all you are good for is issuing pompous hype.

.. and all YOU are 'good' for is obscuring and obfuscating otherwise self-evidental facts.. stick to your Catholic Church/ Jesuit nonesense posts and worthless drivel.. leave these HONEST posts alone.

From the Bollyn article of August 19:

---

Violence is counter-productive, and it is extremely foolish, and irresponsible for Hufschmid and Smith to say things like this on their website:

"Alex Jones and other Zionist Deniers often imply that the only way to stop "them" is with violence. We should consider the possibility that he is telling us the truth. The Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Chertoffs, and everybody else in this Zionist crime network may never give up. We may have to kill all of them."

"If violence erupts, the FBI and police may have to be our first targets."

See: http://www.iamthewitness.com/Battle-Plan.html

I would hope that Eric Hufschmid would have the intelligence and common sense not to say such things. Doesn't he realize what he asking for by saying such things? Perhaps Eric should read what happened to Matt Hale. He has been imprisoned for 40 years for simply being the inspiration for a killer of a judge's family in Chicago.

This language could easily be seen as "hate speech" or inciting violence. With comments like these Hufschmid and Smith are going out on very thin ice - legally. This is nowhere I would want to go. I would strongly urge them to remove such comments and stick to the moral high ground. Such violent language marginalizes them - and their message. Don't they see that?

Hufschmid urges me to speak on his Internet radio show but I simply cannot and would not want be seen as supporting such calls for violence. I can not associate myself with people who are seen as supporting violence. It is that simple.

Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=108125

---

At least, Chris has seen the light. The TFC "trio" is now the TFC duo.

Of course, the reality is that Chris had to provide his followers with a pretext for the fact that he would be doing no more business with the Dynamic DuffSmear Duo. He could hardly admit that his contract had come to an end, and that he was hoping to reinvent himself as an honest journalist.

Correspondingly, DuffSmear, Inc, had to promote their hoax for their followers about "Bollyns gone, kidnapped and probably killed".

When the iamthewitless pair break up, each will probably be observed declaring that the other has been "killed and replaced"!

"I'm the real one."

"No he's not, I am." :-)

P'sidemself's a zionist losel-- I don't believe that Chris wrote that.. and if he did, 't was under duress.

THANKS for posting that PO-sied-ON.. I now posi9tively KNOW Chris Bollyn DID NOT write THAT.. that portion of 'Bollyn's' latest smacks of one Linda 'I Need to See a Dr.' Shelton.

not only is chris safe, but he is obviously being advised by competent adults.

Half the time I feel like a snob, the other half I feel like a hick-in-the-city.

If some playa wants to get my attention regarding important information, they can write it down on a piece of paper (or use a computer to do the same), and I'll read about it at my leisure. (If it's too long I'll quit reading - gotta be careful of that).

But the only way I'll listen to pre-recorded interviewy kinda radioy yack-fests is if God hisself, or Jesus, or the Buddha, or Mohammed is doing the yacking.

Nobody else is likely to be worthy of the attention, I've discovered from hard-learned experience. And if someone is, then there will be others who will commit their essential ideas to print.

Whatever the case, I won't miss out just because I refuse to waste my time listening to shit-wits on the internet.

Anyone who listens to the audio will know the value and intent of POIS-eid-ON and 'Rowan' Berzerkley's commentaries.. I hope (and expect) these parasitical pond-scum leeches meet the fate that they deserve..

its all charades on all sides
bollyn, tfc, shelton, etc

go here
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk

replace the names with 'smith, shelton, bollyn, bjerknes, etc...'
thats what theyre doing, generating clicks (interest).

these people are all together, wasting your time, with overviews they call plans, and conflicts purposely generated. its all they have left after they had to construct and pull off that bollyn attack to cleanup their mistake.

Ditto for GeeZio

go here (on the advice of Carol A. Valentine)
http://pbskids.org/barney/

replace the names with poiseidon, 'rowan berkeley, geez, etc...'
thats what theyre doing, generating clicks (interest).

..to avoid unintentional ambiguity, that (http://pbskids.org/barney/) is a recommendation from her site: www.come-and-hear.com
for those who care not for the truth or find it unpleasant and/or frightening. her other site is
http://www.public-action.com/

For someone trying to make a point, you sure sound awfully stupid.

Trust me, if theyr're real like you say, they don't want your "help" here.

Im sure of it.
haha

ZIONISM vs JUDAISM

Knowing that the mainstream media is generally hostile to 9/11 skeptics and independent researchers, Bollyn, a scholar of Middle Eastern history, explained that there is a fundamental difference between Zionism and Judaism.

"There are Jews who are not Zionists and there are Zionists who are not Jews," he said.

If elements of Israeli intelligence were involved in the attacks of 9/11, he said, that would be very unfortunate but it should have no bearing on innocent Jews anywhere in the world. The state of Israel claims to represent the Jews of the world, whether they support Zionism or not.

Bollyn, who has lived in Israel and the Middle East, explained that while elements of the Israeli state appear to have been involved in the events of 9/11, they are from the most extreme right-wing group of revisionist Zionism. Many of the current officials in the government of the state of Israel are the sons and daughters of the terrorist Irgun organization of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the people who first brought terrorism to the Middle East and the world stage in the 1940s.

Asked why 9/11 would have been done by Zionists, Bollyn said that as the "New Pearl Harbor," 9/11 had been carried out to sway public opinion and usher in the on-going War on Terror.

And thank you, yet again, for proving your duplicity and meager intellect: these fools would no more want you looking at the Talmud than they would www.iamthewitness.com/ And so farewell.

Christopher has posted the following message at rumormillnews.com:

Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid about
Spreading False News and Baseless Accusations

Christopher Bollyn

Eric,

I have known you since 2002 when you were first writing Painful Questions, which I still consider to be the best book about 9-11. I helped you with the editing and since then you have helped me a great deal in my 9-11 research. I can safely say that you have been my biggest supporter since then.

You and I participated in Jimmy Walter's 9-11 tour throughout Europe in May-June 2005. During the tour you saw how different Zionist agents desperately tried to prevent me from speaking about the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11 and the key role that the Israeli-American Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff played in covering up the truth of what happened.

You remember how I was not allowed to speak in Vienna because of the efforts of Jenna Orkin to scare Jimmy and the local PR firm that my comments would be seen as illegal in Austria. You saw how that strange fellow in Paris and London begged me not to mention Chertoff in my speech.

You have also known that since November 2001 I have been targeted and unfairly smeared by Zionist agents, primarily the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). When we visited you in May of 2006, I told you that we did not feel safe at our home in Illinois due to the intrusive FBI snoops.

Since then you have produced an excellent website, www.iamthewitness.com, with which you have done an excellent job in educating your readers and listeners about the history of Zionism and its control in the U.S. media and government.

As I told you then, if we want to win the hearts and minds of the public we have to have better websites to provide the essential information. On your website you have done an excellent job in posting some of my articles about 9-11 and Zionism, for which I am grateful.

When the police cranked up their intrusive snooping of me to the next level and invaded my home and brutally assaulted me, you used your website to bring attention to my plight in the corrupt courts of Cook County. I am very grateful for that.

I sincerely applaud your efforts to educate the public about Zionism and wish you continued success. The struggle against the crimes of Zionism is an extremely important battle which deserves our best efforts, which is why I am writing this open letter.

In order to win the struggle against the Zionist criminal network, we need to keep to the moral high ground and let the evidence and truth reveal the criminals. This is also my philosophy about exposing the truth about 9-11. The facts will reveal the criminals behind the crime.

If your website is to succeed in reaching a larger audience you have to stick to the truth and maintain the highest moral standards. It is essential for your success that you are fair and honest.

There are several areas where you have not stuck to the moral high ground and it has hurt your credibility immensely:

1. You have spread false news.

2. You have damaged my business and reputation by spreading false news.

3. You engage in baseless allegations against serious 9-11 researchers, like Dr. Steven E. Jones, and others.

4. You use violent and hateful language.

SPREADING FALSE NEWS

"Christopher Bollyn is still MIA, but don't let that frighten you!"

For nearly two months, you and your colleague on The French Connection have said that I am M.I.A. and that I, and my family, have been kidnapped or killed. You, however, know very well that this is not true because we have been exchanging emails and spoken on the phone several times during this time.

This is spreading false news.

You know very well that I have not been kidnapped and I have told you so in plain English on several occasions since June that this is complete nonsense. So why do you continue to post such rubbish?

To this day the opening lines on your website say this:

Daryl Bradford Smith firmly believes that Linda Shelton is a principal in the bizarre disappearance of the Bollyn family, and calls for a full investigation into the actions and associations of this woman.

I understand that you work together with Mr. Smith but that you have never even met him. You know that I have not been kidnapped but you are unable to convince your associate on The French Connection of this?

What kind of partnership do you have with Mr. Smith? Does he not believe you, the webmaster and producer of his radio show?

Why do you allow him to spread false news which you know full well is absolutely false? Don't you realize that this is like crying "wolf" and will only hurt your credibility?

Why have you spread alarm among my supporters with false news?

HURTING MY BUSINESS

You certainly realize that it was your criticism of American Free Press that allowed that organization to fire me in October 2006. Although I was not even aware of the article that you had written, AFP used it against me by saying that I was an "associate" of yours. So it was guilt by association which cost me my job.

Because you wrote a critical article about AFP on your website, I lost my job.

Since I lost my income from AFP, I have had to rely on donations, editing jobs, and selling my book for children, ABC Zoo. At the same time I have had to defend myself against malicious prosecution in the Cook County courts.

For the past two months or so, you have spread false information on my links which go through your website saying: "Note: we are not sure what happens if you donate money or order books from Bollyn!"

This "note" has obviously discouraged people from donating to my work or buying my book. Why would you do such a thing unless you really wanted to hurt my income and business?

BASELESS ACCUSATIONS

In your "Battle Plan" of 17 August 2007 you make some very unfair accusations and exhibit a very bizarre prejudice:

Under the subtitle "Professors, engineers, architects, and other phony 'truth seekers'" you (or Mr. Smith) wrote:

"Some of these people may simply be naive, but they should all be considered guilty until proven innocent. Professor Steven Jones, for example, has been associating with Jim Hoffman for years."

"Guilty until proven innocent?"

Guilty of what, may I ask?

Professor Jones has done more to explain the presence of molten metal in the rubble of the World Trade Center than anyone. His research has been extremely important in understanding what caused the buildings to collapse. For this he has suffered the slings and arrows of Zionist agents who grossly defamed him and caused him to lose his teaching position.

See: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=93189

Your baseless accusations against Jones put you on the same side as those Zionist agents who defamed the good professor in September 2006, namely Doug Fabrizio, Robert Goldberg, Gary Fine, and William Tumpowsky of the United Jewish Federation.

Whatever your motivation might be, you have done the same thing to Professor Jones as these Zionist agents. Why would you and Mr. Smith want to do that? Don't you see that you are effectively carrying water for the Zionists and those who would hide the truth of 9-11 by making such baseless accusations against Dr. Jones?

How does it advance the cause of 9-11 truth to say that Professor Jones is "guilty until proven innocent?"

This is what I am in the Zionist-dominated court of Cook County. This is what I am in the eyes of Zionist-run CNN.
This is why I am now an exile.

I am considered guilty until proven innocent and despite an abundance of evidence that I am innocent - I was found "guilty."

Don't you know what it means to consider somebody guilty until proven innocent? It is absolutely outrageous to think or say such things.

Who do you think will accept such mean-spirited and un-American logic? How can you complain about being marginalized when you say such things on your website? Don't you see that you and Mr. Smith are your own worst enemies?

Do you realize that "guilty until proven innocent" is exactly how President George W. Bush treated Saddam Hussein in relation to weapons of mass destruction? You are asking Jones to prove a negative - that he is not guilty?

You are saying that Jones is guilty because he "associates" with Jim Hoffman? Guilty of what?

Daryl B. Smith, your associate on The French Connection, evidently said some very nasty and untrue things about me after he met me in November 2005, yet I have never held you accountable for your association with the person who evidently slandered me.

This evil and malicious slander could have only come from him because it concerned my visit to his home in France during which he and his wife were the only people present besides me and my family. Ask yourself why Mr. Smith, or is it Dr. Smith, would spread evil slander about me and then avoid me for nearly a year.

I asked you if you have ever met Mr. Smith and you said he is "just a voice on the phone." You do all this work for "a voice on the phone?"

Eric, do you really know who you are associating with? Does Mr. Smith really have your best interest at heart? Is he really after the truth of 9-11? If so, why would he say such evil and false things about me and my family?

After he slandered me, I spoke with you and Mr. Smith on your radio show. I did not hold this evil and harmful slander against you or your him. I thought it was more important to get the information about 9-11 out than to discuss our differences.

Now, however, I see that there is a pattern to this madness that is dangerous and harmful. I can no longer ignore the warning flags.

VIOLENT AND HATEFUL LANGUAGE

The last point concerns language used in the "Battle Plan" you and Mr. Smith have on your website. You use language that suggests or implies that violence needs to be used to regain control of our money supply, government, and media.

You, or Mr. Smith, wrote:

"Alex Jones and other Zionist Deniers often imply that the only way to stop "them" is with violence. We should consider the possibility that he is telling us the truth. The Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Chertoffs, and everybody else in this Zionist crime network may never give up. We may have to kill all of them."

"If violence erupts, the FBI and police may have to be our first targets."

See: http://www.iamthewitness.com/Battle-Plan.html

As I wrote in my Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence:

This language could easily be seen as "hate speech" or inciting violence. With comments like these Hufschmid and Smith are going out on very thin ice - legally. This is nowhere I would want to go. I would strongly urge them to remove such comments and stick to the moral high ground. Such violent language marginalizes them - and their message. Don't they see that?

Hufschmid urges me to speak on his Internet radio show but I simply cannot and would not want be seen as supporting such calls for violence. I can not associate myself with people who are seen as supporting violence. It is that simple.

See: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=108125

I am compelled to write this open letter because my private communications with you obviously failed to produce any changes concerning the false news about me. You and Mr. Smith have lied about me and hurt my business. Your irresponsible and reckless comments can hurt you more than you think.

I urgently and strongly urge you to consider my comments and stick to the facts and the moral high ground. You must remove any comments that can be see as inciting violence. You must not make baseless allegations against others and you must stick to the truth. There is no other way.

Sincerely,

Christopher Bollyn
www.bollyn.com

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=108221

bravo!

Now THAT sounds like the Bollyn! And what was said requires me to pause-- and to reflect, and await further developments. Those items address some certain inconsistancies I was aware of but have accepted as a course caused by necessity- to simply cut straight to the chase. However, obviously, I need now to reflect, and so again, farewell.

Alain, that's a pretty well-concoted letter. Sounded convincing enough until I hit:
Because you wrote a critical article about AFP on your website, I lost my job.

If you listen to the Bollyn interviews at www.iamthewitness.com, you'll hear some bitterness about being censored and not being paid by AFP, but he says nothing to suggest he would would have stayed on at the American Free Perverts in exchange for the money. If he were a person of exceptionally high principle, he'd never have stuck his neck out so far.

The next bit also wallows in some very out of character self-pity with another reference to AFP which he had no respect for.

"Since I lost my income from AFP, I have had to rely on donations, editing jobs, and selling my book for children, ABC Zoo. At the same time I have had to defend myself against malicious prosecution in the Cook County courts."

The truth is Bollyn was outraged at being attacked and having his civil rights trampled. This little yarn makes it sound like the financial burden was his chief concern. Rings very hollow.

If people want to hear Bollyn discuss the obvious problems with AFP, try this interview www.iamthewitness.com/Hufschmid_Bollyn_AFP_11Oct2006.html.

"Since June of 2000 Christopher Bollyn has been working with the people that produced the Spotlight and the American Free Press newspapers.

He is perhaps the only investigative reporter in America who is truly trying to expose the lies and perpetrators of the September 11th attack.

However, instead of being proud of him, over the past year they cut his salary twice, and they took away his travel expenses.

It would seem as if they were trying to prevent him from investigating 9/11; that he was getting too close to uncovering the truth about the Israeli involvement in 9/11 and the Zionist infiltration of America.

The American Free Press claims to be an employee owned newspaper, but they never told Bollyn who the employees are who own it, and they never wanted Bollyn to be one of the owners.

• After Bollyn was abused by the mysterious "police", Willis Carto set up a legal fund for Bollyn. However, they were asking people to either send money to the American Free Press or subscribe to the newspaper.
How can anybody trust them to pass the money on to Bollyn?

Bollyn asked for the names of the people donating money so he could send a "Thank You" message, but the AFP said that would be too much trouble.

Boom goes the 'Bollyn dead' folly.

Now THAT sounds like the Bollyn!

It was Bollyn all along, Nobodaddy. Even this one, which people were saying couldn't have been him due to the links to prisonplanet and WRH. He just cited a blog entry from smokingmirrors.blogspot.com, is all. Bollyn was Bollyn and Helje was Helje, all along, and it was always obvious.

Now what're they (TFC) gonna do? It's gonna be entertaining, thassfersure.

I expect they'll tell the truth, regardless. Let Bollyn give an interview, the PROOF he's well is what remains. HIf he's in exile he's safe-- a friggin misdemeanor. Pictures, interview-- that will be all required.

Allow me to quote Shakespeare:
".. for we do not these weighty mansions move,
'Til they wax light again and evanescent fade,
Or Time resolve them into granite thrones,
Or case of writer's block-head reap my hand's surcease.

Well, okay-- that sounds like something Shakespeare might have wrote-- but not the person who wrote the works we know as Shakespeare's.. just trying to make a point.

Telling the truth is not what they do, Nobo. From the August 19 broadcast:

Smith: "Bollyn has been taken, Eric, I'm gonna say that to everybody again, he's gone, probably dead. Probably dead, Eric"

Hufschmid: "Well it might be like they did in Russia, they keep 'em as a prisoner.. see whether he's dead or alive or they're keeping him as a prisoner, he's gone, they took him. He's gone, and they've got him."

Smith: "Yep"

But they've had contact with Bollyn, both written and verbal, the whole time. That's not being truthful. Imagine calling your friends repeatedly on the phone and sending them emails from your well-established private email account telling them you're ok, only to have them continue to tell your other friends that you're either dead or imprisoned. The "voice-morphing" theory wouldn't cut it.

I am compelled to write this open letter because my private communications with you obviously failed to produce any changes concerning the false news about me.

In the same broadcast, Smith says it's a "fact" that AFP is an address-gathering operation.

No, no-- I believe that Smith has made it clear that all communications went to/ through Eric, and that he'd only SEEN the emails, &c. And Eric seems convinced that he might be imprisoned-- not free-- as your post makes perfectly clear. As for your
"In the same broadcast, Smith says it's a "fact" that AFP is an address-gathering operation."-- it sure appears that way to me-- one muct subscribe to read their paper even online, no? That appears to me to be a factual statement.

haha

Keep 'reflecting'...
haha, this is all funny stuff.

hey nobodaddy, your nasty bong is calling your name.

LOL

Hey gooseturd-- you're boss or rabbi's cryin' out your name.

It took me 15 minutes and a little research to reflect that Smith did not ignore him for 1 yr. after his thanksgiving visit. Smith and Bollyn did a 'show' together the following 11 May-- so if Bollyn wrote that he's mistaken, and if he did not then whoever did's a sh**. Smith and Hufschmid and Bollyn remain unimpeachable-- their work's 'spot on'.. and I must suspect some minor misunderstanding or ? during their visit-- nothing so mysterious, at that. No.. it tookmme 30 seconds to realize the letter's not quite perfect-- whoever might have wrote it. It's encouraging to believe it's Bollyn's, but too much room to doubt.

by the way-- i don't care what you clowns write AGIN'-- be it zionism or this or that-- your total zio-frauds and disinfo-quacks-- or else ye've got some serious problems-- trust me, I (and anybody w/ ANY slight familiarity with the subject) can see right through your reptilian controlled-opposition skins..

by the way-- i don't care what you clowns write AGIN'-- be it zionism or this or that-- your total zio-frauds and disinfo-quacks-- or else ye've got some serious problems-- trust me, I (and anybody w/ ANY slight familiarity with the subject) can see right through your reptilian controlled-opposition skins..

Oh, crimes of zion-- well the name speaks for itself... vale.

Stop the Zionist propaganda. It makes you look oh so... Zionist. I can't believe they think people will fall for this third grade attempt at disinformation.

'general Patton, do you call yourself? My mother's name was Patton, and the General happens to be my fairly near-relation. And you call it Zio-dinformation? Cast off the misappropriated name you swine. And have a nice day.

I agree with Fester, after reading "Because you wrote a critical article about AFP on your website, I lost my job" it seems to me this is a fraud but a clever one as it does attack the weak underbelly of Smith/Hufschmid, namely that they they make wild speculations (and are prone to hyperbole) that though not impossible, are very unlikely, like Zundel being a Zionist agent for example.

I think anybody really interested in the truth should just listen to all of Bollyn's conversations with Smith and Hufschmid and take it from there. It is clear he respected them at the time of the recordings.

I have said it before and here it is again. Pay attention to the quality of information presented by the "truth seeker" in question, and do not adopt heroes. Nobody can get everything right. In time you can ascertain, in some cases with a high degree of confidence whether someone is dishonest (like Alex Jones)

In other cases you will not know if dishonesty is a factor or if it is just a difference in opinion or emphasis. For example is Ed Steele honest? I suspect so but do not agree entirely with him as I come from an individualist mindset rather than a group (black, white, Jew etc) mindset though I readily concede that racial differences probably exist ( e.g I.Q and proclivity towards violence)

Is "Birdman" Bryant honest? Maybe. Is Smith honest? Probably, in my opinion, but you can never know with absolute confidence. Just look at the material from each source and form your opinion.

Finally I would say that if Bollyn and his family are safe then why not make a youtube video and let us see them and see if they look ok. Until that happens I think there is every cause to fear for their well being.

Daryl B. Smith, your associate on The French Connection, evidently said some very nasty and untrue things about me after he met me in November 2005, yet I have never held you accountable for your association with the person who evidently slandered me.

This evil and malicious slander could have only come from him because it concerned my visit to his home in France during which he and his wife were the only people present besides me and my family. Ask yourself why Mr. Smith, or is it Dr. Smith, would spread evil slander about me and then avoid me for nearly a year.

hmm..

i wonder if he's talking about what madthumbs said smith had told him.

or did smith say that stuff to more people than just madthumbs?

Fester wrote:

However, instead of being proud of him, over the past year they cut his salary twice, and they took away his travel expenses.

It would seem as if they were trying to prevent him from investigating 9/11; that he was getting too close to uncovering the truth about the Israeli involvement in 9/11 and the Zionist infiltration of America.

That was not some dastardly Zionist plot to get at Bollyn, as the shills would have you believe. Piper has explained that all the AFP staff faced the very same cutbacks. And on his April 6, 2007 show, he read out Chris's total remuneration during his time with American Free Press:

---

[4:26] Piper says, "You know, since the year 2000 when he first came 'board at American Free Press or rather, Liberty Lobby, Christopher Bollyn has been paid $266,000 and received nearly $60,000 in expenses."

Source: http://216.240.133.177/Piper/07/index.php#April

---

Anyone who's been following the whole saga since last summer, when the motives of Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn became increasingly dubious, will realise that Bollyn's statement that it was ultimately Hufschmid who cost him his job at AFP is a very fair assessment of the facts.

TFC have been found guilty of spreading false news, damaging Bollyn's business and reputation, engaging in baseless accusations against serious 9/11 researchers such as Dr Steven E Jones, and using violent and hateful language.

They have zero credibility.

"TFC have been found guilty of spreading false news, damaging Bollyn's business and reputation," exclaims the sinking god of the ocean as if he were somehow exempt from the same charge.

What medication are you on Peter?

Lets examine a little of what you wrote at your website (not to mention within this very site regarding Bollyn):

"What better than to install a man (Bollyn) in 2000 who had spent several summers working on a kibbutz in the Jordan valley, who spoke fair Hebrew and Arabic and whose first wife was Israeli {see just over halfway down at that link} and worked for Israeli military intelligence, according to Bollyn himself. But more on that in a moment. Their man would infiltrate American Free Press after being introduced to Michael Collins Piper using a dubious cover story about a library banning a book, and establish his credentials with truth-seekers by being allowed to photograph David Rockefeller at the 2003 Bilderberg conference and writing a number of hard-hitting articles that exposed Israel's complicity."

"Bollyn would write truthful reports on molten steel and the Israeli connections, but would make some deliberate mistakes such as the 'seismic spikes' and the Sam Danner 'Global Hawk hits Pentagon' hoax. A particularly important scoop was when Bollyn got to relay Peter Tully and Mark Loizeaux's reports about pools of molten steel at the bottom of the basements of WTC 1, 2 and 7. It is possible that Loizeaux said that molten steel was found at various levels from near the surface right down to the basement, down seven levels at the bottom of the elevator shafts, with Bollyn spinning that into it all being found at the bottom to make it seem more sinister. He would also work with the Hoffman Estates police department (and be photographed smirking with them) in a stunt in which he was supposed to have been tasered, denied water whilst in jail, and suffered a minor fracture to an elbow. Hence, his truthful, excellent identification of Israel's central role in 9/11 could be knocked down and dismissed."

"The problem with Bollyn is that he is rather economical with the truth."

"However, in the case of Murdoch's trio, Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid and Christopher Bollyn, the Smithsonians complain that, even though there are reams of evidence against them, it is all merely circumstantial. But we are not trying to convict Murdoch's trio of mass murder and send them to the guillotine or the gallows. The charge is of being Zionist agents who are not worth listening to. So the standard of proof against the terrible trio need not be as high as that required to convict Israel."

"In summary, Hufschmid / Smith / Bollyn's modus operandi is: 1) Impress anti-Zionists by telling them what they want to hear, affirming each listener's own beliefs. 2) Waste the anti-Zionists' time by supplying titbits of information on audio files mixed with gossip and rumors about how all their rivals in the truth movement are "Zionist agents". 3) Sow the seeds of fear and mistrust in the listener. 4) Present the French Connection trio as the "one true truth tellers" who can be trusted. Thus, they establish a degree of control over the flow of information."

"The evidence is more conclusive than ever. Hufschmid, Smith/Setters and Bollyn are Zionist agents: intelligence operatives and agent provocateurs. They should be shunned like the plague."

Again, Peter, what medication are you on?

"TFC have been found guilty of spreading false news, damaging Bollyn's business and reputation,".

There is REAMS of it to spam the thread here with, but the point is very clear...

You are BEYOND incredible, Peter.

"...So the standard of proof against the terrible trio need not be as high as that required to convict Israel"

I just thought I'd remind you again of your upside down, inside-out double-standards and complete idiocy. Not to mention your disturbing and imbalanced scales of justice.

Who is this "Peter"?

Maybe you don't agree with my theories, Michael, but until someone can improve on them, I'm sticking with what I've got.

Here are examples of TeamQuo's 'accurate' reporting:

---

Although the *thirty five year-old* Brendon Lee O'Connell from *Perth* is in no position to criticise anyone else in respect (oops....I said THAT word again) of whatever opinions they might hold in respect (oops....I said THAT word again) of David Icke, this did not deter the *twenty six year-old* Brendon O'Connell from *Esperance* from taking one sentence of one paragraph of one post that I made on the Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew thread that I initiated on the NOLAJBS forum and using that single sentence as the pretext for hijacking and subsequently destroying the thread.

[...]

O'Connell, like his fellow Perth resident and ally Crimes of Zion, has some very strange ideas about Alex Jones. While Brendon O'Connell and James Linton are the anti-Zionist movement's equivalent of Laurel and Hardy, I'm not laughing at the antics ot these two clowns. The only people who are laughing at the moment are the Zionists on whose behalf these two entities operate. O'Connell and Linton pretend to be anti-Zionists, but both entities are about as genuine as a £3 note or a Russian CD on eBay.

[...]

Crimes of Zion: "It's just obvious. He knows I'm not DD or QV or Fester, because we're totally different with regard to both our writing styles and our position on Smith and just about everything else. That's why you'll see no attempt at trying to prove it in the hitpiece. He just says it's so, and expects you to believe it."

PlanetQuo: Do I really? Since I've already stated that I believe Donnie Darko, Quo Vadius and Fester to be pseudonyms used by Jamie Linton, and since I've also stated on several occasions that I believe Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell to be one and the same, it is disingenuous for Linton to claim that I "know" he is not "DD or QV or Fester."

Linton informs us that he cannot be O'Connell since both are "totally different" in respect of writing styles. This is a rather weak premise, and once again, Linton demonstrates his disingenuousness. It would be a relatively straightforward exercise for an intelligent, skilled writer of Crimes of Zion's stature to write articles in the style of a "fucking idiot."

---

constant bickering about DBS and Bollyn.

Do you realize how many readers you guys are alienating???

Enough, already.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Maybe you don't agree with the EVIDENCE (not theories, Peter), but until someone can disprove it, I'm sticking with what I've got.

Again you fail to acknowledge that PlanetQuo and I are TWO separate people.

I realise that this is a hard concept for you to accept as you have indoctrinated yourself with the delusion that Bollyn, Eric and Daryl are the same person.

You really must grow up and face life on life's terms.