Of Who is to go or not then?

Sound sort of AUTHORITARIAN to me.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Of course not-- I'm just a person speaking under the auspices of informed opinion, observation and experience. And so, for now, farewell.

If this doesn't work, I've copied Quasi's code from this thread:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1250

...where the Constitution Celebration speech was discussed earlier. This deserves to be seen for the pro-Bollyn side.

But are they claiming that the Zionists couldn't afford to employ someone to pose as an 'anti-Zionist', 'anti-Bush' character? And it would be double standards to say it's okay for Hufschmid to make a case for people such as Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf being "Zionist plants", but Bollyn, whose actions have been suspicious and whose first wife Bosmat worked in Israeli military intelligence at Herzliya, before they married in Puerto Rico, is somehow beyond suspicion.

There is no more reason for banning critics of a particular individual than there is for banning over-zealous promoters of their favorite source. And when someone is too enthusiastic about promoting some particular source, that in itself is suspicious!

You keep citing those two (Germar and Zundel, and a few others who they have in no wise 'implicated', (kawaja, rodrigez, condit jr., steven jones, among some others) but whose names are mentioned for the purpose of exposing the avenues and potential avenues of Zionist control, &c. I believe, as I'm sure that they do, that the above-mentioned names are in all probability honorable enough men-- but as in the case of Piper, Alex Jones, Wing Nuts and SOTT nuts such as yourself (who prove the obvious point, I believe, that there are no shortage of Zionuts who can be purchased), their accusations are very explicit, and generally precisely on the money. Now go away and die a'ready.

Excuse Me, Mr. Saultpeter, but you do have more front
than flocking Blackpool Promenade, don't you, to repost
my remarks about Christopher Bollyn in such a deceptive
and blatantly backhanded manner on this thread ? ?

You are a duplicitous, forktongue guttersnake

Take your controlled opposition and your endless chum-churning back to Laura, and "I'm Not Lisa",
and there you can have your endless, and mindless
"War Without End" to your cancerous hearts' content.

And save your snake oil for those bitches, they deserve it.

POIS-eid-ON, I confess I'm not as 'skilled' and/or as deliberate in doing this blog thing as a practiced quack like you-- but I'm not disinfo, backwards, or a liar either (as you are). My point is that they cite their names (when they feel called upon) for a specific purpose, and it has nothing to do with destroying the credibility of good people-- only making us aware of the bad and probably bad ones. Thanks, as I said, for posting the video, however-- now anyone can watch and form their own opinion as to who is telling the truth-- and how it was AFP who betrayed CB, and not t'other way around. NOW ye may croak.

Germar Rudolf is just another of the multitude of 'coincidences' that connect Peter Sault with Poseidon. There are more - a lot more. In fact there are too many 'coincidences' for Poseidon not to be Peter Sault. Although the lying toad denies who he is, the evidence says otherwise. If the slithering, slimey, sea-snake of the south thinks he can lie his way out of a watery grave, he's got another thing coming. And speaking of things that Pissodeion has got coming, be sure to visit the front page of planetquo.com this Friday. I will be publishing PlanetQuo 'Debunked' Debunked: Poseidon Drowns. You made a big mistake messing with me Poseidon, and now you you are going to pay a heavy price...with interest...lots of...and this is just the beginning.

Since you ducked the challenge I made on Sunday, I will repeat it here, Peter Psychiatrist. Post a photograph of yourself on the website that you and others unkown operate, along with verifiable proof of your location in England. We have no holocaust laws here and you know it, so don't even try to use that as an excuse. And spare us your pathetic 'the Zionists will do me in if I reveal my identity' bullshit. Eric Hufschmid's photograph and home address have been available on the Internet for years, and he hasn't been taken out. So why should the Zionists want to assassinate an irrelevant tosser like you who poses no threat whatsoever?

Another thing douchebag: you still haven't explained why your IP address traces back to Paris. I'm all ears Mr. Silver Tongue. In case you're thinking of coming back with 'IP trackers are inaccurate', don't even think about it. You used precisely the same tool to do IP traces. Remember? If you've 'forgotten', go have a look at the page on your website wherein you trace Sleazette the Muppette to her exact geo-physical location in Oxnard. Gurgle, gurgle.

Quasi: it wasn't right of you to call Poofzioned a duplicitous, forktongue guttersnake. Duplicitous, fork-tongue sea-snake sounds better, don't you think?

Poseidon has a French IP because he hangs out with Laura Knight Jadczyk indulging in a bit of "ponerology" which his mate and fellow doctor, Rowan Berkeley believes to be " a mite redolent of cassiopean influences".

Dr Berkeley would know as he is in email contact with Dr Poseidon Wankfield Sault.

May be a good idea to get Dr. Jadczyk's opinion on matters "cassiopean" though, a second opinion is always the professional thing to do with doctors.

Poseidon Has died

I'm planning to send Sault an email along the lines of:

Of course, there would be much more explanatory material than that, such as Kerr's consistent pattern of attacking his former friends as "Zionist agents", as soon as they start to see through him and fail to lavish him with sufficient praise and adulation.

Peter Wakefield Sault is the guy who complained in March 2006 about erroneous capitalization of the word 'zionism'. I think it was WRH that linked to his article, which would have been how I came across it.

Although 'zionism' is not itself an adjective, 'zionist' is, and both are derived from the word 'zion'. While many people seem to think, erroneously, that it is the name of a particular geographical location (real or fictional, such as Middle Earth) 'zion' is an ancient Hebrew word meaning a garden or sanctuary in general and it is with *that* meaning that it is used to describe the politics of Jewish national socialism. [...]

Source

When I saw it, I thought there was some sense in his argument and I started writing "zionism" for a while. Then, I found that almost everyone else was still capitalizing the "Z", so I followed suit.

In 2005, Sault was capitalizing the "Z". See this link:

http://www.rense.com/general62/ppop.htm

Then, in August 2007, Sault is still following his own advice of March 2006 and refraining from capitalizing:

Source: http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2782

In any case, I don't agree with his view of Zionism = Jewish national socialism. I see Zionism as the Rothschild / Bronfman / Jewish elite Mafia's program for taking control of the world, so it's internationalist, not nationalist.

PlanetClouseau's team should hang up their gumshoes and call it a day. They are giving the internet a bad name. Leave information processing and sleuthing to those who have the necessary capacity.

"Leave information processing and sleuthing to those who have the necessary capacity."

I agree, now piss off Peter but before you leave have a read of your "sleuthing":

A Collection Of Absurd Statements And Theories From The Webmaster Of TakeOurWorldBack.com

Michael, haven't you ever heard of playing devil's advocate and taking a side in an argument that you would not normally take? It's more creative and productive to consider all sides of the argument to see where it leads to. The problem with PlanetClouseau's team is that they are still promoting nonsense, months after I concluded that their theories were groundless.

Yes, it takes some time to rule out someone's hypothesis, especially when they keep promising that more evidence is in the works. But it doesn't take months and months.

..all this bullsh*t is quite tiresome no?

..perhaps you will think twice before pointing the finger?

..coming from Smith's agent clone#2, doing shiftwork from israel (EUREKA!!), lol.. ring a bell?

"months after I concluded that their theories were groundless."

You are the only person I know of who can take FACTUAL EVIDENCE and transform it into a THEORY.

What you conclude is irrelevant to reality.

I suppose you being Peter Sault is another theory. I'm so glad that you made a public denial of this FACT as, along with your other lies, this shall testify against what little credibility you are attempting to salvage.

..the world is going to be destroyed by hellfire, and all you guys care about are YOUR CREDIT RATINGS???

Who TF are you anyway? and why are you so concerned about a shill being exposed?

Think you can get far with shills in your ranks?

If you don't like it go away and stop posting inane images.

Great to see you helping to expose the diaphanous Peter Sault, aka Pissidemself, sir (the appended video I should think would be enough to accomplish that-- but the sea crod just don't get it).. but don't please start fekking with the Reaper, eh?

I'm planning to send Sault an email along the lines of:

My advice ? Don't plan too hard. It should only take about a half minute or so, for you to send an email to YOURSELF.

There's some nut with a computer on the internet who thinks that you're me. The bad news is that he said he would punch 'your' lights out should he ever have the misfortune to meet 'you'. The good news is that he's relatively 'armless, since he once lay down drunk with his arm on a train track.

How very disarming of you to say such a thing, slug.
Slime like you shouldn't make such careless puns about your so-called 'armless friends. You might get stepped on. Or better yet, some bloke might just pour SeaSault
all over you and have an end of your snot for good.

-Evolution has a tendency to deselect the weak, the foolish and the idiotic.

In your unfortunate case, I must agree,
and I thank the Lord for small favors.

I'm planning to send Sault an email along the lines of: There's some nut with a computer on the internet who thinks that you're me. The bad news is that he said he would punch 'your' lights out should he ever have the misfortune to meet 'you'. The good news is that he's relatively 'armless, since he once lay down drunk with his arm on a train track. Evolution has a tendency to deselect the weak, the foolish and the idiotic.

Peter, old chap. You get sillier with each and every post you make. I think you're losing your grip old boy. You should consult a psychiatrist. Do psychiatrists consult other psychiatrists when their heads are minced? I think Dr. Nina Fraud or Dr. Chimp Anzee might offer you some counselling, but it's just a theory. Why not test this hypothesis yourself(s)? But with you being such a clever chappie, why not consult yourself Peter? Peter can help Peter to get Peter's shit together. Which one of you is it that is schizophrenic Peter? You or him, or both of you?

Don't you think it is rather bizarre behaviour (note the spelling old bean - in England, in we spell behavior with a u between the o and the r) for someone to write an e-mail then send it to themselves? I believe the correct terminology one would use to describe the behaviour that you are presently exhibiting is schizophrenia. So go ahead Peter, write yourself a letter if it makes you feel better, but don't expect anyone with an IQ above 10 to be taken in with your 'my name is Peter but I'm not Peter' bullshit. You ARE Peter Sault. You have made no attempt whatsoever to 'explain' the staggering amount of 'coincidences' that connect the Poseidon handle to Peter Sault. This you cannot do because you ARE Peter Sault, aren't you Peter? And when you write to yourself to tell yourself that you aren't yourself, don't forget to tell yourself that it is not only this "nut" who knows that you are Peter Sault. There are now 50+ other sufferers of Narcissitic Personality Disorder who also know Poseidon's true identity.

The title of your post was very familiar Peter? 'Our 'Armless Friend'....hmmmmm...now where have I seen that one before....hmmmmm....let me think.....hmmmmmm.....ah yes....I remember now! It was on the NOLAJBS Forum. Not only do you use Brendon O'Connell's cliche, you actually use O'Connell's statement. That was a HUGE blunder on your part old boy. You really shouldn't be drawing attention to your links with the Brendon O'Connell handle. My accident didn't happen that way. If I had laid down on a railway track and got hit by a train, do you think that I'd be here taking the piss of you?

Get a clue dickhead. Had my accident happened the way the O'Connell handle says it happened, then the probability is that I'd be presently be shunting wagons in the great locomotive yard in the sky. You're a mathematician Peter, a musician, and a comlpete and utter wanker too. So instead of writing letters to yourself to 'prove' that you aren't you, why not go play a two-minute tune on your organ, get some salty-tasting stuff out of your Saulty body, then go construct a mathematical theorem whereby you calculate the probability factor of a pissed-up twenty-something Glaswegian lying on a railway track, being hit by a train, and living to tell the story. You are living proof Peter that even the most intelligent people are capable of being extremely stupid. Take a large, pointed-hat, paint D on it, then go stand in the corner for half-an-hour.

Me and the friends who are with me as I write, were literally rolling about on the floor when I said "hey guys, you won't believe what the clown has come out with now." "What Jim....what has the pleb said now?", enquired wee John. "The tit has just said that I lay down with my arm on a train track....as if I would've detatched it beforehand", I replied. In chimes Eddie with "yeah....I can just picture you Jim, in a railway station saying, would one of you guys keep an eye on my arm while I go lose the other one. Don't run away with it..I'll be needing it back in a few minutes to climb back up onto the platform." Moments like this are special. There is no better than feeling than four friends simutaneously erupting with laughter. Laughter is infectious. Thank you ever so much Peter, the lads and I are most grateful for the laughs you are giving us at the moment. By the way Peter, my pal Frank says that he would like to meet you in the flesh. He isn't too happy at what you've said about my disability. He's particularly livid at you insulting my Father. So too am I. You WILL pay heavily for the remarks you made. Consider that a promise written in stone Peter.

"Evolution has a tendency to deselect the weak, the foolish and the idiotic", you pontificate. Given that I'm still here on this mortal coil ripping the piss out of your pathetic self, offers conclusive proof that by your own hypothesis, I am neither weak, foolish or idiotic, although I'm not cerain that was the point you were trying to make though Professor Sault PhD. You are talking shite again Peter. Give your mouth a wipe Mr. Sault. Don't dribble Peter, you wouldn't want a brown shirt, would you Peter? Since you are a psychiatrist, and since you keep ducking my questions, I thought this particular brand of toilet paper to be most appopriate for you.

