Pentagon ‘three-day blitz’ plan for Iran
The Sunday Times
Sarah Baxter, Washington
The Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.
Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.
Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.
President George Bush intensified the rhetoric against Iran last week, accusing Tehran of putting the Middle East “under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust”. He warned that the US and its allies would confront Iran “before it is too late”.
One Washington source said the “temperature was rising” inside the administration. Bush was “sending a message to a number of audiences”, he said to the Iranians and to members of the United Nations security council who are trying to weaken a tough third resolution on sanctions against Iran for flouting a UN ban on uranium enrichment.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last week reported “significant” cooperation with Iran over its nuclear programme and said that uranium enrichment had slowed. Tehran has promised to answer most questions from the agency by November, but Washington fears it is stalling to prevent further sanctions. Iran continues to maintain it is merely developing civilian nuclear power.
Bush is committed for now to the diplomatic route but thinks Iran is moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon. According to one well placed source, Washington believes it would be prudent to use rapid, overwhelming force, should military action become necessary.
Israel, which has warned it will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, has made its own preparations for airstrikes and is said to be ready to attack if the Americans back down.
Alireza Jafarzadeh, a spokesman for the National Council of Resistance of Iran, which uncovered the existence of Iran’s uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, said the IAEA was being strung along. “A number of nuclear sites have not even been visited by the IAEA,” he said. “They’re giving a clean bill of health to a regime that is known to have practised deception.”
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, irritated the Bush administration last week by vowing to fill a “power vacuum” in Iraq. But Washington believes Iran is already fighting a proxy war with the Americans in Iraq.
The Institute for the Study of War last week released a report by Kimberly Kagan that explicitly uses the term “proxy war” and claims that with the Sunni insurgency and Al-Qaeda in Iraq “increasingly under control”, Iranian intervention is the “next major problem the coalition must tackle”.
Bush noted that the number of attacks on US bases and troops by Iranian-supplied munitions had increased in recent months “despite pledges by Iran to help stabilise the security situation in Iraq”.
It explains, in part, his lack of faith in diplomacy with the Iranians. But Debat believes the Pentagon’s plans for military action involve the use of so much force that they are unlikely to be used and would seriously stretch resources in Afghanistan and Iraq.
this isnt a bluff
they're desensitizing the world to the impending attack
insane
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
@QRS
It is most certainly a media blitz and a KKKhazar one at that. It is no coincidence that the two UK newspapers that carried such stories are The Telegraph and The Times, both ZioNazi stalwarts. I doubt it will desensitise the public though, as I don't sense much of a desire in any of the countries making up the so-called 'coalition of the willing' for yet more illegal and immoral war at the behest of the occupiers of Palestine.
..like the Iranians won't shoot back!
..what we're talking about here, if ANYONE attacks Syria, Iran, Russia or China; who have mutual defense pacts, is WORLD WAR III.
..and the ultimate CHUTPAH FROM DUSH: Tehran putting the Middle East “under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust”; when he's talking about bombing nuclear facilities POSSIBLY WITH NUKES, causing NUCLEAR DISASTERS<--
..of course the pariah state of AZRAEL says it will bomb anyways..
Greg Bacon
"The Institute for the Study of War last week released a report by Kimberly Kagan... "
And the liars, thieves and war mongers are out in force, again. Again, they are urging America to fight another war for Israel. Kimberly Kagan is the wife of that noted war monger, Frederick Kagan, of the American Entrprise Institute. Freddy boy was instrumental in getting America to fight another war for Israel, the war against Iraq.
More death. More misery. More destruction, all to benefit Israel. This war will not have any benefit to America, except to condemn us, world-wide, as being as deranged nation.
It will not benefit Iran. What country as benefited from getting bombed and smashed to pieces?
The only country the war against Iran will benefit is ISRAEL.
The Zionazi's of Israel must be giddy and full of mirth, contemplating having America fight ANOTHER war for Israel and again, setting the Muslim world and the Christian's off fighting amongst themselves... again.
If their is a more depraved group of people than the Zionists, i dare anyone to point out which people that is--except the war mongers here in America.