Who is Daryl Bradford Smith? And Who is Judicial Inc?

And ye shall know them by their works.
I have long since read or looked over much or most of the material at
http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm,
and still refer to it, mostly for current material, but only now have come upon this:
http://judicial-inc.biz/who_is_daryl_bradford_smith.htm, which, of course, refers to Daryl Bradford Smith and his site at www.iamthewitness.com. Obviously, I could not agree more. Now, I wish that whoever it is who runs the Judicial Inc. site would post a contact e-addy, and, too, I agree with Smith that he should definitely correct the spellings of Mr. Hufschmid'T''s name and iam'A'witness on their links page, along with any other vagrom errors as soon as he becomes aware of them. Other than that, he has an excellent site. Another one is this: http://www.erichufschmid.net/index.html
Their WORKS (along with the Bollyn's) speak for themselves.

Posted in Submitted by Nobodaddy on Mon, 2007-08-27 04:36.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The following is taken from the bio on Daryl's website.
-----------------------------------------
Daryl Bradford Smith is an American patriot who decided to produce radio interviews because of his concern for the future of America.

Smith was born and raised in the USA. His lineage can be traced back directly to the immigrants on the Mayflower. He still holds dear his Yankee roots and his minuteman mindset.

He worked as a top chef, owned his own restaurant, and was a professor. A few years ago he moved to France with his wife. He planned to move back to the USA after living in France for a few years, but now he is worried about the future of America.

His European perspective and his central location in France give him a unique world view.

Smith is willing to discuss the issues other radio shows either avoid or hold back on, such as pedophilia, Zionism, and blackmail.

Smith calls himself the witness because it is his sincerest dream to be standing at the trial and execution of the criminals who rule (and ruin) our world.
Source
-----------------------------------------
Daryl,

1. If you're such an American Patriot what are you doing in France? How are you fighting the battle in France? Are you and Eric going to lead the charge as you have urged others to do as of late?
Source

2. Please provide us with names so that we too, may trace your lineage.

3. Where did you work as a top chef? What restaurant did you own? What were you a professor of? At what university were you a professor? In what time frames did these events occur?

4. If you're so worried about the future of America, what are you doing living in France?

5. On several of your shows, you said you were in the military. What branch of the military were you in? When were you in the military? What rank were you when you left the military? What were the terms under which you left the military?

As the intrepid anti-Zionist that you proclaim yourself to be, you should have no fear in divulging these facts so that we can investigate you. After all, you and Eric keep exhorting us to investigate the investigators, no exceptions!
Source

whippette | Mon, 2007-08-27 08:08

Who is Daryl Bradford Smith? And Who is Judicial Inc?

what have the two got in common?
they share a webmaster.

(and domain reg dates once upon a time, too)

apossumprincess | Mon, 2007-08-27 08:38

Wimpette, get a grip. You're making it too hard. When Daryl and Eric start steering people away from Zionist crimes and criminals, we'll know they were disinfo. Or when they start spouting bullshit and wind like the DC Exhaust Piper and yourself, ditto.

I'd take a farmhouse in France in a second. STFU, ok?

Fester | Mon, 2007-08-27 08:45

Here's quite a deal, Fester. It's a cute little farmansion... and all for less than a small apartment in SF.

apossumprincess | Mon, 2007-08-27 09:21

ANY questions put to you about WHO,WHAT,WHERE,WHEN,WHY of YOU Do you Daryl?

Help us

You know how you can hurt THEM So do it already.

We have seen enough and are going to call your hand.

You seem to want to profess some form of leadership so SHUT the YAP and do as we ask. Answer our important Q:'s and do a video and step out of the shadows. Because right now your just looking like another CIA control. Doing IOR bidding for OL Tardis Mc Firepants Mr Bush and his Crew.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Mon, 2007-08-27 10:13

On the contrary, sir or madam: I believe he's answered ALL of them.

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-08-27 11:20

to whatever you are that said:

"what have the two got in common?
they share a webmaster.
(and domain reg dates once upon a time, too)"

I don't know if that's true or not (but coming from you I rather tend to disbelieve it), or what relevancy it might have, other than they're working towards the same end and/or share impeccable good taste and judgement, &c.

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-08-27 12:56

..did Daryl not work with few different groups before IATW? Obviously these people at RBN or GCN know he exists, so there's one less thing for you to tweak about masher, Smith is indeed a real person, lol.

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2007-08-27 14:37

it is TFC that wrote a number of disparaging statements about judicial inc.biz (a site I happen to read regularly, although I don't always agree with their analysis).

BTW, does anyone know how to contact them?

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

qrswave | Mon, 2007-08-27 15:43

And I guess I may get some flak for this but I tend to trust my gut instincts.
My gut tells me that these two are not what they purport to be and they are a part of the problem and not a part of the solution.
I am beginning to believe that the solution is not going to be achieved by blogging alone and will take a mass awakening on the part of the western world, who will then take their complaints to the streets.
Unfortunately, whilst 24, Survivor, Big Brother, and [*]has talent are on TV no one is going to do shit because the new opiate of the masses is total complete apathy.
Before anyone points it out I am as guilty of this as the next person.

Conspiracy Muse

DigitalSpy | Mon, 2007-08-27 20:31

Smith suggested that judicial-inc.biz provides good information but is inconsistent with their skepticism of Zionist investigators. Judicial which has presented huge amounts of evidence claiming that Zionist have infiltrated various groups and organizations in order to destroy them from within fails to apply that very standard to its associates. In other words, if one is condemning Zionism then one has to be consistent in doing so and supporting a link which is Anti-Jewish or fails to be specific while exposing the crimes of Zion is counter productive to the truth. Smith also leveled accusations that you (qrswave) was inconsistent when dealing with DBS. He suggested that closing off comments in the Mark Lane thread for the reasons you stated constituted a double standard since many anti-DBS threads were allowed to continue without the same courtesy extended to Mr. Lane. I believe that being a moderator is very difficult and withhold judgment on WUFYS until more information is available. Additionally, I thank you for providing this forum. In the future, I would encourage the moderators to demand that anyone making claims against a person or website be speciffic. The claimant has the burden of proof and must be compelled to provide evidence for their claim. For example, DBS suggested that judicial-inc.biz provided links to known misinformation sites. Here is the link http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm#linko
Jeff Rense is questionable. One can also see that they misrepresented Eric's and Daryl's site.

LatinAmericanview | Mon, 2007-08-27 20:42

Smith's August 14 audio (with Hufschmid):

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Hufschmid-14Aug2007.html

...has plenty of little gems. Smith suggests that qrswave could be a paid shill, slams WUFYS as "not worth visiting", and acts the part of a paranoid nut who thinks that everyone is "plotting" against him.

[1:11] What they've been able to do, is gang up on us in a way that, if you were sitting in our seat, in our chair, in my home and in Eric's home, and watching the way that this has been orchestrated, you would understand clearly, that the sites that are pushing people into marginalising the French Connection, and working against our information, our, they're working together here and I'm going to give you a couple of examples, one of them. They claim over at Wake Up From Your Slumber to be honest brokers, this grswave (sic) does, and of course, not that long ago we came out and said that we don't trust what's going on over at that site. Well, I'm going to reiterate again that we don't again. I don't trust what's going on over at that site. And I thought from, to myself that this grswave (sic) may not be taking part in this trashing going on with us. But things that have happened subsequent to my joining over there and posting a few of Bollyn's more important works, namely the Rahm Emanuel work, namely the Chertoff work, and then one that followed from that was the Mark Lane article. There were four things I posted there, four.

I didn't know Daryl was good at maths. Actually, Daryl posted six entries in his blog:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/756

And if the short piece about Mark Lane being a "Zionist" because he met Jane Fonda in 1970 was one of Bollyn's more important works, it wouldn't say a lot for Bollyn. In fact, it was written by Eric, who tacked Bollyn's name on to the top in an attempt to boost TFC's reputation.

[2:37] In every single case, the comments section was shut, in all four. Now if you go back and look at how often grswave (sic) shuts down comments on a blog, she almost never does. Unless, I'm involved. Now go and do your own due diligence on this, it's easy to figure out, it's easy to go and look, it's easy to find out if the comments section's been shut. And when you start looking at all the comments sections from other blogs, where they trash me, I mean wholesale trash me, where they destroy, try to destroy my credibility...

A mistake by Smith. Of course, the posters do succeed in destroying his credibility and he knows it, notwithstanding the fact that the last remaining vestiges of Smith's credibility had already been dispelled from the standpoint of those already familiar with his 'work'.

[3:19] "...try to destroy Eric's credibility, where we've got people like this, this Moe Howard look-alike Suzette...

Fast forward to 32:48 for an example of Smith's hypocrisy:

(Smith) "But then there's an orchestrated effort, on blogs, on websites, on promotions, that pushes people - either they thoroughly and completely ignore the research we did, and in parallel to that, they trash our um, person, they make a mess of us personally. And some of this stuff is nonsense, Eric. They make fun of the way you look..."

...except that Suzette is more Cleopatra (the 1963 film version) than Moe Howard.

Back to 3:27...

...working now with Nina, who it turns out in my view has been attempting to trash us for a long time. And then clandestinely here working with somone who we know has been working against us for a long time. Why would they do that?

To expose the deceptions of a lying shill outlet in the alt.media.

[3:48] Why would our information ... see now, here's the other thing. Also look at the comments from people like this guy Poseidon, or this guy Rowan Berkeley, it's never about - or this guy Masher -

Yeah, right. Almost everyone has twigged that he's either an agent or a fruitcake, and the fact that they all say so means it's a conspiracy. In Smith's bizarre little world, everyone saying the sun rises in the East would be proof of a "Zionist plot".

[4:01] ...it's never about our research, it's always kill the messenger.

Firstly, Smith doesn't do any "research". Secondly, Hufschmid's 'research' consists of disinformation and hoaxes along the lines of "everyone is an agent". Thirdly, when Smith does manage to persuade some other guest to go on his show - before they find out what he is like and vow never to return - most of it is about trying to spew as much piss and vinegar as they can to trash other people in the truth movement, who Smith has already fallen out with.

One of TFC's policies is to attempt to cause division between the 9/11 truth and the nationalist movements. Hence, they claim that David Duke, American Free Press, etc, are "Zionist controlled".

They also attempt to cover for Judaism by denying it has inherent problems, and Bush and the Rockefellers.

[4:05] It's always destroy Eric's person, not his work. It's always marginalise the work that Bollyn has done, he's a hack, he's not worthy of the title researcher, when clearly, the four pieces we put up on that site about Bollyn's work were off the hook qualitative (sic), in fact, they exposed the workings of the criminal network like nobody else had ever done...

Yes, they exposed the workings of TFC's network. The claim that they "exposed Zionism" was debunked at the time.

[4:35] And the site, instead, shuts down comments on it, and allows wholesale trashing of my character, and not our research.

Smith can't have it both ways. Either there is too much moderation for his liking and his dupes and shills are unable to get a comment in before the thread is closed, or there is not enough moderation and posters are more forthright than Smith would like.

[4:45} And so I'm going to reiterate that, yes, that is a bought and paid for site. And that I don't know if grswave (sic) is bought and paid for herself or is just under massive amounts of pressure, but she has written supportive comments about this guy Poseidon who is absolutely a shill.

As is any critic of TFC, according to them.

[5:04] There is no doubt, whatsoever in my mind, that this guy is working with an agenda, possibly even for pay, and will not address any of the research issues but only character issues.

False, but it makes a good story for the tinfoil brigade. And another problem with TFC's 'research' is that there are no supporting references, so acceptance of its veracity requires an element of trust: assumptions about the character of Smith and Hufschmid. And as is readily observed, their character leaves a lot to be desired.

[5:20] And that whole site is not worth, not worth visiting, other than confirming the things that I'm telling you right now. So I urge you to go to the site...

Fast forward a little and there's more tinfoil stuff:

[6:02] And then we've got people like Mark Glenn, attempting to, and let me tell you this he, he got on this, on that almost dead program, I mean, I look at my SHOUTcast numbers on Michael Piper's program, and it's, they're almost zero. I did better on my introductory show at RBN with my SHOUTcast numbers than he's doing now, and he's been on there for a long time, so I, I don't know how many people are actually even listening to him at this point, but he's been, his work is being quoted out into the net, on this network, this Maynard network, this Suzette network, and this Mark Glenn network...

So we 'shills' are really quite sophisticated after all, having all these "networks" to disseminate our propaganda :-)

[6:45] but he wrote a piece recently that attempted to blame Jews, Jews period, not Zionists, but Jews, all Jews. And I've told you repeatedly that I do not believe and I have never believed and I will never believe, that the problem is with Jews. It is not, it has never been, it will never be. There are qualitative (sic)...

Smith should only start to use new words after he has learned their meaning...



An intelligent way of differentiating Qualitative research from Quantitative research is that largely Qualitative research is exploratory, while Quantitative research is conclusive.

Quantitative data is measurable while Qualitative data can not be put into a context that can be graphed or displayed as a mathematical term.

Source


...which is why calculations about the WTC fire temperatures, steel temperatures, mass of thermate likely to have been employed, mass of molten iron product and potentially melted steel members, time molten metal pools could have been sustained, etc, is a more useful type of research than the 99% of TFC's output that comprises waffle about G and P are shills, R is a "liar", etc.

[7:11] ...good-hearted, well-intentioned, well-informed, Jewish members of this fight, that are helping.

Possibly, but it would be nice to have some examples from Smith, since a Talmudist denier employed by World Jewry would say the same thing.

[7:24] I know them personally, I have them working with us....

I can believe that.

Fast forward to 14:20...

Another subject here, another marginalising attempt here at both myself, Eric and Bollyn, but more and more Eric on this one, with 9/11 Mysteries. Sofia has been told, the girl that did that video, audio, CD presentation of 9/11 Mysteries, was told to get Eric's work out of the video, out of it, or it wouldn't be distributed. Point blank, get it out, his research out, we don't want it in there. What are they afraid of?

It's almost universally accepted that Eric Hufschmid is either an agent or a total crackpot. This is not some "Zionist plot" to "marginalise a Zionist exposer", it's about maintaining the credibility of the video by keeping crackpots and shills out of it.

[15:16] Well clearly, they don't want any attention going to Eric because we're kicking the teeth in on these people. And they need to marginalise us, just like Suzette's trying to do, like Poseidon's trying to do, like Rowan Berkeley's trying to do, like so many, have a look at what they've done to Bollyn, with his qualitative (sic) research, trying to marginalise him. They're trying to destroy us so that they can take control completely of this movement. That's fact!

There is very little correspondence between objective reality and Smith's 'facts'.

[15:45] Now of course, all of these liars out there are going to come squawking: 'they're paranoid', this and that, but in fact putting Griffin in charge of the research that Eric actually did, and mentioning only Griffin's work instead of Eric's on her video, is a clear example of many where they've done this to us. We've pushed this story down the road so far, and now they're trying to usurp our leadership in, in pushing the research and push us out of the picture so they can be in control of it. If you don't see that, then you've got a problem with your brain.

This is an example of Smith's persuasion techniques, designed to exploit the intellectually insecure.

[16:28] You, you've become, um, mushy-headed. And you know one of the things that Mr St. John did say and I agree with totally, is we are a fluoride nation of dumbsticks. That doesn't mean all of us, that means many people out there can be fed a line of total nonsense, and they buy it.

Such as the hot air emanating from TFC.

[16:52] Shutting down every blog I put up there and then saying that's, there's no coincidence, that's just a coincidence that they have to shut all mine down.

It's not just Daryl's blogs that were closed, it's whenever the 'debate' about him degenerated into personal attacks on the lines of "you're a Zionist shill" - i.e. invariably! The phenomenon has a common cause: Daryl Smith.

[17:02] Or, she's not against our work. Well, maybe she's not. Open up those things again, open them up, grswave (sic), and let Daryl Bradford Smith's work and Chris Bollyn's work be heard.

If folk really are so interested in the 'work' of Smith and Bollyn, they can go to their respective websites. Why are TFC so obsessed with plugging their product at WUFYS, when WRH, Alex Jones, Rense, AFP, Duke, Maynard and others can make do without resorting to such promotional techniques?

[17:15] Why would you allow me to be trashed on every thread of that blog and not let any discussion come out about Mark Lane, and what his connections to Carto are and the left, and Maurice Dees, and Southern Poverty Law, and the rest of it, why not let that discussion go on? Oh no, got shut down right away, as did all the other threads. You know, if you can't see this, if you don't understand this stuff, then you are going to be marched, you're going to be going the march, guys. And wait a minute here, maybe this guy Ron Paul, maybe they're just collecting names. Maybe that's what he's all about.

It's clearly one of TFC's functions.

[18:02] That's why Alex Jones, and Rense, and, and, and this girl Nina is pushing him like a virulent virus across the internet. This guy would have nothing, not a single supporter, if it weren't for people I'm starting to understand as being shills, if it weren't for him, being pushed out there, now. Now wait a minute, here. That's another place that I agree with Stephen St. John about. That, is this guy just being put up there as a plant?

Hufschmid is brought on at about 20:30. Says he isn't paranoid, "white supremacists" don't care about 9/11 and are "trying to supress it" (a contradiction), Bollyn "made the mistake of trusting people". Hufschmid tries to induce paranoia in people by suggesting that "they" have "done this to Bollyn", so they can do it to any critic.

[33:35, Smith] But look at the volume of stuff against us. That should tell everybody that we're the people they're trying to get rid of. That should tell you, just look at the volume of it, look at the attacks.

Yes, but it ain't because they're the good guys and the bad guys are trying to get rid of them. It's the other way round!

[33:46, Smith] In fact, I've had so many people write to me and say that we, they finally realised that we are the real deal by reading what this guy Poseidon and others on that site have said, they said 'there's no rationale, Daryl, for that kind of attack on you unless you were the guys that were telling the truth, there's just none.' And in fact, more and more people are starting to realise that this co-ordinated attack is intentional.

Obvious lies. There are not that many idiots. And if TFC were benefiting as a result of comments by the more informed posters at WUFYS, then Smith would not describe WUFYS as a site that was "not worth visiting".

[34:09, Hufschmid] Well yeah, and, but, and people have to take it seriously, bacause they think, they always think, well it won't affect me any, it's just you that it's affecting, but it won't, look at Bollyn. Where is that family?

Hufschmid's internet expertise certainly extends to tracing an IP address in an email. He knows only too well where the Bollyns are, which is where they were expected to go to, so this claim of being "unaware" of their location is a blatant lie in order to promote his Zionist deceptions.

[34:20, Hufschmid] How much longer are they going to remain in hiding? Where are their children? Why aren't they coming to us and saying 'we need help. What should we do? We need help getting out of here, we need help finding another place', but, where are they? [...] If I was in their position I'd be saying 'help, help.'

Of course, if Hufschmid weren't a shill, he'd have to be paranoid. But I don't believe he is paranoid.

Fast forward a little to Smith...

[35:21, Smith] Well, there is, like, an effort out there, and you know, to be duped from the beginning by, by the Beauty and the Beast over there Eric, you know, with this Moe Howard look-alike, the turn of this girl, now it's about character assassination from her, I have not seen a single article, or a single blog from Moe over there that said anything about our research. It's all a character assassination, just like, just like it's gonna be from everyone else at these, uh, crooks, because our research is spot-on.

If their research was spot-on, they would be able to prove it with references and footnotes to original sources, rather than expecting folk to take the word of a Zionist shill and a practiced con artist.

[35:55, Hufschmid] Well yeah, and, and what's weird is how they all work together now. I mean, they used to be supposedly enemies. Suzette, and Nina were, they hated each other supposedly, now they're working together? D'you see, this is another thing. Alex Jones promotes the John Birch Society...

There's over an hour of humorous conspiracy freak nonsense for those who have the time for that type of entertainment. As Smith is signing off, he continues with some comments about WUFYS.

[1:06:57, Smith] ...Daryl Bradford Smith telling you all, please be well. And please, do your due diligence, go to the, go to that Wake Up From Your Slumber site, and take a look at the fact that they closed every one of the blogs I put up on Bollyn's work, every one. And take a look at this guy Poseidon's trashing of my character rather than my research.

'Doc Smith' doesn't do any "research", other than into ways of deceiving people.

[1:07:13, Smith] And look at the lies over there, and you're gonna go, 'Oh, my goodness, this is a nest, it's a nest of nonsense.' And it's not just their site doing it, it's all over the net. They're, they're, this is a concerted ... and, and joint effort here, to attempt to destroy our credibility. Be well, ladies and gentlemen, work harder, fight on. Bye bye now.

Poseidon | Mon, 2007-08-27 23:50

Daryl is a real person. He's got a rap sheet as long as your arm, and has changed addresses more often than most people have had hot dinners.

His brother (along with Linda Shelton and many others) regards him as a con artist who likes to make money the easy way instead of working. Clearly, he has to move on as soon as the locals and the local police become aware of him. His doctorate is most likely in deception.

"Doc Smith" is the ideal candidate for a CIA asset and front man in a Zionist-run internet disinfo outlet.

Judicial Inc has some good info, but much of it is suspect. It could be a disinfo site.

Poseidon | Mon, 2007-08-27 23:52

is grswave, anyway? Does Daryl even know? Does he even CARE?
---------------------------------------

Pray the Rosary Daily

Jesse | Tue, 2007-08-28 00:03

hahaha.. the fruitcake is obviously p'sidemself. such a prevaricating, obfuscating, witless little zio-weasel.

Nobodaddy | Tue, 2007-08-28 00:32

But Realistically not any longer. Perhaps a buck or two to run the Eric & Daryl stungun. And the Logic of his Bleating State of Denial is that he is Close to Edge. His training and his helpers are at there limits. The need to stem the tide is clear.

We need no leaders.

Again Daryl Your Knowledge is what we want and need. While you work on the side of THEM you will be sick.

You can be well again FAR sooner than you thing if you take the Roads you are now presented.

Later Daryl. Do good soon.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Tue, 2007-08-28 02:44

NOW what the 'ell is the Besotted1 running out the mouth about? (the poor, deluded fellow.)

Nobodaddy | Tue, 2007-08-28 03:05

..yah way to dredge up an issue we already dealt with, poissydon.. we already dealt with that, he took it back did he not?

..at least Smith presents his suspicions as just that; "COULD BE A.." and not a fact, like so many do. i have no trouble with people discussing their various thoughts and suspicions, but to present your dimentia as a fact, is counter productive.

..more often than not, i hear people arguing about things, not realizing that there really IS NO ARGUMENT, except the one about WHO'S EGO IS MORE BLOATED!

Grim Reaper | Tue, 2007-08-28 04:44

Daryl Smith's 'suspicions' are generally voiced as fact. Consider his August 10, 2007 audio:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_10Aug2007.html

[6:15] Course, you know, Mr Rivero, being one of these nitwits, either he's been bought and paid for, or he's an imbecile, uh, put an article up that confirmed in many ways all the people we knew were frauds. Webster Tarpley and Uncle Fester over there, Mr Fetzer from the University of Wisconsin. And they've been outed as frauds in 9/11. But we told you that ten months ago. Isn't that surprising, ladies and gentlemen?

Fetzer is either an imbecile or a fraud. But there is no evidence of Mike Rivero being guilty of that charge.

And then of course, the list that this nincompoop over on Wake Up From Your Slumber has on there, uh, Poseidon, he says, 'Yeah, see, they trash everybody, they trash Ruppert, they trash Judy Wood, they trash Fester, um, Professor Fetzer, they trash Morgan Reynolds.'

Objection! I did not include Wood and Fetzer on the list as they are obvious shills or dupes. And I mentioned Reynolds after the main list, explicitly pointing out that he was an obvious shill.

Yes, of course we do, they're shills! And look at the rest of his list. Ha! Michael Piper, he's a shill!

Very unlikely. There is plenty of evidence against, but none in favor.

Heh heh heh heh! Along with this guy Poseidon, guys.

Another of Smith's 'facts', and of course, wrong as usual.

Poseidon | Tue, 2007-08-28 07:27

An' I say he was (is) right on every count. G'nite ye squabbling shill.

Nobodaddy | Tue, 2007-08-28 07:48

Nobodaddy said,

"On the contrary, sir or madam: I believe he's answered ALL of them."
-----------------------------------------

Nobodaddy,

Daryl has not answered these questions of mine. If you have the specifics, please provide them to us (with sources). A lot of us would like to know!

1.What are the names of Daryl's Mayflower ancestors?

2.Where and when was Daryl a chef. What top restaurant in NYC did he own?

3. What branch of the military did he serve in, what year(s)? What was his rank when he left the military? and what were the terms of his leaving the military?

4. What was Daryl a professor of and and what university? What year(s) was Daryl a professor?

5. Why is Daryl "fighting the battle" for America in France?

And lastly, Daryl should post a recent photo of himself on the Internet. What is the self-proclaimed "Black Mamba" so afraid of?

whippette | Tue, 2007-08-28 09:13

..gimpette, why oh why do you think that these questions are so important?

IMHO, i don't really give a flying f*ck about this kind of shilly minutae..

..hey, I'VE GOT A REALLY GOOD IDEA!!

Howabout all you c*cksuckers stop dedicating your lives to debunking TFC and each other, and INSTEAD focus on reality, and WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!!

Grim Reaper | Tue, 2007-08-28 09:22

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator