during the time frame that the Mike Gravel post was linked at Digg.

Digg gets a lot of hits.

I think WUFYS and IATW get comparable visits.

I don't consider anti-zionist sites my competition, however - I consider them my allies.

Eventually, I will have to open WUFYS to donations however. I put up the funds for two years of hosting, one of which is almost done.

I may not be in a position to pay for it again when it's time to renew.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

that people stop bickering over non-issues or issues that they cannot definitively prove.

It's a waste of everyone's time and effort.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Here is another graph comparing WUFYS and Rense.com. Note that for the time period from say April 20 thru May 2, WUFYS was experiencing traffic levels greater than Rense. Whatreallyhappened.com experienced no such spike during that period.

QRS - Do you recall what topic was generating all those hits during that time?

At least we could expect a video to confirm the identity of Smith Living right where he says. If he is going to spout off STAND up. Video your house in France confirming your residence there. And enough Quality to make a face voice match once and for all.

I know he will never do this BECAUSE it would make him a target for prosecution.

I have seen it all from day one folks and if this Smith persona is not a CIA mindfuck then WHY all this CRAP? Why the ton of nina BS the whole Nolajbs thing? The Suzette sessions? A gig of Quasimodo poop? What is it you don't get Smith?

WE GET IT ALL.

You are putting NOTHING over here. Node 1154 not enough for you? You trying to get me jailed? You looking for a moment to use my phone number against me? What ever you want is not revelant to the event of NOW.. i think you will be deleted for being a government shill and being proved so log ago and failing to do anything to change it

So Be it...Good riddance..

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

You answered my question before I could post it. I'm really shocked that DIGG generates that much web respect - I consider it a waste of time and effort.

Clay: It's true Digg is generally a waste of time - always about latest technology and irrelevant humor. But it may be worth looking up once in a while to check for posted entries to favorite topics, such as Ron Paul and Mike Gravel.

WUFYS is currently banned on the unfounded claim of anti-Semitic hate speech after Mike Gravel blog was nice enough to link to qrswave's WUFYS post that led to a huge spike in traffic (one of the rare WUFYS post that generate tens of thousands of individual hits besides the 'infamous' post on qrs' Blogger site on Israeli preadolescents signing bomb shells).

Qrs: We will be happy to donate small amounts to help with your web hosting expense the more popular the web site is over time in terms of traffic. I'm not sure about Paypal - they will freeze account with donated fund upon complaints of hate speech. Try another competitor so not to risk Paypal's kneejerk judgment. Set up a secure p.o. box to maximize anonymity.

After all, me and numerous bloggers are the reason WUFYS depend on to spread the message of perceived truth besides you. And we are blessed to have this voice of reason that would otherwise toil in obscurity in the blogs not easily found on Google search and elsewhere but word of mouth and link from a bigger web site with more traffics.

--

My blog Last Throes of US Empire

I sure as hell dont want anyone else conned by those two frauds...

So I wont post.
But you are right.. they do do that sort of thing.

I do have a theory that there is an active attempt to draw WUFYS's participants over to the IATW website with these constant bickerings. An ongoing publicity stunt if you will. As you can see, WUFYS is the site with the greater web traffic.

I would've thought that there'd be more of a migration/flow of visitors from IATW than to it, but there's probably a pretty equal exchange. Many of the people visiting IATW and all of it's listeners would know about WUFYS by now, and the TFC drama going on here would be pretty much irrelevant in terms of the traffic it would generate for TFC because members here are all pretty seasoned anti-Zionists that discovered TFC long ago. But then, there is the readership directed here by sites like WRH and others, so I could be wrong.

Qrswave, thanks for giving this Smith thing a chance to play out a little bit, by the way.

good advice for broadcasters, as well as advertisers!

It is my well-considered opinion that anybody who believes that they've discovered something legitimately amiss about www.iamthewitness: Daryl Bradford Smith, EH, and/or CB are gravely mistaken and have been duped (and pretty easily at that).

I would like to qualify ALL my commentaries by noting that I am just as errable as the next person, and my reading and investigations are an ongoing process, &c.

...as it only measures traffic from client computers whose owner hate their privacy enough to install the Alexa client.

Don't most anti-spyware programs flag Alexa for removal? If so, you are correct Sullivan because very few would make an exception against recommended removal.

I must be in the right place, then. Pray for peace.

"It is my well-considered opinion that anybody who believes that they've discovered something legitimately amiss about www.iamthewitness: Daryl Bradford Smith, EH, and/or CB are gravely mistaken and have been duped (and pretty easily at that)."
Nobodaddy | Thu, 2007-08-09 02:18

'My Progressively Advancing Opinion' is that you need to progressively get an education after first acquiring a measure of intelligence.

Your 'progressed' opinion, Michael, sounds as though it's 'pre-processeed'-- and probably paid or self-amalgamating to boot.

Your 'progressed' opinion, Michael, sounds as though it's 'pre-processeed'-- and probably paid or self-amalgamating to boot.

Your 'progressed' opinion, Michael, sounds as though it's 'pre-processeed'-- and probably paid or self-amalgamating to boot.

perhaps if the two of you could tear each other to shreds, we might finally learn something.