Wolves in Sheeps Clothing
http://crescentandcross.wordpress.com/2007/06/02/wolves-in-sheep%e2%80%9...
This article is by Mark Glenn of Crescent and Cross.
Wolves In Sheep’s Clothing–Darryl Bradford Smith’s Talmudic and Zionist View of Jesus
Since having gotten involved in this business of the Middle East conflict (as well as all the other social and cultural problems that we are facing in the West today stemming from Zionist treachery) I have run into hateful statements from Jews who feel it no longer necessary to hide their feelings concerning this man named Jesus and His message. Recently I was sent an email from a ‘nice Jewish boy’ who had the following to say about the man who preached justice, compassion, humility, submission before God and service to fellow man. I apologize ahead of time to the reader for the language.
‘I don’t believe in your PUSSY ON A CROSS GOD…Any fool can believe in a god, and fools like you are soon worm dirt. As for your Christ on the cross, he was a fag with a foot fetish, and your god can suck me. It is time to FLUSH…’
There was more to it of an equally-venomous composition, but I will spare the reader.
Shocking, yes, but should we be in the least bit surprised? After all, ‘they’ do not need to hide such feelings anymore. ‘They’ have all the guns, whether such guns are political, legal, financial or whatnot. ‘They’ have grabbed the most powerful nation in the world by the throat and are able to make it dance like a marionette without a will of its own, and therefore these folks are not as worried as they once were about any bad PR coming from exposing the inner workings of the Beast–meaning the Babylonian Talmud–and all its sentiments concerning–not only Judaism’s organic hatred of Gentiles, but as well its statements concerning Jesus, His holy mother Mary and His followers. Besides gloating over Jesus’ death, I have personally run into Jews who say that He was gay, that He had an incestuous relationship with his mother, that He ‘got what he deserved’ and many, many others statements that would (and indeed should) outrage any Christian or Muslim who holds Jesus in the high esteem that is deserving of who He was and is.
Now, I have run into something equally vicious in its content, both towards the recipient of the email (typical amongst Zionists who cannot express themselves intelligently but who must resort to ugly, vulgar and vindictive language in trying to make their point) as well as to persona of Jesus Christ. The reader will note the common mood in both the emails, although they were–presumably–written by two different authors. I say ‘presumably’ because of the ease with which people can hide their identities online with fake names and email addresses. Again, I apologize ahead of time for the graphic language–
‘Go fuck yourself and all that think like you! Do not write me any more you asshole!!!!!! Bite me! Eat shit and die!!! Or fuck off !! Jesus should have been a victim of abortion!!!’
As I said, assuming that the writers of both these emails are different, nevertheless the two individuals are basically birds of a feather with regards to their sentiments and delivery. They both lash out at others whose opinions they find intolerable and both express themselves with vulgarity and viciousness as if they were addicts of violent pornography.
However, what makes the 2nd email pertinent is the fact that it did not come from the now-typical anti-Christian, anti-Muslim, Jewish-supremacist bigot who is a slave to the idol worship of Zionism, nor from some self-absorbed, dangerous settler living in the West Bank who has made the study of the Talmud his life’s work…
Rather it comes from an individual who has ostensibly made speaking out against Zionism his raison d’etre, who claims that everyone and his brother is an under-cover Zionist trying to fool the unsuspecting masses, and his name is none other than Darryl Bradford Smith of ‘I am the witness’ fame.
Now I realize that the reader is probably sick-to-death of hearing about this business involving Smith and the two pimples on his derriere–Huffschmidt and Bollyn–and I recognize that there are bigger fish to fry these days, but what must be remembered is that we are involved in the fight of our lives and therefore all threats need to be taken seriously. The body of mankind has been invaded by a dangerous, deadly virus and right now the last thing we can afford to have happen is for any of us ‘white blood cells’ to be tricked by other viruses dressed in white-blood-cell-clothing. Lest we forget, we were warned by none other than Jesus himself that there would come a time in the future when evil would be so prevalent that you could slice it with a knife and that false prophets would come to lead people astray. He went further by saying that He sends His followers out as ‘sheep amongst wolves’, warning us to be careful that we are not deceived.
And now it is obvious that we have a new wolf among us pretending to be a sheep. Of course, the signs have been there all along, but for the most part these signs merely suggested that Smith and his 2 cohorts suffered from personality disorders rooted in delusions of grandeur and paranoia. With Smith’s latest verbal defecation however, what we see is that the problem goes much deeper than one of a simple schoolyard bully who thinks that the playground and all its toys are his domain.
In addition to the recent revelations by Christopher Bollyn that Eric Huffschmidt is Jewish and related to ultra-Zionist neo-con Rupert Murdoch by marriage, that Bollyn himself lived in a communist enclave in Israel and was married to a woman whom he claimed was working for Israeli intelligence, we now have an additional piece of the puzzle indicating that the entire ‘I Am the Witness’ operation is an intel-op designed to sow dissention within the anti-Zionist movement and to lead people’s energies and resources off into a direction where they pose no threat to the overall agenda.
The latest revelation is one that (like all great discoveries that have benefited mankind in the past) came by accident in an email exchange between Smith and one of his followers. This individual (who shall remain anonymous at this moment) was, up until this point a faithful devotee and was questioning some of the seemingly irrational, baseless and contradictory accusations that Smith was making about other individuals within the truth movement whom she knew to be genuine. As is typical with all cult leaders, free thought and free inquiry are intolerable vices and something for which Smith obviously has no patience, as evidenced by the tone of his podcasts and website with the now infamous ‘YOU ARE EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US’ and ‘EITHER JOIN WITH US OR BE COUNTED AS OUR ENEMIES’ statements. When the former follower refused to relent with her questioning, Smith let loose with the aforementioned barrage of graphic and vulgar insults.
Just to make sure that all the i’s were dotted and t’s crossed, I contacted Smith personally and enquired as to the veracity of this charge. His response was of the typically-Jewish variety, meaning haughty, unrepentant, and expressed in the form of a one-sentence, smart-alek, non-answer-of-an-answer. When I let him know that I planned on writing something about it, his response was to the effect of ‘Print whatever you want’. Again, in the interest of affording him the opportunity of refuting his statement or at least explaining it contextually (how one could do that, given its nature is beyond me) I again contacted him with other questions, and, again, his response was to ‘Go ahead with it’, adding that he didn’t want ‘religious assholes’ around him anyway. Finally, in the same brave, fearless, manly fashion that Smith constantly claims is his calling card as an anti-NWO, anti-Zionist freedom-fighter he threatened to sue me if I breathed a word about the incident.
It is fairly well-known that Smith–sadly–suffers from alcoholism, and if other reports are true he is also presently suffering from serious liver problems that may be terminal in nature. This being said, it is easy to chalk this latest incident up to the fact that as a result of his sickness he may not be of ‘perfectly sound mind’. We should all certainly hope that this is the case, for the good of his own immortal soul.
Nevertheless, we also have to pay heed to the words of Jesus himself who–when dealing with the viciousness of His own Jewish-supremacist enemies–said that ‘Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks’. Whether Smith nurses an organic, visceral hatred of Jesus (to the point where he believes the world would be better off had Jesus been cut to pieces in utero rather than cut to pieces by his Jewish supremacist enemies 33 years later) or whether it is the booze talking, the fact is that the diagnosis his words provide indicate he is one sick puppy and perhaps should be avoided at all costs.
Personally, if someone accused me of saying something as horrendous as ‘Jesus should have been aborted’ I would be horrified beyond words and would not rest until I had done all that I could in refuting it. In my opinion there is nothing more horrible or evil that could be said than this. It is something straight out of the Talmud itself, the same Talmud responsible for bringing forth the vicious creature known as Communism responsible for butchering hundreds of millions of people in the last century, the same Talmud that has spawned Zionism that has butchered millions of innocent Muslim and Christian Arabs and which has plunged humanity into the war to end all wars, and yes, the same Talmud Smith and the rest of his entourage pretend to oppose with their website and pod cast.
Is Smith a closet Talmudist who is working in the service of the Zionist agenda? Only time and circumstances will tell. What must be remembered though are the following established facts–
1. He is joined at the hip with a known Jew who in the initial days following 9/11 conspicuously avoided mentioning Israel’s role…
2. He works closely with another individual who lived in Israel and was married to a Zionist Jewess whom he himself has claimed worked for Mossad…
3. He has spent the last year dividing the anti-Zionist movement, casting slurs and suspicion upon everyone who has been working assiduously to expose the inner-workings of what is taking place, and now-
4. He has spoken the language of the Pharisees themselves in saying that Jesus should have been murdered. At the very least, what we can glean from his statement is that he–like the Jewish supremacists who are out to destroy the world today with their poison–revels in the hateful, ignominious end that Jesus endured.
Jesus warnings were clear–that we were not be fooled by ‘men who dress themselves in sheep’s clothing but who inside are ravenous wolves…By their fruits you shall know them.’ By his recent statement and refused denial of same, Darryl Bradford Smith has now revealed himself for what he truly is–an under-cover follower of Talmudic thinking, despite whatever flowery, patriotic and high-sounding words he may offer in the meantime. People of good will who are interested in knowing the truth about what the REAL reasons are for all the chaos that has descended upon the world would be best served to avoid Smith and his operations as if collectively they were a colony of lepers. The fact that he would make such a statement betrays the fact that he does not understand the true gravity of what is taking place in the world today with regards to the battle between the philosophies of Christ and AntiChrist.
In the best of circumstances, he is a madman who does not understand the gravity of his words nor the diabolic sentiments that fuel them…
In the worst of circumstances, he is an enemy who is bent upon the destruction of all that we hold dear.
2007 by Mark Glenn, correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper
So, everyone is supposed to believe the hearsay of this 'private e-mail'? If Smith did say that, it is definitely regrettable.
If Eric's wife's sister marries a prominent zionist Jew, tell me, how much influence does he have over that? What are the chances he's in their will? And what wrongdoing is this proof of?
And Christopher is divorced from an israeli Jew, who is claimed was a spook. Perhaps his new wife is a spook too? Again, proof of wrongdoing is much more important than hearsay, suspicions and character judgements/assasinations.
I will learn whatever I can from whatever sources, and judge the truth for myself. Such zealous fervor from a few overly dedicated people here!
Why not discredit Alex "The evidence against Israel is circumstancial" Jones? Perhaps because Daryl has already done that, and the many zionist infiltrators are now desperate to discredit him with *tadaa*; Talmudic revenge!
Grim Reality,
Are you suggesting that Mark Glenn is a Zionist infiltrator?
WHIP IT GOOD, WHIP IT STRAIGHT,
WHIP IT TO DEATH, WHIPPETTE
If it walks like the same old bullshit, talks like the same old bullshit, and smells like the same old bullshit, it is the same old bullshit.
Refreshing. Truly.
NEVER forget that the Zionists own the MSM but could never take over the alt media; IT'S WAAAAAAAAAY TOO EXPENSIVE.
Ergo, they have unleashed the "3 Key Guys" who will single-handedly divide the troof movement and thwart the "1000s of Pesky Researchers" who would otherwise bring their plans crashing down.
Truly empowering to know that Smith's cursing is Talmudic and that Glenn is an immaculate anti-Zionist shill.
Suse me, I gotta go reset my compass.
At Last ! The only known extant photograph of that elusive iconoclast and closeted Talmudic scholar,
Daryl Bradford Smith, taken sometime in May, somewhere in the Alsatian foothills of France.
“So, everyone is supposed to believe the hearsay of this 'private e-mail'? If Smith did say that, it is definitely regrettable.”
So far, Daryl hasn’t denied writing it. So why doesn’t he just apologize and be done with it? Why would he insult the beliefs of a dedicated follower who wants answers to simple questions? If DBS can’t handle that, he ain’t ready for prime time with the Zionists, unless he is one of them.
The totality of circumstances is making Daryl & Co look bad. The longer they go in silence, the more suspicion they bring on themselves. It’s as simple as that.
Do they really think that they are so high and mighty that they can’t answer a few questions? They want answers about everyone else, but they won’t answer a few questions themselves? Did they really think people wouldn’t start asking questions about them?
Contempt for your enemy is one thing, but contempt for your followers? Seriously, should you listen to people like that?
‘Why not discredit Alex "The evidence against Israel is circumstancial" Jones? Perhaps because Daryl has already done that, and the many zionist infiltrators are now desperate to discredit him with *tadaa*; Talmudic revenge!’
DBS opened himself up to it. He should know better than that if he’s such a genius at snuffing out Zionists. I guess you don’t understand the concept of different levels of deception and that TFC could be part of an effort that’s counter intuitive.
“Suse me, I gotta go reset my compass.”
That’s not all u have to reset.
how much Mark Glenn knows the work of Daryl and Eric if he can't even spell their names right.
I don't believe it; how am I supposed to know who's who in cyber-land? All I know is there's a whole bunch of bullsh*t being spead around!
It's obvious that the zionists would infiltrate the various peace and political movements, as well as the alternative press. Spying is their specialty, sort of like counterfeiting people!
All I know is that while Alex Jones has a blind spot for zionism, Daryl Smith attacks it relentlessly.
We'll just have to wait and see if TFC trio actually do anything wrong. There are plenty of quality interviews worth listening to, and good articles as well.
Hilarious picture Quasi! lol
It's baffling:
1- why the email texts which provoked such a response are not being presented for a fair assessment.
2- why MG is speaking up on behalf of this lady without any explanation.
The original emails are viewable at these links. Daryl Bradford Smith has never denied sending these emails.
http://planetquo.net/NOLAJBS/Screenshots/Large/AbusiveE-Mail1.bmp
http://planetquo.net/NOLAJBS/Screenshots/Large/AbusiveE-Mail2.bmp
Convenient how whatever was said to set Daryl off is cut out from the pic.
It is obvious that there's a dispute between some in AFP and TFC, with large helpings of hearsay. Who's right, who knows, maybe no one; who even cares?
It seems to me that quite a few people a zealously ganging up and attacking TFC trio, because they dared to point the finger at infiltrators within the troof movement. If it weren't for Daryl and people like him, more of us would still be doing laps around ground-zero, divining the next attack with Luciferian number counting, yelling Bush did 9/11.
No excuse for Bush implied.
Good comments Grim but I doubt it'll make a dent.
Duper says, "The totality of circumstances is making Daryl & Co look bad. The longer they go in silence, the more suspicion they bring on themselves. It’s as simple as that."
Sorry. That's weak minded crap. There's been plenty o' flapdoodle about some smelly molehill of "circumstantial evidence," but it is merely a collection of innuendo, gossip, and injured feelings AT BEST.
The more likely explanation is that ABSENT any serious charge against Smith, it's the time-tested death by a thousand paper cuts routine. Run a full on smear campaign and hope to wear down the target and "dupe" the easily swayed who will forget TFC's body of work to go running down some endless blind alley.
Daryl's only mistake was to engage the bullshit artists and waste his energy "debating" them in the BLOWJOBSLAB or wherever the hell it was.
This asshole Glenn calls the exasperated cussing "Talmudic" and there's some horseshit innuendo along the lines of DBS is "guilty" of "murdering Jesus." Whatever Glenn has posted in the past, this kind of dipshit reasoning reeks of dishonesty. If he's not embarrassed, he's a fraud.
Grim, it's not Eric's wife's sister, it's Eric's sister Kathryn Hufschmid who married Rupert Murdoch's son James. James is regarded as heir-apparent to his father's media empire, following his older brother Lachlan's 2005 resignation from his executive positions at News Corp. James Murdoch is CEO of British Sky Broadcasting Group, and Lord Jacob Rothschild is non-executive Deputy Chairman. Earlier this year, Rupert gave each of his six children $100 million in shares, although the $600 million total is a small fraction of his entire holding of well over $8 billion in shares.
This, along with the evidence of Eric's part-Jewish status, would explain Eric's actions such as covering up Israel's role in 9/11 in his book and video, when others such as Mike Piper and David Duke were already exposing Zionist involvement, and Eric's role in deliberately stirring up trouble within the anti-Zionist movement by claiming 99% of 9/11 truth seekers are worthless and part of "the criminal network", and all of his rivals are "Zionist agents". Maybe he could be excused his Zionist denial phase, but I would class spreading such obvious disinformation as "99% are agents" as wrongdoing. And given Eric's Zionist-denial book and video, his accusations that people such as William Rodriguez are "covering up" for Israel are complete humbug.
According to Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Smith, the following are suspected "Zionist agents": Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Ingrid Rimland, Frederick Toben, Mark Glenn, David Irving, David Duke, Mike Piper, Mike Berger, Jim Hoffman, Gerard Holmgren, Wayne Madsen, Kurt Nimmo, Webster Tarpley, Frank Whalen, Willis Carto, Christopher Petherick, John Stadtmiller, Dylan Avery, Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Eustace Mullins, William Rodriguez, Mike Rivero,, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ellen Mariani, Sam Danner, Jim Hoffman, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and countless others, 99% of the truth movement. They are mixing a few probable or possible agents with honest people. If almost all of these people were really agents, then Eric and Daryl would be vindicated. However, folk are increasingly recognising that it is Eric, Daryl and Christopher who match the profile of agents.
Quite a few it seems, I wonder how many actually are zionist deniers or agents, and to what degree. Consider that the zionist network in any medium sized town in america is going to be bigger than that list.
I think Eric should come clean about his half sister, whether it's true or not, because that would be the best way to deal with it. There's nothing anyone else can say about it that's going to make a difference, it has to come from him.
I think that TFC trio would have done much better just to continue their research, and pick their fights wisely, because every one they point the finger at is going to have a group of friends and collaboraters who, right or wrong, are going to all attack the messenger.
So, they, and we, should stick to research and constructive activities. Perhaps we can get a straight answer out of Eric about his half sister, but besides that I don't see anything else that merits our attention.
Thanks for listening!
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_2Jun2007.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo0yuWsF-vs
The Zionists must have thousands of agents. Those 30 are just some of the prominent anti-Zionist figures in the revisionist, 9/11 truth, nationalist / anti-globalist, and anti-Judaic movements who have been singled out as "suspicious" on TFC website or by Daryl in his audio files. Some of them are indeed suspicious. But to cast aspersions on people like Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zundel and to suggest that 99% of the - mostly unknown and anonymous - members of the 9/11 truth movement are part of the criminal network is being deliberately provocative.
James and Kathryn Murdoch were dinner guests of Tony and Cherie Blair on Saturday 17 July 2004 [for official .pdf file listing guests, see here]. Other guests at that dinner party included Paul Myners, who previously worked at investment bank NM Rothschild; Phil Bobbit, who could well be the Philip Bobbitt who is the infamous LBJ's nephew and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and who specialises in terrorism and constitutional law and has written about "conspiracy theorists" who are "calculatedly malevolent" and whose surname gets misspelt in reports; and John Reid, British Home Secretary who said in May 2007 that human rights might have to be suspended and a state of emergency declared as part of the "fight against terrorism".
James and Kathryn are a new entry at number 74 in the Tatler's 100 most invited celebrities list. As of 2007, Kathryn Murdoch is employed by the Clinton Foundation, working on climate change issues.
According to Chris Bollyn, Benjamin Chertoff is a cousin of Michael Chertoff, although Benjamin denies any such connection. If Bollyn is correct, then 9/11 truthers would, quite rightly, have no problems accepting that this would account for Popular Mechanics' pseudoscientific 'debunking' of WTC demolition theories.
Similarly, we know that the bin Laden family were business partners of the Bush family and, prior to 9/11, had invested about $10 million in an equity fund run by a Bechtel subsidiary with former U.S. Secretary of State and former Bechtel President George P. Shultz on the board, giving the bin Ladens an interest in the reconstruction of Iraq. The idea that Osama could be a black sheep, who would turn against his family and their associations to such an extent that he would kill thousands of Americans in a senseless, motiveless act of terrorism is crazy enough to be dismissed. Especially when there is no credible evidence to support it. It is possible that, with a poor prognosis due to kidney disease, Osama - dead or alive - would continue a role as a CIA / Zionist asset in order to make his family a few million dollars, although only intel agencies would have the resources and reliability to actually orchestrate the "new Pearl Harbor". And only a group with control of the mainstream media could hope to prevent the truth getting out into the mainstream for any reasonable length of time.
Yet Kathryn Hufschmid is courted by the Clintons, the Blairs, is married to Rupert Murdoch's heir apparent, and her husband is CEO of a company which has Jacob Rothschild as Deputy Chairman, but her brother is supposed to be regarded as a "genuine" anti-Zionist, anti-establishment type when the increasingly bizarre behavior of Eric and his associates demonstrates that they are part of an intel op. There seems to be one law for "unsophisticated" disinfo agents, and another law for sophisticated agents whose job explicitly involves posing as "anti-Zionists" and telling genuine truth seekers what they want to hear in order to be accepted as "genuine".
Piper's January 10, 2007 show has a bit about the preliminary P.I. report into Bollyn (36:50). Piper said that AFP - or The Spotlight - should have carried out the investigation before they hired Bollyn. The P.I. said [re Bollyn], "Who is this guy?" in wonderment. He found Chris Bollyn is on the payroll of foreign sources, but that could range from foreign governments to money laundered via foreign corporations. And Bollyn was pleading poverty, trying to get suckers to donate to his "legal fund"! Listen to Piper, March 8, 2007 [13:35] for a further report on this investigation into Bollyn.
Here's some food for thought: Consider the final definition of "playing possum" at this link, how Mordechai Vanunu was lured to Rome, and to what extent the dynamic of internet forums can serve as a microcosm of the external world.
Eric and Daryl ask:
I can't speak for AFP, but from my understanding Bollyn's articles were found to be unreliable, and his associates condemned AFP as "Zionist-controlled". AFP's subsequent investigation into Bollyn found that he was receiving money from overseas and had been visited by folks in cars bearing untraceable license plates. Mark Glenn, in contrast, is an honest reporter.
Translation: We hope some suckers will believe our claims that AFP are "Zionists" and Glenn is an "idiot" or an "agent"; the Rothschilds are on our backs complaining that we're doing a poor job. We're supposed to lure truth seekers away from genuine anti-Zionist sources and into a goy pen where they can do no harm. We know full well that AFP and Glenn are genuine. Hence, we must attack them as "Zionists".
So what does that mean, if Eric's half-sister is married to one of Mudoch's sons? Does that mean he's in the will? Is this proof of some actual wrongdoing? Many families have had disputes ending in murder! In fact, you're more likely to be victimized by someone you know, even a bloody family member, than a stranger!
Smith does interviews with officer James Ennes, who survived the USS Liberty attack by zionists who wanted to make sure no one found out about the killing of 1000 Egyptian POW's (who were made to dig their own graves), as well as to blame Egypt for the (well planned by israel) False Flag attack, thus allowing zionist israel to take over Egypt with the USA's help, to checkmate the Russians.
I don't profess to know exactly who's who on the internet, I just check all the sources of info I please, then judge them for myself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsjlfEw9uyo
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsEnnis.html
Dead in the Water 2002
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6595846710992512471
than argue with eachother over who is and is not a crypto-whatever?
what a waste of bandwidth.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
I totally Agree. 100%. Qrswave.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.
"It's baffling:
1- why the email texts which provoked such a response are not being presented for a fair assessment."
"Convenient how whatever was said to set Daryl off is cut out from the pic."
-----------------------------------------
Suzette Bates 05/08/07 8:13 AM
Are you really fighting the Z's effectively?
Daryl and Eric
One reason I ask this is because you have said nary a word recently about the possible passage of the "hate crimes" bill looming on the horizon. Nor has anything been posted at your website recently. Is this not important, or does your "fight against Zionism" consist mainly in attacking others? By the way RBN features this information on the "hate crimes" bill quite prominently at its website.
And Eric, you have been exhorting a call to arms recently, to go lynch these Zionist judges, politicians, etc. Will you be the first to lead the charge?! It is rash for you to suggest such a thing and would do more harm than good. Several months ago, a caller to an RBN broadcast suggested the same thing. Eric, you roundly criticized him on air, and on Daryl's website and said he was trying to stir up trouble.
And furthermore, Eric's "attacking" of Jim Condit Jr greatly bothers me. Jim's Precinct Plan is an excellent strategy for fighting the Zionist stranglehold of America. Jim's latest audio file and a link to his site should be posted promimently at the iamthewitness website.
Jim Condit Jr and Ted Pike have real plans to effectively fight Zionism. Does your attacking others really accomplish anything effective? Or is it a divide and conquer? A controlled oppositon? A neutralizing of effective people.
At your website is posted "Investigate all truthseekers, no exceptions, no blind obedience". Does this apply to the two of you, or are you exempt?
Sincerely,
Suzette
************************************************************************************************
We have talked about these hate crimes, and even interviewed Ted Pike. Why are you always making accusations that we are not doing enough? How much are we supposed to do when I have to work for a living, and Daryl is getting increasingly weak and slowly dying?
We are having trouble just getting people to care about what is happening to him Christopher Bollyn.
There is nothing wrong with Ted Pike concentrating on the hate laws, and someone else concentrating on some other area. But none of us can even get our own relatives or neighbors to care about anything.
************************************************************************************************
Suzette Bates 05/08/07 9:22 AM
Eric.
You haven't had Ted Pike on lately, nor has anything been mentioned about this "hate crime" bill which the ADL has been pursuing relentlessy. Yet, RBN continues to inform people about this! How much work would it take for you to post a link to Ted Pike's webiste and write a short blurb about it? And Daryl could have said a couple of sentences on his broadcast yesterday.
You had time to write a very lengthy article on your website. Dumbing Down Part 2. (I glanced through it last night). I see nothing but lame excuses in your reply to me. But oh, I forgot, I am just a stupid woman, and need a man to do my thinking for me. (This is in reference to what you wrote in this article that men are smarter than women). Also, you said that women are more inhibited about their showing their bodies now.
Say what?!! Women are far more than ever going out in public almost naked. The trend is for women to wear less and less clothing for public consumption, both in the media and ordinary women in everyday life and out on the street.
Also, you link a lot to judicial-inc.biz which has links to white supremacist sites on the bottom of its homepage. What is it you say about investigating people's associations?! Isn't Jim Condit Jr's "association" with so-called "white supremacists" the reason that you attacked him on publicly on the airwaves? Or is this another double-standard, which you are applying to others and not yourself?
Suzette
************************************************************************************************
I put something up for you in the news section. I even put a link to one of ted pikes videos along with the BBC video. Are you happy now?
Why don't you tell Ted Pike to get involved with 9/11 and the Apollo moon landing? How about telling Jim Condit to promote us?
You've been so angry lately... what is the matter?
************************************************************************************************
Suzette Bates 05/08/07 1:02 PM
Thank you, Eric for posting this at Daryl's site. I can't check it out here it work.
I haven't really had any communication with Ted Pike.
Jim Condit Jr is more than willing to work with you. I think you know that. But it is a two-way street. How do you expect him to promote you more, when you are "attacking" him? Jim sent you a recent email explaining his associations with people you regard as suspicious. It was most eloquent and well-said. Jim "defended" himself well. In your answer to him, you didn't address any of these issues.
Why have I been angry lately? Well, you know, I am just your typical, silly, emotional woman. But seriously, it is because you are not holding yourself up to the same standards that you apply to all other truthseekers.
Take care,
Suzette
************************************************************************************************
Suzette Bates 05/09/07 9:22 AM
Eric,
Will you please post the letter prominently (as well as the link to it) from a Christopher Bollyn supporter at the top of Chris's page at iamthewitness? Helje suggested you do this. This supporter urges Chris NOT to accept the plea bargain; advice with which I fully concur! http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=1038
Have you advised Chris in this matter? Have you perhaps advised Christo accept the plea bargain? Just imagine what a field day Piper et al, would have if Chris accepted the plea bargain. They would say, "AHa! We were right. Chris is just a bald-faced liar!" I also suggest you have a prominent link at the top of Chris's homepage on Daryl's site, to Chris's websitew ww.bollynbooks.com I am glad that you revised the email message (per Helje's very prudent request) to send to the Hoffman Estate mayor, police, etc. Your original message was rash and could easily have given the wrong impression, as well as further ammunition for Chris's enemies. However, I did notice that the revised message has not been copied into all the emails completely. The last words are left off of the last sentence.
Suzette
************************************************************************************************
"Daryl Bradford Smith" 05/09/07 3:03 PM
Suzette bite me! Eat shit and die!!! Or fuck off !! Jesus shoud have been a victim of abortion!!! Are you gettig my message??
************************************************************************************************
Suzette Bates 05/09/07 3:09 PM
Daryl,
You can swear at me, that;'s all right. But it is not all right that you are blaspheming Our Lord. The Talmudic Jews would be very proud of you! Madthumbs was right about one thing. You are anti-Christian.
I think it's clear where you stand. This has been noted. When you and Eric say investigate all truthtellers, you are not applying this same standard to yourselves.
************************************************************************************************
Suzette Bates 05/09/07 3:15 PM
Eric,
At least you don't use such bad language and blaspheme Our Lord to me. Such vitriol from Daryl! At least I have forced the issue and know where the two of you really stand now.
Your very silence in not addressing my suspicions of you indeed speaks volumes. I hope I am wrong about you. If I am, I will apologize to you and the others that I have voiced my suspicions to.
Suzette
************************************************************************************************
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Do you really support Bollyn?! and Jim Condit Jr
From: "Suzette Bates"
Date: Wed, May 09, 2007 8:55 pm
To: iamthewitness@hotmail.com, smith@iamthewitness.com
Daryl,
I also sent the email below to your email address at smith@iamthewitness.com just to make sure that you get it. (Does Eric have access to your smith@iamthewitness.com email account?) I think Jim Condit Jr's Precinct Plan needs to be front and center again at your website! Jim will be releasing a new video soon. As Jim said, once he releases his video, we will see "who falls where". If you and Eric don't support Jim Condit Jr's Precinct Plan, then I really have to question your said mission of "fighting Zionism". As Jim so aptly put it, anyone who doesn't support the Precinct Plan, (which is the only action plan that I know of) must be suspected of running out the clock until the Zionist's take full control. Indeed "fighting" Zionism may be all you are doing, rather than trying to END the Zionist control. As you said on yesterday's audio file, "Don't make it a personality battle here", and "Put personalities aside, I will try to do the same". We must work together to take back control of the world from the Zionists, not fight one another because of things we don't agree with, or "associations" we don't approve of. As you said on yesterday's show, You have been fooled before. Maybe Eric has been fooling all of us. Suzette
************************************************************************************************
"Daryl Bradford Smith" 05/09/07 23:03 PM
Go fuck yourself and all that think like you! Do not write me any more you asshole!!!!!!
************************************************************************************************
Daryl is not interested in religion. His brother lectures him every time he talks to him, so Daryl hasn't been talking to him much anymore. His brother is a very religious Catholic.
< GORT ! KLAATU ! VERADA NIKTO !
E-Mail from Michael Collins Piper to GORT -
< GORT !
< KLAATU !
< VERADA NIKTO !
E-mail from Whippette to Poseidon -
< GORT !
< AFFIRMATIVE.
< KLAATU !
< AFFIRMATIVE.
< VERADA NIKTO !
< NEGATIVE.
E-mail from GORT to Whippette -
< KLAATU !
< VERADA !
< NIKTO !
This all may well be true, but is Mark Glen willing to expose the Jews on RBN too? Lets expose "all" the lies, shall we?
"We all killed Jesus" Bill OReilly and Mel Gibson
A few quick comments:
1. A huge volume for barely two days of communication.
2. Eric's comment (You've been so angry lately...) suggests this communications have been going on for some time.
3. Suzette's questions and comments (for these days) don't seem unreasonable, but clearly poking, nitpicking, and micromanaging.
4. Last phone interview of victor Thorn (alias) of Wing TV with Eric is a classical textbook of techniques for self incriminating provocation (to get Eric to say some thing on air that is legally prosecutable, under the guise of interview).
5. Daryl's street fighter retort seems stemming from a longer frustration.
6. The biggest problem with Daryl and to some extent Eric is that they are not "leaders". If you ask them to give a talk on "leadership qualities", the talk would most likely not last more than 3 min. But this is a problem for people who are looking for leadership, which I believe most of us are NOT. This is not about an organized communist like uprising. This is more about grass root collective resistance to domination. Most people are looking for someone honest, untethered, intelligent (enough), and contributing. To this end, I (still) believe DEC are. The rest should depend on our maturity to filter out some irritating personality issues, as opposed to constantly poking at it.
7. I think MG is doing himself and his colleagues a disservice by writing low quality articles that needs somebody's liver to make his point. I held him at higher caliber.
that was a helpful comment.
I too believe Glenn has written much better pieces.
His work is, generally, outstanding.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
Please no personal attacks on Bollyn!! If you can debunk Bollyn's WORK you are welcome to let us know.
My subjective impression is that Bollyn's work is rock-solid. I have some doubts about DBS and Hufschmid, and the American Free Press.
We should be wary of elaborate operations that seek to ensnare are discredit honest researchers.
And i thought questioning people's credibility was forbidden on this blog-site already.
So what if Eric is partly jewish, btw? i have read absolutely not a single line of what i would consider to be "jewish propaganda mentality" in his articles. If he is a jewish, even partly, i must admit that my low opinion of jews in general is obviously wrong and jews actually are capable of substance and content instead of empty cleverness and snide remarks and one-liners.
i don't like Jesus, btw, or that is rather mild, i could say i hate him, at least i hate christianity. Does that make me a zionist?
i think there is a wealth of good non-jews who think jesus was one of the worst things bestowed upon mankind.
Give me the pagan religion of ancient Rome any day of the week over that garbage.
But you see, that's one problem i have with some of this zionist-opposition.
It seems that with people such as Jim Condit we'd be exchanging one tyranny for another. i want mankind to be free again. To live the way they want and to have the gods they want. i don't want to exchange the vulgar godlessness of today to "moral" repression of tomorrow.
Over and out.
For what people did in his name!
Religion is only viable if people are not forced into it, just as is any other ideal. Religions of today were not created by the prophets, but by generations of followers, many who failed to understand the message.
You won't catch me worshipping planets, lol. The Creator of the Universe, now that's another story!
I think Daryl is used by Christopher and Eric. I once trusted Christopher , but his stories seems never to add up and then say him and Piper were never friends. Darly's show seems to be nothing but a whinefest and just go after people and attack them. Yes people have issues, like AFP, I subscribe to them but have issues with them too. Daryl mentioned all the so called jewish people being on RBN. He should pay atention and realize they left when RBN was getting attacked and taken down. There are few people out there who know about 9/11, there are even fewer who know who was REALLY behind it, no it wasnt Bush. Does anyone honestly on this forum think that everything is or can be infiltrated and we just have to use our brain to sort through the information. My problem with Christians is they complain about the disgusting Talmud, but I mean open up the old testament and read the vile stuff in there. I call myself a Christian too, but lets not have it both ways. Every other word out of Daryl recently attacked Mark Glenn for saying that Johnson knew about the attack of the Liberty ahead of time. Does he not realize that The US govt is controlled by the jews/ zionists and that Johnson was an idiot. I mean was it Israel that told Johnson to get in Vietnam? No it was the Bolshevik / Communists arm of the Rothschild empire. This is what many people in the anti zionists movement commonly avoid so they don't appear to be knocking all Jews. The Neocons, Zionist have really grown into power for the last 30-40 years or so, but before that they were controlled by the Bolshevik/ Communists. Either way its always been by the Jewish Rothschild family. I however agree with Daryl that not all jews are involved, but they do not do much to stop it.
Anyway you look at it, whether McNam and Johnson knew in advance; took their orders and/or planned it, or whether they just covered it up, recalling the backup and sacrificing dozens more soldiers ->> IT'S TREASON EITHER WAY, PUNISHABLE BY DEATH.
I find it funny how people can't seem to figure out TFC's angle on things, I find the interviews and research quite educational and revealing.
Daryl is ex-navy, an american patriot, doing the work he's doing has made him paranoid, and rightfully so. The attacks on him are half-baked distortions and flimsy personal attacks that don't even touch on the research he's doing.
Eric has provided many intersting insights into the nature of things, and is not afraid to speak his mind. I think he should have included the israeli connection in his book/video, perhaps in a revised edition! Whether it's true about his half sister being married to a prominent joo family or not, he's acutally going to have to shoot himself in the foot before I pass judgement on this one.
Christopher has done many articles on contentious issues, most of which would be banned by mainsteam media! I think he deserves our support, unless you agree with the Nazi's point of view. Who was it that said they were traffic cops? They were a tactical team! Does it even matter if the cops that beat you down in front of your entire family, in your own front yard, break your arm, taser you, then charge YOU; does it even matter if they are traffic or tactical?
Christopher's case is being prosecuted by ZIONISTS, on the premise of the articles he's written! The undercover police were sent most likely by these zionut prosecutors.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/nearnorthwest/chi-bollyn_01jun0...
http://www.dailyherald.com/news/cookstory.asp?id=318760&cc=c&tc=&t=
Notice the obvious differences in, and the slant of both articles?
I think Mark Glenn's piece is terrible, and he's working with a large group of people who want to discredit all three. Likely he was paid extra for that tripe, like the many sellout journalists and editors. I sense Alex Jones in the background, laughing and getting his revenge.
That private investigator thing with the spooky license plates and overseas money transfers smells like bullsh*t to me, or at very least unfounded insinuations.
It is no coincidence that the all out attack on TFC, the Bollyn attack, the AFP attacks and their witholding and returning of legal defense funds happened around the same time. The zionuts are pissed that some of their shills in the 911 troof movement have lost credibility, and that people are now getting educated about zionism.
I have my own way of thinking and follow no leader. I may get fooled for a time, but will always figure it out.
Anyone who speaks in such a manner about Jesus Christ is not a truth teller.
NO WAY NO HOW.
I FIND HIS COMMENTS EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire
I wasn't too impressed with his athiest self either, but just look at the history of religion, often good things; but many bad as well.
So an athiest blasphemes, does that mean that everything else this guy says is a lie, or what portion therof, or exaclty what? Does this make him a Talmudi?
What's with all these e-mails? Am I supposed to automantically believe all this sh*t to be authentic, when the people we're talking about aren't even here to defend themselves?
I reserve the right to change my mind. =P
So if having a track record as a guy that will (Without any other problems Other than having asked a pointed Q: or two about the issues with TFC content) and then using whatever means to spue lies that the Questioner was a "Troublemaker" and was "Causing fights and infighting" type condemnations.
http://mathaba.net/news/?x=540709
He does it to me at above comments. And i see him do it to ANYONE that is not in line with his PROGRAMMING.
He to this day refuses to say ANYTHING about the Ben fredman thing he spurts about constantly.
I think Suzzette even questioned him seriously about her issues and he snapped and went to work on her. Doing a fair amount of it here even all the time his Cloak of NSA clothing is rapidly becoming transparent to some and withering to most.
Me i think Mark Glen is right. I think Daryl is doing more of the audio from a drugged condition from the weird flakiness of recent postings of his both on this site and his. And some subtle signs point to a house bound Sutter with a increased stress level. The causes of his recent doings is unknown but the "Get yer Guns Show" Told me a Whole volume about the smelly cranial unit emanations of Mr Sutter.
I would just stop Daryl. Stop all the crap already. The Amount of folk that are wise to your path WILL defend the Naive and uneducated. I said i will be here. Others are here and we are not in need of your feed. Your Chow is unhealthy and it is going to get you Daryl if you let it.
Just Quit. It is your last real hope.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.
I don't espouse gun use either, smash, but you gotta keep in mind that this guy was in the navy. There's a fear of being disarmed and unready for the coming unrest, where the government could be your worst nightmare, let alone everybody else; armed or not.
If I ask the guy, you know if this crap about Eric's sister is true or not, and he just goes iron-chef rabbid on me, then I'll stop defending him, but that doesn't necessarily make me assume too many things.
We're not voting for who's gonna be the next saint here; to follow blindly! I'd like to meet just one person who's never said anything stupid, lost their temper, or made any mistakes; just one!
Then sling that stone, David!