Jimmy Carter says “Bush is the worst president in U.S. history”
We know that already, but it’s significant when one living (ex) president condemns another – and it’s unprecedented for a president to publicly use the terms “worst in history.”
Multiple maggots responded by condemning Carter for making “reckless accusations.” Amber Wilkerson, Republican National Committee spokes-thing, said there is no need to take Carter seriously, because Carter also “challenged Reagan’s strategy for the Cold War.”
(Get a clue, twit! The USSR collapsed of its own accord, not because of anything Reagan did. Carter challenged an economy based on enriching U.S. weapons makers.)
Carter said that with Bush’s pre-emptive war, “We attack even though our own security is not threatened. This is a radical departure from all previous administration policies.”
Carter, who won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, criticized Bush for having “zero peace talks” in Israel.
He said Bush “abandoned or directly refuted” every negotiated nuclear arms agreement, as well as environmental efforts by other presidents.
He condemned Bush’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which helped religious charities receive $2.15 billion in federal grants in 2005 alone.
“As a traditional Baptist, I’ve always believed in separation of church and state, and honored that premise when I was president. So have all other presidents except this one.”
Carter also called Tony Blair’s obedience to Bush, “ Abominable, blind, and subservient.”
His comments appeared in Saturday’s edition of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
Source:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18759682/
>>Multiple maggots responded by condemning Carter for making “reckless accusations.” Amber Wilkerson, Republican National Committee spokes-thing, said there is no need to take Carter seriously, because Carter also “challenged Reagan’s strategy for the Cold War.”<<
He can not be taken seriously because he dared to criticize Israel's policy on Arabs not because of the Reagan or any other domestic issue. USSR collapsed when it played down its usefulness in Zionist "Big Picture". Don't forget that Zionist invented communism as a part of hero/villain military tension to boost weapons production and research needed for the 21st century that has to prepare and enable their forces for final battle of Armageddon with its arch nemesis aka Islam. Unfortunately during the last century Judeo-Christian religion was utterly corrupted and disabled to launch any effective resistance to the Antichrist's NWO. 21st century is all about Muslims in general and Arabs in particular because of their geopolitical position around the Holy Land. Russia even today is under Zionist control and that is why you don't see Russian or Chinese veto against any preemptive aggression on Arab states. Why would you?! Neither Russian nor Chinese oligarchs want to see religious and political Islam regime that uncompromisingly prohibits any kind of usurious transactions, racial exploitation, oppression or in general all kinds of immorality. You would rightly notice that all such things are happening in Muslim world but note also that it is so because of the compliance of the regimes to Zionist agenda and not because Islam is tolerating it. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide who strongly dislike their pro Zionist regimes and the whole "democracy" crap as well but are not willing to support or adopt illegal means of resistance to Zionist oppression like militant groups who indiscriminately take revenge on civilians and non combat personnel. Nevertheless they will rise up when righteous Muslim leader calls them for the last stand against Antichrist and his cohorts. Just listen to western Zionist politicians mantra "We do not have feud with the people but with their regimes." So if the regime is not playing the secularist game to allow implementation of the Antichrist's NWO it is automatically bombarded with "EVIL AXIS" demonizing. So as long as the regime is anti religious it is good even if its dictatorial. Otherwise if its pro religious it is evil even if it is democratic. So it becomes obvious that hatred and opposition is not against regimes or people but against Islamic ideology adopted by either of them.
"Let there be Light!"
"A preventive war, to my mind, is an impossibility. I don’t believe there is such a thing, and frankly I wouldn’t even listen to anyone seriously that came in and talked about such a thing."
President Eisenhower, press conference, 1954
Article: Bush Doctrine of Pre-Emption
I admire Jimmy Carter's humanitarian concern by serving the public like working as a carpenter for Habitat for Humanity.
But he was partly responsible for the troubled economic turmoil (excessive oil price spike) and Iran hostage crisis that, because Jimmy failed to resolve the enormously difficult situation after the disastrous rescue mission that cost a small number of American lives, gave way to one of the worst and most corrupt administrations - Reagan/Bush era 1981 to 1989.
Every president face difficult issues. That is why being the President of the United States of America is the hardest job in the world.
And Bush/Cheney clearly abused their executive privilege for being treasonous, arrogant, ignorant and lazy (Bush's month-long vacation in August 2001 preceding 9/11 event).
--
My blog Last Throes of US Empire