Forget Nukes!! Russia Flexes its Muscles


Enter: The Vacuum Bomb, a Fuel-Air bomb:

"A device consisting of a container of fuel and two explosive charges; the first charge bursts open the fuel container at a predetermined height and spreads the fuel in a cloud that mixes with atmospheric oxygen; the second charge detonates the cloud which creates an enormous blast wave and incinerates whatever is below"

The Russian military says it has successfully tested the "Father of all bombs," a powerful thermobaric device that is said to be the world's most powerful non-nuclear weapon.

"It is environmentally friendly, compared to a nuclear bomb, and it will enable us to ensure national security and at the same time stand up to international terrorism in any part of the globe and in any situation," says Alexander Rukshin, deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. He compares the power of the device to that of a nuclear weapon.

..So they're going to use it on "TERRORISTS"?
Sounds more like GLOBAL INSECURITY!

BBC News explains that these "weapons create a huge pressure wave which effectively sucks the air out of the lungs of anyone unfortunate enough to be within range." The Discovery Channel looks at the utility of these bombs in tight spaces or heavily populated areas.

The USA has the "Mother of all Bombs,"
which www.GlobalSecurity.org says WEIGHS 21,000 pounds and packs a BiG punch. Add that to Russia's SS-18 Satan - 10 warhead ICBM's that fly 16,000 Kilometers at Mach speed, each of the 10 MIRVs (multiple re-entry vehicle) packs up to 1 megaton punch (2,000,000 pounds); and they have thousands. Or was that the SS-27 Topol M (sic) i digress..

Now there's NO DETERRENT to using mega-bombs! Unless of course you consider the life force that was in the crater!

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Perhaps Russia broadcast this item as a message to Bush: “If go borderline nuke, we will too.”

We’ve had thermobaric bombs for decades. They were used in Vietnam to destroy large numbers of trees (and innocent personnel). The Bush regime can make them as powerful as it likes.

Russia has the most powerful nuclear weapons on earth in terms of megaton yield--but what about the delivery systems? Accuracy beats firepower every time.

Anyway I’m glad that Russia is keeping up. It’s one more problem for our zio-masters’ plans.

Now let’s see some of those goodies loaded onto Iranian aircraft.

thx1138 | Wed, 2007-09-12 18:30

Does anyone actually believe Russia is independent of Zionist-Talmudic influence?

I, for one, believe it's two arms of the same body, much like the republicans and democrats, simply on a larger scale.

How in the world could the Russian government be free from so-called jewish influence, when it was they (so called Jews), who dominated the Russian peoples via the Bolshevik movements?

I like to have hope that Russia is not a puppet of the Zionist', but I can't bring myself to swallow that camel in whole.

Peacetroll | Wed, 2007-09-12 18:48

More details can be found on https://china.org.cn

Russia has developed a new type of bomb, also known as fuel-air bomb, which was claimed as the most powerful non-nuclear bomb, a senior officer said in a TV interview on Tuesday.

"The results of tests of the aviation explosive device have shown that it is comparable with nuclear weapons in its efficiency and potential," Alexander Rukshin, a deputy chief of the Russian armed forces staff, said on Channel One television.

By spraying a special burnable material, the bomb will make great shockwave and high temperature, which is more destructive than TNT, Rukshin said.

Russia has nicknamed the new bomb "Father of All Bombs," saying it is four times powerful than the US vacuum bomb, the "Mother of All Bombs," Channel One said.

The Russian bomb carries less explosive material than the US one and the temperature in the epicenter of the blast is twice as high. Besides, the Russian bomb's burst area is 300 meters, broader than the US ranger of 150 meters, Channel One said.

(Xinhua News Agency September 12, 2007)

The Great Revealer | Wed, 2007-09-12 20:01

and guess who is delighting on it?! Bankers will do well if we continue like this. Biggest terrorist are not groups like Qaida and IRA etc but big powers that have veto in UNSC. They are also biggest proliferates of weapons sales aimed at tensions and wars wherever possible. UN is satanic organization and its top demons are five veto members. We have to go back to matrices and get rid of this whole financial way of trading. Something is wrong with our way of electing presidents and senators. Anyone showing up with lots of money in campaign is rotten Zionist potato and that should be enough for you not to vote for him/her. Silent Ghandi type rebellion: refuse to vote and refuse to pay banks, yes it will be hard at first but eventually they will crack up and leave.

"Let there be Light!"

Traveller | Wed, 2007-09-12 20:10

These "Mother/Father Of All Bombs" are tactically useless.

They are a bitch to drop. They are a bitch to guide and they are only marginally effective against surface targets.

It is a cover for the seismic event that follows a tactical nuke.

They used tactical nukes in Afghanistan on the tunnel systems.

Birds were found dead all over the areas where bombing took place in Afghanistan. The birds appeared untouched. Also, there was a spate of Afghani's showing signs of radiation sickness including bleeding from the rectum and mouth and stomach where the sensitive bowel lining is affected by radiation.

Brendon OConnell | Wed, 2007-09-12 20:11

Whether or not such bombs will be covers for using tactical nuclear weapons it will work both ways: The US will use them against Iran and Iran will retaliate using modern Russian armament against US interests in the region: The new US embassy in the Green Zone would be a perfect target to try out the new toy!

The timing of the Russian testing makes it a warning to the US. The same goes for the Chinese successful destruction of one of their own orbiting communications satellites. In a war situation they will aim for US satellites no doubt!

The US should also remember the sophisticated modern armament, which is used by Iran. That goes for missiles for protection against air as well as naval attacks.

The fact that the US spends 10 times as much on "defense" as Russia does not provide a meaningful picture of their respective military capabilities as the US under Bush has degenerated into a complete Kleptocracy.

Made Brani | Thu, 2007-09-13 00:12

Here is a primer of sorts on some of the nuclear weapons that were available in the late 80s, which may be almost state of the art since their development was deemphasized after the demise of the Soviet Union.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964414,00.html

Bill Cooper used to talk about a bunker buster he called "Excalibur" It was six nuclear weapons that were arrayed with one on each four sides and one on top, clustered around the main bomb. They theory was that all five surrounding nukes were exploded simultaneously and momentarily before the main charge. It had the effect of creating a wall around the main nuke and directing it's full force downward, enabling it to penetrate very deep, I think it was like 3000 meters. I can't find anything on the web on it, but I do remember it.

THX: You are 100% to question the viability of nuclear missiles. There have only been a couple of missile launches of nuclear warheads that resulted in detonation, and those could have been faked. There is a serious question as to whether nukes can be successfully placed with missiles. The Soviets allegedly had a lot of "Missiles" that were made of wood and were for show only.

We do know that they can be dropped from planes, and fired from artillery shells. Thus the new emphasis on the old Bomber runs.

Claymoremind | Thu, 2007-09-13 01:00

“Does anyone actually believe Russia is independent of Zionist-Talmudic influence?”

No, I do not believe it. Jewish oligarchs were dethroned, but many of them remain in Russia.

If Russia has a debt-based currency, like Europe and North America have, then they are hooked into the zio-system whether they like it or not.

If Russia were truly free of Zionist-Talmudic influence, Russia would smash israel. Instead, Russia is part of the “quartet” that helps sustain the Palestinian genocide.

However…

I also believe that Russia’s interests as a whole put Russia in semi-competition with zio-stan (i.e. Europe and the Americas). Russia has cut many Jewish oil companies (such as Exxon-Mobil) out of oil deals, preferring to develop oil fields itself.

Also, whenever our Jewish masters demand greater sanctions against Iran, it is usually Russia that balks.

The way I see it, Russia cooperates with the Evil Ones, but is not completely owned by them.

I’ve been in Russia. The average person there (today) blames Jews for a lot of the world’s problems.

thx1138 | Thu, 2007-09-13 02:17

..yah, my Ukrainian friend has some pretty anti-shamitic family members, even though he is Maronite.. He told me a long time ago that "the Jews are not a race, they are a culture" [of deceit]

..just think about it, it's like saying the CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS AND BUDDISTS ARE A RACE!! LOL

..the deceit within these devils knows no bounds..

..just look at how many inventions that are devised to KILL US, what a complete waste of energy; sucked right into shaitan's black hole..

Grim Reaper | Thu, 2007-09-13 06:57

How can China have ANYTHING over the United States when it's ENTIRE economy is TOTALLY dependent on selling trinkets to fat Americans at WallMart?

Dont you plebs get it?

Brendon OConnell | Thu, 2007-09-13 11:55

..they'll just make different junk, and sell it to someone else..

..the only reason we get all the cheap junk is because of our CORPORATE GREED; you get what you pay for!

..they might even make good stuff, like the MUCH MORE EFFICIENT CARS that they already are; almost and soon to be higher mileage than Japanese!

..plus they are yet another country that can cause armageddon for us all..

Grim Reaper | Thu, 2007-09-13 12:29

Thanks for expounding Thx1138.

I too do not know if and/or how much influence zionist play on the USSR, but we do know the banking system lords over them as well, therefore the international so-called Jew must have a certain level of sway. The golden question is; how much?!

"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" Voltaire
______________________________
"Hey you,... White House,..charade you are!" Pink Floyd

Peacetroll | Thu, 2007-09-13 23:46

True, the Chinese economy has benefited from US investments in China to produce products cheaper for the US market.

However, this benefit cannot be sustained in the long term if the US cannot get it house in order.

What does the US export apart from jobs? Airplanes, films, and US Dollar bills! The latter lose value every day.

It may appear that it is not in China's best interest to dump USD, but the US economy is going to collapse anyway, and China will have to find new markets for its consumer goods.

It will be helped by the same people who exported US manufacturing jobs, they have stakes in the Chinese companies, and they want to survive with or without the US consumer.

Even Karl Marx would blush to realize that capitalists would surpass his worst imagination.

Made Brani | Fri, 2007-09-14 03:10

..stalin would cackle with glee to know that the capitalists are as bad as he!

..when systems or ideologies are FORCED upon the people, and we are brainwashed to boot, then they are meaningless dictatorships; call them what you will, it's still SLAVERY.

Grim Reaper | Fri, 2007-09-14 10:27

China does not "benefit" from U.S investment. China IS U.S investment.

The U.S economy has been COMPLETELTY unsustainable for more than 30 years.

Whats new today?

In the end the "system" goes down and after the chaos and the totalitarian state a "new" system will be in place.

All that is happening right now is contracts are being torn up.

In the U.S the wheat will still be in the fields, the iron ore in the ground and the 90,000 ton Aircraft Carriers roaming the great oceans crushing ALL who oppose Zionist/Globalist domination.

All theater.

NO ONE stands alone on this one.

One goes down...ALL go down.

As is the plan.

Brendon OConnell | Fri, 2007-09-14 17:06

I interpret your comment to mean that nothing has changed, and nothing will change. We’ll just have more wars and continue as before. (If I misinterpret you, please correct me.)

It’s true that debt-based finance is mathematically unsustainable. There is only so much debt that mankind can handle before the game crashes.

However, I believe the coming crash will be so huge that the survivors will not simply continue as before. They will be forced to rethink money.

There are already many alternative currencies in Europe and the USA. More and more of them appear every day. They are independent of the current banking system, yet they dovetail with it. They work because they are not debt-based currency. They are real money.

This simple change is a black and white difference. Should it be adopted all over the world, we will have prosperity.

This is not faith. It is mathematics. A better world is possible through just a few smple changes (i.e. monetary reform).

I do agree with you that when the USA crashes, China will too. The international banking and finance system is completely intertwined.

thx1138 | Fri, 2007-09-14 18:06

We have been under a scientifically crafted indoctrination system for at least the last 60+ years. Of course it has been going on for a lot longer but it's modern day incarnation is it's most powerful.

