you think you are the font of all wisdom on such matters.

I won't be signing up.  

No surprise there!

There's no need to do so at IATW as this shit's already there.  Snore.....

What shit? You mean shit like this or this (posted on IATW front page)?

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Fri, 2012-11-09 17:54.

I suppose it is fascinating in the same way your continued loyal support for the boozed-up, foul-mouthed, anti-Christian DBS and his "its the Zionists" kick are fascinating, even moreso given your obvious support for facism and national socialism and his attempts to distance himself from supporters of those same ideologies.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 22:19.

The problem is that Rivero doesn't link to this stuff. Smith does.  You want to make an issue of the the label Smith uses most frequently.  Sorry, that's bullshit.  For the slow, the delicate, and the pettifoggers,  one more time:

The "Money Junkies" are Jewish and the historical record proves it.

The "corporate media" is Jewish and the historical record proves it.

"U.S. foreign policy" is Jewish and the record proves it.

Rivero refuses to acknowledge the problem and educate using IATW or any other site.  Kinda just exactly like AJ.  This is not a difficult point to grasp.  Try again.

Submitted by Fester on Fri, 2012-11-09 18:31.

TD, when did you go into the chickenshit business?  Guess you're a "money junkies" and "corporate media" kinda guy.  I apologize for my interest in systems that removed the parasites from power.

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Sat, 2012-11-10 09:06.

What makes you guess I am a "money junkies" and "corporate media" kinda guy? You obviously know jack shit. Judaism is the problem. Not Zionism (DBS) or money junkies (Rivero).

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:09.

TD, you keep asking and I'll keep answering.  How's that for a system?

Since I'd yet to hear to you weigh in on the subject, I took your reference to my criticisms as criticism of my criticism.  Didn't realize you'd joined the "War on Money Junkieism."  My apologies.

Oddly you seem to suggest that Smith ignores the question of problems within Judaism.  You've clearly not been a listener or spent much time looking in the archives.  He's a quick look at what he's done:

He has discussed the messianic Judaism of Sabbatai Zevi, Jacob Frank, et al and associated perversions.  He's covered the core problem of the Talmud repeatedly in interviews with people such as David Pidcock and James Dickie.  He has archived books that provide details including The Controversy of Zion (.pdf), Waters Flowing Eastward, The Jewish Religion, It's Influence Today (.pdf), Jewish History, Jewish Religion (.pdf), and selections from the Talmud. 

It's pretty clear that you know jack shit about what Smith has been doing.  I do hope you're not suggesting that his work somehow is "cover" for the evils of Judaism.  That would be very lame, like a fuckin' bodycast.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:14.

Oh dear, somebody has rustled Fester's feathers.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2012-11-10 18:20.

Not at all, Sully.  I just run out of ways to say the same thing over and over.

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Sat, 2012-11-10 19:41.

"Researching Criminal Zionism". Criminal Zionism = Money Junkies = Corporate Media = Obfuscation. Talmudic Judaism is the problem. Zionism is relatively new. The problem is much older.

Zionism Must And Will Be Stopped

Submitted by Heydrich on Fri, 2012-11-09 19:05.

The Nazis came to power when Hitler was appointed Chancellor on 30 Jan 1933. This gave them control of the banking system and the nation’s finances. Not only did they allow some Jews to remain in control of banks, the Nazis actually privatized the Dresdner Bank (the main bank used by the SS) and even the State Reichsbank, so the banks could have freedom to use monetary policy to control inflation. However fiscal policy (where government money comes from, and where it is spent) was Nazi-controlled.

Beginning in 1933, Max Warburg served directly under Hjalmar Schacht on the board of the Reichsbank, until the Nazis expelled him and all the other Warburg family members in 1938.

To those who say that Jews financed the Nazis, I say the Third Reich financed itself. What need do you have for Jewish money if you gain total control of the government and its finances, and you have the last word on how banks are run in your country? Did the Nazis ever some gold through Jewish operatives during the Third Reich (e.g. the Bank of International Settlements in Basel Switzerland)? Sure. Why not? They used the Jews. The Nazis even had members on the BIS board. The Third Reich was not about destroying Jews. It went far beyond that to create a whole new society.

 

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Sat, 2012-11-10 09:07.

DBS says the Jews financed the Nazis. Yet he's "kosher" according to Fester.

Submitted by Fester on Fri, 2012-11-09 20:07.

Heydrich, very informative. 

Submitted by Lindquist on Sat, 2012-11-10 19:28.

Tom, Daryl said what he said back then but he kept linking to wufys till recently, wouldn't that contradict what he said or is it that he found out he was wrong?

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sat, 2012-11-10 19:43.

Yes, it does, but the attack was so nasty I was a little taken aback. To slight the owner of the site (QRSWave) and label the entire readership because of what a small number were saying is a bit much.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer