Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict's claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn't considered an “absolute evil” as recently as the 1970s.
In his traditional Christmas address yesterday to cardinals and officials working in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered “normal” by society.
“In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,” the Pope said.
“It was maintained — even within the realm of Catholic theology — that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a ‘better than' and a ‘worse than'. Nothing is good or bad in itself.”
The Pope said abuse revelations in 2010 reached “an unimaginable dimension” which brought “humiliation” on the Church.
Asking how abuse exploded within the Church, the Pontiff called on senior clerics “to repair as much as possible the injustices that occurred” and to help victims heal through a better presentation of the Christian message.
“We cannot remain silent about the context of these times in which these events have come to light,” he said, citing the growth of child pornography “that seems in some way to be considered more and more normal by society” he said.
But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept.
Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such.
He said: “That is not normal. I don't know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years.”
Pope Benedict also said sex tourism in the Third World was “threatening an entire generation”.
Angry abuse victims in America last night said that while some Church officials have blamed the liberalism of the 1960s for the Church's sex abuse scandals and cover-up catastrophes, Pope Benedict had come up with a new theory of blaming the 1970s.
“Catholics should be embarrassed to hear their Pope talk again and again about abuse while doing little or nothing to stop it and to mischaracterise this heinous crisis,” said Barbara Blaine, the head of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests,
“It is fundamentally disturbing to watch a brilliant man so conveniently misdiagnose a horrific scandal,” she added.
“The Pope insists on talking about a vague ‘broader context' he can't control, while ignoring the clear ‘broader context' he can influence — the long-standing and unhealthy culture of a rigid, secretive, all-male Church hierarchy fixated on self-preservation at all costs. This is the ‘context’ that matters.”
The latest controversy comes as the German magazine Der Spiegel continues to investigate the Pope's role in allowing a known paedophile priest to work with children in the early 1980s.
source Belfast Telegraph 21 Dec 2010
RELATED:
Pope's Nazi past
Looks like the pope isn't quite as "infalliable" as the Catholic Church would like us to believe.
Benedict XVI former Hitler Youth member
Don't mention the Pope's Hitler Youth past, says the Vatican
The Vatican blundered into a fresh public relations fiasco on Tuesday after seeking to rewrite the biography of Pope Benedict XVI by denying that he was ever a member of the Hitler Youth.
[A vatican spokesman] tried to draw a distinction between pro-Nazi Germans who volunteered for the Hitler Youth and young men, like the pontiff, who were forced to join the anti-aircraft unit but who, he claimed, were not necessarily in the Hitler Youth.
But Father Lombardi’s comments contradicted statements the Pope himself has made.
Comments
Re: Pope’s child porn 'NORMAL' claim sparks outrage among ...
Looks like the pope isn't quite as "infalliable" as the Catholic Church would like us to believe.
I grew up Catholic. I asked someone who had spent time training in a monastery about "ex-cathedra" pronouncements of the Pope. He said there are only two things the Pope can say that are considered infallible - one is that Jesus is the Son of God and the other is that the birth of Christ was a virgin birth. That's it. Everything else the Pope says is fallible. I don't know when this decision was made, but the old time infallibility of the Popes seems to be long gone.
I really don't understand the controversy here, as what he is saying is that kiddie porn is becoming increasingly "normalized" in the mainstream culture. I don't have an argument with that. I don't see where he's endorsing it, as is being claimed.
He's also saying that the 70's were essentially looser in terms of morality - and he's quite correct there. All you have to do is look to the Polanski case and the victim's assertions that those times were different and jumping the bones of a 11-13 y.o. back in the day, especially by that elitist Hollywood crowd was perfectly acceptable. I know, because I was about the same age at the time. The 70's was a skanky era. Anything went. Girls I went to school with in California at that time wore hot pants to class, and no one gave it a second thought.