Your choice: Ethanol for your SUV or Food for the hungry - The fight for the world's food

Ethanol is almost universally popular with politicians as it allows them to tell voters to keep on motoring, while bio-fuels will fix the problem of harmful greenhouse gas emissions. But bio-fuels are not a green panacea, as the influential economist Lester Brown from the Earth Policy Institute explained in a briefing to the US Senate last week. He said: "The stage is now set for direct competition for grain between the 800 million people who own automobiles, and the world's 2 billion poorest people."

Population is growing. Supply is falling. Prices are rising. What will be the cost to the planet's poorest?
By Daniel Howden
Published: 23 June 2007
Most people in Britain won't have noticed. On the supermarket shelves the signs are still subtle. But the onset of a major change will be sitting in front of many people this morning in their breakfast bowl. The price of cereals in this country has jumped by 12 per cent in the past year. And the cost of milk on the global market has leapt by nearly 60 per cent. In short we may be reaching the end of cheap food.

For those of us who have grown up in post-war Britain food prices have gone only one way, and that is down. Sixty years ago an average British family spent more than one-third of its income on food. Today, that figure has dropped to one-tenth. But for the first time in generations agricultural commodity prices are surging with what analysts warn will be unpredictable consequences.

Like any other self-respecting trend this one now has its own name: agflation. Beneath this harmless-sounding piece of jargon - the conflation of agriculture and inflation - lie two main drivers that suggest that cheap food is about to become a thing of the past. Agflation, to those that believe that it is really happening, is an increase in the price of food that occurs as a result of increased demand from human consumption and the diversion of crops into usage as an alternative energy resource.

On the one hand the growing affluence of millions of people in China and India is creating a surge in demand for food - the rising populations are not content with their parents' diet and demand more meat. On the other, is the use of food crops as a source of energy in place of oil, the so-called bio-fuels boom.

As these two forces combine they are setting off warning bells around the world.

Rice prices are climbing worldwide. Butter prices in Europe have spiked by 40 per cent in the past year. Wheat futures are trading at their highest level for a decade. Global soybean prices have risen by a half. Pork prices in China are up 20 per cent on last year and the food price index in India was up by 11 per cent year on year. In Mexico there have been riots in response to a 60 per cent rise in the cost of tortillas.

It has even revived discussion of the work of the 18th-century British thinker Robert Malthus. He predicted that the growth of the world's population would outstrip its ability to produce food, leading to mass starvation.

So far in Britain we have been insulated from the early effects of these price rises by the competitive nature of our retail system. But the supermarkets cannot shield us for long. The European Commission no longer has reserves to help cushion its citizens. Its mountains of unsold butter and meat and its lake of powdered milk have disappeared after reforms to the Common Agricultural Policy.

Then there is corn. While relatively little corn is eaten directly it is of pivotal importance to the food economy as so much of it is consumed indirectly. The milk, eggs, cheese, butter, chicken, beef, ice cream and yoghurt in the average fridge is all produced using corn and the price of every one of these is influenced by the price of corn. In effect, our fridges are full of corn.

In the past 12 months the global corn price has doubled. The constant aim of agriculture is to produce enough food to carry us over to the next harvest. In six of the past seven years, we have used more grain worldwide than we have produced. As a result world grain reserves - or carryover stocks - have dwindled to 57 days. This is the lowest level of grain reserves in 34 years.

The reason for the price surge is the wholesale diversion of grain crops into the production of ethanol. Thirty per cent of next year's grain harvest in the US will go straight to an ethanol distillery. As the US supplies more than two-thirds of the world's grain imports this unprecedented move will affect food prices everywhere. In Europe farmers are switching en masse to fuel crops to meet the EU requirement that bio-fuels account for 20 per cent of the energy mix.

Ethanol is almost universally popular with politicians as it allows them to tell voters to keep on motoring, while bio-fuels will fix the problem of harmful greenhouse gas emissions. But bio-fuels are not a green panacea, as the influential economist Lester Brown from the Earth Policy Institute explained in a briefing to the US Senate last week. He said: "The stage is now set for direct competition for grain between the 800 million people who own automobiles, and the world's 2 billion poorest people."

Already there are signs that the food economy is merging with the fuel economy. The ethanol boom has seen sugar prices track oil prices and now the same is set to happen with grain, Mr Brown argues. "As the price of oil climbs so will the price of food," he says. "If oil jumps from $60 a barrel to $80, you can bet that your supermarket bills will also go up."

In the developed world this could mean a change of lifestyle. Elsewhere it could cost lives. Soaring food prices have already sparked riots in poor countries that depend on grain imports. More will follow. After decades of decline in the number of starving people worldwide the numbers are starting to rise. The UN lists 34 countries as needing food aid. Since feeding programmes tend to have fixed budgets, a doubling in the price of grain halves food aid.

Anger boiled over this week as Jean Ziegler, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, accused the US and EU of "total hypocrisy" for promoting ethanol production in order to reduce their dependence on imported oil. He said producing ethanol instead of food would condemn hundreds of thousands of people to death from hunger.

Population and starvation

* Robert Thomas Malthus was a political economist who shot to prominence in late 18th century Britain. His Essay on the Principle of Population influenced generations of thinkers with its prediction that the world's population would outgrow its food supply, prompting starvation on an epic scale. "The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race," he wrote. "Gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear." But Malthus predicted disaster to strike in the mid-19th century.
http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article2697804.ece

Posted in Submitted by islamservices on Sat, 2007-06-23 21:50.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

First generation bio-fuels make little sense as they take almost as much energy to produce as they deliver.

Therefore, their only purpose as far as I can see is to wage war on the poor in continuation of the first attack on the poor, which was privatization of water distribution, a World Bank initiative, which cut off millions from access to clean drinking water.

However, the situation is not entirely bleak as the problem is not that we are running out of food resources per se, but that we are so poor managers of them that the pollution we generate eradicate profits and harm our health.

In developing countries an intelligent management of resources has proven that it is possible to increase the production of protein tenfold within a given area of land. At the same time human health benefits.

If the US and the EU had some decency they would facilitate this kind of rural development in those countries, which are most likely to be hit by the new competition for land for fuel vs. land for food.

Anyway, the investments needed are not big, and even smaller NGOs may play an important role in this development.

For the specially interested have a look at this:

http://www.onevillagefoundation.org/ovf/downloads/pdfs/IF&WMS_Packet/IF&...

Made Brani | Sat, 2007-06-23 23:08

Truth Seeker--There is already alternative energy sources in existence that are being suppressed by the treasonous powerbroker multi-nationals..Every car can convert to electricity and also water powered cars exist..and willie nelson's tour bus drives on used vegetable oil..with the exhaust of french fries...RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT

Truth Seeker07 | Sun, 2007-06-24 03:51

..of the many 'population control' plans the zionese have in store for us. Do they not know the consequences of their actions? OBVIOUSLY, and that's why it's happening!

Ethanol is better because it is clean burning and high octane (longer burning); the only chemicals that come from it's combusion are water, carbon dioxide, and heat.

What's that? CO->2?
I guess this isn't about the Global Warming Swindle!
..and call off the Global Warming Doomsday too.

They're planning on starving alot of poor people to death. Come on, tortilla riots? Less than two months global food supply!

They're doing it because in the event of a major disaster, like a nuclear war, or say.. Saturn blows up or something, then they won't be able to control all of us, thus threatening 'their' continued existence.

WRH

Grim Reaper | Sun, 2007-06-24 16:38

Tthanol sucks.

It costs as much or more and you end up only getting about 2/3 the miles with it.

So in the end, you are going to spend much more on Ethanol then if you stuck with normal gasoline.

I used E85 in our flex fuel minivan once, NEVER again. E85 is $2.10/gal now and got 16 mpg highway. Reg is $2.51 now and usually get 23 mpg on highway. In the end I spent $5.56 to go the same 250 miles using the E85....WHERE IS THE SAVINGS when you get much lower MPG??????

http://www.autoblog.com/2005/08/27/ethanol-vs-gasoline/

"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire

Peacetroll | Mon, 2007-06-25 19:50

..that particular problem is because you don't put high octane fuel into a motor that's not designed for it, if it says regular or plus in the manual, that's what you put in.

A high performance motor will love ethanol.

Biodiesel rocks ethanol anyways, they can also be blended; even for planes!

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2007-06-25 21:14

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator