As Mr James was being led from the dock after the hearing, he said to the court: "Not guilty. This is the way the Army has repaid me."

Outside court, his solicitor David Martin made a statement in which he said his client was "absolutely confident" of clearing his name.

He said: "He served with the British Army for almost 20 years in any way that he has been called to do so, irrespective of religious or political considerations and he's been proud to do so.

He should consider himself lucky - at least, they didn't shoot him dead like the army did to the poor american soldier who refused to redploy to Iraq.

These governments don't work for their people. They work for multi-national corporations. We can only expect the worst from them.

The enemy is the State.

The State is self-aggrandizing and it gets the people who work within it to work towards its institutional imperatives.

The modern State born after the French Revolution, simply acts as a 'tax collector' generating and paying the "National Debt", making war and re-distributing that wealth in a way which further makes the State and its agents powerful.

Its time ordinary people recognized that the State whether it is democratic or totalitarian as long as we pay massive taxes and have a central bank and the National Debt/paper currencies...they/we will be enslaved to it, and controlled by it. They\we will be required to sacrifice their\our lives and their\ourlabour for it and to it. Meanwhile Wolfowitz, Bolton, Perle and the rest live their lives in luxury without ever sacrificing anything that they ask others to do, so easily.

One would have to be very stupid to accept the terms presented to them by the mass media...it is obvious to anyone with a little sense that these people are not concerned about anyone except themselves....everything else is just rhetoric, and it can clearly be seen to be divergent from their actions. They say and ask others to do what they themselves never do, or they do the opposite to what they say others should do.

I have written to Daniel James to try to help him with these spying charges. It would appear from the news of his case that he is being set up for an unfair trial.

In the UK it is common practice for MI5 and the Ministry of Defence to fabricate evidence in order to manufacture spies. It seems the system needs to do this to demonstrate to the public that the Security Services are competent and catching dangerous spies, however the evidence is often far from what it appears.

In my own case I was framed by these organisations as well, but in my case I received a 20-year prison sentence for falling into their trap. The Prosecution get away with this by claiming that the evidence is so damaging to national interests that it must be heard in secret court, but the real reason is to hide the weak and fabricated evidence that the prosecution rely on.

It is for this reason that I believe Daniel James should challenge all moves to have the trial held behind closed doors. If the public are able to hear what the evidence is, then he will have the best chance to walk free.

You can read details of my own frame-up on my blog at http://www.parellic.blogspot.com and it would be a good idea for anyone believing these spy charges to analyse carefully what is being said, and what evidence really supports such serious allegations.

Michael John Smith
parellic@googlemail.com

as SECRECY.

JFK was right.

I'm sorry to hear about your tragic experience with one of our corrupt governments.