Although not researched per se, if I may add one more thing. If you look carefully you can see a subtle but awkward disproportionate relationship between the apparent number of people active in the website and the amount of efforts required to produce their products. For example Wing TV appeared to have only two people running their programs. But the number of DVDs, books, interviews, etc. they offer seemed to take far more than two people and a few years to produce them. (not considering the obvious lack of scholarly competence of the two.)

Amy Goodman's Democracy Now, or Michael Moore's documentary projects are similar examples. They simply cannot do what they do without having access to the already established and institutionalized media outlets and networks that genuine journalists just are not allowed to use.

And there is oops moments that let the cat out of the bag. Birdman Bryant's open letter to Ahmadinejad and Link-tv's half an hour documentary about Sweden's Anna Lindh assassination were their oops moments for me.

Hi there Katz,

Thank you for your analysis and observations. I agree with your points fully. These are more subtle clues, but clues none the less, to what is really going on behind the frontpage.

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

Shills are easy to spot.

You will know them by their fruits.

"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire

"For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.

A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh."

..Jesus The Christ.

oh, that stinks.

can you show us some links to the offending material please?

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Hi there Qrswave,

I am not sure if the link can still be found at his site, but fortunate some anti-Islaam sites stored the offending weekly newsletter.

As you will see, this is a blatant confession on his part, not an insinuation on mine.

http://forums.prolife.org.ph/yabbse/index.php/topic,1107.0.html

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

and you condemn the entire work of a man? If that's Muslim thinking, then maybe Birdman has a point.

Here in the West, we practice tolerance and plurality. Or at least we try. Besides, I think you misunderstand what he is saying, but I am not going to dissect the article, because it's a waste of time.

Stop playing this game of "trying to find the shill" and do something productive.

Birdman has not really pushed this viewpoint lately, so I think it's rather a red herring. And unlike some people we know, Birdman can make a defense of his position as he publishes correspondence with people that disagree with him.

Give it up.

This is not just "one article."

This is definitely enough to form an opinion of his character.

I'm posting it here for others to read carefully and judge for themselves.

Clearly, the man is a psychotic supremacist who either knows nothing about Islam or is a zionist, who knows all about it and wants to destroy it, if not by spreading lies than by killing all its adherants.

Deranged and deluded fool.

You can't destroy knowledge.

Date: January 24, 2006
To: The usual suspects
From: John Bryant (john@thebirdman.org)
Re: Birdman's Weekly Letter #361: Islam Is the Enemy
Contents: Opinion (as always)
Note to new readers: If you want to know more about me or my 40 books, please visit my website at http://www.thebirdman.org. To subscribe or unsubscribe to Birdman's Weekly Letter, just send me a note. If you are a subscriber and haven't been getting it regularly, see the instructions on the Daily Reads page of my website. This material is copyright by the author, but may be distributed for nonprofit use in electronic format provided it includes author's name, notice of copyright, author's email address and website, and a Birdman's Weekly Letter subscription invitation. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder.

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Temp/Temp-BirdmansWeeklyLetter.html

The Real Enemy Is Islam

For many years I have been writing about the threat which Jews or the Jewish establishment pose for America and the West, and I would not so much as take back a line of it. But in reading the article by Mark Steyn which I posted recently, "It's the Demography, Stupid: The real reason the West is in danger of extinction" found at

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-PerceptiveArticleOnTheWest'sWillToLive-MarkSteyn-Tony.htm

I have undergone a sort of epiphany: I now fully understand in both an intellectual and emotional sense the threat of Islam. It is entirely possible that we could blame the Jews for this threat -- it was they who forced the Balfour Declaration on the world as payment for getting America into the First World War on the side of Britain, and it is they -- or at least their Zionist untermenschen -- who took Palestine by brutal force from the Arabs and have held it by means of the same brutality for nigh half a century. So blame the Jews if you like -- curse them at midnight on the full moon and stick pins into the dolls of all their leaders, but face the facts: The Islamics are on the warpath against America and the West, they are within a hairsbreadth of obtaining nuclear weapons, they are filled with religious fervor to win the world for their Prophet, and will do so with little thought for their own lives. And that, my friends, is quite enuf to put us six feet under unless we wipe these people off the face of the earth.

