Bollyn exposes Chertoff
Wonder why the Z's don't like Bollyn? Look what he was doing back in 2005:
4 March 2005
Controlled press hides Chertoff's Israeli roots:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-Chertoff_roots.html
Also, there is an audio interview with Smith and Bollyn:
Saturday, 4 November 2006
Christopher Bollyn, exposes the Chertoff family as hard-core Zionists:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-4Nov2006.html
Why does Smith have a site anyhow?
You Should have a fourm on YOUR OWN SITE!
First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:
are you seriously claiming that were it not for C Bollyn (whom anyway you are just using as a wedge, without any consideration for his wishes, and without any permission to cite him) we wouldn't know who Chertoff is?
Your arrogance is extraordinary, for people with no real background in this line of study whatsoever - it's hilarious, too, when you attack people like M Hoffman III, incidentally - he is as genuine as the day is long, and has been sticking his head into the mouths of lions for literally decades.
David Duke was posting articles on his site exposing Michael Chertoff's Zionist sympathies in January 2005.
1/12/2005 Israel-firster, Michael Chertoff appointed Director of Homeland Security
Posted under: General— @ 2:55 pm
(left) Former head of ‘Joint Terrorism Task Force’ in the Justice Department is a jewish supremacist who let go a hundred Israeli Spies apprehended by the FBI
by M. P. Shiel
President George W. Bush nominated former JTTF boss and current federal judge Michael Chertoff (pictured, with Bush this morning), a thuggish and fanatical Jewish supremacist, to replace Tom Ridge as the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Bush stated, speaking of Chertoff as of a close and revered friend: “When Mike is confirmed by the Senate, the Department of Homeland Security will be led by a practical organizer, a skilled manager and a brilliant thinker.” Bush referred to Chertoff as a “good leader in the war against terror.”
Possibly implying that Chertoff gave short shrift to the law and constitutional rights when attacking the enemies of Zionism and multiracialism, Bush said that Chertoff “had an impressive record of cutting through red tape as an assistant attorney general.”
Stating that “Our nation is still at war,” Bush equated “cyberterrorism” (by which he may mean nothing more than investigative online journalism which exposes Jewish supremacist crimes) with “Weapons of Mass Destruction”:
“The Department of Homeland Security will also continue working to reduce the nation’s vulnerabilities to weapons of mass destruction and cyberterrorism,” Bush said.
Bush was also quick to point out Chertoff’s multiraciailist credentials: “He stood against racial profiling. He’s worked with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund to represent poor inmates on death row.”
Investigator and author Mark Farrell stated that Chertoff was reportedly “instrumental to the entrapment and fraud” which resulted in the imprisonment of Matt Hale, adding that Chertoff and his accomplices ought to be put on trial themselves, saying that “they should be fairly dealt with in the courts for their crimes, and not have statements manufactured against them, unlike in Hale’s case.”
Pro-White activist Chester Doles had false gun charges laid against him under Chertoff’s watch, though Doles possessed firearms no different from those of his neighbors and had done nothing more than speak out for White interests and against a real terror threat that Chertoff and his gang pointedly ignored — illegal immigration.
Pro-White writer and thinker David Duke was forced into prison on outrageously falsified charges under direct orders from Chertoff immediately after he began an international speaking tour exposing Zionist espionage and manipulation of the U.S. givernment into war against Iraq. Duke stated in an American Dissident Voices interview with Kevin Alfred Strom: “Within thirty days, I was prosecuted by the Justice Department in this case, and the pressure from that came out of Washington and Michael Chertoff’s office.”
Steven Swan, a writer who exposed the Israeli/9-11 connection, also states that he was railroaded into prison under selective prosecution initiated by Chertoff’s office.
Jewish supremacists were quick to praise Chertoff’s latest appointment. “Judge Michael Chertoff is a wise choice to lead the Department of Homeland Security during these dangerous times,” according to Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the “American Center for Law and Justice” a neoconservative front group. (Sekulow, by the way, was an employee of Chertoff at the Justice Department.)
The BBC notes that “Mr Chertoff has been described as the driving force behind some of the most controversial initiatives in the war on terrorism…. Civil liberties groups have accused him of curtailing free speech and the rights of the criminal defendant.”
Principled civil libertarians on both the left and right note Chertoff’s willingness to skirt the law and justify imprisonment without trial or counsel.
According to author Steve Brill in his book After, Chertoff stated that his department’s “detainees” should be held for long periods of questioning without a hearing and that even if some got a hearing, “the hearings could not only be done in secret, but also could be delayed, and that even after the hearings were held and they were ordered deported [usually for only minor immigration violations], there was nothing in the law that said they absolutely had to be deported immediately. They could be held still longer.”
Chertoff, according to Brill, knew that the prisoners “were entitled to call a lawyer from jail, but the lists the INS provided of available lawyers invariably had phone numbers that were not in service…. according to one person who says he was there, someone in the room remarked that the government should not try too hard to make sure these people could contact lawyers. ‘Let’s not make it so they can get Johnnie Cochran on the phone,’ another lawyer added.”
Brill, according to columnist Nat Hentoff, states that “there was indeed a deliberate, pervasive blocking of detainees’ right to phone lawyers. And those orders, as Brill’s book reveals, came from the top. At the very top, next to Ashcroft, was Michael Chertoff.”
The conservative watchdog group Accuracy in Media claims that Chertoff was involved in the TWA Flight 800 coverup, while Independent Judiciary investigators say that Chertoff is responsible for “dangerous curtailments to free speech and the rights of criminal defendants.”
Chertoff’s Zionist sympathies are well known. It was under Chertoff’s direct orders that the largest foreign spy ring ever to operate in the United States — the Mossad’s over 200 “Israeli Art Students” — were released and sent back to Israel without having to face a single charge. This occurred not long before the revelation that the Mossad was assembling literal murder gangs — death squads — to kill enemies of Israel and Zionism worldwide, specifically including the United States. The Israeli hit squad announcements were not even mentioned, much less criticized, by “tough” “anti-terrorist” Chertoff and Bush.
In 2002, Chertoff turned down an offer by Bush to name him to head the Securities and Exchange Commission, evidently believing that his then-position at the Justice Department would give him greater opportunities for advancing Jewish interests. As is usual, the Jewish agenda is supported by bought politicians on both sides of the aisle — “liberal” Democrat Ted Kennedy supported Chertoff when he was appointed to the U.S. Appeals Court and observers predict he and other Democrats will support him now. Another Democrat (and fellow extreme Jewish supremacist), Charles Schumer, has come out strongly in support of Chertoff: “[he has an] understanding of New York’s and America’s neglected homeland security needs… at the outset, he appears to be a strong choice.” (In 2003, Chertoff was confirmed 88 to 1, the one being Hilary Clinton who has a non-political personal grudge against Chertoff because of the Whitewater investigation.)
Standing with Bush at his appointment announcement this morning, Chertoff said he would be working with “the thousands of men and women” who are “protecting our security and promoting our freedom.”
Chertoff’s appointment is an ominous symptom of the Jewish tyranny that has come to America, wrapped in the bloodied and tattered false flag of conservatism.
Not only were Chertoff's loyalties an open secret, but some of Bollyn's claims about Chertoff have been debunked. In this Bollyn article, he asserts that Benjamin Chertoff of Popular Mechanics is related to Michael Chertoff. In fact, he isn't, and it was sloppy journalism on Bollyn's part. No wonder AFP fired him for submitting inaccurate articles. It would have been sheer folly to hire someone to verify his work, when there are professional journalists available who can be trusted to submit reliable articles.
discussed here
Seriously Po-psy-den!
Are you going to link to 9/11 myths as a credible source for debunking the Chertoff link?
Well I guess Osama and his merry men really did flatten south Manhatten with some kerosene then!?
Every heard of Harold Rosenthal? Remember he said they always publish a contradictory account of what happens to cover their own asses?
Does anyone intelligent think 9/11 myths is anything but a site for scared sheeple to go to so they can quell their fears that all the hard evidence they heard about is UNFORTUNATELY TRUE?
They should dock your paycheck this month with that link Po! Seriously!
Poseidon can barely hide his hatred for Chris Bollyn. When the Zionist shill isnt boring the pants off us with maths and physics lectures he is doing his level best to destroy Chris's work and reputation. Chris Bollyn is THE best 9/11 researcher bar none. When you compare Chris's research with the garbage that is on Poseidons site you soon see who the professional researcher is and who the Zionist agent is. Linking to 9/11 myths to try and discredit Chris was a real dumb move because it undermines Poseidons credibility and not Chris Bollyns. I didnt know that site existed until Poseidon linked to it. 9/11 myths is such an obvious disinfo site. I couldnt believe my friggin eyes when I read the crap that is posted there.
Whats your problem with Chris anyway? Did he screw your wife when you were in Tel Aviv on a training course or something? Why do you hate Chris so much? It was Chris who discovered that Ben Chertoff is related to Michael Chertoff but Poseidon would rather believe a disinfo agent like Chertoff than an honest 9/11 researcher like Chris Bollyn. Ferchrissakes even Alex Jones accepts what Chris found out about the Chertoff boys. Chris spends his time producing quality research on how the Zionists did 9/11 but all Poseidon does is go round the net posting on forums. Search Google for poseidon+takeourworldback and youll see that Poseidon is all over the friggin place. Poseidon obviously isnt just a Jew doing this out of love for Israel he is a full time Zionist shill who gets paid for it. Daryl and Eric called it right when they pegged him months ago.
SBalger says that Poseidons handlers should dock his paycheck this month but I think that they should fire him because he isnt very good at his job.
Welcome Daryl,
Having you here adds to the fun. I do hope you continue to post blogs and make comments.
You said in this blog.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2859
"As for what I look like I've been on TV out of London where 2,000,000 tuned in to watch."
-----------------------------------------
Daryl,
Were you actually filmed or videotaped for this television show, or did just your voice "appear"? Do you remember the name of the TV show or the date and channel on which it was aired? I know that a lot of people would like to get their hands on this TV show.
Why don't you have a photo taken of yourself and post it on the Internet? I'm sure someone could help you do this.
And Daryl, my dear, where is your promised forthcoming list of shills? I and others are awaiting with bated breath (no pun intended).
Oh, pretty please, tell me that I made the grade for a top spot on this coveted list!
Suzette the WhipMaster
I'm not going to bother feeding the trolls like Pedros any more. Their attempt to gather information on their opponents came to grief, their 'arguments' have been beaten, and their spamming at WUFYS did them more harm than good. But it'll be fun to hear Daryl's report on today's operation, in his next rant. Eric's prospects of a sizeable share of Rupert's $9 billion fortune must be in serious jeopardy!
I aint no troll Poseidon. I'm just a TFC supporter who agrees with Daryl and Eric on you being Zionist shill. You post message after message accusing Chris Bollyn of being a Zionist agent but you cry like a friggin baby when the same accusation is made against you. There is a lot more evidence against you than against Chris of being a Zionist op. You are one arrogant sonofabitch Poseidon. You accuse Daryl and Eric of pointing the finger at people who dont agree with them but youre doing the same finger pointing that you accuse them of doing. You call me a troll because I think youre a Zionist shill.Im not the only one who believes this either. WTF are you on about with this gathering information on their opponents crap? You sure spout some crap man. You think that you have come out on top do you? Bullshit. You tried hard to destroy Chris Bollyns reputation but you didnt succeed.
So you think is going be fun to hear Daryls next broadcast. I sure as hell hope Daryl rips you to shreds because you deserve it for the lies youve told about him Eric and Chris. Just look at the crap youre spouting about Eric and Murdoch. Ferchrissakes his half sister married Ruperts son. Big friggin deal. At least Eric has the courage to post personal info about himself on the net along with a photo. He doesnt hide like you do. We know that hes in California but we dont know where you are. You sure as hell aint in the States or over in England. Eric doesnt have to hide because hes genuine and you are a total fraud. You cant post your details because you would blow your cover. Youre a Zionist op Poseidon posing as an anti Zionist. Some of us can see straight through you and your bullshit.
Whippette asks why Daryl doesnt have his picture taken and have it posted on the net. Why dont you ask Poseidon the same question? Im sure Daryl will have Whippettes near the top of his list right next to Poseidons. Suzette the WhipMaster? WTF? Have you got balls lady? Are you one of these chicks with dicks? Is there something youve been keeping quiet about Jewette? WhipMaster? Suzette is a man! I always thought there was something not quite right about her but now I know for sure ha ha ha. Suzette the WhipMaster transgender of goyim ha ha ha.
'pedros' seems to have a mental age of about five, but this is probably because 'pedros' is just daryl jerking off.
"we need a few good men... "
http://naqniq.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-call-for-hebrew-speaking-satani...
Well, Poseidon, I guess you are being a good Zionist in keeping up with the writings of your fellow Zionist David Duke. I usually never read David Duke but I guess if you are a Zionist it is important to keep up with his work.
You say that David Duke was “exposing Michael Chertoff’s Zionist sympathies” in January of 2005, prior to Christopher Bollyn’s piece. However, I took the time to read that piece and it is basically softball criticisms masquerading as hardball criticisms. David Duke writes that Chertoff wants:
• no lawyers for detainees,
• wants to hold them indefinitely,
• that he manufactured testimony against defendants,
• that he was “involved” in the curtailment of civil liberties,
• that he was involved in the TWA flight 800 coverup,
• that he has Zionist sympathies,
• that he “sent home the Mossad’s over 200 ‘Israeli art students’ ” (no mention that the vans of these Mossad agents tested positive for bomb residue and no mention of the dancing Israelis who later went on Israeli TV and said that they were sent there to document the event),
• that he wants to advance Jewish sympathies (But in the next sentence he writes: “- as is usual the Jewish agenda is supported by bought politicians on both sides of the aisle.” This makes Chertoff’s desire to “advance Jewish sympathies” seem like just a common occurrence among politicians, nothing particularly egregious.)
Basically, everything in David Duke's piece is stuff we have already heard about and stuff that could be rationalized by an average, uninformed Joe six-pack as what would be considered to be within reason for a tough prosecutor in times of a real tough war against terrorism. His Jewish sympathies are merely what can be commonly found in American politics. This is a fluff piece masquerading as a hit piece, which is consistent with David Duke’s Zionist role in our society.
By contrast, Christopher Bollyn’s November 4th, 2006 audio file and his March 4th, 2005 expose of Chertoff, are much more damning, revealing and specific regarding Michael Chertoff. They explain that:
• Chertoff oversaw the criminal division of the DOJ during the non-investigation of 911,
• Chertoff was the US attorney for the District of New Jersey during the 1993 bombing of the WTC and thus he was in control of the evidence and prosecution relating to that bombing hoax (in which the FBI paid $ 1 million to Mohamed Saleh to hire Muslims from mosques in NY to carry out that bombing [and three of those Muslism turned up in Oklahoma City on the day of the OKC bombing] – the investigation of this hoax also went nowhere),
• Bollyn has received repeated warnings not to write about Chertoff (and now he and his family have gone missing),
• that Chertoff’s mother was the first stewardess of El Al airlines, a state run airline, and that she was an intelligence agent involved in Mossad’s very secret “Operation Magic Carpet”,
• that Chertoff’s father and Uncle were Rabbis,
• that his grandfather was a well known teacher of the Talmud in NYC,
• that his sister was head of Hadassah and brought millions of dollars in fundraising money into Israel in the 30’s and that she attended Hebrew University before Israel was a state,
• that Chertoff’s aunt was working with the Zionist movement in NY + London,
• that the Chertoff family was one of the founding families of Israel,
• that Michael Chertoff was most likely is a dual national and that he most likely lived in Israel in his youth and that he refuses to talk about his youth,
• that in the beginning of the 20th century Michael Chertoff’s family had a family member who was an arsonist who used to set tenement homes on fire in NYC by setting kerosene soaked baby carriages on fire,
• that there was another Chertoff family member who was involved in the communist movement and he was prosecuted for burning US flags,
• that Chertoff’s cousin Benjamin Chertoff wrote the garbage piece “debunking” 911 “conspiracy theories” for Popular Mechanics. (Your attempt to refute this by citing an email of Benjamin Chertoff’s is very dubious. Of course he is going to deny it. He’s a Zionist and Zionists lie routinely. You should know, since you are a Zionist. It is completely in his interest to lie. But you are so determined to discredit Bollyn that without question you take his word for it. I am sure we could find countless criminals accused of crimes who would swear up and down that they were innocent. You can’t take Benjamin Chertoff’s word for it. Furthermore, this was the lead guy who wrote the lying, garbage piece on 911 in Popular Mechanics, so he has no credibility for that reason as well.)
• THAT MICHAEL CHERTOFF WROTE THE PATRIOT ACT along with a Vietnamese colleague,
• And many other very important things about Chertoff and other important topics related to the integrity and security of our nation.
There is no comparison in the level of specificity and detail in the works of David Duke and Christopher Bollyn and the degree to which they actually implicate Chertoff. David Duke’s piece is a false opposition fluff piece while Christopher Bollyn’s work is going for the jugular. David Duke’s info will just fall by the wayside while Christopher Bollyn’s work, by contrast, if enough people hear about it, could result in pandemonium and of Chertoff getting prosecuted and of the American people starting to question the whole twisted system of Zionist control that has been set up for us in this country. No wonder you hate Bollyn’s work and hold out David Duke’s work instead. YOU ARE A LYING, DESPICABLE ZIONIST AND THAT IS JUST HOW WE WOULD EXPECT A ZIONIST TO ACT.
I forgot to mention:
Christopher Bollyn’s November 4th, 2006 audio file and his March 4th, 2005 expose of Chertoff also discuss:
• that the numerous Mossad agents ("Israeli art students" and others employed by "moving companies") who were sent back to Israel by Chertoff had vans that tested positive for bomb materials,
• that Chertoff also sent back the 5 dancing Israeli Mossad agents who later went on Israeli TV and admitted that they were sent to NY to "document the event" (see: http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_ZionSummary.html),
• that the mainstream media has never done a serious biography of Michael Chertoff,
• that Chertoff, as head of Homeland Security, also is in control of our borders, the Coast Guard, the INS, the Secret Service, and more (these facts may not be secret but they are not well known and it is worth pointing them out while pointing out Chertoff’s acute conflict of interest),
• that he is the one responsible for the government's screwed up response to the Katrina disaster.
Did David Duke’s piece mention any of these things or the things listed in my prior post? No. There is no question that Bollyn's piece is much better and much more damning of Chertoff than David Duke's piece. No wonder Poseidon wants to promote David Duke’s piece and to do all he can to discredit Christopher Bollyn. POSEIDON IS A ZIONIST LIAR.
Does anyone happen have the Chertoff genealogical tree handy for our inspection?
Do you know where Bollyn found it? Or did he compile the family's data himself?
the point is, daryl, you are trying to use a supposed neglect of bollyn by everyone except yourself and eric to make yourselves out to be white knights, but in reality bollyn has walked away from you, which is something you just don't seem able to grasp or admit.
In this comment “I always use my real name” Berkeley says “I always use my real name, and look what happens!”
Then refers the reader to this link:
http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2007/01/david_gregory_p.html
The page links to a post with the first comment made by (allegedly, according to Berkeley) Rowan Berkeley on January 27, 2007 3:02 am. Within the comment we read:
“I don't think it is correct to talk about a disinformational campaign in the formal sense, like a concrete conspiracy hatched in a physical smoke-filled room, in many cases. Outside of the core conspirators, there is merely a climate of conformity. It's like under Stalin : you didn't need to send goons to every journalist's doorstep to make the situation clear.”
A little further down we read Berkeley’s disclaimer posted August 01, 2007 at 11:35 am (7 months after) which reads:
“This is really most bizarre. I have been receiving snapshots of this page from people such as my hebrew teacher, who profess to find in it proof that I am indeed the loathsome spotted reptile of fable. However, none of the above were actually posted by me, so the case is not proved.”
The only people who claim to vouch for Berkeley’s claim of being impersonated are these: Observer and Another Observer. I take it that these mysterious observers know Berkeley well enough to come to his defense.
Question: is Berkeley suggesting that his hebrew teacher, who I presume would know Berkeley’s style and presentation in writing, not to mention the fact that he would have spoken with him whilst being in his company during lessons, is lying regarding the source of the comment that Berkeley denies writing?
In this comment “on balance I'm glad I use my real name” (Tue, 2007-08-07 14:19) Berkeley writes:
“I think I decided never to use screen names because I didn't want to end up saying things that would make me look two faced when my various pseudonyms came out.”
What I find peculiar about this statement is that Berkeley is suggesting that by using his real name, and real name only, he will somehow be absolved from being viewed as “two faced” should it ever be revealed that things he has said are contradictory when his “various pseudonyms came out”. Think about what he says.
Another interesting comment he makes is this one,” p.s. - Quo's animation” (Tue, 2007-08-07 13:15) where he claims that the images that I, Michael, created and posted at photobucket (not PlanetQuo.com or .net) were “Quo’s animation”.
Then we have this comment: “Hebrew speaking satanists” (Wed, 2007-08-08 11:50), in which Berkeley links to one of the images I created which he uploaded to this site:
http://naqniq.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/134/
In this one he states that his “anonymous detractors strike again”. Is this the mind of a delusional at work or does he suppose that I, Michael, are his “detractors” and that I have struck again since initially posting the image?
Berkeley says "I have been online for five or six years".
Thats an awful lot of footprints in the cyber snow.
Incidentally, I notice that Masher1 gets reprimanded on account of his 'masturbate' comment yet Berkeley is free to post his 'jerjing off' comment without even a whisper.
"So Just Who is Admin around here then. Quasi is one Qrs is two
Who else is?" says Masher1
I'll give you three guesses; it's a Mad, Mad, Mad world, ask Quasi.
Anyway, back to the snow.
but I like you all, really.
.. and that's your job (along with Po, Ma1, &c.): tTo confuse honest people and researchers to the best of your ability (which is altogether inane and negligible.)
Incidentally, although I'm just awake and need mo' time to research, digest and reflect, this supposed article (posted today) by 'Bollyn', does NOT appear to be his work-- furthermore, I believe there's plenty of internal evidence which will make it easy to satisfactorily disprove it!
Michael, are you saying MT is an admin. here at WUFYS?
It's interesting that Bollyn didn't write that "August 8" article on his site. But he admits as much, on Rumor Mill News:
The following article from the blogspot of Smokingmirrors is a very well written appeal to Americans to take action and hold their leaders accountable and take responsibility "for what happens in your name or you soon won't even have a name, you'll have a number."
Smokingmirrors writes that "the worst part of all the evils" is "what is happening to The Laws of the Land." I couldn't agree more......
See here for the original article dated August 3. There is also an August 6 post on "Doc Zakheim and the missing trillions", that was subsequently posted here at WUFYS.
“I believe there's plenty of internal evidence which will make it easy to satisfactorily disprove it!” exclaims Nobodaddy with regards to his excellent analysis of the alleged Bollyn article………well?
“I do rather tend to confuse you spooks, its true but I like you all, really.” twitters wannabe Jew Berkeley without the slightest idea of where his cyber footprints lead.
Why he would post at this insignificant
site is obvious to most here including those who are progressively getting an education.
To answer your question, The Dead Bishop, regarding MT. Who else fits the bill?
he is in an Israeli dungeon!
P wrote:"It's interesting that Bollyn didn't write that "August 8" article on his site. But he admits as much, on Rumor Mill News"
Let me guess...someone is commenting on "how it doesnt look like Bollyns writing style"?
sigh
no comment. its just too...
nevermind.
ATTN DBS: Im with CoZ and others who plead..Daryl..Please..just tell us who the Zionists AREN'T.
We are the masses, remember,.. you really need to make it easy. 7 names versus 90.. much better odds of us dumbasses remembering who is who.
And afterwards.. are you going to be so kind as to explain why u feel the need to create farce?
A friend of mine says Huff is just jealous and weird..and doing shit behind your back.. rather like a spiteful female whose man never seems to know what a bitch she really is. .....I however fall on the 'group of zionist contractors' side of things.
(Though I do consider the possibility that you are , in reality, the useful idiot you describe on many of your broadcasts)
Uraniumtiger attempts to deceive with the assertion that Chris Bollyn is a "better Zionist exposer" (e.g. in the case of Michael Chertoff) than prominent anti-Zionists such as David Duke. Uraniumtiger downplays the information on Chertoff provided by Duke and others in January 2005 or earlier, yet exaggerates the significance of Chris Bollyn's own 'work' that was published months or years later.
The problem with Bollyn is that he has a long history of making unsubstantiated claims. Indeed, this was the reason for his being fired by American Free Press. It's no good misquoting someone on a matter such as Benjamin Chertoff's relationship to Michael Chertoff and pretending that they said they were cousins. The Zionists will deny it, and with nothing but an unsubstantiated allegation, the prosecution will get absolutely nowhere.
See how Bollyn's claim about the Benjamin - Michael relationship was debunked:
The story...
The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics March 2005 "911: Debunking the Myths" story, Ben Chertoff, is a cousin of Department of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff. Chris Bollyn wrote:
This means that Hearst paid Benjamin Chertoff to write an article supporting the seriously flawed explanation that is based on a practically non-existent investigation of the terror event that directly led to the creation of the massive national security department his "cousin" now heads. This is exactly the kind of "journalism" one would expect to find in a dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Because the manager of public relations for Popular Mechanics didn't respond to repeated calls from American Free Press, I called Benjamin Chertoff, the magazine's "senior researcher," directly.
Chertoff said he was the "senior researcher" of the piece. When asked if he was related to Michael Chertoff, he said, "I don't know." Clearly uncomfortable about discussing the matter further, he told me that all questions about the article should be put to the publicist ? the one who never answers the phone.
Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/070305chertoffscousin.htm
Our take...
We never actually thought to doubt this claim, simply believing it irrelevant. The piece needs to be judged on its contents, not the surname of one of those involved. But then we heard a suggestion that Benjamin Chertoff denied the story altogether, so decided to email him to hear what he had to say. Was he really related to Michael Chertoff? And if he wasn't, then how could he explain the quote from his mother?
This is what he had to say.
Here's the story, as best as I know: I'm not related to Michael Chertoff, at least in any way I can figure out. We might be distant relatives, 15 times removed, but then again, so might you and I. Bottom line is I've never met him, never communicated with him, and nobody I know in my family has ever met or communicated with him.
As for what my mom said: When Chertoff was nominated to be head of homeland security it was the first I'd heard of him, and the same for my family (and, FYI, we'd already sent the 9/11 issue to the press by then!). My dad and I thought there might be some distant relation. When Chris Bollyn called and asked my mom if there was a relation (introducing himself as only "Chris"), she said "they might be distant cousins." Like much in the conspiracy world, this was taken WAY out of context. (Another case in point: Bollyn called me earlier and asked "Were you the senior researcher on the story?" I said, "I guess so," -- that's not a title I have ever used, nor is it at all common in magazine journalism, but I was the research editor at the time, so it kinda made sense.) Nonetheless, I was one of 9 reporters on the story, not counting editors, photo researchers, photo editors, copy editors, layout designers, production managers, fact-checkers, etc., etc., etc. who worked on this story.
Chertoff paints a very different picture from the original story. Some will say he’s lying, of course, but in that case it shouldn’t be too difficult to prove: go to it. And in the meantime, this acts as a useful reminder to everyone, including us: don’t take any 9/11-related claims for granted, whether they come from someone on your “side” of the argument or not.
Source:
Bollyn had made many other unsubstantiated allegations, such as a death threat" in 2000, his misquoting of Mark Loizeaux regarding where the molten steel was found, his misquoting of Arthur Lerner-Lam as to alleged "seismic spikes", the Sam Danner "Global Hawk" report (which Russell Pickering identified as highly suspect right from day one), the "thermite disguised as batteries" red herring which any demolitionist worth their salt would recognise as nonsense, a satirical article from The Onion submitted as Bollyn's "original work", a suspect article that Bollyn tried to get into the Barnes Review, the "Flight 93 was not shot down but landed at Cleveland" theory, etc.
Here's what Mark Loiseaux had to say regarding Bollyn's misquoting of him regarding where the molten steel was found:
Here is what he wrote to me today at 10:38 PST:
Mr. Bryan:
I didn't personally see molten steel at the World Trade Center site. It was reported to me by contractors we had been working with. Molten steel was encountered primarily during excavation of debris around the South Tower when large hydraulic excavators were digging trenches 2 to 4 meters deep into the compacted/burning debris pile. There are both video tape and still photos of the molten steel being "dipped" out by the buckets of excavators. I'm not sure where you can get a copy. Sorry I cannot provide personal confirmation.
Regards,
==========================
Mark Loizeaux, President
CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, INC.
2737 Merryman's Mill Road
Phoenix, Maryland USA 21131
Tel: 1-410-667-6610
Fax: 1-410-667-6624
www.controlled-demolition.com
Source
AFP had found Bollyn's articles to be unreliable. See this excerpt from Chris Petherick's email of October 2006:
...We and our loyal subscribers believe that when Jim Tucker or Mike Blair or any other reporter writes something and we print it that the facts presented are true. When we get a story from one of our trusted reporters we do not need to check every quote or fact. Our reporters would not dream of submitting a false story. The same cannot be said for you, however. By accusing AFP of being under the control of some other agency, you lie. There is an ancient Roman legal maxim; “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,” meaning that if a witness lies about one thing his testimony may be disregarded for all he says. Thus, we can no longer print anything you submit without checking it, and this we will not do.
For the reasons above, please do not bother to submit anything else to this newspaper. In addition, we will no longer be able to pay your salary.
This is effective immediately.
Christopher J. Petherick
Managing Editor/AFP
Source:
Bollyn could have made any number of allegations about Michael Chertoff, such as he was "related to the Rothschilds", he was a "shape-shifting lizard", he was a serial pedophile, etc. Time and again, we find that Bollyn merely regurgitates work that others have already done, albeit in diluted form, then he spices it up with unsubstantiated allegations.
I gather that the 'take our world back' site is yours?
it seems to me as though the only thing you're attempting to 'take back' is your own zero credibility.
Who are you nobodaddy?
All I've seen from you is accusations that others are trying to hide "the truth" from readers.
Cut it out already.
People can decide for themselves who to trust and who not to trust.
Thanks but no thanks, we don't need your help.
Stick to the facts.
You're welcome to post links to old posts at other sites that you feel need some more attention.
But, please stop making unsubstantiated assertions and accusations.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
case closed.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.