I have a theory about evolution that I would like to propose Professor Sault. The theoretical hypothesis that I propose to postulate is based upon the theoretical theory that there is no process of evolutionary deselection that operates on the basis of physical appearances. I base this hypothesis of this theoretical theory that I am postulating exclusively on the principle that if physical appearances alone played any significant part in the survival of the prettiest, then you would never have been born. Never in my forty-seven years of existence have I ever seen such an ugly bastard as you. Seriously. You make Crimes of Zion look like Leonardo De Caprio. Peter Sault, you are one hideous-looking sonofabitch.

That is some barnet Peter. Far-out man. Cosmic. It is a truly awful hairstyle even by the standards of the 1970s. That you were sporting this seriously bad barnet in the 1980s suggests that you had yet to become aware of the fact that it wasn't 1966 anymore. You were in your early thirties when that photograph was taken, and you sure look the part. Never have I seen a dickhead look exactly the way a proper dickhead should look. Dear oh dear Peter, that is a dreadful dodgy barnet old chap. You look like Louis XIV. You scruffbag Peter, you make Brian May's hairstyle look cool. By the way, you old skinflint, why are you still wearing the same clothes almost a quarter-of-a-century later? You miserly old codger, you must be minging. Treat yourself to some new kit Peter - get yer arse down to your local Oxfam shop and get some new clobber. Splash-out Peter (pun intended).

Of course, there would be much more explanatory material than that, such as Kerr's consistent pattern of attacking his former friends as "Zionist agents", as soon as they start to see through him and fail to lavish him with sufficient praise and adulation.

A "Consistent pattern" Peter? Surely you're not referring to Chimp of Zion and Screwloozette the Serviette, Disinfecter of Boils? Hell, I do believe you are. Do you take drugs too Peter? You appear to be having hallucinations. You'll be telling us that there are two Daryls next, or that Brendon O'Connell was sent to Esperance as part of a secret Zionist operation involving Chemtrails. For the last fucking time, James Linton was never any friend of mine. Does his behaviour indicate that we were ever 'friends? Give it a rest Peter? You're like a record that is stuck in the groove. Linton, like you, is a complete and utter twat. I never spoke with him. He was an Internet contact. We exchanged e-mails for about fifteen weeks before I decided that he was no longer of any relevance and binned him. How does this make him my 'friend', Peter old chap? The arrangement I had with you was precisely the same arrangement as I had with your drug-dealing accomplice. Does this mean that you were my "good friend"? Is that what you are suggesting old boy? Speak up Peter, I can't hear you.

As for Statuette the Baguette, Befriender of Shills, does the behaviour exhibited since she got jettisoned indicate any great depth of friendship on either side? To be honest Peter, if Bates Motel was to get run over tomorrow by a Greyhound bus, I would weep no tears. You, Linton and Nina, however, would probably jump for joy given that she has become such a liability to Team Poseidon. Why do you think I was so pleased to see the back of the stupid cow? She's all yours Peter. Thank you kindly for taking off her Michael's hands and my hand. We are most grateful indeed.

That your team mate Suffragette the Omlette, Wholesaler of Go-Cat still has the nerve to show face here on Wake Up From Your Slumber after exposing herself as a liar and deceiver, demonstrates just how shameless you and your cronies are. Kings and Queens of chutzpah indeed. That the dizzy bitch has the brassneck to come to this forum and post messages demanding that Daryl Bradford Smith upload a photograph of himself to the Internet and answer her questions while YOU continue to refuse to post YOUR photograph on the website that you operate with others unkown, and while YOU avoid answering awkward questions that are put to you, is hilarious to watch from where I'm standing. Silhouette the Wagonette, Depleter of Uranium is all yours Peter. Michael and I are delighted that that she has settled in so well with Team Poseidon. How much do we owe you? She is more of an asset to us by being on your team than she ever was when we had her. Cheers....snicker snicker.

So tell me again Peter....who are these "former friends" of mine that you speak of? Can you tell me their names please as I seem to have forgotten who they are. Is this because of my Narcisstic Personality Disorder? Does NPD cause amnesia, Dr. Sault? Can you remember whether or not this is so Peter? Please don't make a bigger dick out of yourself in public as you so spcectacularly did with the post that I am now taking apart, by telling me that this list of "former friends" of mine that you have compiled is comprised only of the Chimp boy and the Whip girl. Don't even think about it Peter. Two incidences hardly constitutes a "consistent pattern."

Are you, as a mathematician, willing to debate me on this point Peter? What was that you said Peter? Speak up old chap, I'm having difficulty hearing you Peter. Must be my NPD kicking-in again. Once again Peter, you enclose key words within quotation marks. In this instance, the key words in question are 'Zionist' and 'agent'. So once again old chap, I request that you go away and come back with some sourced quotations where I say that Suzette is a "Zionist agent." Take as long as you like Peter, but do try and get back to me this side of Christmas. You need not waste your time and energy bombarding me with statements that I have made in respect of the Chimp. I don't deny that I have said he is a Zionist stooge. You say he's not, I say he is. Big deal. You like King Crimson, I prefer Status Quo.

As soon as they start to see through him and fail to lavish him with sufficient praise and adulation.

You what? What are you waffling on about now you silly old musical, mathematical, masturbator? For the last time you mathsturbator, I binned them, not the other way round. Have you got that you divvy? It was me who saw through them and got rid of them, you clown. Sheesh, you are hard work Sault - a pain in the arse. Do you seriously expect anyone here to beleve this pile of absolute balderdash? You are serously deluded old chap. "Adulation" and "praise?" You're clutching at straws now Peter. I used to think that you showed great proficiency at your job. I reckoned you to be a very good shill. At one point, I even thought you to be almost as good as Proemio over at NOLAJBS, but you've been a mega disappointment Peter. You've really let me down. You're not much better than Brendon O'Connell, and he is rank rotten. You're useless Peter.

Sure, you know every trick in the book, but I am wise to them all. You need to innovate Peter, instead of using the same old tricks over and over and over again. You bore me Peter. I'd much rather do battle with shills who are better than you. Go back to shill school - you need to a refresher course. Better still, give it up. Get a proper job. I'll ignore the rest of your waffle. Nice of you to tell us more about yourself, but I and about fifty other people already know all this. How about telling us how you IP address traces to France, or why you wanted to meet me at a service station on the M1 motorway?

PlanetClouseau's team should hang up their gumshoes and call it a day. They are giving the internet a bad name. Leave information processing and sleuthing to those who have the necessary capacity.

Sorry to urinate on your bonfire old chap, but Michael and I ain't going nowhere Peter. Gumshoes....I like that one Peter.....very appropriate indeed....we're going to stick to you like glue. Consider us your guardian angels, watching over you - never far away. When you fart, we'll smell it. Catch my drift Peter? Now go fuck yourself or I shall taunt you further you wiper of other people's bottoms. Silly English shill dog. I blow my nose at you so-called PS-ODEION, you and your silly Australian s-hill-s. I don't wanna talk to you no more, you big-headed fish-food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your Nina was a snickerer and your Linton smelt of methsberries.

Darwinist Peter Sault Poseidon states:

"Evolution has a tendency to deselect the weak, the foolish and the idiotic."

That foul spectre must indeed represent a logical outgrowth
and the final evolution of such "Final Solutions" as these

If I might reiterate, Mein Petersaulten...

From final solutions to Brownshirts. Team Poseidon definitely have an air of Nazism about them. Have a look in the Chimp's photobucket account and you'll find these exhibits:

And don't go denyin' no Holocaust 'round here, Petersaulten. We got LAWS over here, sucka !

( And Hey PO', wuzn't dat YOU wuz dribblin' about
your Ol' Buddy ROBERT FISK right over HERE ? )

ADELAIDE, MY ARSE !

Nice find Quasi. I notice from that link you posted that there is this little gem to be found:

"George W. Bush being the perfect example of a man whose extreme delusional behaviour....

Now where have we seen this kind of psychobabble before? Note how Peter Sault has shares the same idiosyncrasy as Poseidon in writing in American style one post, and in English the next. I did offer the God of the Ocean the opportunity to fess up or be outed. He chose to be outed. Wait 'til you see what I've dug-up on him. I'm going to offer Poseidon one last chance to confess. I'm giving him 24 hours to admit that he is Peter Sault and apologise for denying that he is Peter Sault. If he doesn't, then the nukes are coming out.

By the way Quasi, do you suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder too?

BIG TIME, QUO, DEFINITELY

I thought so Quasi, but I'll bet you that my NPD is more overblown and incurable than yours. There is absolutely no way that you could love yourself as much as I love myself. Worship me you weasly worm Quas, and heap adulation and praise upon me or else I'll do a page on you and tell everybody that you're a Zionist agent.

It's 5:33 am over here in Kerrland, and since my sleeping pattern doesn't fit with Professor Sault's sleeping pattern theory, there can be only one explanation - I am Fester and Eric plus the two Daryls.

crystal clear on your position.

Now, leave readers to decide.

comments closed.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.