The people running the show at the managerial level are "true believers". They are not cackling over the dead bodies. They believe heart and soul that the NWO, with the Jew as it's political, intellectual and religious Elite, is the natural order. It is nothing personal.

They are not stupid. This has been planned for.

They will instigate chaos and take over the "soloution" and "morph" themselves into saviour rather than oppressor.

There is an old Jewish joke where the son goes to his father to borrow $20. He asks for $100 instead and the father is shocked. The son backs down after some theatrical arm waving and the father sighs with relief when he only has to give out $20 which is what the son wanted in the first place.

Now that they have scared us all to death they will roll out the goodies like "free energy" etc...and we will all be happy with our hydrogen cars. They will get rid of Talmudic Judaism and the worst of it's uncouth adherents and replace it with a "New Age" Kabbahla lite with Maddonna at it's head (for the Goy) and we will all be lulled back to sleep.

They have been waiting 2500 years.

Take off the worst of the theater we have been inundated with and the average pleb will snooze right on back to sleep before round 2501.

Brendon OConnell | Wed, 2007-09-19 16:47

Thanks for your comments.

You could be right. There is no logical basis for automatically presuming that some kind of "golden age" will rise from the ashes.

After all, when the Roman Empire collapsed (first the western one, then later the eastern Byzantine one) Europe fell into the "Dark Ages."

I do, however, believe there is a logical (mathematical) reason to posit that there will indeed be a collapse. The banks are all linked. And look at what happened when the subprime housing bubble popped. Greenspan the hero became a villain. If we have a major collapse, the masses might suddenly see the overall Fed as a villain (which it is).

Then again, the masses might not wake up. If there is a crash, mankind could go either way afterward.

It's like UFOs. (Huh?) I mean, it seems that with zillions of planets out there, life probably exists on many of them. However, to have a TRULY open mind, we must also allow for the possibility that the odds of the right conditions for life are so remote (zillions to one) that earth is the only planet that has life.

If you truly look at the math, either extreme is logically possible. (Notice I make no claims about what is probable.)

The future looks bleak, but I don't think it's logical to presume that things absolutely will be as bad as they are now.

Maybe they will be. Maybe they won't. I don't ask for faith or optimism. I just think we should maintain an open mind. If we truly feel in our hearts that "it's impossible," then it becomes "impossible."

"We will never reach the stars as long as we consider them to be 'above us'." -- Nietzsche

I know that sounds like sugar-coated nonsense, but I find it logical.

Thanks again for writing.

thx1138 | Wed, 2007-09-19 17:14

By the way, I like your Jewish joke.

Here’s another.

A Jewish father is speaking to his son.

FATHER: What do you want to be when you grown up?

SON: An investor.

FATHER: Okay, if I gave you ten dollars, how would you invest it?

SON: I’d go to the gas station and change it into two five dollars bills, then to the liquor store and change those bills into ten ones, then to the department store and change them into a thousand pennies. Then I’d go to a bank, change the thousand pennies into a ten-dollar bill, and start the entire process again.

FATHER: How do you expect to make money that way?

SON: Because somewhere along the line, some Goy son-of-a-bitch will make a mistake counting out my change, and I won’t !

++++++++

One more joke…

A teacher told her grade school children, “I’ll give a dollar to any one of you who can name a good choice for the greatest man in history.”

The students were silent. Then little Aaron raised his hand and said, “Abe Lincoln.”

The teacher gave him the dollar and asked, “What made you choose Lincoln?”

The little Jew boy said, “Actually the greatest man in history is Ariel Sharon, but business is business.”

thx1138 | Wed, 2007-09-19 17:34

ROFL....:-D

Especially the Abe Lincoln one.

We do need a laugh.

Brendon OConnell | Wed, 2007-09-19 18:19

unclesam wakeup

Go, Rep. Kaptur!

Tell Wall Street to Go To Hell!!!

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator