Proof that Bin Laden had no links with 9/11 and the Bin Laden tape is a hoax! (Video)
The Bush Administration says yes, citing a grainy, badly-edited videotape that surfaced in December, 2001. In that tape, a fat guy who vaguely resembles Bin Laden chortles about the success of the 9/11 attacks. (In earlier interviews, Bin Laden had denied responsibility for 9/11, once even deploring the loss of civilian life in the attacks and calling them un-Islamic.)
Is the famous "confession video" genuine? Despite Bush's insistence that the tape is authentic, America's top academic Bin Laden expert has finally gone on the record, joining numerous other experts.
"It's bogus," says Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's Religious Studies program.
Lawrence, author of Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama Bin Laden, offered his historic debunking of the administration's lie in an interview with Kevin Barrett ("Dynamic Duo," gcnlive.com, 2/16/2007, first hour). The interview marked Lawrence's first major public statement since he made headlines last year by suggesting that recent Osama tapes are hoaxes and that the real Osama Bin Laden may be dead.
Why has the Bush Administration been lying for more than five years by telling us that this preposterously bad hoax is a genuine "confession video"? Lawrence, citing informants in the US intelligence apparatus's Bin Laden units, said that everyone knows the tape is fake, adding that the hoax has been kept alive because it is politically useful to those who wish to deflect attention from
"conspiracy theories" about 9/11.
If Professor Lawrence is right—and anyone with eyes can see that he is, simply by comparing the overweight impostor in the Fatty Bin Laden bogus confession video to other pictures of Osama Bin Laden—the Bush Administration, by repeatedly citing the tape as authentic, is clearly guilty of obstruction of justice at best, high treason and conspiracy to mass murder at worst. Since the FBI now tells us that Osama Bin Laden is "not wanted for 9/11" because there is "no hard evidence" connecting him to the 9/11 attacks, and since US intelligence personnel all know the "confession tape" is a Bush Administration hoax, it should not be difficult to nail the perpetrators of this outrageous cover-up of the crime of the century.
It is time for Congress or an appropriate judicial authority to mount an investigation of the Fatty Bin Laden bogus confession video.
Where did this tape come from? Who was responsible for the
administration's claim that it is authentic, despite widespread knowledge in relevant intelligence agencies that it is bogus? If Bruce Lawrence is correct in asserting that US intelligence personnel know the tape is fake, we need to put them, along with Bush and Cheney, under oath and find out why our government has been lying so outrageously for more than five years in order to obstruct justice by shielding the real perpetrators of 9/11.
Please email your congressional representatives with the subject header "investigate bogus Bin Laden 'confession video' NOW!" and include a copy of this article in the body of the message.
At the following link,Watch the video on which you`ll see undeniable proof that the man in the tape was not Osama Bin Laden whatsoever:
http://ahmedismailibrahim.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/proof-that-bin-laden-...
But as usual, they're using any doubt that can be generated about it to mess with our heads.
http://muckrakerreport.com/id435.html
http://muckrakerreport.com/id435.html
From the second link:
Many in the controlled and censored corporate news media continue to reference this video as proof and evidence against Osama bin Laden. What they have failed to investigate or admit is that it is also an indictment of treason against the Bush Administration and other elements of the federal government because the videotape was filmed prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan as the result of a CIA sting operation. The CIA had Osama bin Laden in its sights, camera and rifle, on or about September 26, 2001 and failed to capture or kill him in favor of gaining a videotape confession of sorts to support the Bush Administration’s invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. If Osama bin Laden had been captured or killed on or about September 26, 2001 – there would have been no international support for the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.
end quote.
..that 9/11 was a zionist false flag operation, inside and out, then how could OBL, from a cave, have any meaningful hand in this, except as the scapegoat? I assert that the only reason we haven't heard of him lately, denying it or whatever, is because he's dead.
There's no way that's Usama in the confession video.
Was the identity of any of the other people in the "fatty" video ever in question? Answer = "no" as far as I'm aware.
Wouldn't they all have had to be impostors if the OBL in the video were a fake?
I don't know what role bin Laden played in 9/11, but I find the explanation for the distorted fat bin Laden face to be convincing (via first link in my above post). Once you accept that, it becomes a powerful lesson on how disinformation works.
Put it this way: People have been shouting about the fake confession video for years, and as a measure of the strength of the cabal, absolutely nothing has ever come of it. That's how ahead of the game they are in the propaganda war.
And if enough pressure could be brought to bear so that serious questions were publicly asked about the video, then it would in due course be revealed to be authentic, and there would be egg on the face of those who made the accusation that it was fake.
- - -
Then there's the question of the circumstances under which it was shot, and the failure to capture OBL then and there, and how embarrassing that failure might be for the cabal.
Not very, as far as I'm concerned - the Americans are so gung-ho and bloodthirsty, I'm sure there would be little more than a murmur of protest if it ever came out that the US actively avoided capturing OBL in order to continue with the plans to attack Afghanistan.