Very interesting and informative interview. largely ignored by most 911 researchers is this very theory(?). What we have seen is endless prattle about explosives, thermite and batteries etc.
I honestly believe that Christopher Brown is contributing more to the effort to get to the facts of the matter than most others combined. I also agree entirely when he says that the '911 movement' is utterly infiltrated and non-existent where the facts are concerned, or words to that effect.
The forum about this at the website is a good source of information and photos too.

I can't get any of the links to work.

But it sounds like D-I-S-I-N-F-O-R-M-A-T-I-O-N to me, at first blush.

I'm inclined to think that the original design was made with an ultimate pancake floor collapse in mind - the floors could easily have been attached to the columns so that the possibility of a collapse would be eliminated, but they weren't. The reason why they weren't seems likely to be to better facilitate their ultimate controlled demolition.

The thought that they were designed for a catastrophic end, exactly like what occurred on 911 has occurred to me also. Who knows what gets these these rich freaks excited??

But to think that they were wired up 30 years ago is highly unlikely, and hugely convenient for the people who today are falling under suspicion for the crime. HUGELY convenient.

Here's one tip: why coat the re-bar with c4, when all you have to do to demolish the building is make the floors drop? You don't have to explode every floor into dust to demolish the tower, so why, when they built it 40 years ago, would they have rigged it so that every concrete floor would explode into dust? Wouldn't they rig it so that every floor collapsed rather than exploded into dust?

The links work for me.

Do they work for anyone else out there? Because they still don't work for me.

Try clicking on the homepage.

http://www.breakfornews.com/

Go to Twin Towers-Built for Demolition, or go directly to this page for the audio files and graphics.

http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2854

Asbestos inspection and envrromental investigations into the twin towers was the time when the towers were loaded with linear shaped charges and wiring to make em cut all stashed under the foam and hidden from view with fresh foam covering. Every job done around Asbestos is a HEAVY hazard site with access controls a project like this needs to have to keep it QUIET.
Even building maintenance's would miss them BECAUSE of the asbestos hazard. The wiring to make it go could have been a Secret bit like Security wiring laid out at the towers construction on the steel BEFORE foaming with fire proofing. Then months before 911 a crew goes in and shoves in the copper shaped cutting charges under the foam against the steel connect the blasting caps to the wiring already there and install the controls give it a REPAIR coat of Asbestos to finish it off and hide any weird stuff hanging out for Maintenance to get curious about. Seems pretty easy to pull off to me. even on the sly. A crew of twenty environmental inspectors could install everything needed to do this job in the hidden spaces of this tower set And the WTC 7 seeing as they all seemed to be made with the same Asbestos fireproofing. This stuff is PERFECT to hide demolition stuff with.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

No, sorry, I even googled "breakfornews.com" and then "breakfornews" but it still wouldn't let the page load.

Is it just me?

..that's weird, it works for me, maybe your isp is playing games? lol

..i think that the only question here is WHEN the explosives were planted..

..there is no doubt that much of this work was done in the months leading up to 9/11, the further conspiracy of pre-planned demolition at construction is interesting, but would have to be proven..

..even though this seems significant, it is in reality just splitting hairs, because the perpetrators are always the same; zionists, the real terrorists..

..there aren't too many military or civilian demolition teams capable of the 9/11 false-flag terror event..

I eventually got to the/a page. Is this really Jim Fetzer - disinfo agent extraordinaire (according to me, and not a few others) who asks the following on this* page?:

quote
How can I reach Christopher Brown?
I’d like to book him. Jim

Jim Fetzer - July 4th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
end quote

*(I'll leave filtered html for another day) At this page: http://sovereignjohn.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/twin-towers-built-for-demo...

Haven't actually looked an any info yet, just thought I'd ask about this.

Well I don't know, I can't get to the audio or discussion pages no matter what I try.

Maybe I've been blacklisted by the disinfoagent's union?

(Sorry to snipe away like this without having seen the original presentation...but there's not much else I can do at this point.

links work from OZ. Could be that some servers on your path to that page are blocking access to that server. It happened to me several times with some pages in US but it could be also that some servers are temporally down. Who knows...

"Let there be Light!"

Does that mean it should work for me like it works for you, Traveller?

Twin Towers - Built for Demo PART 2
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25223#25223

Special Guest: Christopher A. Brown - A second interview

We continue our analysis of the collapse of the WTC Twin Towers,
based on the work of our guest Christopher Brown. Presenting the
case for demo build; exploring the structure of the Towers; and
responding to review of his ideas in the forum after his previous
appearance in Part 1.

The 9/11 3i Investigation The Next Level Show - 12th July, 2007

LISTEN:
Broadband Mp3 Audio
http://www.BreakForNews.com/audio/NextLevel070712a.mp3
Click to Play or Right-Click to 'Save As' and Download.

Dialup Mp3 Audio
http://www.BreakForNews.com/audio/NextLevel070712.mp3
Click to Play or Right-Click to 'Save As' and Download.

VIEW IMAGES & LINKS & DISCUSSION:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25223#25223

There all just another BS artists cavalcade. This man is HIDING the fact of the MAJOR design element that made this pair of towers work.

The two towers BOTH had huge Tuned Mass Dampers. No very tall building works with out some mode of sway moderation. This guy is hiding this element of the towers. I would think a 600-1000+ ton counterweight 2/3 of the way up the tower would rate a far larger amount of time and notice. Why is everyone hiding these dampers?

U-238 is 1.7 times the weight per volume than lead. Greed and physical necessity for the space not to cause everyone to throw up from motion sickness. Trust me TMD are a REQUIRED component to a tower this flexible. And i have PLENTY of reasons to think these dampers were filled with U-238 granules. Over 2000 tons of it. Enough to sustain a fire to melt the huge amount of pooled steel seen 2 frickin months after the demo job.

So this show you have here is just another time water i think. Sure he is going at it BUT why do all these guys that purport themselves to be experts always fail to account for these things like the TMD's of a revolutionary design or the fuel to melt that steel.

Lets even not even go into the poor Fire men and dogs that Died.

Suzzette there is no substitute for reading, These Mp3 shows on 911 all seem to have time wasting on there agenda. That and they all miss the IMPORTANT details.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

* Real structures are multi-degree-of freedom systems, and have several vibration modes, each with its own period of vibration.
* The mode with the longest period is called the fundamental period or natural period.

* All structures have some inherent damping, which depends on the construction type, including cladding and partitions.
* Damping actually increases with increasing displacements, although commonly used mathematical models (e.g. NONLIN) do not account for this effect.

* Dynamic effects are an important design consideration for a variety of circumstances:
o A dynamic load tends to resonate with the structure.
+ Wind resonates with very long period structures (> 2 sec).
+ Earthquakes resonate most strongly with shorter period structures (< 1 sec), but can be significant for longer period structures.
+ High frequency loads such as walking or exercise (1 Hz - 3 Hz) can resonate with floor systems.
o A structure vibrates in a range to which humans are sensitive (~3 Hz - ~8 Hz).

* Vibration effects can sometimes be mitigated by altering the structure's period of vibration, adding mass, or by increasing damping through artificial damping or tuned mass dampers.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

PlanetQuo: Truth and Lies

Oh, I'm sorry to hear that Quo has lost a friend, but I must admit that I am most pleased to have gained one! =)

Thanks, Suzette. Good work, and a choice well made.

I still can't get those links to work!

* *

Not much of an explanation, so it's not very convincing at this point. I guess we're supposed to take your word for it a la TFC.

Maybe you still are working for yours truly. Still singing lullabies to Huffy?

You're Australian too? This place is crawling with us.

But to think that they were wired up 30 years ago is highly unlikely, and hugely convenient for the people who today are falling under suspicion for the crime. HUGELY convenient.

I haven't heard the audio yet, but it would seem likely that the towers were built with a view to dismantle them in the future. However, it would make no sense to rig the buildings with explosives from the outset; rather the architects would have catered for easy access to the key areas of the structures that the cutter charges would need to be placed for it's demolition in the future. Although thermite has a high ignition point, wikipedia says about thermite:

Similarly, finely-powdered thermite can be ignited by a regular flint lighter, as the sparks are burning metal (in this case, the highly-reactive rare-earth metals lanthanum and cerium). Therefore it is unsafe to strike a lighter close to thermite.

So if a fire were to start in the building, there's too high a risk that it would ignite the thermite and trigger the collapse prematurely.

the thermite mixture is stable in storage, however, in
the event of a fire, the thermite mixture, once ignited, cannot be extinguished with water.

So no problem with the shelf-life, but a pretty stupid idea to incorporate it into the design of the structures.