Yes, my friends, that is a very harsh assessment, but a very realistic one. We almost fell to them at Tours in 732; we almost fell to them at Vienna in 1683; they dominated at least one Western country -- Spain -- for hundreds of years until we finally kicked their miserable arses into the Mediterranean in the late 15th century; and they are poised like the Nightmare on Elm Street to haunt us again and again in the coming years -- if not by nuclear intervention, then by repopulating our territory with their genetic and ideological clones thanks to the short-sighted stupidity of our captains of industry and our politically-correct head-up-the-butt elites. And for this, too, the Jews may be blamed if you so wish to blame them: They are happy for a good supply of cheap labor for their sweatshops, and they are delighted to watch the jerks and tics of the West as it writhes in its death throes from the poisoned pill of multiculturalism which the Jews have so expertly eased down our throats. But of course the Jews are too smart by half, since they will die at the same time the West does, or at least their condition will be significantly worsened by having to live under Koranic craziness rather than Western tolerance.

And don't get the idea that Islam is 'just another religion' in the sense that Dr Johnson remarked of governments, that there was not a dime's worth of difference between them. Yes, Islam emerged from the same roots as Judaism and Christianity, and even honors Jesus and other Biblical characters in its scriptures; but it is altogether a different animal. More specifically, it is an evolutionary phenomenon which has proved a good and useful creed for the Neanderthalic peoples of the mideast, but these people -- being of lower intelligence and higher primitiveness than Western man -- require a brutal system of outer restraint that chops limbs and heads, stones adulterers, whips miscreants, supports quirt-carrying morals police, embraces rape for improperly-attired women, imposes rigid censorship, forbids alcohol, and in general makes itself the antipode of the Christian-shaped inner-directed West which values freedom and creates its physical and cultural treasure directly as a result of it. Islamics need their system because primitive and brutal people need primitive and brutal controls on their behavior; and it is therefore no surprise that evolution has provided them with the brutal system that they require to function. It is certainly no surprise that negroes, who are a brutal and primitive people in their own right, have been attracted in droves to the Islamic faith, which is so far the only system that has been able to control them and thus allow them a degree of prosperity and happiness. But brutality -- while it works to keep the system functioning and its people alive -- does not work well, because people respond much better to rewards for good behavior than they do to punishments for bad, as the late Harvard psychologist BF Skinner has so properly emphasized. And it is clear that, if Western man is placed under the brutal restraints of Islam, both his culture and his mind will be reduced to the primitive state -- a sort of artificially induced Alzheimer's encephalopathy which comes about as a result of what amounts to mind-numbing solitary confinement beneath the yoke of Islam.

And now I am going to give you the bottom line of all this -- a bottom line that will undoubtedly shock many readers to the core: George Bush is right. He is right to see Islam as the enemy; he is right to want to stop Islamic nuclear ambitions; he is right to support Israeli hegemony over Arab lands. Yes, George Bush is crazy -- after a fashion, anyway. Yes, he has done much which is insupportable and insufferable, from filling his cronies' and his family's pockets via government contracts to complicity in 911 and trashing American civil liberties. He may be crazy, but -- to paraphrase Billy Joel -- a lunatic may be just what we're looking for: There is an important usefulness to Bush's craziness, for it has induced him to start a war with the real enemy. In fact it is only craziness -- the craziness induced by religious nuttism, which Bush possesses in abundance -- that would give a man the courage to start a war, and thereby to take a position contrary to the soft, liberal pacifist buffoonery that has opened us to destruction from the multicult, and especially from Islam. Yes, George Bush is a danger to the Constitution, but he is also a danger to our enemies as no one else has ever been; and for this reason we must -- if reluctantly -- wish him well.

Those who have been reading my recent essays will recognize that the above remarks are reflective of my belief that it is religion, and only religion, that will make us strong enuf to insure that 'we will overcome' in the face of our enemies. I have already made a case for this as it applies to the Jews, but I see now that it is equally true -- and perhaps MORE true -- in the case of Islamics. Both the Jews and the Islamics see themselves as fighting a holy war, and we cannot do less or we will be the losers. Our physical resources -- great as they may be -- are simply not sufficient by themselves to overcome either of these threats, for men do not fight with an edge that will bring victory unless they believe in what they are fighting for; and a belief in SUVs and a home in the suburbs is not going to hold a candle to a belief in spiritual reality and the continuity of generations.

Now some are going to read this essay and conclude that I have somehow 'sold out' -- that I am saying that we must fight Islamics and not Jews. But in fact I have not 'sold out', because everything I have said here is perfectly consistent with what I have been saying all along: We must preserve Western civilization, and in doing so, we must beware the Jewish threat. It is true that I am not objecting to allying with Israel to defeat the Arabs, but then the Arabs have a saying that applies here: 'The enemy of your enemy is your friend'. To put it another way, maybe we should think of the situation as a two-front war -- against both Islam and Judah -- where we have no objection to getting help from Israel, but will deal with Israeli and Jewish sins as the opportunity warrants. We do not wish to forget, however, that Israel is of value to us in another way: It remains a place for Jews to go should they somehow be persuaded to remove their mandibles from our hide. That then will then allow us to say, in a notably improved Zionist tradition: "Let Israel be gathered! THIS year in Jerusalem!"

Psycho.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Stop playing this game of "trying to find the shill" and do something productive.

Birdman has not really pushed this viewpoint lately, so I think it's rather a red herring. And unlike some people we know, Birdman can make a defense of his position as he publishes correspondence with people that disagree with him. -dupid

Speak for yourself, you finger pointing hypocrite, you and a few others here have been on the attack for many hundreds of posts, to the extent that most of us are fed up with your bullsh*t conjecture.

There isn't much room for flip-flopping (like a red herring =P) on the subject of zionism, so someone who is prone to changing their mind tawards sympathy for the devil is in my opinion not someone who is stable, or to be trusted.

This is not just "one article."

Yes it is. Show me another one or anything on his website that promotes this viewpoint.

"This is definitely enough to form an opinion of his character."

You must be right.

"Clearly, the man is a psychotic supremacist who either knows nothing about Islam or is a zionist, who knows all about it and wants to destroy it, if not by spreading lies than by killing all its adherants."

Oh geez, thanks for the overemotional, foaming at the mouth, condemnation. Are you even familiar with his work?

"Deranged and deluded fool."

Impressive. You should write for the National Enquirer.

"Speak for yourself, you finger pointing hypocrite, you and a few others here have been on the attack for many hundreds of posts, to the extent that most of us are fed up with your bullsh*t conjecture."

Hi DBS/Eric. Then ignore me, idiot.

Right back at you, schmuck. BTW, that's a dead subject, so stop trying to bring it back. You certainly don't seem tired of it.

He's linked to a couple of my posts in the past.

When I said it's not just "one post" I meant it figuratively.

Its content is very weighty and says volumes about his character.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

"overemotional, frothing at the mouth condemnation . . . "

Isn't that a bit of an overstatement?

How do you expect me to react, as a Muslim, to a man who advocates "wiping Muslims off the face of the earth?"

Perhaps, I should ask him what he means by that before I jump to conclusions, being the "primitive, backwards, Neanderthal" that I am.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

‘How do you expect me to react, as a Muslim, to a man who advocates "wiping Muslims off the face of the earth?"’

Maybe he was prompting you. Ridiculous statements are calculated to get a rise. Don’t fall for it.

I am familiar with Birdman's work and have never seen anything like this on his website. Maybe I'm not paying attention. He mostly just links to other article.

I don't trust the source, because it is reprinted in a forum and is not linked to his website. I’m not going to go looking for it on his website either, because I really don’t care whether it’s true or not.

By these ridiculous standards, everyone is going to turn out to be one of them. I’m getting tired of it. People should start using their own brain and just pick and choose the information that they find helpful.

We’re not picking a significant other, we're looking for info that might be useful. The thing I like about Birdman’s site is that he links to a lot more than just Zionism, politics, etc.

The one thing that this whole fight with you know who has taught me is that I’m really tired of discussing who’s a shill and who’s not. It’s useful, only to a point, and then you have to move on. People are more interested in talking about who’s for real than Zionism, which is what they probably want. Everybody should just go with information that they are comfortable with and use their own filter instead of some “shill alert” that sinks all the info one has, because of a few questionable morsels.

I respect Birdman because he has a lot of crazy ideas. This article, if genuine, is definitely not the most shocking. But at least he has the temerity to make his case, somewhat intelligently. In my book, you get a lot of points for that.

If you want to think this man is the devil incarnate for some stupid ideas of his, go right ahead. I just don't think that's the way to go.

Hi there Qrswave,

You are completely correct in that this article was not a one off post. It was also a mailshot to his entire mailing list and this particular 'newsletter' was then taken up by Islaamic hate sites around the world.

Maybe he has stopped pushing his venom openly, but he has NEVER retracted anything that he has said and has NEVER apologised for what he said. Let's face what he says - that the war in Iraq is justified on the basis that it kills Muslims. Even if Bush himself believed that, he would never have publicly voiced it.

The Muslims who tried to take him to task at the time this came to their attention were all ignored by him.

He is now waiting to snare his next lot of innocent victims. For this reason he never allows back access to his letters or opinion pages. It is just his hard luck that rightwing neo-nazis enjoyed the stuff he put out and were delighted at that particular piece and so saved it for posterity.

He also put links in the piece to all the supporting material that so inspired him (which he has also now removed) advocating his followers to "read and understand".

Thank you for your objectivity.

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

"He is now waiting to snare his next lot of innocent victims."

He's lurking in the bushes. Watch Out!

"It is just his hard luck that rightwing neo-nazis enjoyed the stuff he put out and were delighted at that particular piece and so saved it for posterity."

He's a white nationalist. That's no secret. Why didn't you just go with that angle if you wanted to discredit him.

Did you know the white nationalists were practically the only group that had information on Zionism before the internet?

Do you have to become a white nationalist to read their info and be educated?

Do you have to become a Muslim to read their info and benefit from it?

Even if they tried they could not do it. They may eliminate millions, but kill them all?

Demographics is a big problem for the Zionists (including the Zionist Christians). They are a minority and the enemy is the majority. The only way for the minority to control the majority is to sub divide them, and to make them weak, in morals, character and as human beings with honor, to get inside their minds and appeal to the animal instincts.

Best to ignore all this and know that all their mind control, TV etc. is designed to make you powerless and stupid, to shape your perceptions, so that you accept their framework, and index of reality.

Reject it all. Only God is the All-Powerful He loves the good and has promised them victory. So we have to become the good...by learning what it is and living by it, acting by it...and we will get victory.

The condition of a Muslim is amazing, even if harmed by a scratch from a thorn, he/she is blessed. And only those who are loved by God are plunged into difficulties....so that they can emerge from them as warriors for Truth.

"..unless we wipe these people [Muslims] off the face of the earth.."

"..maybe we should think of the situation as a two-front war -- against both Islam and Judah -- where we have no objection to getting help from Israel, but will deal with Israeli and Jewish sins as the opportunity warrants."

Almost had to quote the whole article!!

This bird-man is an unstable racist, just what the zionists want in their 'pale nationalist' groups.

Welcome, Muhammad!

Turn off that TV pass the NEWS feed on the streets. See all around the tricks THIS lot of money driven fools have used to gain. This and the days further on will just show how fast the mass reign in of this Bunch of money changer gold hording scum how futile there efforts were.

Somehow i get the idea that even with the mighty media teat to suck they will (After a stupid move on THERE part) be astonished at the severity and SWIFTNESS of the corrective force applied to the FIX for everyone living thing on this FRAGILE blue ball of life.

Movies-Crap. NEWS sheets of ANY sort-Crap. Magazines of ANY sort-Crap. Tech gadgets of most types-Crap. Software of most availability-Crap.. I could list every Co. Individually but YOU KNOW just who is not fair and who is. I would just use YOUR own measures and Steer with Jealous regard EVERY dollar spent during a WAR. EVERY CENT!

Fail here and monsters lay in the waters beyond.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

"Best to ignore all this and know that all their mind control, TV etc. is designed to make you powerless and stupid, to shape your perceptions, so that you accept their framework, and index of reality."

Ignore all what? Information? We were talking about an article that is not representative of a website. As they say, don't throw away the baby with the bath water. Use what is useful and ignore the rest. That's my point. Even TV has useful information, if you know how to filter out the garbage.

... I must admit, I never knew who the birdman was. However, it is true that among white nationalists are some of the fiercest opponents of ZOG. However, if you're a racist white supremacist (or racist/supremacist of any race/tribe), that doesn't really give you credit in your opposition to racist Jewish supremacism. I'm not saying that all white nationalists are so, but some are as racist in their thinking as the Zionists they denounce.

