Planet Status Quo
"Round Up The Usual Suspects !"
"So Who IS This Character" ?
Why Do I Like His Looks ?
Is it those nice straight teeth or simply that jovial grin ?
Is it those encroaching crowfeet, which bespeak some past experience, and a shaven pate, which might even suggest some modicum of errant wisdom ? Or is it merely that pricked up ear that doesn't even stick out ? Or in short -
is it the "real turtle soup, or merely the mock" ?
No, sorry, it's none of the above. What really fetches me the most is some vaguely indefinable air of HONESTY about this mug. A sort of "in your face"- "take it or leave it" quality that I might cotton to. A basically OUTGOING impression...
So now, for a moment at least, in this newly burgeoning era of disingenuity, let us give this beamish boy some benefit of a doubt, if only on a tentative basis of his genial and rather trustworthy APPEARANCE, shall we ? But still taking into account of course, that most APPEARANCES can almost ALWAYS be counted on to be DECEPTIVE, let us not be TOO HASTY either, shall we...... or SHAN'T WE ?
Or better yet, come to think of it, let us dare not to TRUST ANYBODY just yet, or EVER, for that matter. Let us all begin to DOUBT the very day that we were ever born, and indeed, every living, breathing person we have ever met, so as not to FALL PREY to DECEPTION ! LIES ! DISINFO ! BULLSHIT !
Stepping in that stuff every time one turns around !
Alright, so much for such a DUBIOUS INTRODUCTION...
Oh, speaking of introductions, did I forget already ?
If this DUBIOUS, but TRUSTWORTHY looking CHARACTER can at all be trusted to furnish us with his REAL NAME...
( subject to further intensive documentation, of course ) -
I do BELIEVE that he is known to his sundry constituents as one certain JIM KERR, who operates on the Internet under a rather quaint shingle, cryptically entitled "PLANET QUO".
My, but I just HATE introductions, don't you ?
They're always so potentially EMBARRASSING !
Let's have a real BULLHORN MOMENT !
THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
- Oh, just a second, before we go to the phones, I have to do a quick Mike Piper and pause for a break, to explain just what this program may or may not really be about...
Due to some recent unfortunate developments, notably, a nearly terminal ongoing outbreak at WUFYS of these - it has become quite necessary to once again- in those immortal words of the Immortal Quasimodo, ( or was it Claude Rains, in Casablanca ? )
"Round Up The Usual Suspects !"
-and in order to accomplish that noble objective, without further sullying this noble site with any further references or accidental inferences to certain nefarious characters, real or imagined, I have temporarily given that precarious assignment to an above-mentioned 'reoKerring' character, once briefly known in these whereabouts as Planet Quo.
Happily, it appears this nebulous planetoid supersleuth
has already come up with an impressive list of his own,
the intrigue of which literally beggars the imagination,
and which most certainly should bear a passing look by any party privy to, or any privy party to, a destructive ongoing onslaught of this citadel of truth known as -
Wake Up From Your Slumber
The Truth Will Set You Free
My reasons for employing such a "dubious character" in such an expeditious fashion are many, and here are but a few. First of all, how better to deal with all these "dubious characters" who have infested this site with a very specific agenda in mind, than with a supposedly "dubious" character ? Somebody who appears to know just about all of them "up close and personal" enough to choose up sides and sniff armpits ? Eh ? What's that you say ? Why not put an end to it ? Why add any more to the misery ?
Well here's another reason why. Because this individual happens to have had enough basic decency and respect for WUFYS to refrain from barging in here in some kind of feeding frenzy like he already owned the place, like all the rest of these maggots did. And in an overwhelming crush of maggots, climbing one over top of another to get at a piece of the action, his own unassuming presence was ignored, and his "appearance" went almost entirely unnoticed, except, of course, by those who already knew of him, and therefore most predictably shunned him.
This individual has linked to WUFYS since before I ever stumbled in here, and to hear him tell it, if you can wade far enough in his minutiae, has developed an enduring respect for qrswave and for her noble efforts in maintaining this beleaguered outpost of free thought in an unfree world. All you 'maggots' who arrived here on some fool's errand, for the sole purpose of taking unfair advantage of her "free speech" policies, because you couldn't find any other place to deposit your foul excreta, already know who you are.
So again, why turn the assignment over to Jim ? Well try this -
If he had ever gotten half the exposure that all you others did,
we all might have even learned something by now. That's why he deserves another shot, and you don't. You already had yours -
and you blew it !
And here's my last reason for now, and most important of all. This is the only way I know of to shed any further light on some extremely shady goings-on, without further subjecting Qrswave and her site to any more of your slanderous slime sucking agony.
And before I ever decide to bow out of this three ring circus
for good, ( and you clowns who keep trying to give me that
bright idea know who YOU are ) I'll give ya the dirty lowdown - one more time. I make no claims whatsoever, to the verisimilitude of any or all of it. Comments, as formerly, will remain open -
with parameters that is, and now that everyone else thinks
I got a red phone to Moscow, here's another bright idea-
Don't give me any more lousy bright ideas, thanks.
Save those for Jim, I'm sure he'd be tickled to hear from ya.
P.S. - I would like to thank all the "Usual Suspects" and assorted clowns and circus people, who put in such sterling performances in their cameo roles, on such a short notice.
I would also like to heartily thank them one and all for their prompt and willing participation in my little experiment in "maggotology". From all appearances, it certainly appears
to have been quite successful. Their comments are below..
is it possible that your evident state of sexual frustration is affecting your analytical objectivity, causing you perhaps to feel malice for womankind at large?
I shall not go into excessive detail, this being a family site, but I find it very significant that Stephen 'Edred' Flowers, founder of the Rune Gild and hence one would think an aryanist of some sort, is married to a jewish lady with the attractive name of Crystal Dawn, who, it seems to me, retains his affections by punishing him for his anti jewish feelings. This is not as illogical as it sounds. There was a viennese jewish writer called Weininger who wrote about this at length:
http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/index.html
it's 0740 hrs here in london
Quasimodo said,
"I make no claims whatsoever, to the verisimilitude of any or all of it."
Then why do you link to PlanetQuo's hitpiece on me to attack me here?
Your ( professional ? ) prognosis is [ "your evident state of sexual frustration is affecting your analytical objectivity, causing you perhaps to feel malice for womankind at large?" ] I would just like to know if you're qualified to..1) make this finding professionaly 2) how you come to the conclusion that the one ( sexual frustration ) affects the other ( analytical objectivity ) 3) your support for the assumation of Quasimodo's " feelings of malice for womankind " I don't trust Whippette either, because she's a liar...certainly. Does that also include me in your professional (?) opinion ?
Congrats Quas, you landed the first maggot...well not exactly the oldest wormy scion of zion...but i'd go as far as maggot of the first magnitude. a bit genrous, i know, but it's a busy little worm our Rowboat.
Quas, you bagged another. Da Wimpette has wormed her head out. A lonely night at the Bates Roach Motel maybe.
You sure know how to string together a non sequitur, Quas. Never have I seen someone so skilled at saying so little with so much.
it's better than saying a LOT with NOTHING!!
..Half an hour left, get it while you still can..
..vote to attack iran!!
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/
Do you believe the United States should take military action to stop Iran from killing our troops in Iraq?
Yes 61% 4393
No 39% 2774
Total Votes: 7167
This is not a scientific poll
Well of all the sneaky, lowdown cunt's tricks, would ya look at that..
The question should be "do you believe the United States should attack Iran?" Instead, they thrown in a bit of disinformation to get the desired response.
Speaking of disinformation and bullshit, Quasimodo, bro, surely you jest.
...
PlanetKoro:
PlanetQuo, who-cares-how-much later:
PlanetQuo's about as honest in daily life as I am to the police when I wind down the car window after smoking a joint. Not very.
lets get it right people
Crimes of Zion, you have a very, very, short memory.
Briefly put:
Nina aka apossumprincess defends Joe Molero, Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis defends Nina aka apossumprincess, Wippette aka Suzette, defender of the Goyim (a self-confessed “Traditional Catholic”) defends Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis and Nina aka apossumprincess, then to top it off Poseidon aka ‘Steve the Brit’ (the self-confessed atheist who chooses to go by the name of a mythical underwater “god”) defends Nina aka apossumprincess, Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis and Wippette aka Suzette, defender of the Goyim
Berkeley, you'd do well to respond to the legitimate questions you raise about yourself and your agenda before making further smart-arse comments comments that simply confirm your lack of good intent here.
You've already been brought to task by Larry O'Hara over your citing of Stewart Home as a credible source.
Berkeley, "Like Home, you cannot argue, or reason, only evade smear & distort."
Larry O'Hara says of you
aimless attempts at smears without context basis or meaning.
Bricks without straw?
Then please explain the basis in which you arrive at this conclusion
While your at it you could perhaps answer the questions put to you regarding your psychiatric credentials
Typical evasion
Quasimodo suggests that Jim Kerr is an admirable character, and whippette and others (I probably feature on the list!) are the equivalent of "maggots".
The situation with Jim Kerr has many similarities with the case of The French Connection (TFC).
I used to be a supporter of TFC. They purport to be "anti-Zionist", and I have been anti-Zionist almost since I began investigating the subject well over four years ago. Around last summer, it became increasingly apparent that TFC were at best lunatics, and at worst Zionist agents. So I withdraw my support.
Within the last two or three months, I became aware that PlanetQuo (Jim Kerr) and Michael (Fugazi) were presenting themselves as "anti-TFC" and "anti-Zionist". Since I was then opposed to both Zionism and TFC, it seemed that they were potentially useful allies in the fight against Zionism and their agents and useful fools.
I initially contacted Michael, who seemed to be less quirky, more anti-TFC, and more consistent. And I was not aware of any whopping blunders made by Michael on the sort of scale as Jim "I'd stake my reputation that Poseidon = Debus" Kerr. Michael forwarded my email to Kerr, who then initiated a long chain of correspondence with me, which may also be viewed via a link included in the page at the final link below.
Incidentally, one of Kerr's many, many lies is that I "initiated contact with him", when in fact he first emailed me after Michael had forwarded to him my email to Michael.
As may be seen, in both cases, the initial support was based on a value judgement on ideological grounds. TFC were supposed to be an enemy of my enemy, the Zionist Mafia, which would have made TFC my natural allies. After it became clear to me that TFC were either Zionist puppets or had such severe personality problems that they were actually harming the anti-Zionist cause, they became my opponents.
Michael Fugazi and Jim Kerr were supposedly "anti-TFC and anti-Zionist", which would have made them on my "side". So, I corresponded with Jim Kerr for weeks regarding his "research", and put some effort into finding evidence that would support his theories. Although I did not agree with his more bizarre ideas, such as Jamie Linton aka Infensus Mentis aka Crimes of Zion = Brendon (Lee) O'Connell aka DonnieDarko aka QuoVadius aka QuoVadus aka truebeliever = Fester = Lord Sidious, he kept stringing me along with promises that the "meticulous" research was being compiled and documented. I was prepared to disregard some of his blunders and shaky conclusions, and give him some time to produce evidence in support of his ideas.
PlanetQuo's attacks on Daryl and Eric, which were supposed to "nuke" them, were in fact the equivalent of being savaged by a dead sheep. And the promised "evidence" to support his theories about James Linton, Nina, etc being "Zionist agents" never materialised.
Then I received an email from Kerr (sent to Fugazi and I) entitled "Stupid Suzette". It was a response to an email from Suzette to Kerr, regarding her having had the initiative to contact Crimes of Zion (James Linton) and apossumprincess (Nina). Kerr's vitriolic response included a suggestion to "go fuck yourself", a threat to "nuke" her, a warning to get the "duct tape" ready, and he called her a "stupid cow", a "stupid bitch", "incredibly stupid", etc. Suzette, aka whippette, used to be part of the PlanetQuo "team", and Kerr evidently has a bizarre childish fantasy about being the head of his own organization, with the power to hire and fire "his agents".
The implication from Kerr was that he would be sending the email to her. Kerr's own PlanetQuo website still has several screenshots along with the full text of the message, and includes a claim that he sent the email to her on Thursday, 12 July 2007.
The following text is the content of an e-mail sent by myself to Suzette the Whippette, Defender of the Goyim on Thursday 12th July, 2007. I have inserted in bracket italics, words that I should've included within the original text.
Source
Note that Kerr's screenshots demonstrate that he only sent the email to Michael and I (he got the date correct). Suzette never received it from him. I forwarded a copy a couple of days later after several of us concluded that she had a right to see it, and in any case it was proudly displayed by Kerr on his website within another few days.
The text of the email may also be viewed at my site:
http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/stupidsuzette.htm
Kerr's promised "evidence" that was supposed to prove his theories had not materialised, neither has any new "evidence" been cited as of four weeks later. But I realised I could not support a person who was prepared to send such an abusive response to a woman whose only 'crime' was to seek the truth by, in the mold of a genuine, intrepid investigative researcher, contacting "suspected Zionist agents" to find out if there was any substance to the allegations.
I was later to find that Kerr had sent Suzette a voicemail message consisting of heavy breathing and an evil chuckle. That was back on May 16, when they were still supposed to be "friends"!
http://www.takeourworldback.com/mp3/msg_planetquo_16_may_2007_15_52_35.m...
The voicemail is one example of Quasimodo's "basically decent", "honest" and "respectable" Kerr-osive, Kerr-osene-like 'admirable' character in action. The "Stupid Suzette" message is another. And here is an example of Kerr's erronous 'conclusions':
The remarks that I made to Linton on 1st May in respect of you being Debus were made in the context of my standing with Linton only. If I were to do a mea culpa and make a public statement in which I say that I am now convinced that you are not Debus, and that I was mistaken, no doubt Linton and his allies will attempt to use this as a weapon. They will say that PlanetQuo has no credibility because he said that he would stake his credibility on Poseidon being Debus.
Source
Quo then adds a curious qualification to that statement:
What I meant when I told Linton that “I would stake my credibility on it if called,” was in respect of my standing with him, but that doesn’t matter anymore lol.
I came to the conclusion that Kerr's "Zionist agents", Crimes of Zion and apossumprincess, were really just normal individuals, although their intelligence and insight are clearly on a much higher plane than people who are merely "average".
I don't believe Kerr is working for the Zionists, and I don't really think he is a "bad" person. I do know that for two or three weeks after Easter, he remained in Scotland following the death of a family member, and I wonder whether this tragic event could have transformed a mild case of narcissistic personality disorder into a more severe, emotionally and intellectually crippling version.
My report on PlanetQuo / Jim Kerr is available here:
http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/
...which also includes links to the voicemail message, email message, and a very long concatenation of correspondence for those who are sufficiently interested to take an in-depth look at what transpired.
I don't think there is evidence of Quasimodo being a "Zionist agent". Quasi is a supporter of Chris Bollyn, whom he sees as a "friend", and he loyally attacks characters who are attacking Chris. We anti-Zionists are supposed to be on the same side, but these fights and conflicts arise when individuals make hasty value judgements based on others' declared stance. I would say that TFC / Bollyn / PlanetQuo supporters have made a hasty judgement on ideological grounds, although it can be seen that I briefly made the same error vis-a-vis Jim Kerr. And possibly regarding TFC, although the evidence against them has only really emerged over the last year.
Once you've done the research and have come to a particular conclusion, it would be dishonest to pretend to support another person's viewpoint merely to avoid strife. But we should strive to accentuate our areas of agreement, rather than placing too much focus upon matters such as identification of shills, a topic whose conclusions are probabilistic rather than absolute. The Zionists just love seeing anti-Zionists fight amongst themselves!
And Quas, I would hate to see you leave here, as your contributions on Zionism are often unsurpassed.
In your usual style Poseidon, you spam the thread with lots of nothing. You know Jim is right thats why you took his findings and research and passed it off as your own.
Your arguments are based upon nonsensical notions with constant reference to Duke, Piper and other suspect individuals. You 'attack' DBS, Eric and Christopher Bollyn largely on the basis that they choose not to align themselves with these people and not on anything solid or actually real and tangible.
I never did entirely trusted you even though I received your emails. You tried to pass me and Jim misinformation from a proven liar, namely Nina.
You chose to align yourself with proven liars and unreliable entities. You are a fraud and you know I know that.
Remember that it was you who first contacted me with your list of statistics and conclusions as to who was/is a shill operating within this site. It revealed so much because Jim and I had already figured much out with actual evidence that took months to gather.
Then you attempted to arrange a meeting with Jim at a morterway cafe without even wishing to disclose your identity to him.
So whats with the French IP address?. Your website contains nothing that would get you arrested and you know it. I live in Australia which has more repressive laws than Europe and that does not stop me from talking or publishing material questioning the holocaust or any other issue deemed 'hateful', whats your excuse? You spend that much time spaming the threads here to be doing anything that would be considered a threat to anyone except your own credibility.
You are evasive, tedious, repetitive and a total waste of html.
"air of mystique", give it up you conceited clown and show yourself or fuck off before I decide to find out who you really are and publish it for the world to see.
Your way out of your league Steve and totally out of your depth.
Lets hope you can swim like your pseudo-name sake.
it is just ridiculous - you should all stop using multiple screen names and just be yourselves!
Part of the technical problem was that some quotation marks had been italicised. There were also others missing altogether.
As for the 'logic' the best thing to do would be to scrap it all and start afresh.
Michael's post:
Crimes of Zion, you have a very, very, short memory.
Briefly put:
Nina aka apossumprincess defends Joe Molero, Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis defends Nina aka apossumprincess, Wippette aka Suzette, defender of the Goyim (a self-confessed “Traditional Catholic”) defends Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis and Nina aka apossumprincess, then to top it off Poseidon aka ‘Steve the Brit’ (the self-confessed atheist who chooses to go by the name of a mythical underwater "god") defends Nina aka apossumprincess, Crimes of Zion aka Infensus Mentis and Wippette aka Suzette, defender of the Goyim.
Berkeley, you'd do well to respond to the legitimate questions you raise about yourself and your agenda before making further smart-arse comments comments that simply confirm your lack of good intent here.
You've already been brought to task by Larry O'Hara over your citing of Stewart Home as a credible source.
Berkeley, "Like Home, you cannot argue, or reason, only evade smear & distort."
Larry O'Hara says of you
That entire 'Daguello' and 'Son of Daguello' stuff was rubbish. I imagine it was originally cooked up by some southern FBI field office in the 1950s to smear Eustace Mullins and like that.
"I came to the conclusion that Kerr's "Zionist agents", Crimes of Zion and apossumprincess, were really just normal individuals, although their intelligence and insight are clearly on a much higher plane than people who are merely "average".
I don't believe Kerr is working for the Zionists, and I don't really think he is a "bad"
person. I do know that for two or three weeks after Easter, he remained in Scotland following the death of a family member, and I wonder whether this tragic event could have transformed a mild case of narcissistic personality disorder into a more severe, emotionally and intellectually crippling version.
My report on PlanetQuo / Jim Kerr is available here:"
http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/
---------------------------------------------------------------
Do you actually read what you write?
again:
"although their intelligence and insight are clearly on a much higher plane than people who are merely "average"."
Like the example of brilliant deduction from Gina/Nina in "response" to Wippette's "mysterious email"?
I see you are a doctor like Dr Berkeley and Dr Nina
Broken links are no problem it's all here.
In fact feel free to browse the album, plenty more to come:
http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z57/ANTIZIO/
I briefly thought there might be something in TeamQuo's claims, so I linked to the French Deception video, for example, as new work worthy of consideration. It soon became apparent that it was nothing more than the Dance of the Seven Veils. See my reply here to honestabe, where I said I had nothing to do with the video.
Duke, Piper, Crimes of Zion, Nina, Suzette and myself are only "suspect" from the perspective of paranoid loons. And as for attacking TFC and Bollyn, you only attacked them on the basis that Smith does not use Skype and he told a phony tale about being visited by a scary-looking character. It's not exactly a nuke. Or are you admitting that you were never really anti-TFC?
I reported on some things that CoZ and Nina had said when I was coming around to the conclusion that they were okay, but I hadn't then totally ruled out TeamQuo's version of events. It was not clear then whether Nina's information was "misinformation", but you two would have been able to deduce that with your 'expertise'.
As for associating with "proven liars", why do you still associate with Jim Kerr?
Yes, I contacted you first, not Kerr, as I thought you were more reliable. You forwarded my email to Kerr, and he corresponded with me before I ever chose to correspond with him.
Regarding the proposed cafe meeting, what did Jim think I was going to do - hire some snipers, or poison him with polonium-210?
If you want to believe I have a French IP, I'm not going to contest that. It suits my purposes of thwarting the authorities. Australia doesn't have holocaust denial laws. With Europe, the problem is that there is an increasing loss of national sovereignties. The European Union takes over more and more of the functions of national governments.
Quite a while ago, I made some changes to my front page, posting a statement that Zionists would perceive as provocative:
The Greatest Hoax of the 20th Century "Homicidal gas chambers" in Poland. This site does not deny holocausts such as Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Waco, Armenia, Soviet Gulags, etc, or that the Germans employed gas in chambers for the purpose of saving human lives by killing typhoid lice. We DO deny that the Germans had any homicidal gas chambers at all, at any time throughout WWII in Germany, Poland, the USSR or anywhere else. The official historical account is in contravention of scientific and natural law, and there is not even one iota of forensic evidence to support it.
There had been a regular visitor to my site, whose IP traced to the Virgin Islands. I thought he was legit, yet after I posted the above statement, this visitor came on about an hour later, and with another 40 minutes or so, I'd had some hits from the ADL! I then found other corroborating information to suggest this person had an interest in the ADL, or more specifically, the JDL.
I blocked the ADL and that Virgin Islands guy. He kept returning almost every day for weeks, consigned to the equivalent of a kind of Flying Dutchman. He must have been pulling his hair out at constantly getting a "you are not authorised to view this page" code 403 :-)
I had another look at it, and I must say it seems more sensible now than it did before.
However, the word 'ponerology' sounds a mite redolent of cassiopean influences.
Yes, I did do an audio of the Deguello Report in the interest of providing the information to anyone to judge for themselves it's authenticity or not, bearing in mind that all I had to read from that time were small prints of the printed pages.
I made no interpretation of my own and all who have it or have heard it know that.
Much of the historical content regarding the Fabian movement is spot on and I have that verified by a gentleman here in Australia who is quite an expert in these matters, Jeremy Lee who was once the president of the League of Rights here, an organisation with members from all walks of life and different political backgrounds who all recognise the importance of free speech, not the brand of free speech touted by the Liberal Zionist element.
If anyone wants a fair appraisal regarding the validity of the Deguello Report you will find it here:
http://planetquo.com/The-Deguello-Report
I would imagine that Jim Condit Jr would be a respectable source of interpretation regarding the individuals and groups mentioned in the report and as such his analysis and experience is appreciated as at least one good source of judgment of the reports content.
If there are others I'm sure Jim will add to it.
If you're attempting to somehow link me with being in agreement with the report don't bother as I wasn't there, never met the people mentioned and therefore have no real authority to give any real interpretation to it whatsoever. I merely felt that it was something to be made available for others to have an oppotunity to judge for themselves before it got used in ways that were not entirely reasonable.
As much as I have critisied DBS and Eric for there bad behavior and double-standards I will never accept the silly charge that they published the report on iamthewitness as a means to discredit Mullins or anyone else mentioned in it.
You probably may not have known about its precise content had it not been and as such you are able to form your opinion of it, just don't link YOUR opinion of it with what you imagine mine to be.
watching an unshaven guy in a pyjama jacket spin conspiracy theories?
Yes you did link to the video Poseidon and you said it raised some very important questions. You also know that the video is merely a companion to the actual written data, data that evidently few have bothered to read, examine, and/or digest. Perhaps more large coloured pictures and less detail would suit some better.
Are you now suggesting, Steve, that you linked to the video before you actually viewed it?
Then Berkeley says regarding Poseidon's website:
I had another look at it, and I must say it seems more sensible now than it did before.
"However, the word 'ponerology' sounds a mite redolent of cassiopean influences."
Oh, please, do you guy's change your underwear as often as your minds? Or is that the other way round?
Then again, I forget, you're doctors right? I should have known with the over-abuse of 'big' words.
william 'behold a pale horse' cooper - only a bunch of lamentably divisive shills could see any relation between this farrago of nonsense and the deguello farrago of nonsense:
cooper bio
"you want me to spend 90 mins watching an unshaven guy in a pyjama jacket spin conspiracy theories?"
I have read that some doctors become addicted to the medications in their surgery.
I'd get a second opinion Dr Berkeley. I've heard Dr Nina is quite an expert at only 22 if your stiffed-necked pride will allow. Of course it will!!
I take it then that you haven't heard many later broadcasts from Bill Cooper. Shame, he nails entities like yourself to the wall.
Then again, on second thoughts you may yet change your mind, again, and actually agree with much of what Bill did, and not just said.
Tell it to Bill's widow and child you scumbag.
you live in some sort of masturbatorium michael.
Berkeley, have you any idea what you linked too? lol!!!!!!!!
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Embassy/1154/WilliamCooperExhibit.h...
I'll leave it up to your impeccable research and analysis and to the sheer wonder of all who will see what you did in regards to linking this site with the Deguello Report!
lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Because he's dead, I have to pretend he was honest?
you live in some sort of masturbatorium michael."
lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And because you've never lived I have to pretend you're not lying?
"some sort of masturbatorium"
Come now Dr Berkeley, you can diagnose better than that...."some sort"?
you live in some sort of masturbatorium michael.
RowanBerkeley | Fri, 2007-08-10 00:14
What the hell is a "masturbatorium" ?
No idea DB, I was thinking it was some kind of institution that he has his practice based in, either that or it's the name of the clinic he visits? Or maybe a regular haunt he frequents to get some relief from being on the front-line in his war against oppression.
Dr. Berkeley's promise to his patients.. "I shall not go into excessive detail, this being a family site,"
He does seem somewhat pre-occupied with "jerking off", but I rather suspect that has more to do with 'ponerology' rather than "cassiopean influences" as Dr Berkeley points out.
The "j-o" word is going to get this thread shut down, Michael. But it was fun while it lasted. Thanks for the cool blog, Quas, and I hope you stick around, because...we need ya ! Peace to you and yours.
about the site with the Cooper biog:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Embassy/1154/
it also contains a handy pdf file of the fbi's "majestic 12" report.
maybe Michael thinks geocities.com is ghey. I do too. Peace be to you.
What on this earth, has the Maj 12 docs got to do with the Deguello Report?
Okay, I shall re-phrase my last comment. What on this thread has the Maj 12 docs got to do with the Deguello Report?
Are you suggesting that David Duke is somehow involved in recovered alien craft?
Ladies and Gentlemen, Dr Rowan Berkeley has just left the internet.
For more details see above.
(Individual results may vary and if symptoms persist, please consult your physician.)
Wow, you really are an imbecile, aren't you Michael? Obviously you missed the entire crux of my goines email interpretation.
I was merely employing the now infamous Quotesque principles of deduction. That exercise was an obvious parody of yours and particularly PlanetQuo's impossibly comedic investigative methods.
But then, you are the pedantic liars that deliberately misrepresent (when it suits your ludicrous theories and seething grudges) any instance of satire as documentary evidence.
Michael said to Poseidon:
Hey Mikey... you mean the same Australia that you suspect to be setting you up as a terrorist? And all because you received a piece of misaddressed mail?!?
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1849
Sounds awfully draconian to me.. but do tell, "they", the postal demons, are "after" you, Mikey, not because of any hate laws but rather because you're a hypocritical liar, huh? And "they", no doubt, is actually just your beleaguered conscience.
Take a look at yourself.
Isn't there someone important you should be spending time with, Michael?
Instead of "spaming" this here thread?
"although their intelligence and insight are clearly on a much higher plane than people who are merely "average"."
Like the example of brilliant deduction from Gina/Nina in "response" to Wippette's "mysterious email"?
Precisely, you were caught bang to rights in your attempt to cast some aspersions by ridiculously 'interpreting' the content of an email sent to Jim at PlanetQuo.net and NOT Suzette the Wippette defender of the Goyim.
Here it is for all to see:
Imitation beyond flattery
Should be changed to read "Imitation beyond insanity"
Your interpretation of this "Sounds awfully draconian to me". What has "postal demons" got to do with anything. I should have known, you were "projecting" again. Either that or you were "merely employing the now infamous Quotesque principles of deduction."
You'd make a great detective Gina. You could become an instructor with the ADL's police riddle training team. Just this alone should get you the job.
Still munching on Talmuds and Israeli money?
I'll pass on your regards to Rachel's family and friends.
If Dr Berkeley is sill interested your "delisious imagination" he can read this superb essay of yours for starters.
Perhaps first, though, you could educate Dr Berkeley on the difference between the 'Deguello Report' report and the 'Majestic 12' as he seems a little confused about things he's so apt to comment about and this could disrupt the flow and integrity of his cointel-pro spotting operation and he's more apt to listen to a fellow doctor.
are you some sort of cointelpro machine, that just randomly cuts and pastes bits of rhetoric back and forth? can't you see the print is too small to read?
whoever wrote that Ninablog needs a good spanking.
Please read the whole blog entry if you're interested. As per usual, Mi'chael has employed yet more tactics from his dog-eared Zionist playbook.. you know, stuff like omitting details about... such minor details as who authored the information he presents. meh.. no biggie. ;)
The blog post is a series of emails between a "libertarian" myspace acquaintance and myself. His message, headed with "From: [redacted]" begins the series (and is what appears in Michael's stalker's screen capture). My responses are all labeled "From: Nina."
i was looking forward to it ;-)
Michael, you're as skilful at saying nothing as Quas is.
That was just a big, steaming non sequitur, Michael. The multitude of hyperlinks in that post are pretty much arbitrary. Let's face it, your theories suck. I'm not O'Connell, Nina is not Eireann Goddess, and nothing that you claim is true or backed by evidence. It really is quite as simple as that.