Behind the Surge: New Pro-Surge Group Is Almost All Jewish

New Pro-Iraq-War Organization Hides Its Pro-Israel Agenda

August 27, 2007
Only the Jewish Press Calls a Spade a Spade: New Pro-Iraq-War Group Is a Jewish Group
With Walt and Mearsheimer's Israel Lobby book about to burst onto the scene, the poverty of the existing debate over the Israel interest in American politics is demonstrated by the coverage of Freedom's Watch, the new rightwing group spending millions on television to urge the Congress to keep American forces in Iraq.

Only the Jewish Telegraphic Agency has the guts to say what is obvious, that "Pro-Surge Group Is Almost All Jewish" that four out of five board members of Freedom's Watch are Jewish, and the fifth board member is married to a Jew. I take this point further. A large number of Freedom's Watch's staff or backers have stated that Israel's security is central to their view of the Iraq war.

Matthew Brooks, a board member of the group, said two years back to justify this war:

You know, as well as I, that Saddam Hussein launched scud missiles at

Israel

...

You know that Saddam paid a bounty of $25,000 to the families of Palestinian homicide bombers.

Brooks is director of a group called the Republican Jewish Coalition, which does not even accept the idea of a Palestinian state. It speaks only of a "Palestinian political entity" under the right circumstances. I think it's in America's interest to push for a Palestinian state!

Then there's Freedom's Watch board member and spokesman Ari Fleischer. Three years ago I heard him tell a Jewish audience in Cincinnati that they should vote for Bush because he had helped make Israel safer with the Iraq war. And as for the the director of the new group, Brad Blakeman, last year at the end of Israel's botched and gruesome Lebanon war, Blakeman, an Orthodox Jew, said on MSNBC:

Israel

... could have wiped out
Lebanon

in a day if they chose to. They chose not to.
[Israel] knows exact what it‘s doing. Israel is protecting their borders.
Israel

is fighting with one hand tied behind their back. They‘re fighting according to international law.

Blakeman had worked in the Bush White House. His brother Bruce told the Forward that Bush launched the Iraq war partly out of concern for Israel.

"The president realized not only that Saddam Hussein was a danger to America, but that Saddam Hussein had designs on attacking Israel," said Blakeman, whose brother Brad is a former Bush aide. "There was a concern that an attack on Israel would turn into a regional war, with Syria and Iran joining in on Iraq's side."

Among donors to Freedom's Watch are real estate kingpin Richard Fox, who is the head of the unreconstructed neoconservative Jewish Policy Center. And casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who has lately donated $60 million to Birthright, the program that seeks to indoctrinate young American Jews in a love of Israel by paying for a free trip there before they turn 26 (gentiles need not apply!).

Most of the leaders of this group live and breathe Israel, but this overarching concern is nowhere to be found in their calls on Americans to sacrifice more blood and treasure in Iraq. When they talk about threats to the region, they are talking about Israel's security. And the press lets them get away with this subterfuge, with the exception of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. The Washington Post, for instance, was happy to suggest that the organization is a "White House front," but said nothing about the Jewish character of the board, or those Jews' view of Israel. Politico was also silent on the issue. In a second piece, the Washington Post reported that one board member leads neocon cipher Scooter Libby's defense committee.

I wish the Post would ask these guys what they think about Israel. Nope, they're all afraid to mention it.

Again I note, there's nothing wrong with rightwingers expressing their views. The problem is when those views have a religious character that they're not upfront about, and that the press declines to discuss. Any one else bringing a religious worldview to American politics is described as doing just that. We constantly hear about the "evangelical" voters or the "Christian right." What about the Jewish right? Especially now, when there's a widespread apprehension in the country that the Israel-centric Jewish right pushed this disastrous war.
http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2007/08/only-the-jta-re.html

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Why does none of this amaze me anylonger?

I'm 'uncomfortably numb' I suppose.

"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire

Peacetroll | Tue, 2007-08-28 20:21

Blakeman, an Orthodox Jew, said on MSNBC: Israel... could have wiped out Lebanon in a day if they chose to. They chose not to.

LOL! I think that Zionist Jews are starting to hallucinate… because they know that Israel is truly threatened now due to the fact that it has just gone far too far. Anybody who knows anything about what happened inside the UN during the negotiations for 1701, knows that it was Israel that was literally begging for a cease-fire (and the reasons are many and known… but of course not covered in US media where Israel was the “victorious” party). The Arab delegation headed by Amr Moussa (the Secretary General of the Arab League) was itself extremely astonished at Israel’s push for an immediate resolution. Let’s not forget that Arab leaders also listen to mainstream media… and there also is such a thing as Arab mainstream media too. "Israel could have wiped out Lebanon" is such a hilarious statement for those who were able to watch the real events unfold… hahaha… The Israeli army couldn’t even advance 3 kilometers let alone feed the soldiers who did advance those few kilometers!

[Israel] knows exact what it‘s doing. Israel is protecting their borders.
Israel is fighting with one hand tied behind their back. They‘re fighting according to international law.

It's funny how Israeli "borders" always seem to be in other peoples countries... Poor little Israel... "fighting according to international law"! What a farce!

Cherifa Sirry | Tue, 2007-08-28 21:06

Out of a soggy bag of dirty diapers. And if they were to engage in fair and real combat there enemy will mop the floor with those frightened useless soldiers they have on there payroll now.

Of all the military forces i have seen this IOF is by far the most lame in a fire fight BALLS wise. Plain and simple they are wimp's and if they fight they loose.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Tue, 2007-08-28 21:21

Did you notice AJC's ad in the New York Times? LOL... It is almost pathetic.. Notice how they carefully chose pictures (or rather frames) that portrayed the four chosen leaders (and 'coincidentally' enemies of Israel..) in the nastiest possible way. How low can one stoop? For God sake, is there no dignity left among Israel advocates? It’s nauseating. They beg for self-pity; they vilify others when they themselves are monsters...

The attributed quotes are garbage..., but the NYT is now accustomed anyway to printing garbage.. and its readers seem to obviously enjoy the taste of garbage..

Cherifa Sirry | Wed, 2007-08-29 07:48

unclesam wakeup

Go, Rep. Kaptur!

Tell Wall Street to Go To Hell!!!

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator