911 INVESTIGATOR C. BOLLYN STATEMENT AUG 17, 2007
On his web site http://www.bollyn.com/index/ Chris posted the first of a several part statement about himself, his 911 research, his trial, his choices, and his view of all that concerns him.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=108035
If anyone believes this is not written by him, they are clearly delusional. It is time to stop the nonsense about his disappearance and support him morally, spiritually, if and when he appears in court by being there, with a massive letter writing campaign and complaints to the press, and financially through www.bollynbooks.com.
The mainstream press and their organizations should also be pressured into supporting him in the same way they supported Judy Miller. Our congressmen and legislators should be harassed into holding hearings on police excessive force and prosecutorial misconduct. It was so grotesque in this case.
Chris's personal life is not the most important thing, nor is it in itself terrifically informative.
Aye, and parts of it are even quite encouraging.. but when was it written (I mean all but the parts that mention Smoking Mirrors-- whose blogs seem sensible enough)? And I most heartily agree: a travesty of justice.
You said "Chris's personal life is not the most important thing, nor is it in itself terrifically informative."
RowanBerkeley | Fri, 2007-08-17 23:17
I disagree VEHEMENTLY, sir. The Constitution is our country's life, freedom and badge of honor, written for no less than individual rights, freedoms, and security in peace, family, and justice. Christopher Bollyn has been elevated to a position of higher than normal profile among many truth seekers. His case may very well establish a precedent of what all of the rest of us Americans may in the not too distant future be subject to. As always, I bid you peace in Christ.
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
I suppose the question now might depend on whether or not you believe this latest (11Aug-- Palast: Gatekeeper) piece to be Bollyn's own work, and as having been written after Monday, Jul30 (as the reference, once again, to another SmokingMirrors Blog re: Palast, would date it). Or, might they have taken something he was working on (post- Palast's 10 May 07 attack on Dr. Jones but pre- his 25Jun sentencing date-- in other words somewhere roughly between 10May-25Jun) and used it now, to make it appear that he's free/alive and still working, after the bogus (I believe, all 35 words or so of 'his') 3 Aug. article that appeared on 's site?
Oh, WAIT-- a new one! If it's his I'll offer up a prayer of thanks (we ALL will 'cept the shills who're paid to lie about him-- and I DO NOT mean Messrs. Smith and Hufschmid, &c).
presumably you all caught this bug from daryl, who caught it from his hated idol alex jones.
This illusion, that the reporter is the story, is related to the 'great men' theory of history, a similarly vulgar, egotistical, petit bourgeois illusion.
Black is white and white is black, right, RowanBerkeley?
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
But, I prefer to see titles that reflect the message as opposed to the messenger.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
You said "Chris's personal life is not the most important thing, nor is it in itself terrifically informative " Right..." the MOST IMPORTANT THING " ( your words, sir ) I consider the salvation of our souls unto everlasting life. So, you're right...technically. And agan-- "terrifically informative" ( your words ) I would put the Holy Bible Douay-Rheims edition at the top, again you are correct. Otherwise my statements still stand. Peace
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
Dr Linda L. Shelton
If this site cares about truth and justice in all aspects of our life, then the Salem Witch Trial conducted against Christopher Bollyn should be news.
His Constitutional Rights to a fair trial were grossly violated by extreme prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. When the transcript is available this will be very clear.
He was defamed for what he writes - shouldn't we be protect the right to free speech so what we say can't be twisted and used against us?
Totalitarian police states jail people for what they say in opposition to the government. How is this different?
If this site only cares about ranting and raving against Zionism and discussing 911 conspiracy theories say so and don't advertise falsely.
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Either you support the Bill of Rights or you don't. Which is it?
Are you now going to fall on your sword and remain silent? Or perhaps you have more truth to share with the rest of us lowly truth seekers. I don't know the condition of Chris Bollyn, but I would not down play his importance in this movement. Peace
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
Shelton said:
"If this site cares about truth and justice in all aspects of our life, then the Salem Witch Trial conducted against Christopher Bollyn should be news."
Linda, glad to see that you agree with Smith and Hufschmid. Maybe you'll take up the task of explaining to Popsydon and MASHER the cabin boy that it's obvious "his Constitutional Rights to a fair trial were grossly violated by extreme prosecutorial and judicial misconduct." That much is all we really know for sure.
You're spot on when you rant about "totalitarian police states" jailing people for what they say. Again, you and TFC are seeing the situation for what it is.
But when you say, "If this site only cares about ranting and raving against Zionism and discussing 911 conspiracy theories" it's false advertising, you go off the rails. 911 conspiracy is a FACT dear. Deep Zionist involvement is also FACT. Once you process those two, you'll be on your way. Cheers.
Dr Linda L. Shelton
Anyone who thinks that Zionism is the cause of ALL evil is delusional.
Linda, don't get carried away. I haven't heard that remark made by anyone yet. Stick to the facts. Let's not get delusional.
that's absurd.
but, zionism certainly does a damn good job of embodying all that is evil.
however, of course, there are evil people who aren't zionists.
and yes, Chris Bollyn is certainly worth listening to and defending.
His rights are as important as anyone else's.
human rights should always be defended.
indeed Bollyn deserves special attention for risking his livelihood (and perhaps his life) to spread the truth.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
Linda Shelton has as much of a right to question the real "purpose" or the credibility of this site as anyone else does, especially in light of an unfortunate fact that it has for some time played the willing host to a certain self-styled expert on Christopher Bollyns' own credibility, who has never ceased in his ongoing effort to assassinate it. Why shouldn't Dr. Linda Shelton, or anyone else's sister or brother, raise a red flag, when certain "highly valued assets" or "loyal adherents" of this site circulate material from their own personal sites -
such as to the effect of - and I quote -
- "It would be quite timely if Bollyn goes to jail, and I see a no-bond warrant has now been issued for his arrest after he failed to show up in court for sentencing!!! I ran a criminal check on Bollyn to see if I could find out any more about his previous convictions. Unfortunately, although the records covered most US states including California, the report said he was clean. His 1981 theft and assault convictions are too long ago to show up in most on-line checks".
And I'm not losing any sleep wondering who wrote it...
Dr Linda L. Shelton
C. Bollyn told me that in 1981 he was riding his bike in a national park, stole some peanuts, was tackled by a park ranger and the convictions were federal charges related to this. These were the actions of a young and careless man 26 years ago. This certainly does not mean Chris is violent, has a propensity for violence, has criminal intentions or motives, or anything except he made a stupid mistake as a young man and paid for it.
I find it amazing how on so many web sites and with so many people, there is a tendency to knee-jerk, wild and rash speculation and defamation of a person without basis. I believe everyone should be more careful about how they interpret "facts". A little knowledge is worse than none at all if a person is careless about how they use and interpret this knowledge. They can easily do more harm than good.
I don't know how long this has been there, but it's absolutely ridiculous.
TFC is backing itself into a corner, bigtime. Idiocy of this magnitude can only hold up for so long before it's left there blushing in the spotlight of evidence to the contrary.
They know nothing about politics, as such, so they simply pursue personalities.
The 30 July 2007, Piper Report, available at:
http://216.240.133.177/Piper/07/index.php#July
...has a few interesting remarks on the Bollyn saga and the proof that Hufschmid and Smith are deliberately lying.
(RBN had some problem(s) with their archives, and this July 30 audio has only recently become available.)
Okay, so maybe Piper overdoes the "former nude model" and "Kinky Bollyn" stuff a bit, unless there is some other scandal that he's holding back for later. However, it's hardly in the same league as peddling baseless hearsay that Chris, Helje and the kids have been either "captured" or "murdered".
And they still haven't retracted their ludicrous claims. The top of TFC's front page still carries the absurd quote posted above by Crimes of Zion, stating that "Daryl Bradford Smith firmly believes that Linda Shelton is a principal in the bizarre disappearance of the Bollyn family..."
It's a blatant lie. Smith is almost certainly not silly enough to believe that, unless the skeletons in his past have addled his brain and he's been duped by Hufschmid. I rather liked a previous suggestion by Linda Shelton that Smith should consider getting himself a psychiatrist and a lawyer. But in any case, whether or not he believes the nonsense that he peddles, if others genuinely believe it, it demonstrates that either their data evaluation skills are poor, or Smith's "mind control" (deception) skills are good!
It's just one of Smith's numerous lies, rumor-mongering and sliming and slandering. I've seen emails from the Bollyns, proving that they are okay and that they successfully fled to Europe and eluded the clutches of the US "justice" system. And of course, the Bollyn website is regularly updated. I also know that the Jay Bollyn who posted here is not an imposter, as some suggested.
That one's a laugh, and is strictly for the tinfoil brigade, e.g. "missiles surrounded by holograms" and 767-shaped holes made by "cleverly placed charges".
Proven liars and con-artists like Daryl Badmouth Smear and Eric Duffsmirch are ultimately on a collision course with the truth.
Dr Linda L. Shelton
Daryl Bradsford Smith and Eric Hufschmid are guilty of per se defamation of character. They eventually will answer in court for calling me a murderer. The statute of limitations is one year. Anyone who wants to send me their addresses will make it a little easier for me to proceed. If they ate crow and thoroughly retracted their lies I would reconsider.
Piper should retract his false statements abut Helje being a nude model and exhibitionist if he doesn't want the same fate - a suit for per se defamation of character from Helje, when she recovers from her illness. She has no history of anything but appropriate modeling.
This is the kind of nonsense that totally discredits the writers, as does vulgarity. They sound like a bunch of drunk and high college students, or like some of my patients with paranoid psychosis. Since they are actively obtaining money in response to their defamation, this falls into criminal conduct amounting to fraud. Pehaps appropriate officials will eventually deal with that.
As a scientist, one of the most important things I ever did and still try to do is to discredit my opinion. I always try to see where emotion, false interpretation of "fact", or ignorance make me come to a false conclusion. I have told C. Bollyn that he will be an outstanding investigative journalist when he uses the scientific method and works hard to discredit his own conclusions. His should interview top scientists who disagree with the 911 theories, not just people who agree with them. Some of the greatest discoveries in science came and come from people who open their minds to new and creative possibilities and who work hard to discredit their own conclusions.
This also applies in the courts, but court is more theatre than fact. The side wins which convinces the jury that their story is true and the other side's story is not reliable. Don't bore me with the facts if emotion will do! Truth based on well presented evidence may save the day if your not blindsided by emotion.
In C. Bollyn's trial, the jury was so brainwashed by the prosecution's argument that Chris was an intelligent manipulator who made up conspiracy theories to write about and that the incident was staged by him, along with this baloney about him being drunk that they ignored the facts that were presented very clearly. The prosecution admitted they got this theory off the web - probably the "Sign of the Times web site" where I recently found two people - Laura and Lisa spinning this tale. This was extreme prosecutorial misconduct. His attorney interviewed several jurors who said that half believed that C. Bollyn was innocent but then were persuaded to change their opinion when others emphasized the above.
I interviewed the children and others and the facts clearly support C. Bollyn (not including his theory about the ADL or Zionist influences where I do not have enough evidence to include or exclude his theory in this realm). I reviewed the arrest reports and incident reports as well as police and fire dept. logs. The police clearly committed perjury.
I have concluded that he was NOT drunk. He was NOT belligerent. He did not resist arrest. He assaulted no one. He was naive in not knowing that police automatically assume a large man like Chris is more dangerous, that arguing with police is like arguing with a gorilla, that questioning police is like provoking a gorilla, and that turning away from the police even when one was standing 10 feet away - especially when the officer reached under his vest for a taser- to take several large steps to request his brother to come out of the house to be a witness and help protect the children and his wife might be interpreted as an aggressive act. Remember this was his property and no crime had been committed. We all have a right to protect our property and family. They knew there was no gun in the house. They had no record of a FOIA card. They didn't try to support their claim that there was a gun in the house with a search afterwards. They had a record of Chris' brother and knew he did not keep weapons in the house and was not allowed to due to his history of mental illness. The story from the police does not hold water.
This is especially true in the face of the fact that his brother who lives at the same address has a long history of drunkenness, belligerence, mental illness with intense manic episodes and run ins with the police. This is also a large part of the reason that C. Bollyn chose to leave his home and travel extensively as a young man - the situation with his brother at home was very difficult.
I believe this primed the police into bias against that address and that they were simply annoyed that C. Bollyn called and complained about them in his 911 call so they decided to teach him a lesson. They came and parked their car in a confrontational manner diagonal across the driveway and not at the curb and then all three exited the car in a confrontational manner in a semicircle. The police also lied about normal patrols. They falsified their arrest record.
In none of the suburbs like Hoffman Estates, where the crime rate is very low are there frequent and usual patrols with three heavily armed undercover men in unmarked cars. This is hogwash. The stories by the police on this are also inconsistent. One time they say they are on routine patrols. Another time they say they were going to check out a drug house several blocks down. Which is it?
Ask yourself, if they were just going to explain who they were, why didn't they just park their car normally at the curb, one person get out of the car, and then they politely explain who they were and what they were doing. Why did a marked car park out of sight before the unmarked car arrived? Why didn't the uniformed officer assigned to the call at first simple come and explain things to the Bollyns? This is all on their logs. If they thought he was nuts or drunk, why provoke him? They are supposed to be trained to de-escalate situations.
A number of children were playing in the front yard and Helje was trimming bushes with Chris in the house looking out the window. So clearly there was no need to jump out of the car in force to protect anyone. Bollyn ran out of the house to protect his wife and young daughter. They instead clearly assaulted the Bollyn family in my opinion. When the transcript is available this will be crystal clear.
..that " provocation " is a viable defense. When the goon squad ( police )use threatening, overbearing actions of a " perceived aggression " the accused has a valid cause for defensive action(s)...even semi-irrational acts, due to ' panic 'But I'm not a lawyer, just a Dead Bishop. Peace to you.
---------------------------------------
Repent and Do Penance
Welcome, Old Buddy, Old Pal ! I've been expecting you !
And now that you're here, and right on the clock, as always, we might as well make the best of that sorry situation.
Okay, "Poseidon", before you stink up another thread with
any more of your cheap, transparent diversionary tactics...
of Piper piping :
gossip-mongering :
and cat-calling :
( as in Pip-Pip Piper, the Pipettes' case )
or cat-calling continued :
( as in your own nauseating case )
...let me remind you, first of all, just in "case" you never
even bothered to read Linda Sheltons' title for this post :
( as in the following "case" )-
911 INVESTIGATOR C. BOLLYN STATEMENT AUG 17, 2007
Im very sorry to disappoint your Divine Presence, in your self-appointed "Anti-Zionist" quest for the ultimate falsehood,
but if one thing would seem to be glaringly obvious, after you have repeatedly made a vomitous hash of anything even remotely resembling the so-called "truth", it would be this :
THIS BLOG IS ABOUT CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN, NOT ABOUT SMITH AND HUFSCHMID
You have done nothing but use the alleged shortcomings of that curious pair as a poisoned trident on which to impale the outstanding career, the overall credibility, and the upstanding character of a fine and true truthseeker, Christopher Bollyn, without relenting in your odious, noxious assault, since you first appeared in the turbulent waters of this forum last year.
And you would love nothing better than to turn Dr. Shelton's legitimate concerns into a trough of doubt, by completely -
W. O. T.
...as if you hadn't heard, while you scurry in and out of the cochlea of your convoluted conch shell, to treat us with yet more of your foul, ambergrisian vomitings, that can be taken to mean something to the general effect of ---
WASTING OUR TIME
By spamming this thread with your insidious refuse, you have only attempted, and utterly failed, to distract any potential readers from my own pertinent remarks above, to which your predictable skulking about and skullduggery only gives proof.
...and if you think this an "ad hominem" attack, "old buddy,
ol' pal", I'm also very sorry to inform you that you got another "think" comin', and you ain't seen nothin' yet, because the oceanic chum slick you have so lovingly crafted from your own acrid lying puke is about to be flushed right down the
ROYAL POSEIDON POOPSHOOT
SO GET READY
FOR A HEAVY RUSH
Behold ! He Rises !
Damn Thee, Cursed Whale !
OK "PO", THAT DOES IT
for the moment, at least.
I'll settle the rest of your hash later...
and P.S. ( as in Po.S.eidon )
it's so reassuring to know that you would "hate to see me leave here", and that you "don't think that Quasimodo is
a "Zionist Agent". Thanks, Old Buddy, Ol' Pal......
It would be nice to believe in the legend of Christopher Bollyn, the "straightforward American patriot". But his supporters have never satisfactorily addressed the glaring holes that quickly become evident in the "honest Chris" interpretation of the data.
For example, why would someone who is paranoid about a "suspicious" car - which sounds like something dreamt up by Eric Hufschmid - choose to cycle two miles to a liquor store, and two miles back, on the very same streets that the "suspicious" car was cruising? This is like an ophidiophobe choosing to descend into a dark pit of vipers! Hasn't Chris ever heard of a person being eliminated in an "accident"?
And if the whole thing was a conspiracy by the ADL, the entire Hoffman Estates police force, the public prosecutors, the CIA, RBN, Mike Piper, Scott Makufka, etc, how did they know their "suspicious" car would be able to provoke Chris into calling 911, so as to provide the pretext they required in order to turn up at his home?
We are supposed to believe that the guy is intelligent enough to connect the dots and deduce that the Zionists did 9/11, but at the same time he fails to comprehend that yelling at the police about getting his reinforcements and turning to go into his house - where he could have had a gun - ain't a wise move.
His first wife Bosmat was Jewish - Israeli military intelligence, and based in Herzliya - and his second wife has two Jewish names (Brand, Kaskel) and hails from Tallinn, Estonia, which has a Rabbi who was appointed by the Chabad Lubavitch movement, its own synagogue, and most of the country's Jewish population. The latest Census found there were 1,628 Jews in Tallinn in 2000, and the figure as of 2006 is given as 1,443.
http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=PO0222&ti=POPULATION...
And we're meant to believe that Chris is exposing them, not working for them! Just like Eric Hufschmid, brother of the heiress to a $9 billion Zionist media empire, is supposed to be an "anti-Zionist" in the alt.media. Yeah, right.
Although Chris originally went to Israel in the 1970s, where he witnessed Israeli Air Force bombers screaming over his head in the early hours, he did nothing about it until 2000, when he got a job at Liberty Lobby, producer of The Spotlight, the forerunner to American Free Press.
I have lived in Israel/Palestine for years and seen my friends shot, maimed and killed. I was married to a woman who worked in Israeli military intelligence. I was the subject of an Israeli inquiry when I was 21 years old. I have been to Iran, Syria, Jordan, Gaza, Egypt, Tunisia, Turkey, and other Middle Eastern capitals since I was 18 years old. I know what has gone on in Israel and Lebanon since 1977-78 when Israeli Air Force bombers used to scream over my head at 5 a.m. in the morning when I cleaned the pool on the kibbutz in the Jordan Valley. I learned Hebrew and Arabic because I needed these languages on a daily basis.
Source
2000, of course, is one year before Israel was to conduct a false-flag terror attack of unprecendented magnitude, and the very time when the Zionists would have been installing agents whose job was to infiltrate the nationalist, patriot and truth movement. And we are supposed to believe that Chris was so worked up about a library banning a book (Piper's Final Judgment), that it motivated him to dedicate the next seven years of his life to exposing Zionism. The library ban did within months what the sounds of those screaming Israeli Air Force bombers failed to do in more than twenty years!
We are supposed to believe that the "arrest" incident just happened to occur in August 2006, which was the very time that Chris's career at American Free Press was coming under pressure, because there were increasing doubts about the reliability of his articles and the Sam Danner hoax had come apart at the seams.
I can understand people getting angry when their hero is debunked. Some people will have had experiences such as run-ins with the law, or email contact with Chris, that color their interpretation of the data, and they end up perceiving events as the Zionists would wish them to. But talk of "chumslicks" or "ambergrisian vomitings" doesn't address the issues.
And anyone interested in how Christopher Bollyn has gone from the American Free Press journalist of 2006 to a man in exile and object of ridicule in some quarters, must reflect on the fact that his involvement with Eric Hufschmid - and to a smaller extent, Daryl BS - played a not inconsiderable part.
They made a man come out for a year or two, work hard at facts that were already known, 'cos he never exposed anything that wasn't already known. And got in, got trusted as a guy that was a fact finder and a truth teller. And then, at the appropriate time, sent him off to be a complete nutjob, to discredit the rest of us.
But anyway, so what they're trying to do is, that they're going to put these people out as factfinders and then nutjobs, and so that people can junctasuppose (sic) juxtapose? a belief that everybody in this movement is a Looney Tune.
Now that's a pretty good description of Zionist tactics, but it was Daryl Bradford Smith talking (August 10, 2007 audio), not me. David Icke, Chris Bollyn, David Shayler, except in the case of Icke the "nutjob" part came first and the aligning with incriminating evidence second.
Well now, "Old Buddy, Ol' Pal', as it just so happens, in that foregoing instance, I simply couldn't agree with you more,
the reason being, of course, that such raw terms were never intended for a single solitary second to "address the issues",
much less any of your predetermined "issues", but simply to DESCRIBE the entire content of your pitiful foregoing entries, which constitute nothing but a disavowal and a disgusting lie of omission, which is very much apropos of your "style".
No, sorry again, Old Buddy, Ol' Pal, since you can't seem to compete with my superior vocabulary, intuitive intellect, and universal understanding of the universal language of music, please allow me to explain, once more ( for the uninitiated, that is ) in some common, everyday parlance, ( or any other vernacular to which you may have since grown accustomed, throughout your mythological transoceanic transits ), what I was really attempting to describe, pure and simple, in all
of its unadorned effervescence, would be much more aptly
and perhaps best described as -
WHALE PUKE
Oh, and here's another P.S. -
MOZART is for PUSSIES !
Linda (and any others who have not seen it),
Press the 'play' button and watch the brief video presentation about half-way down this page: http://www.thetruth247.com/
The End.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.