Iraq: The Ultimate War Game - A Centuries-old Vendetta
As the world descends into global guerilla warfare, engulfed by espionage, assassinations, and worldwide intrigue, Jeffrey Steinberg at Lyndon LaRouche offers a plausible theory as to who is REALLY behind the fiasco in Iraq and the Middle East.
While the hands and feet of this "three civil war" fiasco may be American, the authorship of the Armageddon drive is distinctly British.
* * *
[T]he Bush Administration has launched a new berserker "diplomatic" initiative, which, if successful, would likely trigger a new Hundred Years' War, starting in Southwest Asia, but soon engulfing much of the planet in chaos.
The Cheney scheme to promote a so-called "Sunni alliance" to counter Iran's growing Shi'ite dominance over the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean region, is the latest handiwork of a crew of outright British agents, who have employed the thuggish Vice President and his deadly wife, to wreck the United States from within, as a step towards undoing the entire nation-state system.
On the surface, the argument could credibly be made that the immediate target of the Cheney trip to Riyadh—the latest victim of a Cheney preemptive strike—was his long-time political rival cum arch-enemy, James Baker III. Cheney's push for a Sunni military alliance with Washington and Tel Aviv against Iran was, after all, kicked off literally moments before the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group held its final meetings, before presenting its findings to the White House and the outgoing Congress on Dec. 6. Those findings were widely reported to include the call for a regional peace conference and the beginning of direct diplomatic talks among the United States, Iran, and Syria.
But the reality is different. By the time the Baker-Hamilton study group was seated around the conference table at the U.S. Institute for Peace in Washington, the "Ultimate Decider," President Bush, had already "decided." He shot off his mouth at the NATO summit in Riga, Latvia, declaring that the United States will not consider withdrawal from Iraq until "victory" has been achieved, and will not talk with Iran or Syrian.
Moreover, State Department official Nicholas Burns had told reporters travelling with the President that the goal of the NATO summit in Riga, apart from the push for increased NATO troop deployments in Afghanistan, would be to forge closer security ties between NATO and the leading American allies in the Pacific Far East, and in the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean. In the case of the Persian Gulf, Burns singled out the Gulf Cooperation Council, the alliance of Sunni oil sheikhdoms, as the best vehicle for NATO extension. Qatar and Kuwait, two GCC members, have already been engaged in quiet talks with NATO, on increasing defense cooperation, according to one well-placed Arab source.
And on Nov. 29, Nawaf Obaid, an advisor to the Saudi government, penned a Washington Post op-ed, threatening that Saudi Arabia would intervene to arm the Sunni population in Iraq, were the United States to withdraw its troops. "To be sure," Obeid warned, "Saudi engagement in Iraq carries great risks—it could spark a regional war. So be it: The consequences of inaction are far worse."
In point of fact, there never was a Bush Administration "policy review" on the Middle East. Senior Washington sources have reported that the United States is doing exactly what Jordan's King Abdallah II warned against on Nov. 26, in an appearance on CBS-TV: fomenting three civil wars in the region—in Lebanon, in the Palestinian territories, and in Iraq.
· In Lebanon, the U.S., in conjunction with Saudi Arabia, is covertly arming the Sunni Muslims, in preparation for a showdown with Hezbollah, the Shi'ite political movement whose militia defeated Israel's military invasion in the July 2006 Lebanese War. According to one eyewitness account, truckloads of arms are being distributed in Beirut after midnight every night. What's more, al-Qaeda elements, operating in northern Lebanon, are reportedly conduiting arms to the Lebanese Sunni—with the see-no-evil approval of Washington and Riyadh. Current events inside Lebanon are reminiscent of Henry Kissinger's mid-1970s orchestration of the first Lebanese Civil War, which began with a string of targetted assassinations, and was stoked by a massive clandestine infusion of weapons to all sides.
· In the Palestinian territories, the United States, in league with Jordan, is covertly arming and training Fatah militia factions, with the aim of orchestrating a showdown with Hamas. Furthermore, every effort at establishing a Palestinian national unity government, with Hamas and Fatah, has been shot down by the Bush Administration, giving Israel the green light to continue to withhold tax payments to the Palestinian Authority, thus creating a cauldron of poverty and rage. On Dec. 1, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas announced that the unity talks had totally broken down, and that he could call early elections.
· In Iraq, the Bush Administration is fueling the downward spiral into full-scale civil war and ethnic cleansing—including an effort to induce Shia versus Shia fighting. Just hours before the scheduled meeting of President Bush with Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Amman, Jordan, on Nov. 29, the White House disclosed a classified memorandum by National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, questioning the Iraqi Prime Minister's ability to deliver.
The memo—which was "leaked" to the New York Times by a "senior administration official" who also briefed the author of the Times story, Michael Gordon—stated, in part: "His intentions seem good when he talks with Americans, and sensitive reporting suggests he is trying to stand up to the Shia hierarchy and force positive change. But the reality on the streets of Baghdad suggests Maliki is either ignorant of what is going on, misrepresenting his intentions, or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action."
The White House leak guaranteed that the Bush-Maliki meeting would be a fiasco. Reportedly, the President pressed the Iraqi Prime Minister to crack down on Shi'ite leader Muktadr al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army, a preposterous demand, given that Sadr had delivered the decisive votes to get Maliki the Prime Ministership in the first place, and his militia is larger, more disciplined, and better armed than the official Iraqi Army. To further fuel Shia versus Shia communal violence, President Bush announced on Dec. 2 that he would be hosting Sayyed Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the president of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), at the White House. There, he will reportedly press Hakim to turn his Badr Brigade against the Mahdi Army. Sheer madness!
* * *
It is no secret that Vice President Cheney operates under the influence of three notorious British agents: Dr. Bernard Lewis, Dr. Henry Kissinger, and George Shultz.
For Lewis, the British Arab Bureau Zionist spook who originated the "Clash of Civilization" lunacy in 1990, a Sunni versus Shi'ite conflict in the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean region, would be the ultimate British imperial "wet dream." Lewis has been Cheney's key "advisor" on Arab and Islamic affairs, frequently participating in private dinner seminars at the Vice Presidential Residence at the Naval Observatory.
Washington Post author Bob Woodward wrote in his latest book, Denial, that Cheney admitted to him that Henry Kissinger, the author of the Malthusian National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200), has been his most frequent outside advisor on national security and foreign policy affairs—particularly Iraq.
In May 1982, Kissinger boasted, at a public event at Chatham House, the London headquarters of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), that he took his cue, as Nixon and Ford's National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, "from the British Foreign Office," often working directly off Foreign Office draft documents. In the same speech, Kissinger waxed eloquent on the imperial virtues of Winston Churchill, while denouncing the "moralizing" of Franklin Roosevelt.
And while ground zero for the planned chaos is the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean, the primary target is not the oil patch: It is the United States.
The Anglo-Dutch Liberal imperialist faction, the Venetian-modelled structure behind the antics of Lewis, Kissinger, and Shultz, is dedicated to a world empire, built on the rotting corpse of the nation-state system.
To achieve that goal, the United States, itself, must be destroyed—internally through economic and social disintegration, and globally, through a string of horrific policy fiascos. That is what is behind the latest insanity from Bush and Cheney. They are the dupes in a high-stakes British game to destroy the United States once and for all.
For these oligarchs, the prospect of a United States surviving the Bush-Cheney Presidency, with its constitutional institutions intact, is unacceptable. They fear a revival of the American System, and understand that the resounding electoral defeat of Bush and Cheney on Nov. 7, was a mandate for impeachment, and a demand for fundamental changes in economic and national security policy.
Furthermore, they know that their vision of a one-world empire, led by an Anglo-Dutch-centered financier oligarchy, is unattainable, without a massive reduction in world population. They therefore welcome a new Hundred Years' War. They relish the prospect of global chaos, asymmetric warfare, and waves of disease and famine.
They do not seek an American giant, flexing its muscle while tugging on a British leash. They want the United States Constitutional ship to sink in the depths of the ocean. Why else would anyone have engineered George W. Bush and Dick Cheney into the White House?
Far fetched? I don't think so.
I ran into this story shortly after reading Steinberg's -
London poised to overtake NY as world's leading city
Notwithstanding Silverstein's flowery promises to rebuild the 'freedom towers' - New York and America are not meant to recover from 9/11.
If the scheming moneychangers in London have their way, it will mark the end of the American experiment and final payback for 1776.
http://mosnews.com/news/2006/12/05/hostageswap.shtml
.
.
.
Russia Holds Israeli Prisoners Hostage, Seeks to Swap Them for Wanted Tycoon — Report
MosNews
Moscow has continuously denied four Israeli nationals convicted in Russia permission to serve their prison terms at home, unless Israel extradites Jewish Russian-born entrepreneur Leonid Nevzlin, once the second-in-command of Yukos and business partner of the jailed Russian tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, leading Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth wrote Tuesday in a report headlined “Putin’s Israeli Hostages”.
According to the paper, four Israeli jewelers and diamond dealers convicted of illicit diamond smuggling in Russia are currently held in a Moscow prison. The authors of the story insist that the four men are effectively held hostage as Russia, seeking extradition of Leonid Nevzlin, refuses to allow them to serve their terms at home, in violation of diplomatic accords signed by the two countries.
The wrongdoings attributed to the Israeli nationals were decriminalized after the four were convicted. In talks with Israeli officials and families of the convicts the Russian officials reportedly hinted at the possibility of “the exchange”.
Moscow and Tel-Aviv signed the extradition agreement two years ago. Russia has already used it once when Israel extradited a Russian-Israeli suspect on condition that if convicted he would serve his prison term in Israel. Russia honored its commitments under the treaty.
But ever since the Israeli jewelers were found guilty in Moscow two years ago numerous requests made by Israel to let them return home have been flatly rejected by Russia. Even personal requests made by top Israeli ministers were ignored, Yedioth Ahronoth reported.
One of the convicts has recently wrote a letter to his relatives where he claimed that in October 2005 he and his inmates were visited in their cell by an unidentified man who informed them that their task was to bring Nevzlin back to Russia and assured them that if they agreed to help Russian law enforcers they would be discharged from prison; if not they would have to serve their entire terms in Russia.
The NEWSru Israel website asked Leonid Nevzlin who currently lives in Israel to comment on Yedioth Ahronoth’s report. “I have heard that those convicts were warned that if Israel refused to extradite Nevzlin they could abandon hope for early release or transfer to an Israeli prison. I also know that my extradition has many times been discussed at meetings between top Israeli and Russian foreign ministry officials but those conversations were never officially recorded,” the entrepreneur said.
Nevzlin also pointed out to an inaccuracy in Yedioth Ahronoth’s report. “In truth, there is no permanent extradition pact between Russia and Israel saying that criminals shall serve their sentences at home. Such an accord was achieved once, on the Zhuravlyov case (Multiple murder suspect Andrei Zhuravlyov, aka Terrazini, was extradited to Russia in 2002, after the court said he had obtained Israeli citizenship unlawfully). As to the jewelers’ case a separate agreement was drawn up,” Nevzlin said.
Nevzlin said he had no reason to doubt the facts unearthed by Yedioth Ahronoth. “I view [Russia’s actions] as a hostage-taking in spite of the fact that those people had been arrested before I moved to Israel. In fact, what we deal with here is blackmail where innocent Israeli are being used as bargaining chips,” Nevzlin said.
Regarding the above comment,
in the words of your (Zionists') mouth-piece Jim Cramer, BOOOOO-YEAH!
I don't think that it's a coincidence that the Russian Spy was killed in London.
It seems that there is a heavy duty power struggle between Russians and Zionists in London and Tel-Aviv.
I agree that the foreign policy disasters that the USA is entrenched in and the economic doom that is part and parcel of such policy decisions and monetary system are not mere miscalculations, but instead are part of a very carefully crafted strategy. A strategy aimed at fueling America’s hubris and goading this lone super power into acting quite foolishly and self-destructively. This strategy has not been, and is not, crafted by the US or Britain, oh no sir, their days have passed. These devious plans come from elsewhere, with Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Blair, and the rest serving simply as agents which can be interchanged and replaced quite easily. You’ll find they possess the same power over the DNP. The British empire, the empire where the sun never sets, is done. It is now just a third rate power. Unfortunately for Americans, the current US trajectory will lead it to a similar result. America is no longer the world’s manufacturing base. Anything the US can do, India and China can do better and cheaper. This has been all but ensured to happen. Washington’s time is all but up, London will not regain it’s prominence, the new center of power and hegemony will be Jerusalem, the ground work is already being set and it’s just a matter of time until this shift takes place.
Previous quote:
"A strategy aimed at fueling America’s hubris and goading this lone super power into acting quite foolishly and self-destructively. This strategy has not been, and is not, crafted by the US or Britain, oh no sir, their days have passed. These devious plans come from elsewhere, with Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Blair, and the rest serving simply as agents which can be interchanged and replaced quite easily."
'Carefully thought out plan' by the Ashkenazi Khazars, aka 'THE MAN' behind the Illuminati, regional and world wars, famine, disease (yes man are created in the lab, and if not they implement them directly or as a by-product).
well its nothing, most of ASHKENAZIS are in diamond business in centuries, it is very common thing, knowing that from Belgiums Antwerp diamond market, its jewish club, both ashkenazi black hats and israelis, even jews from all nationalities, such as Iranian jews, syrian jews, wherever they come from, the reason being is that diamonds are small sizes and its easy to transport easily,and small stone cost lots of money, look in south afrika, the mines are owned by jews, same as in siberia, even though at the soviet era, in a tight political scenes, they(jews) were doing all kinds of always illegal acts, and mostly run and guided by jewish temples and their rabis, this is not a new game, it was since the roman era, once my jewish friend told me that legal business is for goyims, because you do not profits as much as illegal activities. there are 2 main aspects missing in a jewish blood, 1-shame . 2- pitty. so you get the picture?
why do you think soviet union was bankrupted? because all the natural wealths such as diamonds and gold were sent to israel.
next in line is USA. in near future, already ther are clear signs. Europe paid heavily for them, until to this minute.
Sure - if you can call exploitation 'entrepeneurial'.
Britain's just another den of vipers - financiers through and through.
From moneylenders, to moneychangers and speculators, the Brits sucked all that wealth from the blood and sweat of others.
My point is, however, compare these numbers to the numbers in this post.
That puts Brits way up in the food chain. Much further up than Americans can ever be.
that all Brits are involved in this scheme, or even that all the Brits who have assets are culpable (well, they are but most of them unwittingly so).
It also doesn't mean that Zionists aren't very much involved - they most certainly are. But, there is a serious British twist to all this scheming. Whether it's primarily Zionist or primarily British, it's hard to tell.
Nice observation QRS, Brits have been "sleeping with the enemy" for centuries now (some of them unknowingly, but others like Tony Blair are fully aware of the situation).
The first bank that the BAUERS (aka later changed their family name to ROTHSCHILD) first controlled the BANK OF ENGLAND (BOE), and it was through Britian - which at the time was EXPLOITED the 3rd world - gained a foothold in other nations (with the exception in particular of Czar Russia, hence the "Bolshelvik Revolution").
In fact, many MANY of the rich and powerful Brits believe (or intentionally through self-deception) they are part of the "Israelites" ------------
------------ hence the term "British Israelites". But this is even MORE ABSURD than the concept of ASHKENAZI KHAZAR "Israelites".
Thus, you see this "Marriage of convenience". With such historical events as the BALFOUR DECLARATION which was CONCOCTED AND DEVISED in the PREVIOUS CENTURY, in which Palestine - the 'holy land' - was "given" to the "jews" (aka Fake Jews, technically composed of White Ashkenazi Khazars).
A little bit of history helps here.
Cheers!
;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The growing wealth in the UK is due largely to a strong property market and an increasing entrepreneurial culture which encourages individuals from all walks of life to take risks as they strive for business success, according to Barclays Wealth Insight.
Sure - if you can call exploitation 'entrepeneurial'.
Britain's just another den of vipers - financiers through and through.
From moneylenders, to moneychangers and speculators, the Brits sucked all that wealth from the blood and sweat of others.
My point is, however, compare these numbers to the numbers in this post.
That puts Brits way up in the food chain. Much further up than Americans can ever be.
qrswave | Wed, 2006-12-06 07:50
that is not to say, however
that all Brits are involved in this scheme, or even that all the Brits who have assets are culpable (well, they are but most of them unwittingly so).
It also doesn't mean that Zionists aren't very much involved - they most certainly are. But, there is a serious British twist to all this scheming. Whether it's primarily Zionist or primarily British, it's hard to tell.
qrswave | Wed, 2006-12-06 08:57
i have been travelling throughout britain for many years, the fact that behind every financial acts or transcts always there are hidden characters behind it, do not be fulled by their names, ever since jews were re admitted to England, they had in their mind to gain most of the financial powers in england, and they did, the reason being is that money can buy anything, incuding politix, media, and evry possble alternatives to rule and conquer, you never see any alcoholic jew on the streets or homeless, every rich neighborhood is filled by them, even the uniersities, schools, printing houses, diamond and gold market, average brit is unaware of all whats happening around, which they are fulled and drugged by alcool, sports and soap operas on the tube.