I see on Wikipedia there's been attempts to smear Ritter. For example, it reads "According to an anonymous source...Ritter was arrested allegedly for arranging over the internet to meet with an undercover police officer who was posing as an underage girl"

Does that mean anyone can anonymously contact Wikipedia and say that some Zionist (like Richard Perle) was arrested for attempting to arrange to meet underage boys, and that will go on Wikipedia?

Of course not. Wikipedia seems to be controlled by Jews. Scott Ritter has been smeared and slandered by Zionists because of what he wrote about the Israeli lobby. It seems that anyone who stands up to the Zionists receives a character assassination.

That's why I take accusations like that with a grain of salt.

I do, however, remember reading a comment from someone who did not appear to have links to Zionists (I just can't remember who) that Ritter's character is questionable.

Nevertheless, like I said, I don't know anything about it. What I do know is that the US invaded Iraq (for israel) based on lies and intends to do the same to Iran.

This much is quite obvious.

It would seem it may not be just a case of Zionist smear tactics. The issue is one of possible blackmail. If his case was sealed then why was it sealed? Was it in return for him diluting the truth he tells?

The details of the Ritter case are linked here with many news sources:

ritter

see what it says about Richard Perle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle

more scandals

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Boesky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Milken