Think Tank Calls For Bush to Be Dictator For Life
Published on Thursday, August 16, 2007.
Source: Rogue Government - Lee Rogers
Family Security Matters a neo-conservative based think tank has published an article advocating that George W. Bush should be a dictator for life. The organization has since taken the article down, but is still viewable via this cached link.
Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy: By Philip Atkinson
The article written by Philip Atkinson states that Bush would fail his country by becoming an ex-President or can achieve greatness by becoming President-for-Life Bush in order to bring sense to Congress and sanity to the Supreme Court. Atkinson is bluntly advocating that Bush should become dictator for life with these outrageously anti-American statements.
From the article:
President Bush can fail in his duty to himself, his country, and his God, by becoming “ex-president” Bush or he can become “President-for-Life” Bush: the conqueror of Iraq, who brings sense to the Congress and sanity to the Supreme Court. Then who would be able to stop Bush from emulating Augustus Caesar and becoming ruler of the world? For only an America united under one ruler has the power to save humanity from the threat of a new Dark Age wrought by terrorists armed with nuclear weapons.
Atkinson also advocates that Bush should get rid of everyone in Iraq through military force and repopulate the country with Americans.
From the article:
If President Bush copied Julius Caesar by ordering his army to empty Iraq of Arabs and repopulate the country with Americans, he would achieve immediate results: popularity with his military; enrichment of America by converting an Arabian Iraq into an American Iraq (therefore turning it from a liability to an asset); and boost American prestiege while terrifying American enemies.
Read complete article here:
http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=4022
**************
All I have to say is: WTF?!
There's a cached version of the article here.
Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy
By Philip Atkinson
President George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. He was sworn in for a second term on January 20, 2005 after being chosen by the majority of citizens in America to be president.
Yet in 2007 he is generally despised, with many citizens of Western civilization expressing contempt for his person and his policies, sentiments which now abound on the Internet. This rage at President Bush is an inevitable result of the system of government demanded by the people, which is Democracy.
The inadequacy of Democracy, rule by the majority, is undeniable – for it demands adopting ideas because they are popular, rather than because they are wise. This means that any man chosen to act as an agent of the people is placed in an invidious position: if he commits folly because it is popular, then he will be held responsible for the inevitable result. If he refuses to commit folly, then he will be detested by most citizens because he is frustrating their demands.
When faced with the possible threat that the Iraqis might be amassing terrible weapons that could be used to slay millions of citizens of Western Civilization, President Bush took the only action prudence demanded and the electorate allowed: he conquered Iraq with an army.
This dangerous and expensive act did destroy the Iraqi regime, but left an American army without any clear purpose in a hostile country and subject to attack. If the Army merely returns to its home, then the threat it ended would simply return.
The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life.
The simple truth that modern weapons now mean a nation must practice genocide or commit suicide. Israel provides the perfect example. If the Israelis do not raze Iran, the Iranians will fulfill their boast and wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Yet Israel is not popular, and so is denied permission to defend itself. In the same vein, President Bush cannot do what is necessary for the survival of Americans. He cannot use the nation's powerful weapons. All he can do is try and discover a result that will be popular with Americans.
As there appears to be no sensible result of the invasion of Iraq that will be popular with his countrymen other than retreat, President Bush is reviled; he has become another victim of Democracy.
By elevating popular fancy over truth, Democracy is clearly an enemy of not just truth, but duty and justice, which makes it the worst form of government. President Bush must overcome not just the situation in Iraq, but democratic government.
However, President Bush has a valuable historical example that he could choose to follow.
When the ancient Roman general Julius Caesar was struggling to conquer ancient Gaul, he not only had to defeat the Gauls, but he also had to defeat his political enemies in Rome who would destroy him the moment his tenure as consul (president) ended.
Caesar pacified Gaul by mass slaughter; he then used his successful army to crush all political opposition at home and establish himself as permanent ruler of ancient Rome. This brilliant action not only ended the personal threat to Caesar, but ended the civil chaos that was threatening anarchy in ancient Rome – thus marking the start of the ancient Roman Empire that gave peace and prosperity to the known world.
If President Bush copied Julius Caesar by ordering his army to empty Iraq of Arabs and repopulate the country with Americans, he would achieve immediate results: popularity with his military; enrichment of America by converting an Arabian Iraq into an American Iraq (therefore turning it from a liability to an asset); and boost American prestiege while terrifying American enemies.
He could then follow Caesar's example and use his newfound popularity with the military to wield military power to become the first permanent president of America, and end the civil chaos caused by the continually squabbling Congress and the out-of-control Supreme Court.
President Bush can fail in his duty to himself, his country, and his God, by becoming “ex-president” Bush or he can become “President-for-Life” Bush: the conqueror of Iraq, who brings sense to the Congress and sanity to the Supreme Court. Then who would be able to stop Bush from emulating Augustus Caesar and becoming ruler of the world? For only an America united under one ruler has the power to save humanity from the threat of a new Dark Age wrought by terrorists armed with nuclear weapons.
Family Security Matters = a front group for the Center for Security Policy thinktank, which espouses and end to democracy in America, fascist dictatorship, and depopulating Iraq of Arabs.
FSM has ties to the ADL, Radio host Laura Ingraham and former director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency James Woolsey are on it's board of advisors, members include Dick Cheney, Richard Perle and Elliott Abrams, and FSM members regularly appear as guest commentators on Fox News..
And the " newly formed " occupied country may as well be named Amerael! Absurd IDEAS, and absurd behavior from would be ( God forbid ) Ameraelis...." Ahhh..there's a time ..ahhh...ahh..for politics..and ..ahhh......There's a time for politics.......It's an ABSURD insinuation " ( and IDEA ) Quoted statement made by Geo. Bush Jr.
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
"Only an America united under one ruler has the power to save humanity from the threat of a new Dark Age wrought by terrorists armed with nuclear weapons".
This statement should be read by replacing the terms with their opposites as in all communication from the present US administration.
America is already a dictatorship and the new Congress has done nothing to change that. The Congress is a joke.
The US has no business in saving the world. The world does not need to be saved and it certainly does not need the US to play any kind of role in its salvation. The US has nothing to offer in respect of moral, rule of law or anything that we hold dear.
The US has no right to talk about humanity because its acts demonstrate that it does not know what humanity is. It has become known not for its freedom but for its ability to abolish freedom for its own citizens as well as anybody else. It breaks any law, any international treaty any moral code there is.
Its criminal acts appear a carbon copy of those of a country which since Moshe Dayan has pursued the foreign policy of a rabies stricken dog, and we have reasons be doubt that the US is any longer a sovereign country.
Do not talk about saving us from the Dark Ages, it is the US policy which is heading down the road to the new Dark Ages, and its abolition of Habeas Corpus is one very concrete example of that.
Till now we have not seen one single credible court ruling confirm the existence of organized terrorism. The nuclear weapons which are constantly on the table, also to threat countries which have abstained from this form of savagery are in the hands of the US administration, not the "terrorist organizations" that everybody are taught to fear.
Gawwwwwwwwd, and I thought I tended to rant a bit. I used to have a neighbor that talked like that, but that was when the anti-psychotic meds were wearing off. This is more of the same. Whoever wrote it, what a turd!!! Sounds like Cheney, or maybe one of his handlers. Bush, with the power to save humanity? Humanity is actually fine without his kind or the sub humans that pull his strings. Bring sanity to the Supreme Court? First, get the sub humans out of Washington, and the Zionists too. :-)