Everybody who repeats ‘Iran talk’ are Zionist fellow-travellers
The Reputation of The Guardian, R. I. P.
The Guardian and The Observer are in the middle of a remarkable series of articles about Iran and the chances of an American attack on Iran, the latest of which is here http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2127343,00.html All of them follow the Miller/Gordon style made famous in the NYT series of lies about Iraq (of course, Gordon is continuing the tradition by lying for the NYT about Iran). The style is hard to miss: the articles rely on a single-source anonymous tipster from Washington, i.e., a Zionist working for the Lobby, to spread an obvious pile of horseshit, with the fine-print qualifications in the articles not reflected in the headlines. The most recent relies solely on a “well-placed source in Washington”. It backs this up with a quote from a London thinktanker, who says (emphasis in bold):
“"Cheney has limited capital left, but if he wanted to use all his capital on this one issue, he could still have an impact.”
This pattern of deception in The Guardian about Iran has become so obvious that it is creating a controversy of its own, with the paper receiving the worst insult in journalism, being compared to the New York Times.
As I’ve said before, the point of ‘Iran talk’ has nothing to do with an actual attack on Iran, but is a Zionist invention intended to increase Sunni-Shi’ite dissension, dissension which is being successfully exploited by Israel to work on building the Zionist Empire. Everybody who repeats ‘Iran talk’, whether lies about Iran or lies about the upcoming supposed American attack on Iran, is a Zionist fellow-traveler, as evil as Pipes or Dershowitz or Kristol or Perle.
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2007/07/reputation-of-guardian-r-i-p.html
Iran signed a treaty with ussr in 1920 that gave ussr a right to enter Iran and fight against a third party who had entered Iran that ussr considered a national security threat to herself. All I know is that Iran has tried to get out of this treaty since early 1930s but Bolsheviks opposed it. Since nobody talks about it any more and both governments have changed, one might assume it is nullified already. But again, when you hear the alternative stories about how the us helicopters crashed in Tabass in the 1980 hostage rescue mission (that the Russians actually downed them not the sand storm,), you go hmm..! May be that's why Russians don't seem too worried about us attacking Iran.
Countering that idea is how Iran-Iraq war ended. US actually entered the war in 1988 on the side of Iraq, by destroying Iranian navy assets in Persian gulf and taking out a major oil facility and then sending an actual message to Tehran that 'sign the damn thing or we are coming in'. That's where Khomeini said his famous quote that he 'had to drink the chalice of poison' and sign the damn thing.
A google of the topic of Surface to air missiles and the end they put to air operations. The Russian lead KNOW just how useless the modern war machine is versus the current level of missile in use today.
B-52,A-4,F-4 and many others fell in pointing this out. The Russians sure kicked ass with those HIND-8 gunships. But even the huge mighty Russia military were driven off with Surface to air missiles. The Russians lost a hansom pile of hardware to American stinger missiles. As did the Americans to Russian SAM's and other Anti-aircraft systems.
The storm of the NEW war is going to be serious and deadly if it is unleashed.
There are a few combined forces that will be used against the threat of American Empire.
Regular war is not as it will be in coming conflicts. Far WORSE things that have ever gone down in war are going to happen if the Dogs of WAR get going.
Are you ready to do the right things when they get the poo started into the fan?
I will say this Get your hands on medical supplies for plenty of need. At least we can be ready to help if others loose there heads.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.
Just because I firmly believe the zionist regime's in Israel and America want Iran to be de-fanged, does not mean I'm a "fellow traveler zionist" as the article implies.
I state it again.
Israel with the support of the West WILL attempt an attack on Iran LATER IF NOT SOONER.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire