Secret Relationship Between Israel and Oil

What the Zionized US media hides from Americans...

The Secret Relationship Between Israel and Oil: What the US Media Hides

by Wendy Campbell • Friday October 01, 2004 at 10:59 PM

I have found that there is nothing more inspiring than taking a trip, especially to a foreign country where I leave behind my daily routine, including e-mails and the internet, to get to think outside the box and to get a chance to write down my thoughts.

The moment of inspiration for me to start writing this article on this latest trip, to Baja Mexico, came moments after I stepped into the Alaska Airlines jet and picked up the complimentary issue of The Wall Street Journal.

Generally I avoid mainstream media these days since I know it is mostly pro-Israel propaganda as well as blown-up sensationalistic stories such as the case of Scott Peterson, meant to distract people from the more important issues of our time, such as the US foreign policy, for example.

The article in the Wall Street Journal dated September 21, 2004, that rankled me into finally writing this article which has been brewing in my mind for some time was one by Jeffrey Ball entitled "As Prices Soar, Doomsayers Provoke Debate on Oil's Future".

The sub-title was: "In a 1970's echo, Dr. Campbell (no relation to me!) Warns Supply Is Drying Up, but Industry Isn't Worried". Now let me explain to you that I have already come to the conclusion a while ago that this controversy about the 'shortage of oil' is being pushed forward by mostly pro-Israel forces for their own narrow agenda that has nothing to do with the vast majority of the American people's interests.

Even in this article, it is explained that: "Dr. Campbell is at the center of a small but suddenly influential band of contrarians known as the 'peak oil movement'".

US MEDIA DECIDES WHO WILL BE SPOTLIGHTED IN THE MEDIA

Is it a coincidence that Dr. Campbell is "suddenly influential"? No, it is not. Even the Wall Street Journal is playing into the game of making Dr. Campbell "suddenly influential" with this article.

Why is the US media pushing Dr. Campbell, a man who lives in a tiny Irish village, into the limelight? Because the media, which is run by pro-Israel forces, want people like Dr. Campbell to be in the limelight is why.

And you may ask, why is that? Well, because Dr. Campbell's views help support the pro-Israel agenda of that other "suddenly influential band of contrarians", known as the NeoConservatives. The NeoConservatives are mostly Zionist Jews, headed by Paul Wolfowitz, who qualify as Israeli Americans, and who are now openly directing our US foreign policy almost completely.

Christian Zionists such as Bush and Cheney have jumped on their bandwagon. Of course, it looks even more convincing when a non-Jew such as Dr. Campbell, puts forward claims that will lend support to the pro-Israel agenda.

People whose voices the US media wants you to hear will be heard. Conversely, people whose voices and actions the US media want to hide, will go into the memory hole. It's only an illusion that we have a free and democratic press here in the US.

Personally, I think it's about time to vote for affirmative action laws with regards to specifically the US media and those in our US foreign policy department, both of which have a hugely disproportional percentage of Israeli-Americans in them.

Whoever shapes public opinion has an unfair advantage politically. It serves as the government's propaganda mouthpiece, but only when the government does as it wants.

Conversely, it has to power to bring politicians down who are not pro-Israel enough, often simply by ignoring them and not giving them any coverage.

LET'S DEBUNK SOME COMMON MYTHS ABOUT ISRAEL AND OIL

First of all, I'm sure many of you are aware of the notion put out there by political pundits (who are most likely pro-Israel) that the US somehow needs Israel in the Middle East to be its stationary "aircraft carrier" to act as the "tough cop" looking out for American interests in that region, specifically with regards to oil.

Let me ask you these few revealing questions. Have you ever noticed that bottled water is actually cheaper than gas? Have you noticed or read the reports that the price of gas has not risen in keeping with inflation? Do you realize that the Arab world needs to sell its oil even more than we need to buy it from them?

Did you know the US gets oil from many other countries including Mexico, Venezuela, Canada, etc. besides a few Middle Eastern countries? And that there are more and more discoveries of oil resources throughout the world? And that many geologists say that oil is actually a renewable resource?

Even this Wall Street Journal article that sparked my writing this article gave many examples of how geologists scoff at Dr. Campbell's prediction of an "oil crisis" looming ahead.

Even in Michael Moore's Arab-bashing, misleading, "daring" exposé documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11", he made it clear that the Saudis are heavily invested in some sectors of American business, and that the Saudis are and always have been very cooperative with the US government, with the exception of the "oil crisis" of 1973, which I will discuss later in this article.

It is well-known that the despotic Saudi government caters to the US government, so much in fact that the Saudi government is not popular with a vast majority of its own people, who see their government as selling out to the American government, which supports Israel's brutal persecution of the Palestinian people.

In fact, the Saudi government risks being overthrown by its own people because of their government's relationship with the US.

Osama bin Laden was thrown out of his country Saudi Arabia, his assets frozen in banks there, and he was ex-communicated from his family, because he advocates the overthrowing of the Saudi government for cooperating with the imperialistic, materialistic, Zionist-dominated US government, which has thousands of American troops stationed on Saudi soil, a key sticking point with bin Laden.

By the way, did you notice how Michael Moore didn't even mention the word "Israel"? Or "Zionism"? Or even "NeoConservatism" in his documentary? Not surprising. His agent is top Hollywood Jewish Zionist Ari Emmanuel whose brother is Rahm Emmanuel, a hyper pro-Israel senator in Illinois.

Another interesting note about Moore's documentary: he even pointed out how none of the Saudis could reap any financial benefits from the war on Iraq, unlike American companies such as Halliburton. So his whole Arab-bashing approach basically backfires.

It shows how cowardly Moore is in the face of Zionist Hollywood, not to mention how greedy he obviously is to go for the big bucks, which toeing the Zionist line assures anyone in the worlds of US media and politics.

It's ever so convenient and "somehow" politically "acceptable" to scapegoat Arabs and Muslims in Zionist Hollywood and US media.

Consider this as well: does it make any sense whatsoever to spend over $200 BILLION on the war on Iraq to get control of Iraqi oil for US interests? Especially when we could easily buy it, if we needed to? Not to mention the war's cost in human lives and alienating much of the world in the process?

SO WHAT IS REALLY THE PRO-ISRAEL AGENDA WITH REGARDS TO OIL?

First of all, the ethno-centric Jewish state of Israel is a small, resource-poor country, with no natural oil resources, and is almost completely dependent on US support in the form of not only massive financial support (billions of US tax dollars yearly) but US military and political cover as well.

Israel, quite simply, would not survive as the apartheid, imperialistic, war-mongering Jewish state that it is, without the massive support of the US government.

Israel is surrounded by well-deserved, self-made enemies thanks to the initial injustice of the UN unilaterally giving away Arab land that was not theirs to give away in the first place to Eastern European Zionist Jews who have been committing ethnic cleansing and persecution of the indigenous non-Jewish Palestinians ever since 1948.

Since that time, Israel has continued to aggressively steal even more Arab land and has blatant ambitions to control the entire Middle East, using the power and might of the United States.

If more Americans were truly aware of how racist and imperialistic Israel is, they would most likely demand that our government stop supporting Israel at all until it is transformed into a true democracy for all regardless of religion, race or gender, as the world pressured South Africa to transform from an apartheid country to a true democracy ten years ago.

If more Americans knew how support of Israel increases anti-American sentiment worldwide and ensures endless unjust wars, they might very well question their government's support of Israel.

There are many reasons for Americans to question their government's support of Israel including first and foremost for real financial and security concerns as well as our country's hard-won reputation as a democracy for all, regardless of religion, race or gender.

The fact is that the pro-Israel, Zionist-dominated US media very rarely even mentions the topic of Israel outside of incidents that involve Palestinian suicide bombers, which then make the screaming front page headlines.

The footage of the aftermath of such an attack is played over and over again, back to back on ZNN (oops! I meant to write CNN!) and Fox News and all the other US media. These isolated attacks by Palestinian suicide bombers are thus over-reported while the context in which these desperate acts occur is usually completely ignored.

The on-going brutal persecution of the non-Jewish Palestinian people, including the killing of innocent civilians and children, since 1948 by the Israeli army goes almost totally unreported and is generally veiled from view by the American public.

MOST AMERICANS DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT ZIONISM IS, US MEDIA LIKES TO KEEP IT THAT WAY

In a nutshell, it is a racist, nationalistic, political ideology conceived by Theodor Hertzl, an Austrian Jew in the 1890s, that maintains that there must be a Jewish state in Palestine, although that means and always has meant policies of ethnic-cleansing, apartheid and general persecution of the indigenous non-Jews of that land, the Arab Muslim and Christian Palestinians.

In a nutshell, advocates of this racist Zionist ideology are driving our US foreign policy. What ever happened to separation of synagogue/church and state? Isn't it time to openly discuss this? Why are double standards allowed for Israel and for Zionists?

However the US media does not want Americans to even think about these things, never mind discuss them! Certainly, the pro-Israel media does not want Americans to question our government's support of Zionist Israel.

That is why there is never any mention in mainstream US media of the Israeli connection to 9-11, to the war on Iraq, to the so-called "war on terror", and to the subject of Israel's quest for oil.

This intentional covering up by the Zionized US media of the Israeli connection to anything that impacts the US negatively has been going on for decades.

WHAT THE US MEDIA STILL HIDES ABOUT THE 1973 "OIL CRISIS" A

nd nothing proves to me that the US media has been covering for Israel and still covers for Israel (refusing to show the negative effect for Americans of the US government's "special relationship" with Israel) more than this article about the "oil crisis".

Here is a specific case in point: Does anyone remember that time during 1973 when there was such an "oil crisis" that there were really long lines at all the gas stations and when gas was actually rationed out at the gas stations so that you could only get gas every other day, depending on whether or not your license plate ended in an even or an odd number?

I do remember that time vividly. I didn't know why it was happening at the time, but I know exactly why now. And it's not because I got "enlightened" by the pro-Israel US media.

Here is how this Sept. 21, 2004 Wall Street Journal article by Jeffrey Ball (who obviously passed the required litmus test of being pro-Israel enough to work in the US media) presented the "oil crisis" of 1973, in such a manner that still puts a veil of the Israeli connection to that event even today.

Here is a direct quote:

"Then in 1973, the Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) tightened their spigots, and the world panicked. The result: high prices, long lines and frequent shortages at gas stations across the U.S. and Europe."

There was exactly no mention of the context of why OPEC "tightened their spigots" in 1973. No mention at all.

Are you ready for the Israeli connection to this crisis that is almost uniformly covered up by the pro-Israel US media?

Here it is: In 1973, Egypt went to war against Israel in order to win back the Sinai Peninsula, which Israel had stolen six years earlier in Israel's infamous pre-emptive "Six Day War" in 1967 against her neighboring countries.

In that pre-emptive 1967 war, Israel not only stole the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, but also part of southern Lebanon, which Israel has since relinquished, and the Golan Heights from Syria, which is still being occupied to this day by Israeli forces, as well as The Palestinian Territories: the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, now generally referred to as The Occupied Territories.

Pro-Israel forces generally prefer to refer to the Occupied Territories as the "disputed territories". Egypt appeared to [be] winning its retaliatory war against Israel in 1973, so Golda Meir, the American-Israeli Prime Minister of Israel at the time, worked with American-Israeli Henry Kissinger to pressure the US government to come to Israel's rescue, which it did.

Therefore in a show of solidarity with Egypt, the Arab countries of OPEC "tightened their spigots" of gas and oil for export to the U.S.

There you have it: the real reason for the "oil crisis" of 1973. But the pro-Israel US media does not want Americans to realize that support for Israel has many negative effects on the lives of Americans, which includes potential politically induced "oil crises", such as was obviously the case in 1973.

Pro-Israel forces in this country and around the world want to minimize the power of Arab countries which is mostly due to their oil resources. Therefore the pro-Israel forces are relying on the US government to directly control these resources primarily for Israel via wars, campaign contributions and a manipulative media.

Pro-Israel people detest going to the gas station, because every time they pump gas into their cars, they angrily believe they are helping Arab Muslims ("terrorists"), whose land and resources Zionists view somehow as rightfully theirs.

But of course, they don't want the non-Zionist or unaware-of-it-all Americans to resent their US government's support for Israel which can possibly mean paying more for gas in a future politically induced "oil crisis", as it did in 1973.

Another example of the Israelization of America: have you been to the airports lately?

The kinds of procedures at the US airports that you have been experiencing lately have always been the "norm" in Israel.

This is a prime example of how Israel's "war on terror" has SOMEHOW become America's "war on terror" and how it directly impacts the lives of Americans.

The "war on terror" is NOT about democracy. It's an imperialistic war which will have no end if the Zionists (anyone who is pro-Israel) have their way, because it is unjust and breaks International Laws.

There is another aspect of the Israeli connection to the war on Iraq, which many people wish to believe is all about oil for the US, rather than the Zionist ideology that is actually the driving force behind the push for a war on the entire Middle East, which began with Afghanistan, and moved onward to Iraq, and threatens to expand to Iran, Saudi Arabia, and even Syria, which is not an oil exporting country (which just goes to show once again: it's not just about the oil!)

PRO-ISRAEL FORCES WANT TO RE-OPEN A PIPELINE FROM IRAQ TO HAIFA, ISRAEL

The fact that American-Israelis in our government are endeavoring to use the war on Iraq as a way for Israel to gain control over oil in the Middle East is rarely reported in the mainstream pro-Israel US media with your average American readership, however it has been reported in Jewish newspapers with Jewish readership and in Israeli papers.

A case in point is the fact that American-Israelis in our government want to "re-open" or re-instate, the pipeline that used to exist between Iraq and Palestine, which is now specifically Haifa, Israel.

When Israel was created in 1948, that pipeline was re-directed by Iraq to Syria. Now pro-Israel forces are actively seeking to cut off the pipeline to Syria and re-direct it to Haifa, Israel.

For more information on this, please do a Google-search using such keywords such as "Iraq oil pipeline to Haifa, Israel" and see what you come up with.

Just as Israel's connection to the war on Iraq has been kept out of the US mainstream media (as you may have noticed, Israel has not even been mentioned as one of our "allies" in the war on Iraq), this choice nugget of information with regards to Israel's ambition to get a basically free supply of Iraqi oil is also kept out of view for vast American public consumption.

I could go on about all this (yes, there is much more) but I will stop here. You get the picture, I hope. You won't get it from the Zionized US mainstream media.

Wendy Campbell is a California-based producer and distributor of political documentaries.

For more information, please check out her websites http://www.marwenmedia.com and http://www.exposingisraeliapartheid.com.

MarWen Media...ahead of the curve!

Note: Ms. Campbell's latest documentary "Rosa Remembers Palestine", featuring an interview with a Palestinian woman who became a refugee when the Jewish state of Israel was created in 1948, will premiere at La Pena Cultural Center on Thurs. Oct. 28 at 8pm.

For more information, please visit http://www.marwenmedia.com

Posted in Submitted by The Great Revealer on Sun, 2006-12-03 23:28.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Very good and lucidly written article exposing the Zionists' evil plan.

This web site "Judicial Inc" lays out its theories (his theory, not endorsed by me, reader should judge) as to the Zionists' plan to subjugate the Middle East and Central Asia to their control in the headquarter of State of Israel for the implementation of dictatorial geopolitical hegemony.

Part one, two, three

And finally, what is "Jewish Rule"? Would it matter to know the culprit behind the sealed iron curtain identified as the Great Oz of Yisraelim Zion?

So many horrors going on with senseless death toll caused by the never-named snipings, massacres and car bombings that it's becoming more of a training battleground for the Zionist thugs as Israeli mercs and contractors.

Then there is this insanely (perhaps ancient as conceived over a century prior) ambitious plan called "Fortress Americas" divided in two parts, extensively written by the now-deceased Joe Vialls who was (according to his claim) one of two last survivors who saw the evil plan in an accidental interception as a British scientist-turned-expatriate two decades ago.

It reads like an espionage thriller novel meshed with unimaginative horror ripped from Lovecraftian lores.

Please take time to read both parts and contemplate what the Zionists are capable of committing akin to Empire of Japan and its atrocious military conquests that controlled 1/10th of the world before being ultimately subdued and defeated with two atomic bombs in August 1945.

--

My blog Last Throes of US Empire

Nepos Libertas | Mon, 2006-12-04 03:03

There are lots of good points in the original post and I would point out that the 1970's increase in the US dollar price of oil was not just down to the Arab's disgust with Israel but also (and perhaps more so) that they were becoming wise to the debasement of the US dollar and were demanding more US dollars in exchange for each barrel of oil.

As a side note the US dollar is currently being debased at a pace but so are most of the worlds (fiat) currencies.

Visit

http://www.dollarcollapse.com/

and read Jim Turk's book "The coming collapse of the dollar and how profit from it" to get some easily digestible background on this.

Now, some cards on the table. I am certainly an anti-Zionist person but feel the need to put the other side of the peak oil debate on here. Now it is certainly the case that we cannot as "ordinary people" be certain of anything in this world, like oil production and consumption figures over the past few decades but I think these figures would be a lot more difficult to falsify than oil reserve figures!

Hubbert predicted in the mid 50's that US oil production would peak in 1970 and it peaked in 1971 I think! In a nutshell what happens is that x years after discovery of reserves peaks, then production of oil peaks, which is pretty obvious! In the case of North Sea oil, discovery peaked in 1972 and production peaked in 1999 and there is some evidence to suggest that x gets smaller as we find better ways to extract the natural endowment as technology improves.

I would submit that firstly the peak oil idea is almost certainly correct. A simple (not involving calculus as Hubbert's original work did) derivation of the result that production declines after half the reserve (of conventional oil) is exhausted is included in the book written by Ken Deffeyes "Beyond Oil".

The writer talks about the fact that some people think oil is being generated all the time. These theories are under the umbrella of "abiotic oil". Just google it or read this:

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/100404_abiotic_oil.shtml

It suffices to say I think it is wishfull thinking!

Now it is true that there are massive reserves of non conventional oil but this does not mean they will allow us to increase production above the current 85 million barrels per day as the energy input involved is enormous and the environmental impact of producing oil form these reserves is pretty awful. The Canadians only estimate they will be able to produce about 4 million barrels per day by 2020 which will not significantly mitigate the effects of conventional oil peaking (maybe about now, it is too early to say. Hubbert predicted about now)

Colin Campbell gave a talk a few years ago in Germany and the online video may not be around now but the text is here

http://www.oilcrisis.com/de/lecture.html

Also see
http://www.oilcrisis.com/campbell/

You can get more information on

http://www.theoildrum.com/

(see peak oil primers section down the right hand side) and one of the guys from oildrum was interviewed on

http://www.netcastdaily.com/fsnewshour.htm
(25 Nov 4th hour) You will note he is called Dave Cohen but I doubt that means much! He was talking about the recent CERA report that suggested the peak is a couple of decades away and that the decline in production will be less precipitous than most peak oil supporters assert.

In a few years we will know if the peak of production was reached "now" but at any rate all but the abiotic oil crowd think it wil peak within 20 years or so.

hadenuf | Mon, 2006-12-04 07:15

But, I tend to believe that oil reserves are dwindling. That is not to say, however, that I believe that price is directly correlated to supply as they insist.

I continue to believe that the biggest crisis the world suffers from today is one of morality, imagination, and perhaps very soon - FOOD AND WATER.

The average person doesn't realize how dangerously close we are to severe food shortages all over the world.

A small number of companies control almost everything which means they can starve us to death.

qrswave | Mon, 2006-12-04 07:33

is from Romania!

what a scumbag.

qrswave | Mon, 2006-12-04 09:51

Is that you are a hateful bitch.
I was intrigued with the title but then when I read "Israel's brutal persecution of the Palestinian people." I know that it was the time to stop reading as you are plain... STUPID and nothing but bullshit can come out of your mouth.

The Palestinians are an enemy to the Israeli people as they activley support and allow terrorist acts against army and civilians in Israel.
Since Israel removed entire settlements from the Gaza strip, the Palestinians did nothing to try to rebuild the economy, to build housings... agriculture.. nothing !!!! They only "work" on improving the mass of their rockets and increase the weapon smuggling efforts from the Eyptian side of Raphah, which should have been under the supervision of the Egyptian army forces.

As a pro-peace Israeli who supports a solution of two seperate states, I can only say that my children are more important to me then Palestinian children, and when Israeli troops need to go and shoot down terrorists in order to stop the next restaurant bombing, or the next wild rocket launched at Sderot, I really don't bother myself with thinking what our rockets cause the civilian Palestinian population.
And why is that ? Since those terrorists use the same children to scan the streets, teach them hate at schools, and also send those children to commit suicide bombings.

The Palestinians are not westners dumbass. They don't play by western rules. You can see that on Iraq.
The Palestinians could have chosen peace YEARS AGO but they still support the notion that they will get to kick the last Israeli out of the country.
I will fucken shoot every one of them before I will allow this to happen.

And dude... while you keep getting stupid with your hate... I suggest you return your house to the native Americans who owned the land before you great grandfather decided to kill them and make the land his own.

Bitch!

Anonymous | Wed, 2006-12-06 22:48

LIVE! at WUFYS!

Laughing

stay tuned for rebuttals.

qrswave | Wed, 2006-12-06 23:04

Michael "THE MOLE" Moore, has been exposed as a Zionist Jew.

In his famous "Bowling for Columbine" he forgets the MOST IMPORTANT FACT -- that the killers were JEWISH, HATEFUL RACIST JEWS.

This has been documented. Also the fact that the cover-up cop/investigator who "CLOSED" the case was Jewish.

And that this couldn't have been committed by the two boys alone was ignored by Michael Moore.

********* In such a high-profile mass murder case, the two most important facts to uncover is:

(1) Who was murdered and why?

(2) Who was the murderer (their background) and what was their motivation.

>>>>>>>>>>> Fact (2) was COMPLETELY IGNORED by Michael Moore. In fact, ALL ATTENTION was taken away from the fact that the boys were 'jewish' and had grown up with HATE FILLED PROPAGANADA (i.e. Blacks, Asians, "White Trash", Hispanics, Christians, Muslims were to blame for all the worlds problems. And it is the Chosen One's right to be holy and chosen).

Not only that, but their "jewishness" was NOT EVEN REVEALED...

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM??????????????

If it was a black man, or a Asian man, or a Arab that would have been REPEATEDLY DRILLED INTO PEOPLE'S SUBCONSCIOUS --- but not a Racist Zionist Jew?!!!

------------------- quote : ------------------------

Even in Michael Moore's Arab-bashing, misleading, "daring" exposé documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11", he made it clear that the Saudis are heavily invested in some sectors of American business, and that the Saudis are and always have been very cooperative with the US government, with the exception of the "oil crisis" of 1973, which I will discuss later in this article.

Anonymous | Thu, 2006-12-07 04:52

Michael Moore's movie on gun control and Columbine was so outrageously misleading that I have to believe that it was deliberate. Even the way he played with Terry Nichols' idiot brother in Michigan would lead a thinking viewer to believe that if he's that easily manipulated, what about his brother and the Oklahoma City bombing?

I believe that the naive, drugged-out Columbine kids were led astray by a Christina Applegate-type sayanim (among others) and that if their explosive activities had been successful, Jewish teens in American high schools would've been persecuted, even if they did not practice the hideous Talmud. Qui bono? Who sells Jews protection?

Anonymous | Thu, 2006-12-07 06:29

An interesting interlude but just to reply to qrswave I would say that oil reserves must be dwindling unless one believes in abiotic oil and secondly nobody with much knowledge believes the oil price is solely set by supply and demand as:

(a) There is a "risk premium" associated with the price of oil as a lot of the big oil producers are in the middle east or in Russia and production is about 90% within the control of nationalised oil "companies" rather than companies like BP or Exxon Mobil.

(b) The price of oil is subject to manipulation like everything else and a good example of this was before the recent US elections when Goldman Sachs did just that in my opinion:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/stojan1.html

http://www.kellerkomments.com/2006/10/gasoline-price-manipulation.html

(c) OPEC fixes production anyway, when it has control over production which it will probably not enjoy for much longer as nature will take over.

hadenuf | Thu, 2006-12-07 06:40

Why is there no mention of the Cold War when describing the oil crisis of 1973? Egypt was patron of the Soviets until the invasion of Israel, and after their resulting defeat became an American patron. This follows the line of anti-communist American foreign policy for the preceedingly 28 years!

-Jebus

Anonymous | Fri, 2006-12-08 11:11

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator