Used in any way to further EMPIRE and the WHOLE game goes into the FIRE stage of our life on 3rd rock o the system.

Just one.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

It's possible the weapons were loaded by mistake.

I was in the US Air Farce. My actual job title was Nuclear Weapons Specialist. I worked in those exact bunkers at Minot AFB in North Dakota. My job was to take nuclear weapons apart and run tests on them to ensure reliability.

It was a routine occurrence to take dummy bombs and cruise missiles with inert warheads out to B-52s and load them. The weapons were always shrouded as I took them from the bunkers and proceeded out past the security installation. The security people never looked under the shrouds. They did not have security clearance to do so. The B-52 air crews inside the craft did not look at the weapons. They trusted us. Real weapons appear identical to dummy weapons until you get close and see the word "inert" painted on the dummy weapon.

It is possible that weapons with live warheads were accidentally loaded onto the B-52.

How? Two or more trailers may have sat there, some with live warheads, others with dummy warheads. The wrong trailer might have been taken out to the flight line. This would be highly unusual but not unthinkable. No security police are allowed inside the compound that has storage bunkers. Only "nuke" people like me.

No B-52 would be allowed to take off with live nukes unless the crew intended to use the weapons in combat. Warheads are sometimes moved from one base to another, but that is always by C-130 aircraft. However, someone could have screwed up.

In any case, Barksdale AFB has plenty of nukes. Why fly them down from North Dakota? Dyess AFB in Texas also has nukes.

I don't dispute the report. I merely say it's possible that the report is in error, and someone did screw up.

U.S. policy establishes a "no-lone-zone" within fifty feet of all nuclear weapons, which means no individual shall be around any nuke by himself. There must be two or more people at all times. Hence if there was a screwup, at least two people were culpable.

I wonder if that is a court martial offense? Peace

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

Smart and QUESTIONING Aircrew
And a 5 mega pixel pocket camera along for a boring ride showed the photographer a freaky sight

SEVERAL cruse missiles NOT marked "INERT"

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Let's be clear about what a court martial is.

If you screw up in the military, you are subject to increasing penalties, up to and including an "Article 14" plus a dishonorable discharge.

In most cases, personnel do not receive these punishments. Instead, they have their paychecks docked. This shapes people up right away, since it hurts badly.

Now suppose there is major screwup, and the military has many questions, and wants an inquiry. In that case we can have a court marshal, but only if you are specifically charged with breaking a law (as opposed to simply violating general procedure).

This is not a punishment, just as it is not a punishment when a U.S. President is impeached. It simply means you must appear in a military court under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and perhaps answer to charges. A court marshal is rarely called, and indicates an extreme crime. If you are acquitted, you go about your business with no penalty.

If someone screwed up at Minot AFB, will that someone be court martialed? It depends on the circumstances, plus internal politics, and so forth. A court martial draws a lot of attention, and is embarassing for the military. The Air Force would prefer to avoid one if possible (unless some bureaucrat wants to use one to advance his career). There are pleny of other ways to quietly nail people to the wall. A dishnorable discharge, for example, is like a felony conviction. It follows you the rest of your life.

Seems to be a "test run" of an upcoming FALSE FLAG Nookalur attack by some "rogue" state (they might be correct about "Rogue State".... Yisrael anyone?!????)

How convenient - lil' George is out of the country and Cheney's playin' with the nukes!

Last Monday I had this thought, which I posted, that there would be a big event that would serve many purposes for the Cheney ziocons - a massive contaminating event to bring about the implementation of the NAU and the NASCO trunk corridor from the new Chinese ports in Mexico thru to arctic Canada.

The only way they can quickly implement this plan is with the authority of martial law. There will need to be massive population relocations, property seizures, and shifts in transportation routines to pull it off.

Nukes in five cities - Houston, Kansas City, Davenport, Iowa, Los Angeles, San Fransisco or another west coast port would do it.

The only bridge across the Mississipi on the NASCO main I-35 trunk conveniently fell earlier this summer, giving them the jump they will need on that choke point. The other bridge choke point is at Davenport.

Now the U.S. Air Force is in "stand down" mode until Sept. 14. And USNORTHCOM has a big martial law exercise planned for Oct. 15-20.

Mexican trucks are now crossing the southern border unimpeded - 2 firms with 100 trucks for now that will turn into 22 firms next month if all goes well. This was done in spite of the Congress pulling the money for that program.

It could all just be a sophisticated fear inducing exercise, but these mattoids are capable of anything and they believe they can get away with it too.

You mention that:

Two or more trailers may have sat there, some with live warheads, others with dummy warheads. The wrong trailer might have been taken out to the flight line. This would be highly unusual but not unthinkable.

Do you mean to say that a trailor carrying live warheads can simply move around and deliver its warheads without very meticulous control of whom the warheads are being delivered to? Isn't there a process for driving live warheads from location to location that is very closely monitored? Are the teams that monitor the movements of live warheads the exact same as those who monitor the movements of dummies?? When I read what you write, I feel that there is absolutely no differentiation in the manner live warheads and dummies are treated... and I am astonished. Could you elaborate? Thanks for you interesting comments.

Also, has such a "mistake" ever happened before in the US... and what do you personally feel about this story since you would be in a better position than most people to judge? What are the chances of this being a "mistake"?

50/50?
80/20?
95/5?
99.99/.1??

What do you think?

seems to be less secure than airport security post 9/11...if what thx is telling true state of handling of nuclear weapons we are lucky to be still alive...furthermore insufficient security clearance for personnel involved in mounting nuclear warheads is ridiculous as it makes conspiracy more likely to happen. What if pilots are not informed that they are loaded with nukes and get order to simply carry on "exercise" bombing of certain targets?! I doubt they would be court marshaled either because probably they will crash on zero ground being effected by nuclear blast. Well guys mistakes happen and it was the human error that mushrooms season started earlier this year. Look if this kind of "mistake" happened in Pakistan I personally would be quite surprised but for this to happen in US is to much of BS to digest in post 9/11 heightened security all over the country. Cherifa I think for this to be mistake is 99.9/0.1 chance especially seeing Bush with same expression in Sydney after he found out that mission "Global thunder" was foiled by some self-righteous patriotic sons of bitches within US military. Man I think he was seriously pondering of what kind of torture to inflict on those military men that refused to nuke their own people. His face was revealing extreme madness that afflict people with Nero syndrome. What an idiots have voted for this lunatic. He should not be impeached but put into asylum for criminally insane and Chenney should be nailed on that huge obelisk in DC. Bankers are Jews and Illuminatis are Jews but they are not followers of Torah but Satan himself so we don't call them Jews but Zionists. What the hell are they supposed to do now when they see how many people are against war in Iraq and even more against war on Iran and Syria, the only possible swing of masses toward those wars would be something terrible as nuclear attack on US soil. Wise up guys, desperate dictators go after desperate measures.

"Let there be Light!"

Mai Lei massacre RSVN circa 1966 (?). He was looking at a firing squad or 20 years to life in Leavenworth military prison, Kansas (?). That's a pretty serious court's martial, I'ld say. Peace

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

"A dishnorable discharge, for example, is like a felony conviction. It follows you the rest of your life."

thx1138 | Sun, 2007-09-09 15:59

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

Walt Disney's urban legand

Steve McQueen's Marine story

"Although McQueen started his Marine Corps career as a trouble-maker, his actions in the arctic resulted in the saving of five fellow Marines who would have otherwise drowned in the freezing water. His actions got him a spot on President Truman's private security team. "

McQueen played a number of outlaw parts where the character was dishonorably discharged - but the movies aren't reality.

Posted By: Never_Surrender
Date: Friday, 7 September 2007, 11:06 a.m.

Ok....

Something just occurred to me....

On Aug. 30th we had the B-52 nuke incident, no one knows for sure if there were 5 or 6 nukes yet.

If there were 6 ONE IS MISSING

On Sept. 3rd, we are being told that a famous man went missing... a highly connected famous man.

for days they have been searching for him.....

OR HAVE THEY?

This all just hit me when I was watching the news for the first time in about two weeks, and I heard them say that the MILITARY is helping to look for this Fossett guy.

WHAT? The Military????

It was then that it hit me....

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THE MISSING NUKE!

Nevada Guard Aids Search for Missing Pilot Fossett

Air Force units assist in search for adventurer Steve Fossett

COME ON, THERE IS NO WAY THAT THIS IS ALL FOR SOME GUY!!

They even have GOOGLE searching for the guy FROM SPACE!!

Mark my words.... THEY ARE LOOKING FOR A MISSING NUKE.

This Fossett guy is ONLY missing because they needed a cover story... they had to find a way to explain all of the military planes that were going to be flying around over Nevada.

They needed a good excuse and VOILA... Fossett provided it!!

As soon as they locate the nuke, they will produce the set up "crash" scene!

Right now that man is in a bunker somewhere with his plane hidden inside or underneath of a mountain being held in safe keeping away from public eyes until they find what they are really looking for......... A MISSING 150 KILOTON NUCLEAR WEAPON!!

and then they will take him out to some remote location and set up the "crash" scene.... or, there is a chance that Fossett is in on this whole thing and that he volunteered to "disappear" for a few days into some government bunker so that he could play a part in saving the country from being nuked.

In which case he will show up in a week or two with some heroic story of survival and everyone will be amazed that he made it.

I don't know why it took me so long to get this one but...

they are DEFINITELY NOT looking for a missing man using ALL of these military resources and EVEN going as far as to have satellites searching FROM SPACE....

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH MATTERS OF NATIONAL SECURITY.... mark my words.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Symmetrically on the external hard points of this size and type of Aircraft/Payload

So what was the deal? Five or six??????

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

those in the power positions can not only CHANGE the meaning of words in the dictionary, ..but they can change the course of past history. For OVER thirty years, it was said and taught Walt and Steve were " booted out " of the military. Urban legand? Look up the definition of " anti-Semite " in your dictionary, if you have one , or borrow one. More urban legends, I suppose.

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

That if a weapon like a NUKE just happened to "Broken arrow" and fall off one of those hard points there is systems in the missile to deploy chutes and locater transmitter no?

So if this did not happen?

What metric was at work? was a weapon LAUNCHED and it went ???? Or did one fall off??? or is the sixth one being trucked to it's new hide??

The WHOLE world HATES Q: like this America.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

http://www.stratofortress.org/specifications-b52h.htm

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Google " Ostpolitic" and see what you get. IF you do an extensive, exhaustive search you may come to the truth about the agreement between masonic forces within the Catholic Church and the Kremlin, ( our Communist friends ) whereas the Church agreed ( masonic shills in clergy garments, that is), to quit condemning Communism in exchange for Russia's 'appearence' and ( false ) support of the Church at Vatican II. It would seem to me the truth is becomming a rare and almost extinct commodity. I really don't care about Disney or McQueen, I liked them both for their God given talents. I DO, however, resent and resist athiestic Communist Judeo Masonic infiltration and influence of the Catholic Church. No doubt, in time, this may also be labeled an "urban legend". Peace

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

In the past, the controllers of media could spread bullshit far and wide and they could count on the grapevine to spread it. No longer.

As to the term you refered to, You might be interested in this thread on the "language war"

But if it's a language war they want...I suggest we give them one! If anyone refers to "Semites"..they BETTER include our Arab brothers and sisters...because it's true. Peace

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

CRIMINAL Illuminati CONSPIRACY UNCOVERED IN PLANED BIO-TERROR PLOT!

SHIPMENT OF LIVE WEAPONIZED EBOLA VIRUS XX2LL WAS TRANSFERED FROM FORT DETRICK MARYLAND TO UNKNOWN LOCATION. EVXX2LL IS GERMANIC DEATH CULTS' SOLUTION TO OVERPOPULATION. EVXX2LL WAS DEVELOPED DURING THE FIRST GULF WAR. UNFORTUNATELY, EVXX2LL WAS NOT SUFFICIENTLY EVIL ENOUGH FOR THE BABY EATING LUCIFERIAN WORLD CONTROLLERS AND A NEW ROUND OF TESTING WAS ORDER BY THE NEOCONs. THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHICH ARE AT THE TOP OF PYRAMID OF EVIL ARE SATISFIED THAT THE NEW AND IMPROVED EVXX2LL WEAPON IS READY FOR DEPLOYMENT ON THE AMERICAN POPULATION.
THE EVXX2LL CANISTERS REMOVED FROM THEIR SECURE BIO-STORAGE AFTER ENTRY AND CONFIRMATION OF PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORIZATION!

Military investigators have confirmed to LatinAmericanview that During the gulf war, the troops were guinea pigs of very heinous experiments conducted by the Satanist front, the US government, during all of Bush Sr.'s presidency.

"Super-soldier" experiments were conducted on the troops, by cause cells to reproduce at a very rapid rate. In cases that limbs were blown off, the soldier would be able to regrow limbs and body parts. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/19/ap/tech/mainD8NCNHQO0.shtml http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.htm...

The scientists involved used "reversed engineering" to locate the genes responsible for regrowth. If the soldiers grew extra limbs, it would attract media attention. Instead, the scientists PREVENTED limb growth and by identifying which genes prevented growth, they located the genes that promoted growth.

Deformed children are the result of these experiments, that is STILL GOING ON. It's NOT DEPLETED URANIUM. DU is a small truth, used as a front to cover the evil experiments that went on and is STILL GOING ON.

If these so called "truth movement" groups promote the depleted uranium front-story, and NOT Peter Kawaja, nor his evidence, they are most likely DISINFO AGENTS.

The troops were infected with HIV/ebola hybrid microbe. This disease is a communicable disease, transmissible by casual contact, sweat, and breathing on someone. It's in a dormant state, constantly mutating. For some people, the microbe has already become partly active, which is resulting in the "Gulf War syndrome." Transmissible cancer, like HPV(human papaloma virus), and lime disease are derivatives of this microbe.

Phase 2 of this disease will be released in the very near future. By a massive Bio-terror the microbe will react to the chemical and become active. Carriers will die "ebolic death," death by bleeding organs, unless they get treatment.

The lucifarian controllers will offer treatment ONLY to those who will accept the medical/national ID/card, the Mark of the Beast. Those who refuse will be hunted down and murdered, or will die from the disease. People will turn in family and friends in order to survive. They will thank the Neocons for solving the plague problem that THEY HAD CAUSED. The new world order will be installed and the one world satanic religion will be forced on everyone. This world wide plague is a BLOOD SACRIFICE.

Those Investigators also confirmed that the cruise missiles containing EVXX2LL warheads were placed, were mounted on the wings of the B-52 and not placed in the belly of the plane with other missiles headed for decommissioning.

When those BIO-WEAPON cruise missiles arrived at Barksdale AFB, Investigators say plans were made to move those bio-warheads off the base, allowing them to be used for what was to be a massive, "bio-terrorist" strike against five U.S. cities. They speculate the attacks will be blamed on AL-Qaida and used as an excuse to impose Martial Law in the U.S.

Government officials are scrambling to silence this investigation because it proves definitively that President George W. Bush was personally complicit in planning terrorist attacks against his own country for the purpose of declaring Martial law, merging the United States with other countries after we've been "crippled" by massive bio-attacks attacks, implementing "one world government" to "prevent anything like this from ever happening again" and, of course, remaining in power forever as absolute Dictator.

Elements inside the U.S. Military are aggressively seeking to arrest President Bush while top Brass in the military is doing everything possible to quash the crisis.

They leaked this information to me because efforts to "spin" and cover-up what really happened are overwhelming righteous efforts to hold the President accountable for his acts.

Investigators have been removed from the case and re-assigned. All have been threatened with arrest and prison if they reveal what they know.

Investigators have told LatinAmericanview the scope and grandeur of this conspiracy is so vast, so intertwined in the upper echelons of military and political power, that it is almost impossible to believe."

They went on to say that career Military Brass are putting their own personal interests (careers and pensions) ahead of national security because they are terrified of the consequences of this situation being made public. Lastly, no Jews were harmed during the fabrication of this conspiracy.

Note: LatinAmericanview has risked life and limb to bring you these "facts" from unnamed sources. Our only hope is that Ron Paul stages a political coup and restore sanity to our great republic. May god have mercy on all of US.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_michael__070907_was_a_covert_att...

"Who was in Charge of the B-52 Incident?

Who ordered the loading of Advanced Cruise missiles on to a B-52 in violation of Air Force regulations? The quick reaction of the Air Force and the issuing of a public statement describing the seriousness of the issue and the launch of an immediate investigation, suggests that whatever occurred, was outside the regular chain of military command. If the regular chain of command was violated, then we have to inquire as to whether the B-52 incident was part of a covert project whose classification level exceeded that held by officers in charge of nuclear weapons at Minot AFB. The most obvious governmental entity that may have ordered the nuclear arming of the B-52 outside the regular chain of military command is the last remaining bastion of neo-conservative activism in the Bush administration.

Vice President Cheney has taken a very prominent role in covert military operations and training exercises designed for the “seamless integration” of different national security and military authorities to possible terrorist attacks. On May 8, 2001, President Bush placed Cheney in charge of "[A]ll federal programs dealing with weapons of mass destruction, consequence management within the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal agencies" . Cheney subsequently played a direct role in supervising training exercises that simultaneously occurred during the 911 attacks.

According to former Los Angeles Police Officer Michael Ruppert, Cheney had a parallel chain of command that he used to override Air Force objections to stand down orders that grounded the USAF during the 911 attacks . Ruppert learned that the Secret Service had the authority to directly communicate presidential and vice presidential orders to fighter pilots in the air thereby circumventing the normal chain of command. "

Furthermore: “It is the Secret Service who has the legal mandate to take supreme command in case of a scheduled major event - or an unplanned major emergency - on American soil; these are designated "National Special Security Events".”

The more you learn, the more you know we're screwed.

To Cherifa Sirry

I think the chances are 50 / 50 that it was a mistake. More on this below.

“Do you mean to say that a trailer carrying live warheads can simply move around and deliver its warheads without very meticulous control of whom the warheads are being delivered to?”

There is some control. A particular weapon is supposed to go to a particular aircraft.

However, when a weapon is taken out of the secure storage area, it is covered with a tarp (a shroud), which is not removed until the transport trailer is beneath the aircraft on the flight line. The nuke people (like me) move a weapon out of the storage area. Then a different team (not part of us) loads them onto the aircraft. There may have been miscommunication, or failure to follow procedure. I could give you very precise details of exactly how an error could have happened, but this web site is probably monitored, so I won’t.

There’s another way an error could have happened.

The USA has had many accidents involving nuclear weapons. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_nuclear_accidents ).

Because of these accidents, B-52s are not supposed to fly around with live nuclear warheads except in combat. The only live warheads delivered to the flight line are for B-52s on alert standby. Perhaps the wrong B-52 took off. I’m just guessing. B-52 deployment is outside my knowledge area. I only know about nuclear weapons.

In today’s environment, errors are inevitable. The U.S. military is demoralized, both stateside and abroad. Orders come from on high, and regular personnel must follow them. Nukes are moved around for strange reasons. No one knows what’s going on. Bush follows orders from Cheney, who follows orders from zionists and international bankers, who follow orders from Satan.

SO YOU’RE SAYING IT WAS AN ERROR?

No.

I said I think it’s 50 / 50.

In mid 2005, Rumsfeld changed nuclear procedure by implementing his “Interim Global Strike Alert Order (CONPLAN 8022) which put most B-52s back on alert, ready to nuke anyone who displeased Bush’s controllers (i.e., zionists and the banking cartels).

It’s all part of the U.S. military’s “Global Strike” madness, which was implemented so zionists and bankers would have “more flexible” options regarding the use of nuclear weapons. A Presidential order is not required to move nuclear weapons. Moreover, the Air Force does not have final say in where its nukes are deployed. Overall weapons inventory is controlled by the Defense “Threat Reduction” Agency headquartered in Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

SO WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

I don’t know, and I don’t pretend to have “inside knowledge.” I only suggest scenarios in which errors are possible, based on my military experience. Your guess is as good as mine.

One thing is odd…

Some reports say the missiles were loaded onto external pylons of the B-52. If that is true, it warrants further investigation. A B-52 bomb-bay has room for two rotary missile launchers. That’s where nuclear-tipped missiles are normally installed. I haven’t seen missiles loaded onto external pylons since the Cold War days. Those missiles were Boeing SRAMs (Short Range Attack Missile). They had nuclear warheads, but they were not as delicate as today’s AGM-86C cruise missile, which are normally loaded into the bomb bay.
There are still a lot of questions about this incident.

To Traveler

“If what THX is telling true state of handling of nuclear weapons we are lucky to be still alive.”

The problem is not in the handling of nuclear weapons, but in the madness of the Bush regime.

The actual handling of nukes involves safety measures. You cannot detonate a nuke even if you drop it into a bonfire, toss it off a building, or shoot it with a canon. (The military has done all these actions in tests, many times.) Detonation can only happen when a nuke is linked with computers on an aircraft or missile platform. The bomb crew must load specific codes into the weapon as though entering a combination to a safe. The codes are frequently changed. Everything must be done precisely. If someone stole a nuke, he or she could never set it off. Trust me. The danger is that someone might break open the damned thing and spread its radioactive contents.

“What if pilots are not informed that they are loaded with nukes and get order to simply carry on ‘exercise’ bombing of certain targets.”

That's most unlikely. The arming of nukes is a very precise procedure. Code containers must be broke open, like you see in movies about submarines with their nukes. Several people on the aircraft must authenticate the codes.

If you want to see how the procedure occurs, look again at the 1964 movie “Dr. Strangelove.” The weapons are incorrect in that movie, but the arming procedure is amazingly accurate, and quite involved.

Remember, zionists and bankers don’t want their slaves to have power over nukes. Hence the myriad security procedures.

To Claymoremind

“Cheney had a parallel chain of command he used to override Air Force objections to stand down orders that grounded the USAF during the 911 attacks . Ruppert learned that the Secret Service had the authority to directly communicate presidential and vice presidential orders to fighter pilots in the air thereby circumventing the normal chain of command.”

This report is slightly misleading.

First, if there were objections, they probably didn’t come from the Air Force, since the Air Force doesn’t handle air defense in the USA. That’s the job of the Air National Guard, which is semi-autonomous, and headquartered at Tyndall AFB Florida. The Air National Guard also patrols “no fly” zones in Iraq and elsewhere. (By contrast, the US Air Force is for war and attack purposes.) Above the Air National Guard is NORAD. Above NORAD is USNORTHCOM, which will implement martial law when Bush receives his orders to move.

Second, a “National Special Security Event” would be handled by DHS and USNORTHCOM. The Secret Service (headed by a Gentile named Sullivan) is mainly to provide bodyguard service, and to protect the Fed gangsters by thwarting counterfeiting. The Secret Service comes under the DHS, which is headed by a zionist Jew (Chertoff). That’s where the power lies. Chertoff works very closely with the military (USNORTHCOM).

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Does Cheney oversee a “parallel chain of command”?

Yes. Before 9-11, a Presidential order was needed before an ANG fighter could shoot down an aircraft over U.S. territory. No longer. Is a presidential order still needed before nuclear weapons can be used? That’s kept mysterious. Today the President is supposed to be “consulted” or “informed.” What does that mean? I don’t know.

For many things the chain of command became mysterious after the zionists and the bankers installed their drunken chimp in the White House.

Four red dots sure does put the shading on this map into focus.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Thank you for your very interesting observations and explanations

forward to reading...who were extremely intelligent...not just that, they didn't throw their weight around and act all huffy. Morton who commented on a christian zionist site [he was against "christian" zionism], and Wally from Arizona who commented on a Scottish site [he was emphatically against the terrorist militia of "israel"]. I loved reading their comments - lots of great facts and knowledge there. It is always so refreshing to read information with integrity.

Thank you very much thx.

Ellendra Jane

http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=3548

Whoa! I didn't realize the Air Force had changed cruise missiles (again). That means one part of my comment was in error.

This makes the "plot thicken." I could indeed imagine the newer models mounted on external pylons.

Thanks for the update!

are not out of reach to those skilled in modern sophisticated weaponry run by computers and softwares...I fear that possibly missing nuke could easily fall in hands of crazy warmongers with hacker in stock to flush codes and install another one...think impossible? Well today even Pentagon is not safe from hackers let alone dormant nuke dropped in some weird desolate place. Even if it had beacon on itself it could be jammed with certain technology or material. No matter how safe all this looks I don't trust AI era. Teenagers are wrecking the latest IT gadgets during their lunchtimes and then imagine some greedy established hacker making some real money by serving Zionist zealots set on decimating world population. Great depression is on our doorstep and this is nuclear age so guess how WWIII will start.

Thanks Thx for clear and on point response to various questions I really appreciate your info.

"Let there be Light!"

To have a Nuke Dropped off from a B-52 into your lap You Can get the codes too!

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

This "Event" is This B-52 was TASKED to fly "THE" strike and in process of getting into the theater One of there nukes becomes lost and they have to abort. Those crews must have KNOWN a weapon of THAT weight Left the Airframe. And You don't just load Live "Advanced Cruse Nukes" without a "ShitStorm" of "Orders" regardless of there "Claims".

The Whole World is Some Nervous NOW America.

Now what you GOT? We now get see how WELL one of those ACM gadgets can blow the shit out of something?

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

It is either an attempted hijacking of a load of stealth cruise nukes OR a massive disinfo operation designed to test the limits of the internet bullshit bandwidth capacity.

Now the story is that the Fossett plane crash is thin cover for a detailed search being conducted by USNORTHCOM for a missing nuke in the Nevada desert.

The discrepancy between whether there were 5 or 6 on board is too obvious. Balance dictates that SIX were loaded - three on each wing.

The rumor is that this lost nuke is going to be used to set off the big California earthquake - THE VIEW TO A KILL option- the so called third FEMA scenario:

"FEMA STUDY FROM 8/01 "PREDICTED" 911, NEW ORLEANS, AND A SAN FRANSISCO EARTHQUAKE...

...U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Lucy Jones remembers attending an emergency training session in August 2001 with the FEMA that discussed the three most likely catastrophes to strike the United States.

First on the list was a terrorist attack in New York. Second was a super-strength hurricane hitting New Orleans. Third was a major earthquake on the San Andreas fault.

...A catastrophic temblor at the right spot along the San Andreas could significantly reduce energy and water supplies - at least temporarily, she and others said...

...Because the Los Angeles region is so much larger than the Louisiana city, it is difficult to conceive of a disaster - "short of an A-bomb" - that would blanket the whole city, let alone the whole county, in ruin, said Lee Sapaden, a spokesman for Los Angeles County's Office of Emergency Management..."

STAY TUNED FOLKS - More will surely follow!

You are correct. My comments made it seem that nuclear weapon handling is safer than it really is. Today, people are routinely able to hack “impregnable” codes.

Meanwhile, israelis are allowed onto most U.S. military installations, but Americans are not allowed on israeli installations, except in rare cases, and under armed escort at all times.

Yes, World War III will start when the Israeli and / or U.S. government detonate a nuke in the USA. Then we will nuke Iran, and the game will begin. Martial law, mass imprisonment, the works.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trivia: as far as I know, this story first appeared here, a month ago…

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/09/marine_nuclear_B52_070904w/

quote:
_______________________________
Smile Re: B-52 mistakenly flies with nukes aboard
Admittedly, I left the Air Force back in 1978 after serving six years, with two years as an officer in a command center. I’m sure some procedures have changed since then, but I don’t believe the Air Force could have changed so much as to have allowed a mistake like this to occur. I was stationed at Barksdale and knew about some (but certainly not all) of the procedures involving the transfer of nuclear weapons.

A nuclear weapon can only be removed from an igloo upon written orders originating with a very limited number of senior base command officers and signed by at lease three other senior officers. Even then, the senior OIC of the arsenal site along with at least one junior officer will only order a weapon be retrieved and prepared for transfer after they both have verbally confirmed their written orders to do so with the base commander or his deputy. This is done using special limited access and encrypted telephone lines or in person, and verification is accomplished only after each party has correctly read a unique sequence of letters and numbers printed on their orders. A senior OIC along with at least one junior munitions officer will arrive at the arsenal site at the time designated in their orders to transport the weapon. They will have already verified their written orders with a very senior base command officer. Each pair of munitions officers can only sign and be responsible for a single weapon at a time, and they must be accompanied by a special highly trained munitions crew and by a squad of heavily armed security police officers. After the two arsenal site officers and the two munitions officers have each visually verified the serial number of the weapon being transferred matches the serial number typed on both sets of their orders, all four must sign both sets of orders indicating the transfer has been verified and completed. A maximum of four nuclear weapons can be transferred to the flight line in each convoy, but each weapon must have their own team of officers with verified orders, munitions specialist, and a security detail. Also, the printed orders for the OIC of each munitions team indicate exactly which aircraft will receive that weapon and exactly where every weapon is to be mounted. Everyone involved is trained to repeatedly triple check everything for accuracy.

An SP OIC will have their own written orders because all information involving the movement of nuclear weapons is classified as top secret. After acknowledging the receipt of a coded phrase by radio, several squads of SP will move in and close all roads in the area. Those roads will remain closed until the SP OIC has verified the nuclear weapons have successfully arrived at their destinations and broadcasts another coded phrase to signal them to reopen the roads. Also, members of a squad of armed SP must remain within various distances of each nuclear weapon from the time they leave the igloo until the aircraft carrying it takes off. A police dog is normally involved in these operations. They must also follow a similar procedure when an aircraft with nuclear weapons lands. The SP will remain with the weapons until the plane takes off or the weapons have been transported to storage.

Upon arrival at the operations center, every member of every flight crew must present a military ID along with a special AF B-52 Crew ID to the SP OIC, who must verify each ID is valid and that their names and service numbers are correctly listed on the flight manifest. Then every B-52 crew member will receive their written mission orders and attend a briefing just prior to each flight in order to discuss their mission and possible alternative missions. These briefings will identify and discuss every weapon they will be have available on that mission. After that, the SP OIC will have an SP NCO escort each flight crew to the security perimeter of their aircraft. Once there, another SP NCO will check the ID of each crew member and compare it to the list of names printed on their copy of the flight manifest, making sure the crew is at the correct aircraft. Each crew member has to sign their name on that manifest as they enter the security perimeter. Then both the pilot and radar navigator must visually inspect every weapon and verify each serial number and location matches the numbers and locations typed on their mission orders. As they verify each nuclear weapon is properly in place, they both must exchange signatures with the two munitions officers responsible for that weapon acknowledging they are accepting responsibility for that weapon. Once in their seats, both the pilot and copilot of a B-52 can easily and clearly view a weapons display that electronically verifies every weapon system installed on their aircraft. That display also clearly identifies every weapon as being a practice, conventional, or nuclear weapon. The radar navigator has a similar display, which can also be viewed by the EWO and navigator. Part of the checklist when preparing for a flight is to electronically identify each weapon on the plane and to verify it is properly registering with and responding to the weapons control system. Therefore, the entire crew would have known nuclear weapons were mounted on that aircraft. And if the air crew had not been briefed about flying a mission with nuclear weapons installed, their training requires them to inform the pilot about the discrepancy, at which time the pilot is required to abort the mission. Therefore, even if the nuclear warheads were supposed to have been removed, the displays would have confirmed they were there. That plane should have never even taxied for takeoff.

Due to all of the safeguards in place, I find it absolutely impossible to believe such an unbelievable series of mistakes could have been made. Even just one innocent mistake involving the elaborate chain of custody would have prevented a transfer from taking place and would have automatically triggered an investigation in order to determine the problem. There is simply no way those nuclear weapons could have been accidentally removed from the igloos at the arsenal, transported to the flight line, installed in specific locations on a B-52, and then have a flight crew go through their preflight check list without realizing they were there. Multiple officers must verify the serial numbers of the weapons and sign for them during every transfer of custody. And no officer is going to ever sign for a nuclear weapon unless they have been briefed and received specific orders to do so because a very explicit paper trail records every move for each weapon and clearly identifies the officers responsible for it at all times. Therefore the only conclusion I can come up with is that this even must have been concocted by someone to appear as an accident. And, because nuclear weapons were said to be involved, orders approving such an event most certainly came from the White House. The reasons for this would be speculative, but I think our president wanted to subtlety remind the head of another government that we still have large numbers of these weapons. In fact, this even may not have even occurred. There is a very good chance the White House just ordered a select few people to say this happened. After all, how would anyone prove this didn’t really happen? And were all of the people being fired about to retire anyhow? They may have agreed to take a bullet for the cause.
______________________________

source:http://www.militarytimes.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1559956&page=24

..yah Latin, this one totally does not add up, because it's forked-tongue propaganda, that's why..

..if the men and their commander were suspended from duty for real, it's because they spoke out.

..i vote option one.

Andreas von Bulow is quoted as saying:
"95% of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation"

Imagine if the statement were true then what would reality look like? Another way to look at the story "CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY UNCOVERED IN NUCLEAR MISTAKE!" is if the nuclear warheads were lost or misplaced then the US Military HAS TO ASSUME THAT THEY WERE STOLE! Think about it! They have no choice since the weapons are unaccounted for. Now the story begins to look a little different. The stolen warheads were quickly recovered and an immediate investigation was launched. The investigator were instructed to keep this serious breech of national security internal. However, some naive and well intentioned officers broke rank and leaked the entire story to major news sources. Zionist and Military news centers were instructed not to run the story until Military Intelligence had scrubbed them of sensitive information. Furthermore, the media was told to sit on the story until an official cover story was crafted and made available for public consumption. In accordance to the New war time Military code and conduct guide the offending parties have tried and convicted in a secret military tribunal. They have all been sentenced to death by firing squad. The offending generals and their conspirators are currently being held at an unknown location. The military personnel which first made the story public has been demoted and sent to the front lines in Iraq.
I can't imagine that the US Military would allow a story like that to run. This would be like showing the enemy your weak spots. Just on the basis of national security the story would not be run. So what could be the rationale behind this recent disclosure? I wonder?

Mparent posted this article from a pay site - it is a great summary:

Barksdale Missile Number Six: The Stolen Nuclear Weapon

Chuck Simpson at AboveTopSecret.com has an analysis of the Barksdale nuke incident in which he speculates that, "Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon." It's a long read, but he systematically outlines what amounts to an impossible mistake.
---
posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:09 PM

Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon.

ATS Premium Article by Chuck Simpson

Some History

Barksdale Missile Number Six deserves far more public attention than it's received to date. Missile Number Six is potentially the major story of at least this year.

Until 1968 under the Airborne Alert Program, informally called Operation Chrome Dome, the Air Force routinely kept about a dozen strategic bombers with nuclear weapons flying at all times.

One predictable result was crashes and incidents. In 1968 the Department of Defense published a list of 13 serious nuclear weapons accidents that occurred between 1950 and 1968. In 1980 the list was revised to include 32 incidents through that year.

Notably, the Pentagon has not acknowledged any accidents since 1980. This alone highlights the importance the Pentagon is placing on the recent transportation of nuclear weapons from North Dakota to Louisiana.

Through 1968, several reported incidents involved plane crashes or malfunctions, beginning with the crash of a B-29 near Fairfield, California in August 1950. The resulting blast was felt 30 miles away.

In July 1950 a B-50 crashed near Lebanon, Ohio. The high-explosive trigger for the nuclear weapon detonated on impact. The blast was felt over 25 miles away.

In May 1957 a nuclear weapon fell from the bomb bay of a B-36 near Albuquerque, New Mexico. Parachutes malfunctioned and the weapon was destroyed on impact.

In October 1957 near Homestead, Florida a B-47 crashed. The nuclear weapon was burned.

In March 1958 a B-47 accidentally dropped a nuclear weapon near Florence, South Carolina. The high-explosive trigger detonated on impact.

In November 1958 a B-47 crashed near Abilene, Texas. The trigger of the nuclear weapon exploded upon impact.

In July 1959 a C-124 crashed near Bossier City, Louisiana. Both plane and nuclear weapon were destroyed.

In October 1959 a B-52 with two nuclear weapons was involved in a mid-air collision near Hardinsburg, Kentucky. One weapon partially burned.

In January 1961 a B-52 broke apart in mid-air near Goldsboro, North Carolina. Two nuclear weapons were released. The parachute on one weapon malfunctioned, and contamination was spread over a wide area. The uranium core was never recovered. Daniel Ellsberg reported that detonation was a very real risk because five of six safety devices failed.

In that month near Monticello, Idaho a B-52 carrying nuclear weapons exploded in mid-air. No information was made available as to the weapons.

In March 1961 a B-52 with two nuclear weapons crashed near Yuba City, California.

In January 1964 a B-52 carrying two nuclear weapons crashed near Cumberland, Maryland.

In January 1966 a B-52 carrying four hydrogen bombs crashed after a mid-air collision near Palomares, Spain. Two weapons exploded on impact, with resulting plutonium contamination. A months-long program was undertaken to locate and extract the other two weapons from the ocean. Major policy changes were taken under consideration.

In January 1968 a B-52 carrying four hydrogen weapons crashed and burned near Thule AFB in Greenland. Explosives in one bomb detonated, spreading plutonium contamination. Apparently, the other three weapons have never been accounted for.

Following large public protests Denmark, which owns Greenland and prohibits nuclear weapons on or over its territory, filed a strong protest. A few days later the Secretary of Defense ordered the removal of nuclear weapons from planes. After that order was issued, all aircraft armed with nuclear weapons were grounded but kept in a constant state of alert.

In 1991 by Presidential order, nuclear weapons were removed from all aircraft. Bomber nuclear ground alerts, during which nuclear weapons are loaded onto bombers during test and training exercises, were halted. After that time, all nuclear weapons to be delivered by plane were permanently maintained in secure storage facilities.

August 30, 2007

All of which makes the transport of nuclear weapons in combat position on a combat plane so newsworthy.

On August 30, for the first time since 1968, nuclear warheads in combat position were carried by an American bomber. Numerous international treaty provisions were violated in the process.

That Thursday, a B-52H Stratofortress flew from Minot AFB in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana while carrying twelve cruise missiles. Either five or six of those missiles were armed with nuclear warheads.

Cruise Missiles

The missiles on the B-52 were AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile units, specifically designed to be launched from wing pods of B-52H planes.

A total of 460 units were manufactured by Raytheon. A total of 394 units are currently maintained by the Air Force. Apparently, 38 are to be modernized and upgraded in Fiscal Year 2008 and the other 356 are to be decommissioned pursuant to the 2002 Moscow treaty.

Raytheon has publicly announced the AGM-129 missiles are to be modified to accomplish a "classified cruise missile mission". This has widely been interpreted to mean conversion to bunker-busters, most likely for use in Iran. This widely accepted explanation is being used to explain why armed cruise missiles are being flown in American airspace.

Nuclear Warheads

The AGM-129 was specifically designed to deliver a W-80 nuclear warhead. The W-80 weapon has a variable yield capability, of 5 to 150 kilotons. For comparison purposes, the bomb used on Hiroshima was 13 to 15 kilotons, or equivalent to 13,000 to 15,000 tons of TNT explosive.

News Stories and Flawed Explanations

The story of the B-52 flight was first reported by Army Times, owned by Gannett, on Wednesday September 5. Gannett relied on information provided by "anonymous officers". The story was picked up by Yahoo Wednesday morning, published by USA Today and The Washington Pos, and then quickly spread.

In response, the Pentagon quickly spread an official explanation.

The Air Force admitted to an inadvertent error: The intent was to transport ACMs without weapons. According to military officers, the nuclear warheads should have been removed before the missiles were mounted on the pylons under the wings of the bomber.

In the words of the Pentagon:

"There was an error which occurred during a regularly scheduled transfer of weapons between two bases. The weapons were safe and remained in Air Force control and custody at all times."

For almost the first time in the history of the nation, the military has publicly and promptly admitted it "made a mistake". This in itself is truly astounding.

To reinforce the military's claim that a mistake was made, a system-wide stand-down was ordered for September 14.

That official explanation was quickly explained away. The mistake was made intentionally, so a "deliberate leak" of a secret operation could occur.

The CIA and the Office of Counter-Terrorism in the State Department explained that Barksdale AFB is a "jumping off point" for re-supply of the Middle East.

The "deliberate leak" was intended to serve as a veiled warning to Iran. This deliberately misleading explanation is evidently intended to lead the public or Iran or both to logically conclude the missiles are bound for Iran.

Bluntly, State and the CIA converted a whistleblower leak by true American patriots into a deliberate leak by official Washington, to scare Iran.

By this means Washington has led the public to forget or overlook the real issue.

To begin, the multiple official explanations reek to high heaven. They collectively read suspiciously like flimsy cover stories concocted in hasty desperation. And no amount of pretty lipstick will be able to make the official explanations pretty.

Transportation Violations

More conflicting explanations followed. These missiles are part of a group scheduled to be decommissioned. This would explain why they were shipped out of North Dakota.

But the missiles were not transported on their way to decommissioning. Missiles are normally decommissioned at Davis-Monthan AFB at Tucson. Nuclear weapons are decommissioned at the Department of Energy's Pantex facility near Amarillo, Texas, accessed through Kirkland AFB in New Mexico.

And military policy requires minimization of the number of flights made with nuclear weapons aboard. So the weapons should not have been mounted on the missiles, flown to Louisiana, un-mounted and flown to New Mexico.

The mode of transportation is also a major issue not defused by official explanations. Per standard operating procedures, or SOPs, both missiles and nuclear warheads are transported primarily by air, in specially modified C-130s or C-17s. Under no peacetime circumstances do military SOPs allow transport of nuclear weapons mounted in cruise missiles mounted in combat positions on combat planes.

Department of Defense Directive Number 4540.5, issued on February 4, 1998, regulates logistic transportation of nuclear weapons.

By delegation of Commanders of Combatant Commands, movement of nuclear weapons must be approved by commanders of major service commands.

Commanders of Combat Commands or service component commanders must evaluate, authorize and approve transport modes and movement routes for nuclear weapons in their custody.

The Air Force is required to maintain a Prime Nuclear Airlift Force capability to conduct the logistic transport of nuclear weapons.

Under SOPs, combat planes with combat-ready nuclear weapons can only be flown on the authority of the Commander in Chief, the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the National Military Command Authority.

All of these transportation regulations were flagrantly violated on August 30.

Handling Violations

Violations of regulations concerning handling of the nuclear weapons in North Dakota are worse.

A sophisticated computerized tracking system is used for nuclear weapons. Multiple sign-offs are required to remove the weapons from their storage bunkers.

The AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile was designed to carry nuclear weapons. No non-nuclear warhead is available for this missile. So the only possible error could have been loading nuclear warheads on the missiles instead of practice dummies.

The practice warheads have standard blue and yellow signs declaring "Inert, non-nuclear". The nuclear warheads have at least three distinctive red warning signs. This error is therefore highly improbable, absent tampering with signage.

Nuclear weapons are transported from the storage bunker to the aircraft in a caravan that routinely includes vehicles with machine guns front and rear and guards with M-16s. All steps in the process are done under the watchful eyes of armed military police.

Rules require that at least two people jointly control every step of the process. If one person loses sight of the other, both are forced to the ground face-down and temporarily "placed under arrest" by observant security forces. All progress stops until inspections are made to assure the weapons weren't tampered with.

All nuclear weapons are connected to sophisticated alarm systems to prevent removal or tampering. They could only be removed from the storage bunker by turning the alarm off. And the squad commander clearly would not have authority to turn off the alarm.

The Impossible Mistake

Bluntly, the mistake of loading nuclear weapons on a combat aircraft in combat-ready position is simply not possible to make. Safeguards are far too stringent and far too many people would be involved. Particularly given that the mounting was in violation of policy that's been in place without exception for almost 40 years.

No discipline is expected to be meted out. The New York Times tried to imply the commanding general had been fired. Actually, the squad commander in charge of munitions crews at Minot was "relieved of duty pending an investigation". He has not been removed from his position or disciplined. The crews involved have been "temporarily decertified pending corrective actions or additional training" but have not been disciplined. No mention has been made of the wing commander.

Note carefully: These actions amount to nothing at all. The wing and squad commanders are still in place and the crews can easily be re-certified.

Successful Confusion

Washington's efforts to confuse the public have been successful. Attention has shifted from the crucial issue.

This news has already become non-news. The August 14 stand-down will momentarily become news, followed by announcements of more stringent restrictions, improved safeguards and additional training. The public always has been and always will be safe.

One of the major issues will be avoided:

Someone in an irregular chain of Air Force command authorized loading and transport of nuclear weapons.

And that would never have been done without a reason. Given the magnitude of regulatory violations involved, the reason must be extremely important.

The paramount issue will be avoided, if necessary with repetition of the reassurance that the Air Force was in control at all times. The weapons were only missing during the 3.5-hour flight.

At Barksdale, the missiles were considered to be unarmed items headed for modernization or the scrap heap, and of no particular importance. They were left unguarded for almost ten hours.

According to one report, almost ten hours were required for airmen at Minot AFB to convince superiors that the nuclear weapons had disappeared. According to information provided to Congress, this time lapsed before airmen at Barksdale "noticed" the weapons were present. News reports will continue to overlook this fact also.

Even here the focus is on time. The number of missiles and warheads issue was overlooked.

Early news reports spoke of five nuclear warheads loaded onto the bomber. Apparently, this information was provided from Barksdale.

That number was later updated to six weapons missing from Minot, apparently based on anonymous tips provided to Military Times by people at Minot. This information has also been forgotten.

Conclusion

Six nuclear weapons disappeared from Minot AFB in North Dakota.

Five nuclear weapons were discovered at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.

Which leads to my chilling conclusion:

Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon.

What next?

The answer has been provided several times, most recently by CIA Director and General Michael Hayden. On September 7, dressed in full military uniform, Hayden told assembled members of the Council of Foreign Relations:

"Our analysts assess with high confidence that al-Qaida's central leadership is planning high-impact plots against the U. S. homeland."

"We assess with high confidence that al-Qaida is focusing on targets that would produce mass casualties, dramatic destruction and significant aftershocks."

An eye for an eye. Use of nukes will justify use of nukes. A perfect excuse to wage nuclear war against Iran.

I suspect Hayden is absolutely correct, except for his mistaken identification of the "central leadership" that is planning detonation of a nuclear weapon on American soil.

Chuck Simpson's blog: The Geronimo Manifesto

'Solid Curtain' And 'Citadel Shield 2007' Military Drills
Raise Spectre Of Imminent False Flag Provocation And Attack On Iran
By Webster G. Tarpley
9-13-7

WASHINGTON, DC -- US military bases in the continental United States (CONUS) will go on special lockdown between September 17 and September 21 under the auspices of Solid Curtain-Citadel Shield '07, a reliable source reported today. Under these exercises, US installations will institute enhanced anti-terror force protection measures, with increased security at all gates. The increased security was so elaborate that base personnel were being warned to expect significant delays at all base entrances.

According to William Arkin's 2005 directory of military code names, Solid Curtain is a US Navy Fleet Forces Command anti-terrorism/force protection exercise. In Solid Curtain '03, Arkin reports, the drill scenario involved 15 simultaneous attacks across the country including the Corpus Christi naval air station, the Ingleside naval station, local shipyards, and other targets of attack in the coastal bend of south Texas. In earlier versions of Solid Curtain, the Newport Rhode Island naval station was featured in the scenario.

Smaller local news outlets near US bases have begun to report on these drills. One such account can be found in the Ridgecrest, California Daily Independent, site of the Sierra Sands Naval Air Weapons Station. (see http://ridgecrestca.com/articles/2007/09/13/news/news02.txt)

Other reports concerned the Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, (see http://www.wmbb.com/gulfcoastwest/mbb/news.apx.-content-articles-
MBB-2007-09-13-0004.html), and the Goose Creek Naval Weapons station near Charleston, South Carolina (see

http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/sep/12/briefly15607/).

No further details concerning Citadel Shield could be ascertained.

These drills cause acute concern because they occur before the backdrop of widely reported preparations by the Cheney clique to manufacture a new 9/11 and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin incident to be used as a pretext for a US sneak attack on Iran, with an included option for martial law inside the United States.

On Friday, September 14, the US Air Force has instituted a stand-down for the alleged purpose of reviewing procedures after a B-52 transported six nuclear-armed cruise missiles from Minot AFB North Dakota to Barksdale AFB Louisiana. Intelligence community sources have pointed to the fact that Barksdale is the jumping off point for US air assets moving to the Persian Gulf, suggesting that US nuclear weapons are being readied for a strike on Iran. Another option might well be that one or more of the cruise missiles was destined for use in a false flag attack on an American city, a scenario alluded to by Cheney on April 15 in an interview on CBS New Face the Nation.

Solid Curtain and Citadel Shield will be taking place within the same general time frame as Vigilant Shield '08, scheduled to be held October 15-20, 2007, with a scenario that calls for the detonation of three radiological dispersal devices within the purview of USNORTHCOM (continental US) and the US Pacific Command. Vigilant Shield is supposed to be centered in Oregon, Arizona, and Guam. The drill is slated to include multiple homeland defense, critical infrastructure protection, and aerospace events. Linked to Vigilant Shield is another drill called National Level Exercise 1-08. In addition to the US, Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom are scheduled to take part. Concurrent with these drills is TOPOFF 4 (Top Officials 4), the main yearly terrorism preparedness exercise sponsored by the Department of Homeland Security. The boss of this agency, Michael Chertoff, announced earlier in the summer that he had a "gut feeling" that a terror attack on the US was about to occur. This is another drill that lends itself to going live.

Also relevant to these events is Noble Resolve '07, a drill organized by the Joint Task Force Command (JTFCOM), Northern Command (NORTHCOM), J9 Joint Innovation and Experimentation Directorate, FEMA's command bunker, the Department of Homeland Security, and Virginia police. According to false flag drill expert D.L. Abrahamson, Noble Resolve '07 represents a four-day marathon of "simulated" terror attacks across the US and Europe, including a simulated detonation of a "loose" ten-kiloton nuclear weapon Virginia harbor, smuggled in by a "foreign nation." Drills like these, if flipped live, would give Cheney the pretext to put the entire world on a catastrophic slide towards general war.

Recent terror events, such as London July 7, 2005, have occurred when drills and exercises went live or were flipped live by military and intelligence factions supporting the War of Civilizations, which such actions are meant to stoke. Most significantly, the original 9/11 coup d'etat by these same aggressive US military and intelligence factions was preceded and accompanied by installation security clampdowns of the type now imminent at the military bases in the Washington DC area and elsewhere. These exercises can be summed up as follows:

BASE ISOLATION AND COUP PREPRATION

Forts Hamilton, Meade (NSA), Belvoir, Ritchie, Myer, and McNair

Starting August 15, 2001, Army limits public access to bases near Washington DC, supposedly as part of nationwide security clampdown because of terrorist threat.

Fort Meyer, VA, Fort McNair, DC, 3rd US Infantry

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=
a090501fullaccesscontrol#a090501fullaccesscontrol

September 5, 2001: US Army bases near Washington DC implement "full access control." Fort McNair is HQ, Army Military District of Washington DC

Fort Meyer, Virginia

"Force protection exercise" scheduled for week after 9/11

Fort Belvoir, Virginia

On September 11, 2001: second Tuesday of "garrison control exercise," allegedly to "test the security at the base in case of a terrorist attack."

Persons of good will in the United States must demand that elected representatives and presidential candidates act to expose, denounce, and shut down these reckless and highly dangerous drills. Countries outside of the US must demand explanations from the US Embassy as to whether the US is indeed preparing a nuclear aggression against Iran, under the cover of a false flag war provocation. Countries not wishing to be drawn into the abyss of such a catastrophe must take steps now to assert their national independence.

naval base lockdowns should be a stand alone post under "false flags" - VIMP

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

..i agree, this is VERY IMPORTANT; be prepared to run for the hills!!

..today's the day, let's all pray that it's not our last!

..the vipers aren't that original when it comes to tried and true methods of oppression..

The Trillion Dollar Lie - The Holocaust: The Force Behind the Lie, the Cause of the Lie and the PRINCE OF DECEIT: THE ANTICHRIST

..AND THEY WERE LIARS FROM THE BEGINNING!

Phoenix Journals
http://fourwinds10.com/

..just don't ask me about spaceships, but note that AkhenATUN [ATEN, ATON] was the father of Tutankhamun [Tutankhatun]. They both tried unsuccessfully to change the religion from polytheism, mostly Amun-Ra (Amen anyone?) to Atun. After their deaths, the priests always reverted to Amun. [mammon]

..it is also the strongest theory out of several imho, that the COPPER SCROLL describing vast wealth hidden, was the treasure of Akhenatun passed on to the similarly monotheistic Hebrews [Essenes], and did not describe where the treasures of the first and second Temples of Solomon WERE HIDDEN [Templar excavations!]. Yet some of the gold may have been the same.

http://www.unknowncountry.com/storecatalog/mystery-of-the-copper-scroll-...

..so what do you think, good guys, bad, both or bullsh*t?