The French Connection Counter-Flop


PlanetQuo and Fugazi discuss their next move

You never know now...PQ and Fugazi, with their video of little substance, may just be fishing for information on those who slap DBS & Co around. They may actually still be DBS loyal subjects. It is strange to take so little substance and make such a loud noise about it. Very weird.

PlanetQuo 'Nuked' Part One

PlanetQuo Debunked

All Howlers And No Play Makes Jim A Dull Boy

Endless Howlers

Absurd Theories and Amusing Quotes From the Webmaster of PlanetQuo.Com

Coup D'Etat



TEN HOWLERS

PlanetQuo:

  • Believed Nina to be Daryl Bradford Smith's "handler".

    "Yes, strange indeed…but then again not. They do not attack you because you do not attack them! Linton is no neutral observer, his job is to protect Nina, who, evidently, is Smith’s controller and handler."

  • Believes that the women in this photo are one and the same.

    Other photos of Gina make it even clearer that it's not the case.

  • Believes me to be Brendon O'Connell. Nothing is more abundant than evidence against that theory, to make no mention of common sense. Also, I'm Fester and Lord Sidious in the skewiff reality of PlanetQueer.

    "I believe more than ever that the agent who operates the Fester handle is the same agent who is operating the Crimes of Zion handle."

  • Accepted Dead Bishop's "testimony" vis a vis Suzette being Jewish on the grounds that he was more Catholic than she was. Now that DB has clarified the matter, he is a "shill" and has his own spot on the Suzette hit-piece.
  • States that Daryl Bradford Smith "decrees" me to be a Zionist agent, when he has never mentioned me on air or in print, or in any way, ever.

    "Smith in turn decrees Crimes of Zion to be a member of the Zionist network, and states that Poseidon is crypto-Zionist Scott Makufka."

    (Having said that, I'm sure Smith would be quite happy to put me in that category, and being that I've dared to ask questions, it follows that I am a 'Zionist agent').

  • Actually believes that Nina attended 'IDF summercamp', that this is evidence that Nina is a Zionist Jew, and that she was being quite serious in this comment.
  • Believes that Nina = Benevolent Muse = Cait = Caitlyn = Dresdenburning = Eireann Goddess = Eireannlass = Evicted From Life = Gina = Gina Grham = Gina Graham = Nimbus = Sniperbabe. In reality, Nina = none of them.

    "I am delighted to see that she denies being Eireann Princess, and now that she had made a public denial, she is trapped in a lie. When my team decide to release the evidence, she is finished, and COZ with her. Hopefully, Smith too. Indeed, It is a question of when they fall rather than if. Nina’s time is almost up – Smith’s too. Good riddance to the pair of them."

    I'll save the uncontrollable laughter for later, but that was June 10, and still no "evidence".

  • Stated unequivocally that Poseidon = Debus. In an email he sent me, in which I argued that there was no evidence to support that theory, he told me that he would 'stake his credibility' on it.

    "Debus IS Poseidon. I would stake my credibility on this, if called."

    Later, he told Poseidon

    "I am now satisfied that you are not Debus and wish to apologise for mistakenly saying that you were, and for any embarrassment caused, although it is I who has the red face lol. I now stand corrected and retract my remarks.

    If you have no objections, I would be happy to host some of your work on PlanetQuo."

  • Believes that Tontheon, geeez and Newmath (of NOLAJBS.net) are one and the same.

    "Tonethon is one of New Math's aliases.....Geeez is the other."

    In reality, they are three separate individuals.

  • Adamantly asserts that Poseidon is Peter Wakefield Sault.

    "Germar Rudolf is just another of the multitude of 'coincidences' that connect Peter Sault with Poseidon. There are more - a lot more. In fact there are too many 'coincidences' for Poseidon not to be Peter Sault."

    "I know you are Peter Sault, and so do about fifty other people."

    In reality, Poseidon is not Peter Wakefield Sault.



  • Dipshit

    Me:

    I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me.

    Kerr:

    I gave you my word that I would not reveal details of the information on Nina that you supplied me with.

    Nina's email was fowarded to Suzette by Kerr and posted on the NOLAJBS forum on May 5.

    Hi Jamie,
    I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid.

    Nina's Email on Kerr's Website.

    The 'evidence' which proves "conclusively" that I am a liar. So what? I made you a promise that I never had any intention of keeping. Big deal. Oh dear, I've lost your 'trust' and forfeited your 'friendship'.

    I offered you nothing but a promise that I had absolutely no intention whatsoever of keeping. You strung me along, I played along. You and Nina set a trap, I pretended that I was unaware that I was being set-up. 'Keep your friends close but your enemies closer still'

    I did not agree to your request hence there was no agreement made that could be broken dipshit.

    No promise was broken dipshit. When will you get that fact into your meths-rotted brain dipshit?

    I made you a promise that I never had any intention of keeping.


    Dipshit.

    Posted in

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

    Isn't this whole issue getting a bit ridiculous and not a bit convoluted?

    When i first saw the message from 'geeez', the reason i didn't even comment on his "suspicions" on PQ&Fugazi was that i thought it an obvious attempt to get people discussing more garbage and to distract people from the fact that con-DBS -crowd is running out of their fluff-ammo.

    tontheon | Mon, 2007-05-21 22:03

    Going to continue to run at the mouth He is going to have to get used to the Normal Wind of public life regardless if he likes it or not. The Duped IATW audience is not going to be quiet and feel like they are to blame. There all starting to become just a little angered at the BS Mr smith and his pod cast from hell.

    Good luck Daryl.
    Your going to need all the help you can get i think.

    And keep sending those post march 06' Mp3 of his show so Masher1 can catch up on all this crap i have missed over this year. If i have to i can be a real pain Mr smith.

    Let's just say that Times up For the effectiveness of the Daryl and Eric podcast now that more than just Me is calling this persona out.

    Spook want to play LETS play! You cannot frighten everyone off from reacting to the brain washing baloney going on at the smith site.

    First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

    Masher1 | Mon, 2007-05-21 23:24

    Masher, you don't actually think I'm DBS or a TFC representative, do you? Because that's fucking ridiculous. I've been a TFC skeptic from day one. I mean who are you talking to? You always seem to address Daryl in your posts, and not the people that're actually posting.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 00:05

    As most know Daryl's bot picks through everything looking for trouble. I always talk directly to DBS or Fester for a very good reason they refuse to respond to anything. And no i have a very good bead on who is a piece of crap and those who can and do helpful things and deeds. Fear not. But kinks and twists are there game wherever they are lurking.

    I am just sorry to have to air this DBS crap out here. I and others have had enough of this garbage flowing forth from Eric's servers.

    Sorry if i caused any confusion. But the DBS faction is just getting too out of hand. Times are now such that repair starts at the trouble makers like DBS Et Al.

    I detest the need to respond like this but the need for a place with a good amount of ammo for the DBS skeptics is long over due.

    P.S. i never bought any of Daryl and Eric's claims of numbers to there site. Down loads and such. There are far more than they admit coming into those servers FAR more.

    This 9/11 truth movement is being contained by some slippery persona. My concern is for those numbers alone. My heart felt thanks for trying to understand my problems in responding to the DBS promoters.

    First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

    Masher1 | Tue, 2007-05-22 01:02

    DBS is surely going to see my comment, and I hope he does!

    Before I begin though, I want to make it very plain that I'm not a disinfo/agent of any sort. I'm a secretary that makes $312.00 a week and I've been living with my mother since my second divorce. Anyone with a brain can guess why. I don't make enough money to live alone.

    Furthermore, I want to give credit where credit is due. Had I not found the French Connection I would be oblivious to the racist establishment of Zionism. My father knew well before the issue was being discussed that Jewish Zionists were destroying our country, although he never elaborated on the issues as DBS has. DBS opened my eyes and made me aware of this movement in a way that my father was incapable of.

    However, I have always been rather leery of DBS and the French Connection, due in part, because most of my emails received no responses. And too, I was suspicious of anyone living in another country espousing their American patriotism. Why would an American patriot be in another country?

    Also, I had close contact with Sam Danner for several weeks this past year (2006) after Christopher Bollyn reported his alleged encounter on 9/11 at the Pentagon. Although, the FC and Mike Piper eventually decided that Danner was lying, I felt that he had been compromised in a rather dangerous way. His life has been threatened more than once and he was damn near killed on a road not far from his home by unknown persons in a black SUV. Danner is not a well man. He has been fighting cancer for some time and he is on several medications that distort his cognitive abilities. Regardless, I feel absolutely confident that Danner is genuine and telling the truth in spite of what his son revealed. The family was scared out of their wits by CIA and FBI operatives, which insured their silence. But no one, not even the FC would back him.

    I was also a close friend of Suzette's and we talked on the phone for a few weeks last year. However, because I would not reveal the intimate conversations I had with Mr. Danner, she decided not to correspond with me further. However, my correspondance abruptly ended with Danner when he learned that I was an atheist. So, "ce la vie", or whatever. People are strange and quite judgemental. I found this out the hard way. It doesn't matter if you're a good friend who keeps confidences. If you're ideology disagrees with theirs then it's good riddance, literally.

    Suzette though is an honest person and she was an avid follower of Daryl and Eric - she does not deserve to be treated in this hostile manner by Daryl. The emails he sent to her were distasteful and quite offensive.

    In addition, I can vouch for Fugazi. I know this man personally and I know without any doubt that he is genuine and honest in his beliefs and opinions. If he is disregarding Daryl and the FC then you best take notice. He has nothing to gain from this recent development. I don't believe for one minute that he is attempting to divide the truth movement. If anything - he is attempting to acquire the truth and nothing more.

    Daryl has a lot of explaining to do if he wants to keep his former loyal fans. However, I doubt that he will capitulate in any form. He appears to be narrow-minded and definitely over confident, which is a latent form of egregious pride.

    From this point, I've taken the stance of "trusting no one" regardless of what they say or do. In the end - actions speak far louder than any words.

    whitewraithe | Tue, 2007-05-22 04:17

    DBS was one of the first sources I saw on the Internet back when I first learned about zionist evil.

    Even then, I had trouble taking him seriously. He seemed to regard everyone as a zionist plant. Moreover his reasoning was unintelligible.

    He does not interest me in the least, and I never listen to what he says. I regard his opinion as self-serving, and therefore irrelevant.

    You wrote, “I've taken the stance of trusting no one regardless of what they say or do.”

    I see no need for that. That’s buying into DBS’s illness.

    If a comment benefits israel, or the rich, or the warmongers, or tyrannical corporations, it is a lie.

    If a comment strictly benefits the person who makes it -- as occurs when DBS blasts everyone, including you and me – it is also a lie.

    Abdul-Alhazred | Tue, 2007-05-22 04:46

    "If and when the Quo/Fugazi TFC smear operation succeeds, as a unit they'll be conveniently positioned to be it's natural replacement, via the PlanetQueer website, and by virtue of their keen eye for deception and ostensible dedication to the integrity of the anti-Zionist movement."

    Yeah, all these fights seem manufactured to further divide any kind of unity. Why couldn't Zio deniers and Zio accepters work together for simple ideas like freedom and liberty? Does it really matter what we call the oppressors? Are we so dumb that a few bad apples shut us down?

    Also, would DBS really write those stupid emails knowing they are a written record? A moment of weakness or planned combustion?

    "It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. If the Smith operation does in fact "implode" as Fugazi alleges is the plan, the prescience of the Quo/Fagarsie team will be highly suspect. But of course, we'll all be expected to believe that it was due to their valiant efforts at "exposing" TFC, rather than that they were actually involved in a deliberate transfer of power/allegiance/credibility, planned by the Zionist criminal network who set up the TFC disinfo operation in the first place."

    Don't count on it. I don't think that's the point of all this. It's more like jilted love. Everyone's dirty in this mess. And not everyone can do broadcasting. But even if it's the next level of disinfo, hopefully the info will be better and the people nicer. Besides, we should just stick to local stuff that we can accomplish hands on.

    "Alternatively, if the Quo/Fagazi team-up really is a legitimate splinter group of mindless Smithsonians that has belatedly woken up from it's TFC slumber, as it were, and the Smith operation survives (and I think it will, albeit having suffered a minor blow), the anti-Smith operatives behind all this will have lost some credibility themselves. Their only option will be to continue their campaign of gathering and publicising "evidence" that supports their assertions, casting evermore doubt on the motives and credibility of Smith and Hufschmid."

    Not really. Just because they survive doesn't mean anything. Alex Jones is still around and he was exposed a long time ago. TFC had their moment in the sun, but their influence will wane. The disinfo will have to become more sophisticated and that's a good thing.

    I think this will help people realize that they have to start doing things on their own, in their own locality, using their own brain and stop listening to voices in the dark. Do we really need anymore information?

    duped | Tue, 2007-05-22 05:10

    How many bad weather stories do we really need anyway? More? I don't think so. We all nered to work the FIX to hell with this bad weather crap.

    First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

    Masher1 | Tue, 2007-05-22 05:26

    I think TFC's aim was to carry on as long as possible, building up a cult following whose receipt of information was at least in part controlled by the Zionists. The last thing they want is everyone diverging and carrying out research on their own initiative:

    "The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence."

    From Protocol no 5.

    But even the "sophisticated" disinfo agents have a limited shelf life. Once Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn became damaged goods, they would go into the self-destruct mode. It would probably involve Eric posting an article claiming that Daryl and Christopher are "Zionist agents" (true, in fact). After the inevitable arguments, they would split up and not be heard of again. The aim would be to discredit all their previous work, so anyone pointing to Israeli involvement, or thermate used to demolish the WTC, would be dismissed as a "Bollyn" or a "Hufschmid" lunatic.

    I don't know where PlanetQuo's true allegiances lie, so we shall have to find out in the weeks ahead.

    Poseidon | Tue, 2007-05-22 05:43

    Personal intiative and unity would destroy these people's plans.

    We all need to grow up, get along and stop following the people drunk on their own ego.

    duped | Tue, 2007-05-22 06:06

    Notwithstanding the rampant narcissism and blatant self-servitude, TFC hasn't been compromised in the sense PlanetQuo claims it has. Quo's entire investigation is based on a single premise.. that the owner of certain other forum is a Christian Zionist. This rumor has been dispelled and the opposite has been revealed to be true. Said forum owner has been explicitly opposed to Zionism since at least 2004.

    That said, TFC's problems are, I believe, inherent ones which have been obvious to me since my first introduction to their material. Individual judgement of TFC should be based on whether one can stomach the arrogant, self- congratulatory tone, and inordinate amount of time spent denigrating others doing similar research... rather than empty allegations leveled by spurned former fans.. erm obsessive lockstep followers. =)

    I'd personally be interested in hearing more about viable solutions to our Zionist infestation...ways to encourage radical changes in government policy going forward (preferably without the need for firearms). Elimination of the Federal Reserve being perhaps the most attractive option... hello Ron Paul! =)

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 06:25

    Yes - although watching TFC's con game become more and more visible is fun.. (especially if it pisses you off that they tricked you too)...

    Mr Paul does need our attention and active participation

    possum is right about that

    ============

    The thing about DBS is to look at what he is doing at the particular time he is doing it - that is when you can see that he really helps zio-interests.

    He bashes Irving just when holocaust denial jailings are causing a backlash.

    He tells people to forget opposing the war in Iraq (war for zion) becuase it distracts from opposing zionism.

    He bashes Paul when Paul comes out the gate and he is the closest thing to anti-zio there is.

    The list is long and Ive forgotten a lot of it.. but the point is, TFC seems to be a sortof 'zone defense'.. they float around.. they deflate potentional trouble spots like 'holocaust denier jailings' and people gaining following.. and move on to the next one - theirs is a war of attrition.

    Theyre like handymen.. troubleshooters, snipers.

    they are one group out of many.. i think they are the group assigned to christian patriots with a clue - i think they were supposed to split christian patriuots by going antichristian.. but never got there - we started deflating them too fast First.

    I do believe they actively work for the enemy. I think they are paid to do it too.

    they just act too much like 'an operation' to me.. and theres 5 or more individuals working it too. Judicial-inc is theirs and the Skunk is one of the individuals on the TFC team..

    thats my theory based on watching those shits for a few months.

    geeez | Tue, 2007-05-22 07:10

    MASHER, I posted the indictment because I noticed your keen interest in attacking Daryl. You were so passionate that I felt sure you had something worthwhile to present. I was a bit naive.

    Here you say, "I always talk directly to DBS or Fester for a very good reason they refuse to respond to anything." Not very accurate as I tried for a couple of weeks before I realized that innuendo and chum were you only game vs. Smith (still truly curious about the dampers, but you need a couple of coins to buy your way in).

    It took a week or two for you to go beyond your high school confidential "Oh, he's a BOLD LIAR, but you'll all just have to find out for yourselves" ruse.

    You and Ol Po love to go off on irrelevant tangents based on obvious mischaracterizations of what's on the record. There a loads of examples over at the Chum Trail if anyone here is truly interested.

    A brief example or two: if I use the common phrase "pet project," that's clear proof that I'm DBS. If I get exasperated and curse, that's additional proof that I'm DBS. You two then have at least a week's worth of material to chum the indictment with. Fact.

    If this debate was public, you'd be laughed out of the building, but on the net you can spin away as if you're making sense all the while getting further and further from the original intent which was to SEE THE EVIDENCE AGAINST SMITH which you claim to ALREADY POSSESS. Fact.

    I'm open to admitting mistakes as I did when someone pointed me to the Mullins interveiw with Piper. What Mullins' appearance with Piper DOES NOT do is to prove Smith a mind control expert. Fact.

    You have insisted that it's clear Smith put words in Mullins' mouth but again if you presented that to a public audience you be laughed off stage. Fact.

    Mullins has no credibility and I thank whoever it was who pointed me to that fact. Fact.

    Piper, if he continues to use Mullins, also has no credibility. Smith would look better if he gave an explanation about the Mullins thing, but the onus is on those who still handle Mullins. I know you're bright enough to realize that all by yourself. Fact.

    And so you hang out here and carry on about how you deal with evidence and facts, but you never have regarding the indictment. Given the ample amount of time, it's obvious that you can't.

    Fester | Tue, 2007-05-22 08:54


    5 threads is unnecessary; let's keep it to one or two. I propose 1154 (DBS Indicted) and/or 1685 (DBS Guilty).

    UnitedAgainstZionism | Tue, 2007-05-22 09:49

    UAZ, I concur wholeheartedly. Seems like a closed circle over here and very chummy. My old friend Suzette, is posting the same piece in multiple locations. I've offered what I thought was a fair question, but so far silence.

    I hope the anti-Smith gang hasn't decided to become an exclusive self-congratulatory society as the absence of substantive evidence is loud and clear.

    Let's hope the spirit of cooperation still reigns.

    Fester | Tue, 2007-05-22 10:02

    "Notwithstanding the rampant narcissism and blatant self-servitude, TFC hasn't been compromised in the sense PlanetQuo claims it has. Quo's entire investigation is based on a single premise.. that the owner of certain other forum is a Christian Zionist. This rumor has been dispelled and the opposite has been revealed to be true. Said forum owner has been explicitly opposed to Zionism since at least 2004."

    First of all, you have no credibility in the matter, since you are one the causes of this mess. Called conflict of interest.

    Second, NOLAJBS is a Zionist infested rat hole that makes TFC smell like roses. If that's being opposed to Zionism, it's clear where ur loyalties are.

    Third, Joe Molero is a Christian Zionist opposed to Zionism? Let's see how u sell that one.

    "That said, TFC's problems are, I believe, inherent ones which have been obvious to me since my first introduction to their material. Individual judgement of TFC should be based on whether one can stomach the arrogant, self- congratulatory tone, and inordinate amount of time spent denigrating others doing similar research... rather than empty allegations leveled by spurned former fans.. erm obsessive lockstep followers. =)"

    Please stop using 50 cent words. We already know you are a pseudo-intellectual.

    There's no e in judgment, but there may a judgment for u.

    "I'd personally be interested in hearing more about viable solutions to our Zionist infestation...ways to encourage radical changes in government policy going forward (preferably without the need for firearms). Elimination of the Federal Reserve being perhaps the most attractive option... hello Ron Paul! =)"

    I bet u would, so u could cause more trouble.

    duped | Tue, 2007-05-22 10:17

    THE EVIL OF TWO LESSERS

    additional exhibits to follow.

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 10:43

    Joe Molero, owner of the NOLAJBS forum,wrote this article in January 2003. In it, he states that:

    "At the time, NOLAJBS and other local Chapters of the John Birch Society, as well as non-members, were getting organized. However, this is no longer the case. As you may already know, we are no longer affiliated with the John Birch Society, but are continuing the work we started."

    Since Molero stated in *2003* that he is no longer associated with the John Birch Society, and since he states on post #13 of this thread on Freedom Underground that he "gave them the boot" in July, *2004*, he has made two contradictory statements. Perhaps NOLAJBS' official spokeswoman and ambassador to France might care to explain the discrepancy.

    So, which, if any, is true? Did Molero resign from the JBS in 2003, yes or no?

    And before Nina's official spokesboy comes strolling in spouting his mouth off, this question is not being addressed to you son, so put a sock in it your gob, hard as it might be. It would be such a refreshing change to hear the Ventriloquist speaking clearly and directly rather than in garbled tones through her dummy.

    PlanetQuo | Tue, 2007-05-22 11:38

    From UAZ:

    5 threads is unnecessary; let's keep it to one or two. I propose 1154 (DBS Indicted) and/or 1685 (DBS Guilty).

    I agree with this. All three threads deal with the same subject matter, and none of us have time to scour and scrutinise all three. I suggest we stick with the "DBS Indicted!" thread where the discussion began, and where the bulk of the posts are.

    From Whitewraithe:

    In addition, I can vouch for Fugazi. I know this man personally and I know without any doubt that he is genuine and honest in his beliefs and opinions. If he is disregarding Daryl and the FC then you best take notice. He has nothing to gain from this recent development. I don't believe for one minute that he is attempting to divide the truth movement. If anything - he is attempting to acquire the truth and nothing more.

    First of all, Whitewraithe, good to see you here. My feeling too is/was that Michael aka Fugazi is genuine. I don't know him personally, but I've watched him for awhile now and had some limited email contact with him via myspace. However, he posted a reply to a comment in his myspace blog in which he appears to be lying. The context is people using multiple handles, credibilty etc:

    "One example of this is Infensus Mentis aka Crimes of Zion (at wake up from your slumber). He requested to be my friend on "Site Space" several months ago. He had no idea about Zionism and was still heavily promoting Alex Jones and Company (he still does, in fact!). Now, on the strenght of an article that he stole from Bollyn using links that Jim (Planetquo) gave him weeks ago, Mike Rivero has linked to him!!!!! Good timing eh? I don't know who's credibility is at risk here! lol!!!!!!!!"

    There are several falsehoods here. I posted a reply to it, but he's thus far refused to approve it for publication. I had an idea he'd not include it, so I saved it on wordpad:

    Now you've joined Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo in being an absolute liar, Michael. a) I've been schooled up on Zionism for a long time now, first lie- b) The "AIPAC's Powerbase: America's Real Terrorists" article in my blog that Rivero linked to was written by Ted Lang, not Chris Bollyn (look who doesn't know about Zionism now, hmm?) - c) Jim did NOT give me the link for it; I found it about four days ago here:

    http://www.etherzone.com/2004/lang090304.shtml

    Once again, you're wrong. Please refrain from spreading lies about me, Michael.

    The only reason I won't call him out as an outright liar here is by virtue of the fact that his information seems to have come from PlanetQuo. I know they're in regular IM contact (skype or something), so Jim's obviously fed him a lot of bullshit. I've already demonstrated that PlanetQuo is untrustworthy and a proven liar, three times no less.

    Me:

    "I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me."

    You:

    From:planetquo@hotmail.co.uk

    Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 6:36:23 AM

    To: jamie linton (jmzlinton@hotmail.com)

    Hi Jamie,

    I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs.

    He did share the email, and he did post it on his site.

    I apologise to those that've read this little exchange more than once, but I think it's important.

    He refuses to reply or provide an explanation. What he has done, is create a whole page devoted to "exposing" me on his website, wherein he publishes all my personal details and even my home address. (Actually I just checked it whilst fetching the link, and he seems to have moved or removed my personal info). This is quite obviously totally uncool, and a breach of ethics by anyone's standards. He was a friend of mine, and when he lied to me and I called him on it, he set about trying to punish me for revealing it publicly.

    This is the only post he's made on WUFYS since I revealed the email excerpts that prove he betrayed me. In it he totally ignores my calling him out on the lie. He knows that Mike Rivero linked to that blog of mine, so I guess he thought that'd be the most convenient place and the most public way to "expose" me. If you look at his hyperlinks, you'll see the kind of tactics this prick uses to smear people. He's a creep.

    But most importantly, the guy's a liar, plain and simple. Michael's on his own as far as credibility goes, and even his is dubious. I don't know what their motives are, but I'll be watching with interest as their little operation rolls on.

    From Whitewraithe:

    From this point, I've taken the stance of "trusting no one" regardless of what they say or do. In the end - actions speak far louder than any words.

    I understand this. There's a lot of paranoia going around right now, and it's hard to know which players to trust, and what their motives are. You're dead right about one thing; actions speak louder than words.

    "By their deeds, ye shall know them".

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 11:47

    Oh what a tangleded web we weave, when we flatter to deceive.

    PlanetQuo | Tue, 2007-05-22 11:51

    Aah, so here he is. Finally.

    PlanetQuo:

    "And before Nina's official spokesboy comes strolling in spouting his mouth off, this question is not being addressed to you son, so put a sock in it your gob, hard as it might be. It would be such a refreshing change to hear the Ventriloquist speaking clearly and directly rather than in garbled tones through her dummy."

    You'd like me to shut up, wouldn't you Jim? I've been quite the thorn in your side. But let's see a show of hands: who wants to hear PlanetQueer answer my allegations about his lying, and who wants to hear from Nina about Joe Molero? Which shall we address first?

    You've got some 'splainin to do Jim, and you might as well do it right now. It's been five days now, and we've heard diddly squat from you. Pipe up.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 11:59

    James Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion a.k.a. Infensus Mentis conveniently forgot to post the first four paragraphs of the e-mail reproduced above.

    Here are the paragraphs that were edited out:

    This profile had no information on it when I visited it earlier - just pictures of chessboards. The profile creator states their astrological sign to be Scorpio. Maybe our friend Donnie was trying to tell me something. I do recall that e-mail Donnie sent me to forward to you after we were banned from NOLAJBS ended by something along the lines of...."I might pursue this on MySpace."

    I thought I'd make a comment just in case Mental Warfare is yet another of Darko's aliases. Regardless, it will indeed be checkmate for Donnie lass...oops...sorry...lad at the weekend. I have the bastard bang to rights over some provable lies. The execution is scheduled to take place on the front page of PlanetQuo.Com and on the revised 'NOLAJBS Exposed' page of PlanetQuo.Net that I'm presently working on. You will be creased-up with laughter when you see what I put on that page. Brendon O'Connell, whoever they might be, will suffer public humiliation before being executed.

    Nina will suffer the same fate soon after. On that issue: I will be confronting Daryl Bradford Smith about his connections to, and involvement with Nina, tomorrow. I gave you my word that I would not reveal details of the information on Nina that you supplied me with. It is, however, that Smith sees what she has told you otherwise I have nothing with which to confront him! Smith needs to explain himself and answer the questions that I will be asking him. If he is clean, he has nothing to hide. In view of this, will you give me permission to reveal the information without naming my source. Smith does not need to know where my information came from. All he needs to know is what Nina has said. He will know whether or not she is telling the truth.

    Hufschmid is also being questioned. Suzette has published a list of questions on NOLAJBS (page 11 of DD's 'cutting' reply to our armless friend' thread). Smith and Hufschmid are being investigated - make no mistake about that Jamie.

    Linton had good reason to edit the first four paragraphs out, as will soon become apparent. In the event that he should attempt to present further edited or incomplete e-mail correspondence to this forum, I have compiled a list of all correspondence received from Linton. Shuld I have overlooked or omitted any relevant e-mails, then I'm sure Linton will point this out.

    Linton is under the impression that I was a "good friend" of his. In a post he made on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted thread on 17th May under the title of PlanetQuo, Liar or Just Stupid, Linton states that he considered me a "good friend", and that I "publicly declared" him as a "good friend" on the NOLAJBS forum. Linton has quite a remarkable memory. He remembers things that were that were never said....at least not by me anyway.

    The following screenshots of the NOLAJBS forum's search engine were taken during the week commencing 13th May, 2007.

    Entering the text "good friend" into the query box with PlanetQuo as the username, and checking the 'search all' box, produces the following result:

    Let's try another username.

    Entering the text "good friend" into the query box with InfensusMentis as the username, and checking the 'search all' box, produces the following result:

    Interesting.

    Entering the text "good friend" into the query box with QuoVadius as the username, and checking the 'search all' box, produces the following result:

    Very interesting. Very interesting indeed.

    It can be determined from these screenshots that I, Jim Kerr a.k.a. PlanetQuo, did not "publicly state" on the NOLAJBS forum that James Linton was a "good friend", as he falsely claims. Only two people have made such a statement, and Infensus Mentis a.k.a Crimes of Zion, is Crimes of Zion a.k.a. Infensus Mentis was the first of the pair to do so. This he did in a post he made on the NOLAJBS forum on 13th February, 2007.

    Exhibit A:

    The other individual who falsely claims that I have stated Linton to be a "good friend", is his fellow Australian, and fellow Perth resident, Quo Vadius a.k.a Donnie Darko a.k.a True Believer a.k.a Brendon O'Connell a.k.a Brendon Lee O'Connell a.k.a Fester.

    Exhibit B:

    Linton and O'Connell not only live in the same Australian city, they actually live close to another. Indeed, so geographically close are they, that O'Connell proposed to Linton that they should arrange a meeting, a proposal which Linton accepted.

    Exhibit C:

    O'Connell, however, had second thoughts about meeting Linton in person, deciding instead to personally visit the street where Linton lives.

    Exhibit D:

    In the post that he made on this thread at 16:02, Linton alleges that I "stalked out" details of his address. If this allegation is true, then anyone else who has read what Linton wrote on the NOLAJBS forum on 9th February, stands accused of stalking Linton. I guess the 8000+ people a day who visit PlanetQuo.Com and PlanetQuo.Net will soon be 'stalking' him too.

    Linton's statement below confirms that it he, of his own freewill, made public his own physical home address, and in the process Linton himself proves conclusively that his allegation is false.

    Exhibit E:

    Linton also alleges that the posts he has made on the NOLAJBS forum....

    Only demonstrate that I was actually helping him out in his beef with "Donnie Darko", but he makes out that he doesn't know why I was there, and that it's all a big mystery. And that's despite the fact that in a myspace email to me, he actually said "I just wish I had some help."

    Since I have taken the time and effort to produce a comprehensive list of correspondence that has taken place Linton and myself, so too should he. Linton is hereby called upon to produce the MySpace e-mail that he refers to, so that it can be established beyond doubt what was, and what was not said in that particular piece of correspondence. He should follow my example and lay it all out for everyone to see

    Linton would have us believe that his presence on the NOLAJBS forum was to "help" me. Linton's idea of "helping" was to declare in a private message that he sent to Donnie Darko that one of his friends is an Australian Federal Police agent. Darko gleefully siezed the opportunity with both hands, and to this day takes great delight in reminding me of how my "good friend" from Jew Central came to my 'assistance' by providing a sworn enemy with a weapon that she has attempted to deploy against me on numerous occasions.

    My "good friend" James Linton from Jew Central has proven himself to be a bigger drawback than an elephant's foreskin. With "helpers" such as Linton around me, who needs imbeciles, buffoons and dimwits?

    The fact is, Linton did not join the NOLAJBS forum to "help" me. Since Linton gets his kicks from observing what other people do, it should come as no great surprise to discover that he joined NOLAJBS purely to "observe".

    Linton evidently experiences bouts of amnesia, as in order to be a good liar, one needs a good memory. Since Linton is one of the worst liars I'm ever likely to have the misfortune to encounter, this would perhaps explain his apparent forgetfulness. Linton is now reminded of a statement he made three days in advance of his 'I came here to observe' proclamation.

    Exhibit F:

    Infaeces Stinkis. James Shiton. Slimes of Shite-on. James Linton, Turd-hurler extrodinaire. If poo-propelling was an sport, Linton would be of Olympic standard. Linton Crustie, the undisputed 100 metre champion, winner of several brown medals. Sling shit is all Linton has done since he arrived here. Qrswave is soon going to have enviromental health officers serving notice on WUFYS if this shit-throwing, shit-stirring, shit-talking turd named James Linton continues to discolour the forum walls at the prolific rate that he has so far achieved.

    Exhibit G:

    And why does Linton attack me with such venom? He claims to have been "betrayed." So deep was our 'friendship' that he is unable to come to terms with me binning him along with the rest of his gang of MySpace 'troofer' miscreants. So meaningful was our brief liaison, that Linton is experiencing serious emotional turbulence in coming toterms with his sudden loss. Unable to deal with his grief, he weeps buckets whilst wailing like a demented Banshee. I wish someone would either counsel this poor wretch, or shoot the pathetic, whining bastard, and put him out of his misery - preferably the latter.

    The fact is, Slimeball Linton was never any friend of mine, nevermind a "good friend". I really do wish MySpace would expand the categories to include not only friends, but also real friends, acquaintances, freeloaders trying to make a name for themselves on the back of yours, enemy operatives posing as friends and complete and utter cunts. If such categories had existed while James Rant-on was listed in my contact list, then he would have fitted in nicely within any of the categories other than the first two named. Indeed, the last-named is where this piece of shit belongs. With friends like Linton, who needs enemies?

    PlanetQuo | Tue, 2007-05-22 12:08

    Oh my, how embarrassed I am.

    Jim, you've just dropped another boring old load of non sequiturs. I stated I'd like to fuck Nina, so what? I stated that I didn't think NOLAJBS itself was a Zionist operation, so what? I said some nice things about you when we were friends, before you deceived me, so what?

    What are you saying?

    I just gave this thread a link to all the crap you just posted up there anyway, Jim. It's not like it's news to them.

    For the last fucking time (actually, no, I won't stop asking), are you or are you not going to tell the WUFYS community why you lied through your teeth?

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 12:11

    Another case of lack of substance and simple character assassination.

    This is what Eric has been talking about...they pose as your friends, and wait until you say something that can be used against you. This is how they create useful idiots...if COZ would've been even more open to PQ, PQ could've gotten in the end something to blackmail COZ with.

    tontheon | Tue, 2007-05-22 12:26

    Jim had in excess of 100 "friends" on his myspace profile; I was #4 on his "top friends" list.

    Jim and I often spoke on MSN (instant messaging).

    Jim often referred to me as "bud", and other affectionate terms in our IM contact.

    And now he's asserting that we were never friends. Evidently, Jim aka PlanetQueer doesn't know what "friend" even means.

    Am I lying about any of these things, PlanetQueer?

    Of course, I can only assume that his "evidence" that we weren't friends is somehow supposed to justify the fact that he's a liar. According to Jim, no friendship = permission to lie and deceive.

    You've brought up everything but the fact that you broke our email agreement, Jim. Stop obfuscating and explain why any of us should trust a word you fucking say?

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 12:37

    Who cares whether it was 2003 or 2004? How is the specific date of Joe's departure from the JBS relevant to the issue at hand? What's important is the reason he chose to leave the organization. He left because he discovered they were Zionists.

    He is no longer a member of the JBS. (Just as you, Jim, are no longer the cloned minion supporter of TFC you had been for roughly 6 months.) I'm surprised in your rounds scouring the internet for references to Joe Molero and the JBS.. you hadnt found and posted the one I did... particularly since it also explicitly cites Zionism as his reason for leaving.

    Also, it was one of the first items returned through a cursory Google search. How the hell did you miss it, Jim? .. Oh, wait... it didn't fit into your fantasy, did it? Shucks. Sorry, Quo.

    My favorite line from PlanetPedantic's email memoires:

    ...however, that Smith sees what she has told you otherwise I have nothing with which to confront him!

    HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA !! pitiful.

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:09

    From tontheon:

    Another case of lack of substance and simple character assassination.

    This is what Eric has been talking about...they pose as your friends, and wait until you say something that can be used against you. This is how they create useful idiots...if COZ would've been even more open to PQ, PQ could've gotten in the end something to blackmail COZ with.

    Well, you can see that he's been stockpiling a file on me, so yeah, it's more than a bit suss. Suss and fucking creepy.

    From PlanetQueer:

    Linton's statement below confirms that it he, of his own freewill, made public his own physical home address, and in the process Linton himself proves conclusively that his allegation is false.

    I deliberately didn't provide the actual number of my address, Queero. Scroll up: I revealed my address as "Fifth Ave, Mt Lawley". I'm not fucking stupid. You not only published my exact location on Fifth Ave, but you published on your site my IP address and my landline phone number, which, fortunately, is only used for my internet connection. That's about as low as it gets, you little cunt.

    Linton himself proves conclusively that his allegation is false.

    Nice try.

    The only person you're "exposing" here is yourself.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:13

    Why are btw those who like Daryl "cloned minions" whereas of course people who don't like Daryl are brave and individualistic fighters for freedom and truth and justice and all that is good and beautiful in the land of eternal sunshine and biscuits and gravy?

    Seems like a very very basic brainwashing technique to me. Just create as many unpleasant associations with the name Daryl Bradford Smith as possible.

    tontheon | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:14

    Why are btw those who like Daryl "cloned minions" whereas of course people who don't like Daryl are brave and individualistic fighters for freedom and truth and justice and all that is good and beautiful in the land of eternal sunshine and biscuits and gravy?

    Liking someone, such as Daryl in this case, isn't the sole prerequisite for being a cloned minion. In fact, I personally like Daryl and admire him for taking the risks he has.. but certainly NOT to the exclusion of liking anyone and everyone else.

    If you rely on Daryl and Daryl alone to inform your opinions, then you are probably a cloned minion. The same applies to the obsessive followers of Alex Jones, Noam Chomskey, Oprah Winfrey, Paris Hilton, Lyndon LaRouche..etc etc

    Sorry for the misunderstanding.

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:30

    Ok, fair enough.

    tontheon | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:35

    Look at this crap coming from "duped", which not a misnomer for such a moron, I might add. The person he's quoting is Nina aka apossumprincess:

    "Notwithstanding the rampant narcissism and blatant self-servitude, TFC hasn't been compromised in the sense PlanetQuo claims it has. Quo's entire investigation is based on a single premise.. that the owner of certain other forum is a Christian Zionist. This rumor has been dispelled and the opposite has been revealed to be true. Said forum owner has been explicitly opposed to Zionism since at least 2004."

    First of all, you have no credibility in the matter, since you are one the causes of this mess. Called conflict of interest.

    Second, NOLAJBS is a Zionist infested rat hole that makes TFC smell like roses. If that's being opposed to Zionism, it's clear where ur loyalties are.

    Third, Joe Molero is a Christian Zionist opposed to Zionism? Let's see how u sell that one.

    "That said, TFC's problems are, I believe, inherent ones which have been obvious to me since my first introduction to their material. Individual judgement of TFC should be based on whether one can stomach the arrogant, self- congratulatory tone, and inordinate amount of time spent denigrating others doing similar research... rather than empty allegations leveled by spurned former fans.. erm obsessive lockstep followers. =)"

    Please stop using 50 cent words. We already know you are a pseudo-intellectual.

    There's no e in judgment, but there may a judgment for u.

    "I'd personally be interested in hearing more about viable solutions to our Zionist infestation...ways to encourage radical changes in government policy going forward (preferably without the need for firearms). Elimination of the Federal Reserve being perhaps the most attractive option... hello Ron Paul! =)"

    I bet u would, so u could cause more trouble.

    Looks like "duped" has been aligned with the PlanetQueer/Fagarsie duo for some time now.

    So who are you, "duped"? I'm betting your other name is Sean. And I'm almost certain now that this PlanetQueer/Fagarsie campaign is an intelligence (and I use that word loosely) operation.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:49

    If "duped" IS Sean.. the same Sean, who generally uses the handle SBalger, then his friend Fugazi is probably going to be pretty unhappy about this. tsk tsk

    So I'd wager that it's not him.

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 13:57

    This is from PlanetQuo's own post, in this thread:

    "I gave you my word that I would not reveal details of the information on Nina that you supplied me with. It is, however, that Smith sees what she has told you otherwise I have nothing with which to confront him! Smith needs to explain himself and answer the questions that I will be asking him. If he is clean, he has nothing to hide. In view of this, will you give me permission to reveal the information without naming my source. Smith does not need to know where my information came from. All he needs to know is what Nina has said. He will know whether or not she is telling the truth."

    (Emphasis added.)

    That's an excerpt from an email he wrote to me. As for the quotes I've highlighted in bold, the first is "I gave you my word that I would not reveal details.." The second is "will you give me permission to reveal the information...[?]" The permission was never given. He's since used the information therein to mount an all-out attack on the (possibly disinfo) FC operation, and has set about slandering, defaming, and "exposing" Nina and I, publishing my physical address on his website in the process. Needless to say, that's a threatening gesture and very likely illegal. He has to discredit me in order to discredit Smith, because I've shown him to be a liar; if he doesn't get me off his case, his whole operation is compromised.

    It's also become apparent that he was compiling a file on me the whole time we were "friends". That in itself, is highly suspect.

    When I posted excerpts from our email correspondence as evidence of his deception, I made it very clear that they were excerpts (as if it wasn't already obvious enough). But in his post, he states:

    "James Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion a.k.a. Infensus Mentis conveniently forgot to post the first four paragraphs of the e-mail reproduced above.

    Here are the paragraphs that were edited out:"

    He then goes on to reproduce that particular email in full. It's up there for all to see. There's nothing in it that makes the excerpts I've presented contextually deceptive in any way, but the point was to make me look dishonest and deceitful. Nothing could be further from the truth. I've been extremely careful not to misquote anyone here or present any inaccuracies, because I know who I'm dealing with. Who puts together files like that on people, by the way? Fucking nutcases, that's who. He did one on Nina, too.

    If all this doesn't raise suspicion about the PlanetQuo operation in the minds of the anti-Zionist community, I don't know what will.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 15:17

    I just spotted another deception in PanetQuo's post, above:

    "Linton had good reason to edit the first four paragraphs out, as will soon become apparent. In the event that he should attempt to present further edited or incomplete e-mail correspondence to this forum, I have compiled a list of all correspondence received from Linton. Shuld I have overlooked or omitted any relevant e-mails, then I'm sure Linton will point this out."

    (Emphasis added.)

    In fact, I do have something to point out. PlanetQueer asserts that I "edit(ed) out" the "first four paragraphs" in my demonstration of his lies. In the email he presents above, his statement is "I gave you my word that I would not reveal details of the information on Nina that you supplied me with. It is, however, that Smith sees what she has told you otherwise I have nothing with which to confront him!"

    But I didn't use that particular email to demonstrate his deception. I used (on numerous occasions) this email:

    Re:
    From: planetquo@hotmail.co.uk
    Sent:Wednesday, 25 April 2007 6:36:23 AM
    To: jamie linton (jmzlinton@hotmail.com)

    Hi Jamie,

    I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs.

    Daryl and Eric have regularly called for ALL truth seekers to be investigated - no blind obedience, no exceptions. Fair enough. Daryl is now a part of my NOLAJBS investigation since Nina has been positively-identified as the person who posts on NOLAJBS under the handle of 'A Possum Princess'. If you read the posts that Nina has made on this thread, you'll see that Nina has already weighed in to it - rather heavily too. That was most unwise indeed - live by the sword, die by the sword. You know how I operate Jamie. If Nina is indeed having regular telephone conversations with Daryl, then I will be asking hard questions of Daryl.

    I'm sure I'll find clues in Nina's correspondence. I know what I'm looking for. With regard to The French Connection, I will continue to support and promote the project until if and when I find good reason not to. I reserve judgment until I can establish the facts regarding Nina vis-a-vis Daryl Bradford Smith. I already have a folder on Nina with which I can cross-reference any information that you can supply me with.

    From the events that I witnessing, it is rather clear - to me anyway - that a psyop is taking place right now. I've been following the thread about DBS on Wake Up Your Slumber with great interest. So, someone named 'Poseidon' is the brains behind the Take Back Our World website. This guy's writing and argumentative style are remarkably similar to those of Debus. Although I have no concrete evidence that the Poseidon and Debus handles are being managed by one agent, it would not in the least surprise me to discover this to be the case. Another researcher I liaise with believes that Scott Makufa aka Victor Thorn is Poseidon's true identity. Again, it would come as no great shock if this was actually the case. Nothing surprises me any more. Slowly but surely. masks are beginning to slip and someone is due will soon fall....it won't be me, that's for sure.

    Regards

    Jim

    So where are the "first four paragraphs" I "edited out", you fucking liar?

    "Linton had good reason to edit the first four paragraphs out, as will soon become apparent.

    I've got nothing to hide you fucking lowlife prick, and certainly not now that you've published every last detail you could find about me on your poxy little website.

    Is there anything you've said up there that isn't a lie? The more you rant and lie and spin and deceive, the more your little disinformation operation is exposed for what it is.

    If Fugazi knows what's good for him, he'll distance himself from you and your lies post haste, if credibility is of the slightest concern to him.

    http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

    Crimes of Zion | Tue, 2007-05-22 16:19

    Ok PlanetQuandary.. now, let's see your research... notes... articles... posts... curiosities, etc about Zionism dating from ...say... 2003 and 2004. Mr. Molero has been openly discussing his suspicions in multiple indexed venues (AND acting on them!)since then.

    But then I'm sure you had already published volumes on the subject... only under a different nom de plum, apparently...since Google doesnt seem to have indexed PlanetQuo prior to.. 2006is it??

    I suggest you go back to the drawing board, Jim... how bout taking a couple practice runs exposing.. say like.. Tom Lantos.. or maybe even Wolf Blitzer..? Those two exposes will probably prove plenty challenging for you. Good Luck.

    apossumprincess | Tue, 2007-05-22 17:18

    Whitewraithe said {"Suzette though is an honest person and she was an avid follower of Daryl and Eric - she does not deserve to be treated in this hostile manner by Daryl. The emails he sent to her were distasteful and quite offensive."} I agree whole-heartedly!

    Jesse | Mon, 2007-05-28 10:40

    unclesam wakeup

    How much “MONEY” exists on Earth?
    Take a WILD guess!

    US Gross National Debt

    Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator