I am a bit lost on his perception of progressiveness...to the point I have impression that he is going to far with a view on homosexual marriages although he might imply it as progressive in the terms of shuttering the fears of "different". However homosexual issue is not that simple, for really who cares if they are married or not, but marriage as institution is extending to all aspects of society especially on issue of raising kids who in homosexual marriage can not be conceived between partners of same gender. Another detrimental culture of homosexual orientation and or marriages is that eventually we will become extinct as a species. The effect of homosexual parents on their adopted or children conceived through superficial medical means is going to be almost decisive in fashioning easily influenced child's mind to be of homosexual orientation as well. So where does that lead humanity in general, hmmm...it seems to me that dictatorship has too little freedom and progressive democracy too much of freedom. They say that the middle path is best and most productive. Thats just me but hey he can't be worse than Bush or other Zionist puppets...

"Let there be Light!"

Including...

>The Constitution says Congress can declare war, or end war, but not interfere with war. If Congress wants to end war, Congress must pass a law to end it. Any variation from this simple fact is hot air.

>If you want to end a war, the “power of the purse” means nothing, since such power is buried in committees. To end a war, you must pass a simple law the public can understand.

>If Congress passed a law to end the war, the warmongers would filibuster it, thus exposing themselves.

>Obama was seven years in the Illinois state legislature. No one ever asks what (if anything) he accomplished.

>Since WW II, we’ve had a paranoid bunker mentality, in which Americans fear anyone they perceive as different. This has allowed the military-industrial complex to take total power, and it’s killing us.

>Realistically, the best way to deal with the Zionist lobby is to give greater support to Jews who favor peace.

>Our corrupt income tax system is a major cause of the widening gulf between rich and poor. It must be eliminated. It can never be reformed, since wealthy people write tax laws, and since reform would take power from politicians. If a government raises money unfairly, it will do everything else unfairly. We need a flat tax or a national sales tax, like Europe has. This will allow for transparency.

>It is pointless to attack corporations by imposing higher taxes on them, since corporations pass all taxes to consumers in the form of higher prices and so on.

>We must have a national (federal) voter initiative. Individual states with voter initiatives have better government than states without voter initiatives, since citizens participate in government, and since initiatives overcome legislative log-jams. Money controls initiatives, but we need laws that allow contributions from human beings only, not from shadowy lobbies and organizations. There are problems with initiatives, but when it comes to fiscal matters, they are a hundred times better than legislatures.

The founding fathers wanted a national initiative, but were prevented by the issue of slavery. No state, not even in the south, would have ratified a constitution that clearly allowed slavery. It would have been too odious. In order to have a national constitution, the founding fathers vested all power in legislatures. Since then, there has been little or no public participation in federal government.