Cut Down for Knowing the Truth?

Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead.

Police said Zebuhr was walking to a parked car with family members, when robbers approached them and demanded his mother's purse. She gave it to the gunmen without any resistance. One of the men then shot Zebuhr.

This comment by James Redford at 911 Blogger sums up my suspicions:

If the objective was to get his mother's purse, why needlessly throw a murder charge on top of it by firing *two shots* into Michael Zebuhr's head? Obviously the objective wasn't to get the purse, the objective was to murder Michael Zebuhr. The purse was simply taken so that it would be written up in the press as a mugging.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth had better get this case front-and-center on the frontpage of their website and point out the logic in my previous paragraph--as well as using press releases and everything else at their disposal to draw attention to it. If they don't call attention very load and clear to the obvious and sinister political implications of this case then they are making it easier for other members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth to be knocked-off.

---
Also interesting:

"Mpls. Police Say Uptown Still Safe Despite Murder," Jason DeRusha, WCCO (CBS), March 22, 2006:

http://wcco.com/topstories/ local..._080225959.html

Now how can the police truthfully say it is safe unless they believe that this wasn't a random act that could have happened to anyone at the same place and time? The only way they can truthfully say that is if they believe that it was a targeted murder specifically inteded for Michael Zebuhr; in which case others in the area need not fear the person who murdered Michael Zebuhr, since it wasn't a random act

How angry does that make you, because my blood is boiling.

We've got to stay on this story until the truth about who murdered him comes out.