The Connection between 9/11 and Protocols of Zion (Video)
Zakheim, a dual nationality Israeli-American and a rabid Zionist, had co-authored "Rebuilding America's Defenses", a position paper by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 2000, which called for a new "Pearl Harbor" type of incident which would provide a pretext for US military moves to boost its global hegemony. The other signatories on the document included neocons I Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Paul Wolfowitz, and William Kristol. Rabbi Zakheim's career included various posts at the Department of Defense (DoD), foreign policy advisor to George W Bush, and also in the private sector on defense and consultancy. In the years running up to 9/11, he was corporate vice president of System Planning Corporation (SPC) and chief executive officer of SPC International Corporation. SPC is a manufacturer of highly sophisticated military specification technology such as its "Flight Termination System". FTS includes SPC's Command Transmitter System. It enables remote operators to control up to eight planes simultaneously, from a single position either on the ground or airborne (or, say, in WTC Building 7). The technology provides the capability to take remote control of aircraft already in flight.
Zionists had tricked the Bush Administration into carrying out a relatively small scale false-flag terrorist operation. An unmanned, remote-controlled plane would be crashed into a section of the Pentagon that was under renovation; hence, casualties would range from zero to very low. The remote control technology for the Pentagon incident would be provided by Raytheon. Since it was necessary to claim that "Arabs" had hijacked a passenger plane and the US government had not signed up to deliberately murder dozens of their own civilians as part of Operation Pentagate, the claimed flight that the "suicide pilots" had taken over would be one that ran fairly regularly, but was unscheduled on the particular day of the operation. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) flight records could be falsified after the fact - unless, of course, the planners were to slip up, as they did...
The "dead passengers" were to be individuals linked to government (e.g. Barbara Olson), and the defense contractor Raytheon, who would be paid to fake their own deaths and provided with sanctuary in Israel. As confirmation of the official version of events, it would be claimed that the "passengers" had made cell phone calls to report a hijacking by men of "Arabic" appearance. (Never mind the fact that such cell phone calls were impossible with 2001 technology at cruising height and speed; the fact that it takes at least an hour and 30 kg of coke to cremate a cadaver had not stopped the indoctrination of millions of people with a physically impossible ludicrous conspiracy theory about a secret German plot to gas and cremate 11 million "undesirables".) If required, fictitious names could be concocted. In order to save on names, it would be claimed that the passenger count just happened to be unusually low that day, say, around one-third of capacity.
American Airlines Flight 77 from Washington Dulles to Los Angeles was scheduled on most days, but was not scheduled (and did not fly) on September 11, 2001. The date had been chosen from the US "911" emergency number. Hence, the official Bush-Cheney story would claim this as the plane which hit the Pentagon. The Bush Administration would then have a pretext for invading Islamic oil-rich nations and looting their oil wealth, and for granting itself with authoritarian powers by introducing legislation such as the Patriot Act. More to the point, Rumsfeld and Cheney - along with other corrupt leaders who had been bribed or blackmailed into the scam - would have a pretext for doing the Zionist Mafia's bidding of supplying the servicemen of the US, UK, Australia, Italy, Spain, etc, as Israel's proxy army to fight its enemy neighbours. I.e., the offering up of national armed forces as a supply of private mercenaries, or cannon fodder, or uranium-ingesting leukemia and cancer cases waiting to happen. These sacrifices were primarily for the personal profit of the avaricious Zionist Mafia, along with the corrupt Mafia-appointed government leaders who lapped up the few scraps and morsels tossed their way by their Zionist handlers.
Watch the video that explains the connection between 9/11 and Protocols of Zion at: Ahmed Ismail
[I wonder why?]
The Protocols, purportedly the text of a secret Jewish plan to establish world supremacy, is a book that has enjoyed sustained and vibrant life despite the fact that it has long been discredited as a forgery.
[The Protocols a forgery?? Heh heh heh.... in his wildest dreams. Enjoyed sustained and vibrant life? Aw GEE I wonder why that could be???]
First published in Russia in 1903, it became a keystone first of Russian anti-Semitism and then of the Nazi movement. Today, it is still sold all over the world and appears to have found new footholds on the Internet. Of all the anti-Jewish writing, it is perhaps The Protocols that has empowered anti-Semites the most.
[Oh there goes that FANCY word again - "anti-Semetism" or anti-Semites!]
Although other anti-Semitic works may have a sharper intellectual base, The Protocols' conspiratorial imagery has been more effective in fueling the hatred of Jews and Judaism.
George is right and wrong - anti-semetic YES but to Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq; the fueling of hatred against these TRUE semetic people is amazing - and the Jews of today are living quite well and prosperous]......
The authors examine the current use of the book by extremists, but the core of the work is a point-by-point refutation of all 24 charges against the Jews.
This compelling and scholarly work draws on many resources, including authentic Jewish texts, to clearly expose The Protocols as a cruel hoax.
[Ya got that BACKWARDS georgie...the PROTOCOLS expose the CRUEL HOAX laid upon the American people....hence, the WORLD]
George Cohen
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
[a customer review]
By E. Baumgartner (New York, NY) - See all my reviews
This book too often uses biblical reasons as to why the protocols can't be attributed to Jews. Its arguments go something like, "the old testament forbids Jews from doing this or that, therefore, such and such protocal can't be attributed to Jews".
That's a silly argument because it assumes all Jews live according to biblical principles.
[good point!]
As anyone can see by studying modern society, the protocals have basically come true. [YES!]
The question is then, can the protocals be attributed to nefarious things done by Jews? An interesting research project would be to look at each protocal, one by one, and discover it's origins... I mean its origins in terms of its implementation.
For example, one of the protocals talks about pornography. Who then is responsible for pushing for legalization of pornography in the USA? There may have been a first ammendment type case brought before the Supreme Court involving the legality of pornography... was it a Jew or gentile who was responsible for pushing this case?
[another good point!]
Another protocal deals with a fiat money system (ie. one not based on a gold/silver). Obviously that's what we currently have in the USA, but who was responsible for this change, a Jew or a gentile? Was our fiat money system every later challenged? By whom? A Jew or gentile? Who objected to this challenge, a Jew or gentile?
This is the way this book should have been written.
=====================
There were actually other good posts available against this book that tries to refute the Protocols but they mysteriously..............
[emphasis mine]
http://www.amazon.com/Dismantling-Big-Lie-Protocols-Elders/dp/0881257869...
This quote is definitely no fraud, just one of many from high profile Zionists that seem to be following the Protocols to the letter:
"The state of Israel must invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the methods of provocation and revenge.... And above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space."
-- From the diary of Moshe Sharett, Israeli's first Foreign Minister from 1948-1956, and Prime Minister from 1954-1956.
When this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L4hHCInQoQ
...was posted at YouTube, I was pleased to see they had used part of my History of Zionist Crimes narrative. See
http://www.takeourworldback.com/short/zionistdenial.htm
...for a more concise version that incorporates links about Zakheim, the Flight Termination System, the PNAC document, and a whole lot more.
It is sheer lunacy to imagine that some lowly postal worker, described as a "German anti-Semite", along with a Russian secret police agent who was also a writer, would go to all the trouble of creating a grand master plan for world domination and global enslavement, merely in order to "discredit innocent Jews". It's a bit like someone breaking into Fort Knox just to steal a pen. And the events in the world still correspond to the Protocols, confirming its authenticity.
IT IS FROM US THAT THE ALL-ENGULFING TERROR PROCEEDS.
Protocol 9
Maurice Joly's The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu was probably written by the same group of Zionists - headed by the Rothschilds - who wrote the Protocols. Maybe Joly was paid to pose as the 'author', and possibly as compensation for the 15-month prison term he was to receive:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Joly
...à la an infamous contemporary "anti-Zionist". Did Joly kill himself in 1878, or was he "suicided"?
See Peter Myers' debunking of the strongest arguments advanced by the "Protocols of Zion is a forgery" brigade:
My argument is that Joly did not create these parallel passages ex nihilo, but modified an existing revolutionary text (precursor of the Protocols), reworking parts of it to suit his attack on Napoleon III.
Source: http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/toolkit.html
I agree that there would have been a number of revisions of the plan. The proto-Zionist Khazars had to document their plans, and by having an earlier version handy they could always cry, "It's an anti-Jewish forgery" if the document was discovered by the goyim. Maybe Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince was based on a pre-early 16th century prototype?