The Doom of Nations
Revilo P. Oliver
Late Professor of Classics at the University of Illinois at Urbana
In the foregoing pages I have tried only to suggest what seem to me to be the most important phenomena that must be taken into account in forming an objective estimate of the Jews and in considering dispassionately the present plight of our race and the doom that seems to hang over our children and over ourselves, unless we are individuals who have already come prope ad ipsos exactae aetatis terminos.
I do not know what, if anything, can be done to preserve a species that some judicious observers believe to be driven by a largely subconscious, but irresistible, death-wish. In 1914, although we had the Jews on our backs, we were indubitably the dominant race on earth; we are now a despised and degraded species of anthropoids on whom all other species, including the very lowest and most brutish, joyously feed. When I see that our people are either too doltish to perceive their degradation or too craven to care, I am close to despair. Even a few decades ago, I should not have believed it possible that here in the United States Aryans would willingly see their children hauled to "schools" to be defiled by enforced association with savages and to be robbed, beaten, raped, and mutilated by the animals. Even today, I am almost incredulous when I hear chiefs of police on the radio urging the white rabbits to minimize the chances that they will be mauled or killed by the savages whom they tax themselves to nourish and whom they subsidize to breed faster: in the jungles that were once our large cities, the cringing white inhabitants are told they should not venture out of doors after dark, should walk only in the middle of sidewalks so that Congoids are less likely to pounce on them from doorways or from automobiles in the street, and must not show themselves in large areas of their own cities. Are creatures that accept such degradation capable of survival or even fit to live? Is it only that they have been enslaved by foul superstitions, or have their brains been so clotted by centuries of systematic poisoning that they have been rendered permanently and irremediably imbecile?
When the Jews invade a nation, their first concern is, as prudence demands, to acquire control over the minds of their victims. In the middle of the Nineteenth Century, Lord Harrington told Parliament that the Jews already controlled "a large portion" of the British press, and, of course, in other Aryan countries they had been equally or more successful. Less than a century later, their control over all the means of communication within every Aryan nation had become virtually absolute, although a few small journals are still permitted to publish some articles that the occupying power has not approved. In this connection, it is well to remember the dictum of Dzhugashvili (alias Stalin) that a periodical with a circulation of 10,000 or less was not worth capturing or suppressing. It is also true that the Jews need to have a little open opposition to maintain the fiction that they are "persecuted," and it is possible that they have encouraged on a small scale the more absurd and impractical forms of "anti-Semitism" for precisely that purpose. But they seem now to feel that they may safely exhibit their arrogance and to have resolved that no Aryan cur shall be permitted to bark at his owners or even to whimper audibly.
For all practical purposes, the natural aristocracy of our race, which once gave it some sense of direction, has been totally destroyed, by revolutionary massacres, by contrived wars for hallucinatory ends, by economic looting under the guise of "democracy," by internal corruption through the fostering of its vices, and by miscegenation. We are left with what is, on the whole, an Aryan proletariat, differentiated only by income, and, especially if the income is somewhat above average, willing to submit to anything and even to do anything for a few additional dollars, pounds, or rand. Our entire population, with almost no significant exceptions, is now at the mercy of, and therefore enslaved by, the economic pressures which the Jews exert at the first signs of disaffection. Our race's traditional suspicion of "tradesmen" was only realistic. The man whose income depends on vending to the masses is always subject to temptations to profit that are likely to be stronger than any moral restraints he may theoretically acknowledge, and today he is no more than a slave at the mercy of his masters. Even more precarious is the status of those who have no material goods to sell, such as authors, journalists, actors, clergymen and other soothsayers, salesmen, advertising agents, teachers, and the like, whose livelihood depends entirely on the sale of words, mere sounds whether spoken or written, to masses whose tastes have been formed by the formidable machinery that controls their minds. These facts of economic enslavement lead many acute observers to the conclusion that our race's only chance of survival lies in the chance that the Jews, blinded by their own arrogant confidence in their absolute superiority, will permit or precipitate a total collapse of organized society into the anarchy in which the strong and resolute will again survive at the expense of the weak and foolish.
Chapter 13 of Oliver's The Jewish Strategy, Palladian Books, 2002




"White"wraithe-
Some discretion may be advisable with Prof. Revilo Oliver.
Although he is undoubtedly a formidable authority on the "Jewish Question", belatedly finding a new recognition,
his credibility remains compromised by his obvious "racism".
Unfortunately, much like Professor David Duke, and also Professor Frank Weltner, of "Jew Watch", ( both of whom
are purveyors of extremely vital information ) his substantial contribution is much diminished by an overall whitewash,
and the usual hogwash, of White supremacism.
For a glaring example, you need only note a typical entre'
to the screed above ( Paragraph 4 ):
-"For all practical purposes, the natural aristocracy
of our race"...and so on, etc.
Be on the lookout for this when reading the "revilations"
of Old "Revilo". I believe that "racism" is one thing, and "supremacism" is quite another. But "White Supremacism", in the long run, can't really be any more constructive than "Jewish Supremacism", now can it ? Just look where
that has gotten us already, old chum.
All the same, it was very 'white' of you, Whitewraithe,
to pass this on. ( damn, where's my bottle of whiteout ?)
So beware all these prophets of gloom and "doom", and
be thou not "reviled", by these revelatory racist relations, otherwise notable as "Revilo's Revilations".
which is why I posted the excerpt from his book after reading it. I've stumbled across a lot of material like this that suggests "whites" should band together in order to save the caucasion race from extermination. To be honest, I am conflicted by this idea. Though I am caucasion, I do not believe any race is below me and I harbor no ill will toward another race or people just because they are different in color and culture. Yet, I would like to see my own race survive. I feel that articles like Oliver's are forcing us to choose either racism or survival. The concept is rather uncomfortable for me, which is why I wanted another opinion. Thank you for providing yours.
I was a bit confused at first as to why you would propagate this type of supremacism. Having read you posts and comments before, it seemed inconsistent with this reasoning.
I'm glad to see that you don't embrace it.
Supremacism by any race is an absolute abomination - whether it's exercised by Jews, Whites, Blacks, Japanese, Hutus, or any other race or even economic class under the sun.
We were created from the same material by the same God. No doubt we are all different, some more talented and capable than others - but, we will all be judged by the same criteria - HOW WE CONDUCT OURSELVES based on our abilities (God's gifts).
Those who believe themselves to be above God's Laws, i.e., entitled to special status because of their "race", are simply delusional.
They will soon learn that their delusions will not avail them on Judgment Day.
As far as I am concerned, there is only one "race" - the HUMAN RACE.
People are, however, entitled to indulge in their own preferences when it comes to marriage and children and who they associate with - provided they afford everyone regardless of "race" the respect and dignity they deserve in civil, political, and economic discourse.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
Atheists and Darwin seem to be making very loud noises about how 'its all a accident'....after saying so and indoctrinating the masses with such thinking....its an easy step to charge them interest, create a Central Bank and Fractional Reserve Banking. 'The People' will just agree to their own enslavement and atheism/humanism simply allows this as far as I can see.
These militant atheists will laugh at religious morality and say it is all nonsense...but if 'it is all an accident'....there does not seem to be much point to anything, and all the injustice must continue indefinetly.
I think this de-moralizing is engineered by the Khazar elites so that they can gain greater control and the enslaved have nowhere to go but in chains. Christians fell into the trap, and Muslims fell into the trap...they became saduced by the 'wealth and power' of the khazars...and only now people are waking up to discover what they have lost.
worth mentioning:
In concluding that "[the white] race's only chance of survival lies in . . . a total collapse of organized society into the anarchy in which the strong and resolute will again survive at the expense of the weak and foolish" underlines the ruthless and brutal nature of this man's "morality" and how he is no different than his zionist counterparts who apparently he detests only because they are more adept at ruthlessness and treachery than he.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.