Olmert gives Sarkozy his Seal of Approval
Nicolas Sarkozy - 100% Zionist Certified.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is confident that Israel's relations with France will strengthen during Nicolas Sarkozy's presidency, an overnight statement from the premier's office said."I am convinced that cooperation between us will be fruitful and that together we will be able to advance diplomatic activity and peace in our region," Olmert said, describing France as "one of the most important and influential countries in both Europe and the world."
Satisfaction guaranteed.
These are just a couple of details….
Hungary
Sarkozy is an ultra-zionist Jew with a Hungarian family background. He calls himself a “Catholic” for political reasons, as does Nancy Pelosi, whose family is Argentinian Jewish, and whose children all married Jews. Three-fourths of Hungary’s government (all the top positions, including the prime minister) are militant zionist Jews. They spend almost as much time in israel as they do in Hungary.
Relations between Sarkozy and the Hungarian government will now increase.
When there are riots in Budapest (Gentiles opposing government tyranny), the government normally flies israeli troops in to help the police. Now the government will bring in French troops as well.
‘Holocaust’ denial
Penalties in France are severe, and will increase under Sarkozy. "Sarko" will also push for Europe-wide laws against Muslims, and against "anti-Semitism."
Lebanon
France controlled Lebanon from World War I until Lebanese independence (1943). Right now there are French “peacekeeping” troops in Lebanon. Sarkozy will order those troops to “roll back” Hezbollah in an attempt to start another civil war for israel’s benefit.
Iraq
Message to young French Gentile males: see you in Iraq, mons amis. Under Sarkozy, you’ll be joining us there.
Can it get any more obvious than this that Zionists have won France?
God Help Us.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
'Good Lord'!!!!!
What has the world come to? End of times? (BTW I am NOT a superstitious religions person)
'Sarko mini Bush', this you can read on banners in France nowadays. Entirely correct, AZ, Sarkozy is an Ashkenazi aristocrat straight out of the pannonian steppes. His full name is Nicolas Paul Stèphane Sàrkozy de Nagy Bòcsa, said to be the son of a hungarian aristocrat who fled the Soviets. Don't be fooled, he's a Khazar too and the family comes from the town of Nagy in Hungary. This is a family of cripto-Jews converted for convenience to the Catholic faith. Sarko's father married Andrée Mallah, the daughter of a greek (Ashkenazi) Jew, also converted then to the Catholic faith. This grandfather is the real master of Sarko's election to the presidency in France. So ... what else to expect?? Well done France! Another complete colony of the Ashkenazi is now secured.
Cheers, history_worm
You think Sarko is bad news - wait til Netanyahu and Likud take back the helm from Olmert.
Wasn't Royal also Judaic, playing John Kerry (aka fake opposition)? Either way, let's give the hunchbacks of Notre Dam credit for so brilliantly fool their enemies to bend over and let them ride on their backs.
Maybe its our turn to write in a newspaper bold face front page headline: Are xx Million French so Dumb?
From Global Research
Historyworm said
Surely that is a contradiction in terms?
To Sullivan, I didn’t know about the use of e-voting machines in France. Thanks.
I suspected that the USA helped “Sarko” take power. Now you have confirmed it. The entire thing closely resembled the fraudulent U.S. elections that put Bush in the White House.
“Sarko” is definitely a sleazebag. He married a Corsican, had two children, and divorced her to marry a Russian glamour model named Cecelia Ciganer-Albariz. The Russian left him in 2004 because of his chronic infidelity. Now of course he married to a Jewess. Sarkozy’s father married a Jewess and later dumped her, refusing to provide financial help despite being wealthy. (Source: http://heatonnorris.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html )
For amusement, take a look at this French anti-Sarko web site. It calls him an arch-Zionist… http://www.toutsaufsarkozy.com/
To Kats, I’ve seen references that Marie-Ségolène Royal is Jewish, but I’m skeptical. Her husband Francois Hollande is definitely Jewish. Judicial-inc. thinks she’s Jewish. (See http://judicial-inc.biz/F_.rench_writer.htm )
In January, Ms. Royal met with Roger Cukierman, the president of CRIF, which is France’s militant equivalent to the ADL. Ms. Royal did this in an attempt to garner favor with France’s 600,000 Jews, but the Jews had already chosen “Sarko,” who is one of them. (see http://frenchelection2007.blogspot.com/2007/01/royal-meets-jewish-leader... )
Riots continue in France in the wake of “Sarko’s” victory. 730 cars were burned, and 592 people were arrested. (See http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1916859.htm )
France is now openly OWNED.
So the khazars continue their suffocating strangle hold on the world.
who can possibly stop them?
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire
AZ - Looks like the burnt car count is rising by the hour.
This must be really good news for Zarko in Paris...
...just like it was good news for Bush in Manhattan -
...and as far as election fraud goes, what's that old saying,
"it goes with the territory" ? ( regarding Sullivans' remarks )-
May 7, 2007 -- Nicolas Sarkozy ( whom our French intelligence sources have referred to as the "little French Hitler" ) will govern France with the help of two Silvio Berlusconi- and Rupert Murdoch-like billionaire neo-con French media moguls, Martin Bouygues and Arnaud Lagardere. Bouygues owns the TF1 television channel, which can be expected to act as Sarkozy's own version of the U.S. Republican Party's Fox News Channel. Lagardere's media group owns the Europe 1 radio network, Paris Match, several French regional newspapers, and is a major stakeholder in the French television network Canal+. Sarkozy is known to censor any news reports that are unfavorable to him and pressure publishers and editors to fire wayward journalists. With much of the French media in his pocket, expect the Franco-Hungarian Sarkozy to institute a new era of Janos Kadarist-style censorship in his nation.
The French election, from the start, has been plagued by election fraud -- bogus polling data, false exit polls, and electronic voting machine and machine counting irregularities were hallmarks of the first presidential election round. ES&S's I-Votronic machines were used in both elections across France. Only Sarkozy's party was supportive of the machines, with all the other political parties calling for a moratorium on their use. Turnout in the French election was 85 percent. With large turnouts historically favoring the left in France, the exit polling and actual polling were at odds with the turnout -- an indication of massive election fraud.
Similar polling irregularities were experienced in recent elections in Scotland, Wales, and England. In Scotland, 100,000 ballots, thought to mostly be cast for the pro-independence Scottish National Party, were declared "spoiled" in Scotland's election. That "glitch" cost the Scottish Nationalists a larger majority in the Scottish Parliament. Irregularities in Wales and England similarly affected larger margins for Welsh and Cornish nationalists.
As the Bretons and Corsicans will soon discover with Sarkozy, regional nationalism is anathema to the globalist neo-con agenda, particularly the international bankers who want strong centralized control and minimal devolution of power to local and regional governments.
The electoral malfeasance of neo-cons in manipulating elections in France, Britain, Canada, the United States, Italy, Australia, Peru, Costa Rica, Mexico, and other countries will remain a problem until the people, acting through the power
of progressive, anti-globalist, and anti-capitalist governments, seize control, via whatever means necessary, of the media, the voting and vote counting process, and the opinion polling mechanisms.
...courtesy of Wayne Madsen Report
I like your term “Zarko.” I’ll use it from now on.
One thing though … don’t you know that questioning electronic voting machines is “anti-Semitic”?
Electronic voting machines bring up something….
Imagine going back twenty years in a time machine and telling everyone that future elections would be done via electronic voting machines that will be easily rigged.
No one would believe you. Everyone would say, “The people won’t tolerate it.”
Of course, they would say the same thing about most other events that have transpired since the zio-Bush regime seized power.
NSA wiretaps? Illegal combatants? Unthinkable.
Total AIPAC control of government? Implausible.
Total Jewish ownership of all media outlets? Laughable.
Real ID? Absurd.
Abandonment of New Orleans? Impossible.
Vietnam in Iraq? Yeah right.
“The people won’t tolerate it.”
Even today the public continues to think this way, despite all that’s happened….
Bush in office for life? Unthinkable.
A national draft so Americans will die for Israel? Implausible.
A college admissions system that gives Jews a major advantage? Laughable.
Total collapse of the U.S. economy? Absurd.
Israel nuking the USA out of sheer spite? Impossible.
A “hate crimes” law that makes mainstream Christianity illegal? Yeah right.
“THE PEOPLE WON’T TOLERATE IT.”
Sarko's family name is Sàrkozy de Nagy Bòcsa. Don't know what Bòcsa stands for yet, but Nagy is a town in Hungary and a hungarian Ashkenazi family name as well. This 'de Nagy Bòcsa' denotes an aristocratic background (rendered, curiously, in a french way), but the rest denotes Khazar background and this concords with the fact that both Sarko's (or better Khazarko's) mother and latest wife are 'jewish'. So we are dealing with Khazar Ashina aristocracy, long the dominant clan in Central Asia, Europe, West Asia, the USA and the world over. The Rothschilds are Ashina, Theo Herzl was Ashina (Herzl is yiddish diminutive for Hertz, and Hertz is a version of Hirsch, which is the german rendering of Bulan, the semi-legendary Khazar leader who brought about the first massive wave of conversion to Judaism in historical Khazaria) etc.
So, in what sense Sarkozy Ashkenazi aristocrat would be a contradiction in terms?
The only thing I don't understand about this exploit of the Khazars is why they risk putting one of their aristocrats in a top position ... Normally they elect one of their puppets, like Bush or some other twit of the Skull&Bones or of the Illuminati not-so-secret gentile riff-raff.
Btw, went to see 'The Good Shepherd' by Robert De Niro. What a letdown, De Niro: you really and totally sold yourself to the Khazars you so beautifully depicted as criminal gangsters in Sergio Leone's 'Once Upon a Time in America'.
Looks like the Zionists pretty much controlled both sides in this election. The French media builds up the two pro-war (pro-Zionist) candidates in order to create an illusion of choice (no different than Bush & Kerry), and slightly favors Zarkozy, who is the Zionist's favorite, being a rabid Zionist and a crypto-Jew. If Royal had won, the Zionists would still have scored a victory, as she's surrounded by Jews, if she's not a crypto-Jew herself.
As is typical of crypto-Jews, Zarkozy is a very racist person, and has demonstrated it on various occasions with blacks and especially with Arabs. The French media, I imagine, did not mention that little detail about him, which would've likely caused him to lose the election, vote fraud aside.
Good idea: We should all call him "Zarkozy" or "Zarko", as it suits him better. He's a friend of Bibi Netanyahu -- that alone earns him his "Z".
Where are the 10+% of Le Pen voters? They should be protesting the streets en masse. They got exactly the opposite of what they wanted. They should be calling upon their fellow countrymen for being so stupid.
I was thinking the same thing... It looks like they're trying to get more control. Puppets are not 100% controllable - not even Bush. Zionist Jewish friends who actually care about the Zionist cause are always better.
France is a key country in Europe, after Britain and Germany. Perhaps Chirac was too "independent" for the Zionists, less controllable than Blair and Merkel. Let's see who they set up to replace Blair: another puppet, or a Zionist crypto-Jew like Zarko.
I still maintain that the Khazar and aristocracy are mutually exclusive ideas, even if aristocracy is itself a flawed concept.
Aristocracy, being derived from the Greek aristos or 'best', suggests rule by those that are intelligent and educated, moral and unselfish, audacious and abstemious.
So, yours was just Sarkasm. But let's not split hairs, please. There was and is a very strict 'aristocracy', or
self-styled 'nobility', or 'upper crust', amongst the Turks and Mongols, most of these 'aristocrats' judaised and ended up in the Khazar Ashkenazi upper classes.
I always thought De Niro WAS a Khazar.
Robert De Niro is half-Khazar, half-Italian, that's what I know.
Does anybody know the film, truly excellent, 'Once Upon a Time in America', by Sergio Leone? The film is drawn from a book (don't remember the title) and portays the Khazar immigrants in Lower East Side, NY, as gangsters during the early 1900s. For that's what they (OK, some of them) were up to in those years, after arriving straight from Kishinev Poland (now Moldova). That film is a must for any Khazar scholar, it's so well done and realistic you can feel the atmosphere of a Khazar shtetl by watching the film. De Niro plays the role of one of these kosher gangsters, Noodles, who was very good with the knife. Watching this film you can come to understand the role of the Khazar gangsters in the Bolshevik 'revolution' (which was no revolution at all, rather a restauration!). President Wilson, as is well known, gave in to the Khazar bankers in Wall Street who were determined to topple the Czar and his establishment in order to gain control of the immense resources of Russia. So, a ship laden with Khazar gangsters from NY, led by the 'excellent' Lev Bronstein (aka Trotzky) was organised by the US Secret Services and sent to S.Petersburg to organise the 1917 takeover of Russia by the Reds (not exactly Marxism-Leninism fanatics ...).
The new De Niro's film, 'The Good Shepherd', about the early days of the C.I.A., introduces huge decoy messages regarding who really controlled the Agency. Its top ranking officers are depicted as Skull&Bones' twits rejecting Jews and Blacks in their ranks. What? Blacks maybe, but the Agency, like the Cheka and the NKVD in the Soviet Union in those days, was totally controlled by the Khazars, judaic or not. That's why I'm saying De Niro has sold his soul to his Khazar component completely ...
Some of us truthseekers come up time and again with the question, 'how can we put an end to this domination', this New Tartar Yoke of the entire world? John Beaty, who knew the secret services and military intelligence milieux well, wrote an excellent book, the best ever, on this issue in 1951. 'The Iron Courtain over America' is his formidable legacy, how many truthseekers have read this book?
Oh my G-d, A CHALLENGE!
"how much wealth did the Khazars siphoned from Russia during their reign through the Reds? To the best of my knowledge, it was a failed economy"
You must go back to the 1920s and 1930s to see what New Khazaria in the Soviet Union was. In Malcolm Muggeridge's words ('Winter in Moscow'), the USSR was then "the Jews' paradise". The 'Jews' (actually the Khazars and their tribal allies: Bashkirians, Tatars, Mordwinians, etc. etc.) were then the masters of the USSR. Just an example: Molotov (Stalin's foreign affairs minister) was married to a Khazar woman whose brother went to the USA and changed his surname to Karp, making huge business by means of trade with the USSR Bolshevik Government. The US Khazar bankers, in the first line Yakub Schiff, made billions developing the USSR railway system, ignoring the Caspian oil (that was left flowing although it needed no drilling) and building huge river dams for the generation of electricity. Thousands Ukrainians died under labor camp conditions to man the construction craze that characterized the USSR in the 1920s and 1930s. The Bolsheviks replaced German technological know-how (booming under the Czars) with US know-how (taking over unders the Red Czars).
History has been totally re-written by the winners and most of us Gentiles know very little about REAL HISTORY ... since, oh ..., the last Partition of Poland?.
Many or most of them are Jewish. Many looted Russia under the drunk Yeltsin, but afterwards were kicked out by Putin.
Many fled to London, bought up British Premiership soccer clubs and live like kings.
How did these Jews manage to gain all this Russian wealth? One ridiculous claim is that because they were persecuted in Russia they were more driven and they rose to the challenge. In fact they are criminals working for Rothschild who owns Yukos and its shares.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/criruss.htm
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/chapski5.htm
*Thx hw for the elaboration.
*The counter intuitive college background of most of the heads of cia ("accounting") is a clear shibboleth who they represent.
*In Marx's writings there is only one reference to "asiatic mode of production" that scores of books later could not clarify what he really knew about any thing outside of Europe. But Europeans called the bankers' bluff, who sponsored Marx. When the bankers realized their plan for Europe was not going to work, they chose Russia. Russia was close enough and yet not quite familiar with who really was behind communism. They bussed in 4000 (mostly non Russians like Trotsky) from outside who ran the October revolution. Pretty impressive. But actually that's how they run 'colored' revolutions today. Georgia was turned around just before she joined Iran, Armenia, and Greece in an intelligence/military treaty specifically designed to ward off subversive activities of Panturanianists (aka Khazars) in Asia minor to central Asia.
*The real power of khazars is not their power! But their strategic decision to operate 'under the radar'. The devil's danger is not its destructiveness, but when we don't see it and think it does not exist. (Just like a virus.) A substantial amount of their investment goes into making people believe 'they don't exist'. Holly wood and Wikipidea are good examples. When they failed in Europe and Russia with communism, they dug deeper and are coming back now with legit looking cryptos like Kzarko. The question is if we can catch up with their tricks against the public.