Anyways duped, I'll take your advice to look into birdman for myself and filter his info for myself, rather than declare him a shill because of one 'unrepresentative article'.

And I hope you can give the same advice to those who make it their prime efforts on WUFYS to attack TFC, rather than let us do our own filtering.

This advice equally applies to DBS, btw.

“And I hope you can give the same advice to those who make it their prime efforts on WUFYS to attack TFC, rather than let us do our own filtering.”

Something tells me that they don’t take advice too well. You’d think they would be tired of it, but I guess not. I'm trying to steer clear of the whole thing at this point.

“This advice equally applies to DBS, btw.”

It sure does. Bring a big filter. My complaint with them was more that they discredited themselves with their actions and contradictions, rather than the information. There’s not a lot of new information there either, unfortunately. But if people still like it, then they should go there. I for one won’t stop listening to TFC, more out of amusement than to learn anything new. They seem to have lost their inspiration and their constant attacking sounds juvenile and counterproductive at this point.

Hey Mahummed. When will Hamas stop killing Arab Christians in Palestine? When will the oppression of Iranian Christians stop? When will the killing of Iraqi Christians stop by the Iraqi insurgency?

In effect...when will you Mahummedians stop posing with guns? When will you Jihadist fools lay down your guns in Palestine and take up camera's to film the oppression? When will you retards learn to conduct a funeral with a "solem" tone and stop jumping up and down screaming death to israel while firing wildly ove a dead babies body?

Ya see...when you bunch of cretins learn to do this maybe we in the West will be able to help you. Until then...you live by it...you die by it.

I guess we are seeing evoloution in action.

When will the racial supremacists stop comitting genocide against innocent people?

The ideas you have about what Hamas is like have come to you by clever and deceptive Zionist propaganda. Hamas are very different than you think...

The Western media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. They intentionally portray Hamas in as negative a way as possible. In reality, Hamas are an exceptionally courageous group of people, and are much more decent and honorable than the Jewish Supremacists.

Don't believe everything you see on TV or read in newspapers - wake up from your slumber, free your mind from all the Zionists' lies and deceit!

Wow, brendan, the very fact that you call Muslims Muhammedans shows your ignorance and bias.

What if I told you some Palestinian Christians voted for Hamas, because they were the better alternative to the corrupted Fateh?

What if I told you Hamas never killed Christians, that Christian and Muslim leaders commonly hold protests, rallies, and conferences side-by-side in occupied Palestine, and that Christians are as much part of the resistance as Muslims are, sometimes even militarily?

Funny how Christians were able to live in Jerusalem and Bethlehem for centuries untouched under 'Muhammedan' rule, and only when Zionist occupation came about, did their numbers start to dwindle (along with all the other Palestinians forced out of Palestine).

And who are you to tell how Palestinians should behave to get your support, when they are under the gun, and you take offence to their wails and cries in funerals.

'Die, and be silent about it', you say. Well, they've been silent for decades. Now they're screaming. What are you doing about it?

No ignorance here Monkey Zerg. O'Connell a.k.a Donnie Darko a.k.a True Believer a.k.a Quo Vadius etc etc is part of the Zionist/Nazi White Supremacist network that PlanetQuo and I have been exposing for weeks now. They infiltrate Patriot groups, sites and forums with one purpose in mind, to stir up racism so that the ADL always have food in which to act upon.

Did you read the other comment O'Connell made?

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2580#comment-10672

The link below explains what the deal is. Scroll down until you see 'doclover' near the bottom.

http://planetquo.net/The_French_Deception/Index/OConnell/Wogs.htm

Try this one too:

http://planetquo.net/The_French_Deception/Index/WUFYS/Fester.htm

Then O'Connell claims to be all this:

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z57/ANTIZIO/DONNIEDARKO.jpg

And on and on it goes.......

Brenden O'Connell is the only other person I've ever heard use the word ' cretin' Quote ( partial ) from Mr. O'Connell "Ya see...when you bunch of cretins learn to do this maybe we in the West will be able to help you. Until then...you live by it...you die by it.

I guess we are seeing evoloution in action.

Brendon OConnell | Sat, 2007-07-21 08:51

Try this one too:

http://planetquo.net/The_French_Deception/Index/WUFYS/Fester.htm

Michael and PlanetQlouseau, like Bart Simpson who demonstates it in his sister's science experiment by suffering repeated electric shocks in his attempt to grab her electrified cookie, have once again proven that they're dumber than hamsters. From the same geniuses that expect us to believe that these two women are one and the same comes this hilarious blunder.

Donnie Darko = Brendon O'Connell = Fester = James Linton = Crimes Of Zion

You two refuse to admit that you're idiots. The rest of us admit that you are, though. Michael, you sound so articulate and intelligent up there in your exchange with Muhammad; how is it possible that you can be this stupid? I'm not Brendon O'Connell, Nina is not Gina, and you two are not very clever, not very clever at all.

Are you the one that put that 'JFC' poster up here at WUFYS? If so, that was a very BAD MOVE, dude!

"...I just can't wait to see Brokeback Mountain again... man, i havent seen a movie this many times since Cruisin' with Pacino...."

"Sorry MichaelBabe... I may not look like a cowboy... but I sure can dig deep... and work my way into the tightest of (rabbit) holes!"

This may help explain their wild imaginations:

Sad when seen taken in the larger context, really. =(

What gives?

Somebody is is playing ...games here or a lot of people are very tightly allied.

Hey, Bishop... were you looking to join some "alliance"? You see, I noticed from the time log that you posted only 2 and 4 minutes after I did.

keep it up and the comments will be closed.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Are you the one that put that 'JFC' poster up here at WUFYS? If so, that was a very BAD MOVE, dude!

No mate, I didn't. That image is something I found on myspace, which I then posted as a comment on the myspace profile of a friend of mine. Michael brought it here because he knew it would offend the religious sensibilities of the people that frequent this site, and cast doubt on my character, even though he himself doesn't find it offensive, and doesn't think Jesus would either.

I didn't create the image, I just found it funny, and so did the person who received it in a comment. Michael and PlanetQuo have since reproduced it on at least 5 different occasions on different sites and fora, including myspace, PlanetQuo.Net, and WUFYS, and you can be sure they'll post it again. I've apologised for my role in it's showing up here, despite the fact that in reality, I played no role in it at all.

I'm not a religious person, Bishop, but I believe "God" is in the good and the bad, the profound and the profane, and that the bigger insult to Christ and his father is surely to attribute our own petty, dualistic value judgments to him as if he requires something of us. God is whole, One, and perfect, non? He or It is most certainly not neurotic or capable of being harmed or offended by us. His perfection would necessarily preclude that possibility. How can God be omnipotent, and at the same time be offended by parts of himself? That doesn't make sense.

Nonetheless, my apology stands.

Please don't close or censor any more of my blogs or posts, it would look kinda suspicious of you. Have you not read in the Holy Scriptures, when our Lord spoke " do you not know that I could ask of my Father and He would send 12 legions of Angels to fight at my side"? I am seeking the truth and hope all others here are doing likewise. How are we to do so if you shut down the 'natural' process of conversation here? If you " shut me up " you are not silencing me, ... you are silencing He who has sent me. Peace and long life to you.

Rafeeq,

Thank you for your very polite and thoughtful response to me. I would have liked to have posted my reply on the blog that yours was posted on, but that blog was shut down before I had the chance to.

I, as a Traditional Roman Catholic, was deeply offended by the vile and blasphemous image of Our Lord Jesus Christ, that was posted here.

And to Dead Bishop,
The reason I posted the photos of Michael aka Fugazi and PlanetQuo with the funny comments is because of this hit piece that PlanetQuo just did on me.

http://planetquo.net/The_French_Deception/Index/Whippette/Deception.htm

Hi there Whippette,

Glad to see that you too were offended by the unpleasant image that had been posted.

Although it is not really my thing, I had a look at the link in your comment that was intended for someone else. I must say that the experience has left me completely and utterly dazed. There does not appear to be any serious research at the link and people seemed to be in a flap about a single email from someone making a lot of difficult to prove claims

The page is definitely a personal slur against you, but this person (I can't quite work out who the author is meant to be, it is confusing) has also made comments about Daryl, Eric and others.

Although this person may be allowed to make comments about your opinions or research, it is entirely wrong for them to slander you.

I was extremely annoyed by an mp3 which downloaded on to my computer from this link, that I thought was going to be a discussion or presentation of evidence about you. I was disgusted when it turned out to be a song that the link author thought was applicable to you. This is completely childish and infantile, it serves no valid purpose.

In my opinion the author of this page should apologise for such purile conduct and inference about you. If they have anything legitimate to say about you then they should put forth clearly and simply their claims.

Respectfully,
Muhammad

That's interesting about Birdman. I had found him to be very right on some issues, although I disagreed with him on others.

For example, he advocated a minimalist, libertarian government, and said that anarchy could not work. But his libertarianism would not only be unsustainable, but could never come about. A relatively honest, intelligent leader would never be permitted to roll back the frontier of the state for long, before the Zionists would replace him with a puppet who would be more amenable to their lust for power and profit. A non-statist solution would allow us to throw off the yoke of corrupt power brokers who bribe and blackmail leaders into furthering the Zionist cause.

See this piece by Birdman Bryant, in which he argues that we should openly embrace the Jews and cultivate their help:

Source: http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Fight/Fight-Jews&Haters.html

As an atheist, I am not particularly concerned about images. However, religious people will find certain images offensive and insulting, and the 'benefit' to those who see such images as a "joke" would be outweighed by the cost to those whose beliefs are insulted. If such images are privately circulated then little harm would be done. But I could not condone public posting of such images where some might take offense.

Finally, those who have not realised that the PlanetQuo team have turned themselves into a laughing stock with their absurd theories such as Brendon O'Connell = Fester = Crimes Of Zion = Lord Sidious, they might want to listen to this audio of a May 16, 2007 voicemail message left for Suzette the Whippette by Jim Kerr of PlanetQuo. Is this heavy breathing and laughing the voice of sanity? Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo aka the Yorkshire Ripper aka Peter Sutcliffe :-)

hahaha
Who was the lucky recipient of that oddity?

Dead Bishop,

I see that your perception skills have been honed by being a regular here at WUFYS. You found me out! I operate all these handles you mention, plus scores more. Let's see if you can spot them.

whippette | Sat, 2007-07-21 19:55

Geeez,

I was the lucky recipient of Quo's voicemail. Quo left this voice message for me while we were still friends. I only discovered this voice mail a few days ago. I couldn't possibly have deprived the world of this "little gem".

CHANGE YOUR NUMBER.

Change your heart...Repent and do Penance.

It's too good to be true - it reminds me of the Taxil Hoax:

"Taxil ... mentioned the struggle for the control of Palladism between two powerful Satanic high priestesses called Diana Vaughan and Sophia Walder. To make these two fictitious characters more believable, Taxil ... pretended these women were in touch with other well-known Freemasons of the time who were secret members of Palladism, including the Italian prime minister Francesco Crispi (1818-1901), the powerful great master of Italian Freemasonry Adriano Lemmi (1822-1906), and Albert Pike (1809-1891), the great commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America. Although Pike was particularly controversial during the U.S. Civil War, Taxil made him the secret Satanic Pope of the World, who reigned over a worldwide Satanic-Masonic enterprise from his "Luciferian Holy See" in Charleston, South Carolina (perhaps a strange and exotic place for the average European reader of the time, as well as the place where the Civil War began). When the Roman Catholic bishop of Charleston ruled out the possibility that his city was the seat of a "Luciferian Holy See," Palladist high priestess Diana Vaughan personally suggested that some U.S. bishops were perhaps in league with the Satanists. According to Taxil, Diana Vaughan had converted to Catholicism and was hiding in a monastery for fear of being kidnapped by Palladists. From her hiding place, she was busy publishing a monthly journal (written, of course, by Taxil) that included her recollections. Bishops, cardinals, and even the Vatican congratulated Taxil for being instrumental in the conversion of Diana Vaughan. By 1894 other anti-Masonic writers-possibly to the genuine delight of Taxil, who may not have been in league with them originally-began writing their own books about both Diana Vaughan and her archrival Sophia Walder..."
http://2s2.com/chapmanresearch/user/documents/anti-mormon.html

Intriguing story.. however, there is no 'versus'. Suzette and I no longer have a conflict. What we did have would best be described as a 'mutual' misunderstanding.

You see, the resolution of our differences has allowed our creator- novelist- chronicler to abandon us and focus on his next, more ambitious project, a dramatic teen fiction series.

So we are each on our own now.

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Nina Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Suzi Blah Blah Blah Blah

BORING!

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.