Think about it -- the government, shamelessly opportunistic politicians and anti-gun advocates are salivating for a terrible tragic moment like Virginia Tech massacre.

They may pretend to shed tears for this horror, but in their black heart they rejoice with ambition to create new rules that would triumph in the abolishment of the Bill of Rights.

Another clip from the same show on the subject

President William J Clinton didn't even hide his disdain for the Constitution back in 1994:

When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly ... that they would work for the common good, as well as for the individual welfare ... And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities.

Columbine High School massacre led to a stronger push for gun control during the Clinton administration.

Rosie O'Donnell had a heated argument with gun owner advocate Tom Selleck on her now-defunct show that was quite infamous in 1999.

Sickening incidents like this provide the perfect opportunity to pick up the megaphone to voice the preconceived & prejudicial opinion on the benefits of responsible gun ownership and demand the imposition of tighter gun control that might turn the Second Amendment upside down by distorting the meaning and purpose of the original wordings.

The Founding Fathers intended the Second Amendment for the informed citizenry to acknowledge their rights to bear arms responsibility as the means of adequate defense against unreasonable conduct of force by the intruders that strive to impose the tyrannical intention. That's the point of the Second Amendment.

Unnamed Judicial Inc webmaster may be correct in his belief that further tragedies involving armed weaponry on civilians by the deranged civilian(s) would pave the way to tyranny by first confiscating guns, thus depriving the citizenry of weapons to defend themselves from thugs (power-tripping government, local corrupt law enforcement, etc) that seek to utilize their excessive & brutal show of force to strike terror into the hearts of the good citizens and urge the citizens to be completely subordinate to their demands & never question authority at all.

This is exactly what happened at Waco and Ruby Ridge.

It's about the federal and state tyranny over the citizenry's natural right to bear arms under the legitimate circumstances.

This is exactly what happened under Nazism in Germany and Communism in Russia under the banner of Union of Soviet Socialist Republics & elsewhere.

The Zionists and 'New World Order' Elitists have been waiting for the new horrendous national tragedy with bated breath. This is their opportunity to press the Congress and state legislatures to devise new draconian gun laws and revise the existing gun laws considered "too liberal" to them as the barrier to their ominous plan of evil design.

Combined with the eventual extinguishing of the Second and Fourth Amendments & so on through the elimination of liberal gun law & protection from unreasonable intrusion & seizure for upstanding citizenry, the new form of tyranny rise without significant opposition.

Here is what our first Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton have to say (Federalist Paper number 28, Dec 1787) on the expansion of the federal & state government's power to abolish the independent liberty of moral law-abiding citizenry by taking away their right to bear arms and provide suggestions what the citizens can do when their rights are being encroached upon:

To the People of the State of New York:

THAT there may happen cases in which the national government may be necessitated to resort to force, cannot be denied. Our own experience has corroborated the lessons taught by the examples of other nations; that emergencies of this sort will sometimes arise in all societies, however constituted; that seditions and insurrections are, unhappily, maladies as inseparable from the body politic as tumors and eruptions from the natural body; that the idea of governing at all times by the simple force of law (which we have been told is the only admissible principle of republican government), has no place but in the reveries of those political doctors whose sagacity disdains the admonitions of experimental instruction.

Should such emergencies at any time happen under the national government, there could be no remedy but force. The means to be employed must be proportioned to the extent of the mischief. If it should be a slight commotion in a small part of a State, the militia of the residue would be adequate to its suppression; and the national presumption is that they would be ready to do their duty.

[...]

Independent of all other reasonings upon the subject, it is a full answer to those who require a more peremptory provision against military establishments in time of peace, to say that the whole power of the proposed government is to be in the hands of the representatives of the people. This is the essential, and, after all, only efficacious security for the rights and privileges of the people, which is attainable in civil society.

[...]

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo. The smaller the extent of the territory, the more difficult will it be for the people to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition, and the more easy will it be to defeat their early efforts. Intelligence can be more speedily obtained of their preparations and movements, and the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance.

The obstacles to usurpation and the facilities of resistance increase with the increased extent of the state, provided the citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them. The natural strength of the people in a large community, in proportion to the artificial strength of the government, is greater than in a small, and of course more competent to a struggle with the attempts of the government to establish a tyranny. But in a confederacy the people, without exaggeration, may be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate. Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the state governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government. The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. How wise will it be in them by cherishing the union to preserve to themselves an advantage which can never be too highly prized!

[...]

The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the national councils. If the federal army should be able to quell the resistance of one State, the distant States would have it in their power to make head with fresh forces. The advantages obtained in one place must be abandoned to subdue the opposition in others; and the moment the part which had been reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive.

We should recollect that the extent of the military force must, at all events, be regulated by the resources of the country. For a long time to come, it will not be possible to maintain a large army; and as the means of doing this increase, the population and natural strength of the community will proportionably increase. When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning.

Let it be said that I believe in the imperativeness of responsible gun ownership. Used in self-defense under the circumstances and proper judgment, it is an effective prevention of crime and bodily harm.

Tragedies like this is absolutely senseless and I have a reason to suspect the powers-that-be are relishing such hideous incidents to further their agenda to revoke the citizenry of their rights to bear arms so the citizens will be subject to the dictatorial attitude of the usurpers in the near future.

Posted in

• deception
• Gun control
• gun rights
• horror
• hypocrisy
• Media
• new world order
• tragedy
• truth
• tyranny
• violence
• Virginia Tech
• zionist agenda

Submitted by Nepos Libertas on Tue, 2007-04-17 05:37.

• Nepos Libertas's blog
• Login or register to post comments