THE ZIONIST AND THEIR AGENTS SEEK TO CONTROL THE ACADEMIC CLASSROOM: BY FAHIM A. KNIGHT
THE AFRICAN CENTERED MOVEMENT: CRITIQUE OF DR LEFKOWITZ 'NOT OUT OF
AFRICA'" by FAHIM A. KNIGHT
I purchased a book titled, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA", authored by Mary Leftkowitz thus, prior to me purchasing this book, I heard about some of the controversy, which was centered on this book. I as an African living in America have a agreat deal of respect and appreciation for the African Centered movement and its scholars,
but before I rendered an opinion or critique of this book, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" it was only intelligent that I read the book objectively in order to examine the credibility of the scholarship.
In assessing the "Foreword" and "Introduction" section of the book,
it was clear that this research was aimed at being critical of the African Centered movement, which critical analysis is not all together a negative thing and I would be the first to agree that all leaders, organizations, movements, scholarship, etc., should be subject to critical evaluation.
There are many Africans in America that do not fully embrace, agree nor accept all the intellectual contentions espoused by the African
Centered Movement. But a large segment of the Africans in America do respect the African Centered scholars' efforts to rescue African history from white definition and interpretation.
Thus, this book, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" seeks to discredit African Centered scholarship as being emotional and lacking the scientific and empirical methodology required under the guidelines for those such as historians and social scientist who write scholarly studies.
Lefkowitz accuses the African Centered movement of being politically motivated, as opposed to being treated as an intellectual school of thought whose mission is research, she never clarified what she meant by describing the African Centered movement as being
politically motivated. However, I am of the opinion, that all scholarship and social ideals in America are somewhat politically inspired; thus, so why make the African Centered scholars appear as of committing an unpardonable sin.
Lefkowitz perhaps was challenging black people's right to self-determination of ideals and we had no right to develop independent thoughts without white scholars' approval.
This book gave the impression of perhaps having a Zionist Jewish
agenda, no different than the Anti Defamation League (ADL) or the Simon
Wiesenthal Center type propaganda. I consider, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" as being reactionary scholarship with a political objective of discrediting the contributions black people made on the stage of human history.
In the "Foreword and "Introduction" Lefkowitz is attempting to incite university officials and administrators, as well as politicians to think about formulating policy and is covertly challenging the concept of academic freedom, which is granted to professors, scholars and academicians that have met the stringent requirements to be designated as a tenure professor.
This proposed new policy will allow universities and colleges the latitude to structure professors contracts, specifically tenure professors by granting the university the power and authority to terminate and rescind a tenure and non-tenure professor's contract,if he/she expresses theories and/or academic concepts deemed to be
controversial or goes against the popular view.
The professors' tenure status and academic freedom clauses no longer
will able to protect the employment status of a professor that goes
against the status quo. These reactionary theories were aimed at
destroying the First Amendment Right and controlling disagreeable
speech, as well as the concept of Academic Freedom.
But what led Zionist controlled University officials and politicians to this desperate measure was a speech delivered by Minister Khallid Abdul
Muhammad of the Nation of Islam on November 29, 1993, on the campus of Kean College in New Jersey, titled, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews". Whites and Zionist Jews denounced and repudiated Muhammad's controversial speech as being racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, etc., they felt Muhammad's speech on the college campus had gone to far and the Zionist denounce the Kean College officials for allowing this radical spokes person on the campus. Although, the university environment is suppose to be a place where ideals are shared and debated and has never been a place comfortable
with censorship. The United States Congress even drew up a resolution censoring and repudiating Dr. Khallid Abdul Muhammad.
Lefkowitz cited Dr. Leonard Jeffries Empire State College speech as being academic irresponsible in 1991, but she did not mention her Jewish colleague Michael Levin who is also along with Dr. Jefferies on the faculty of City College and/or condemn him (Levin) for his racist and anti-black perspectives. I guess in her mind she found Dr. Levin's views acceptable and they met the requirements suitable for an academic environment.
In Lefkowitz conclusion it is clear that she desires to curtail and
control outside controversial speakers from having access to young fashionable and impressionable black minds on college campuses. But more importantly these evildoers did not want public and private monies coming in the form of honorariums to black academics, scholars black leadership, spokesperson, etc., to be used in
financing organizations and movements, which the ADL and their white puppets establishment do not approve.
This is the larger argument and debate when it comes to black scholars such as: Cheik Anta Diop, George G.M. James, Khallid Abdul Muhammad, John Henrik Clarke, Yosef Ben Jochannon, Molifi Kete Asante, etc., who represent the African Centered persuasion. Whites historically have always shown fear of black people through out history that dared to define themselves.
White scholars have been collectively irresponsible and it is my belief that Zionist scholars and/or their white counterpart can't morally offer black students scholarly or intellectual direction. We can detect from this book that Zionist Jews and blacks are at war for the hearts and minds of black people; moreover, this dissertation, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA", is
an open declaration of war in the arena of ideals.
Lefkowitz attacked the training and schooling of African Centered scholars, which to bring into question their academic credentials and dismiss them as being pseudo historians and researchers not worthy to be taken serious as scholars.
She claim to be concern about anti-Semitism and racism in all forms,
but Lefkowitz did not mention Charles Murray's book (author of the "Bell
Curve") as also deserving condemnation. Her mentality is the same of Jensen, Shockley, Bakke, etc., these racist scholars claimed to
offered scientific data as proof that blacks are intellectual inferior to Europeans. Also, U.B. Phillips, a post slavery racist historian held the same contention that Africans contributed nothingtowards human civilization.
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad asked the question, "who is the original man"; ANSWER, "the Asiatic black man, the maker, the owner, the cream of the planet earth God of the universe." Lefkowitz is attempting to limit the black man's history to about five to ten thousand years. The black man's history has no beginning or ending,
we can go back 78 trillion years ago and our documentation for this claim is written in the stars.
European history only goes back 6,000 years, thus the white man and the Zionist Jew are infants on the planet. How can Greece and Rome logically speaking compare to their fathers and mothers of civilization? Her arguments
are emotional and subjective, possessing half-truths, distortions, outright lies and propaganda.
I view her as a Zionist Jew, whose making a last ditch scholarly effort to
rescue a dying white supremacy society. She has forgotten for
centuries western society propelled it-self on false superior premises, which led to the oppressing of darker skinned people physically, psychologically, and intellectually around the world.
And in the late 20th century ex-slaves are intellectually challenging a system of white supremacy and her writings serve as evidence that the former slave masters children are dismayed that the ex-slaves have uncovered and rediscovered the knowledge of self.
Her research did not include European scholars such as Gerald Massey
who authored the monumental book titled," Ancient Egypt the Light of
the World", He maintained that African contribution, specifically
Kemet (Egypt) fed the entire world with its enlightment. African
Centered scholars were only quoting and documenting what European
scholars had discovered a long time ago and the bases of their philosophy rest on these documented truths.
Lefkowitz deceitfully rearranges ethnic assignments; moreover, if a
fact of history favored black people she would determine that the said contributions must be attributed to Semites, but she was actually pointed to the Kazars and the Ahkinazi Jew,which is the Eurpean imposter Jew (who were the Semites Arabs, Jews, Africans and other people of color). But be scholarly truthfully the term Semitic is defined as a body of Mediterranean languages and has nothing to do with race, but her designation was geared towards discrediting Africans of their place in history by disguising significant contributions under the code name "Semites".
Those who are Biblical scholars and students of the Bible know that Prophet Noah so-called had three sons Shem (Semite lineage, the so-called Jews), Ham (Hamities, the so-called African lineage) and Japheth (Japhites, the so-called Caucasian lineage). Noah was of African descent, so what does that tell you about the above race classifications?
Lefkowitz refers to Egypt as being geographically part of the Near East, but to my last viewing of the world's map, it was clear to me that Egypt sits on the continent of Africa, which is north east Africa and in reality, there is no place on the map called the "Near East" and only the man made Suez Canal separates Africa from the so-called Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula.
Her knowledge of Freemasonry, its history, philosophy, mission, ritual, etc., were treated very poorly and left the readers with a confused and vague understanding of this complex fraternal order. The Ancient Arabic Order Imperial Council Nobles of the Mystic Shrine was incorporated on June 6, 1876.
If she would have thoroughly done her homework, she would have found as indicated in the Masonic (Shriners) name stated above, which is associated with higher degree Masonry; specifically those that have acquired the 32nd and 33rd degrees put more philosophical emphasis on Mecca, Medina, Jerusalem, etc.,as opposed to Egypt.
The Muslim (the religion of Islam) and/or Islamic Holy Kaaba shrine is somewhat revered on this (high degree Masonic) initiation level much more than Egypt. The High degree Masonry known as Shriners claim to have originated in 644 A.D. along side Prophet Muhammad's son-in-law Ali Ibn Talib, the so-called founder of Shia Islam. So the Egyptian Stolen legacy concept was not indigenous to true Masonic teachings.
Every High Degree Mason's (shriners) goal is to pay respect to Allah, the God of the Muslims by making the holy Pilgrimage to Mecca and like the Muslims circumambulate the Kaaba in ritualistic form (I will at some point Post the relationship between Islam and High Degree Masonry) . George G.M. James was not influenced by Masons because most African Centered scholars would not accept Mecca because of its Arabic and Islamic cultures, which may be perceived as being alien to the African Centered audience, but Ancient Egyptians of antiquity are perceived as being black.
Most African Centered scholars and scholars in general, view Egypt as pre-dating Mecca in valor and civilization. I said all of that to
say this; Egyptian Mystery Schools were not patterned after Masonic
initiation rites as Lefkowitz maintained, but all of Africa operated
off a system of MAAT (JUSTICE, MORALITY, BALANCE, RECPROCITY, etc.)
that stems from greater universal laws.
It has been European aggression and their inhumanity to man that fostered a George G.M. James or a Molefi Asante into existence. She fail to understand that African Centered thought is an answer to white intellectual racism that has always described Africa as
the "Dark Continent" and black historians through out history have
always rose to challenge this type white supremacy ideology.
We are historical and present day victims but "NOT OUT OF AFRICA"
portrays us, our scholars and black people in general, as the criminals just because we dare say that Africa is the cradle of world civilization.
I am a shame of big white America, a nation built on 310 years of black injustice and has the nerve to be crying unfair play in the universities classrooms. We remember Professor Lefkowitz just a few years ago denouncing, attacking and repudiating Dr. Tony Martin who serves on the faculty with her at Wellesley College because he used the book titled, "The Secret Relationship Between Jews and Blacks" written by the Nation of Islam's Historical Research department in his classroom discussions.
"NOT OUT OF AFRICA" in my opinion, is part of a neo Zionist onslaught aimed at destroying truths in the name of censoring free speech and controlling scholarship. She could have kept this venom to herself because black people do not need white scholars and Zionist Jews speaking and defining history for us. African Centered scholars and movement have no ulterior motives or political agenda other than rescuing our history from the lies and distortions giving to us by white America.
Peace,
Fahim A. Knight





"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire
78 trillion years?????Written in the stars?No beginning and no end???
You must be kidding.I thought the zionists were egocentric pathological case who call themselves God.
from the book that you refer to:
"In the 'Foreword' and 'Introduction' Lefkowitz is attempting to incite university officials and administrators, as well as politicians to think about formulating policy and is covertly challenging the concept of academic freedom, which is granted to professors, scholars and academicians that have met the stringent requirements to be designated as a tenure professor."
I agree with peacetroll - 78 trillion years is a bit hard to swallow.
besides - who the hell wants to replace Jewish or White supremacism with Black supremacism???
I sure don't.
Having said that, however, I agree that Africans and dark skinned people in general have suffered immeasurably under the hatred of white and other racial supremacists.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
@ www.iamthewitness.com
White Supremacists
From Daryl's Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
White Supremacists are a catagory of racist who hold that the Caucasoid (or "Aryan") race is inherantly "superior" to others, which has been used to justify colonialism, slavery and oppression. Most striking of all are its fundamental roots in Judaism through the Slave Trade and the cult of British Israelism (supremacism should be seen as distinct from separatism, though it should be known that most separatists are crypto-supremacists, an example of Crypto supremacists are the National Alliance, who are also Crypto-Zionists).
Contents [hide]
1 Slavery and Talmudic Tradition
2 Foundation in Anglo Colonialism
3 Charles Darwin and Francis Galton
4 Adolf Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg
5 Neo-Nazism
6 Overview: White Supremacy and Zionism
7 Links
[edit] Slavery and Talmudic Tradition
White supremacism can be said to have originated in the slave trade as a means of justifying its continued practice. Quite interestingly, and very ironic, is that the basis for White supremacy likely originated in Rabbinical tradition.
During the 1600's, The Netherlands had developed into an economic giant under a burgeoning banking establishment. The Netherlands quickly became expert tradesmen, particularly Jewish sailors called "Chuts". These sailors competed with the rest of the world for Mercantile commodities. When they landed in Western Africa, they exploited the local political situation by purchasing captured prisoners of war from chieftains to be used as servants. The slave trade began in this manner and African slaves soon become one of the Dutch's biggest exports to Spanish and Portugese colonies, which required an enormous amount of manpower for sugar and tobacco plantations which those nations were not willing to spend on.
The Jewish Dutch merchants justified this to British and Spanish customers with scriptural traditions concerning Noah's cursed son Ham and Cabbalistic traditions about Cain being the descendent of the serpent in Eden. The slave trade would continue on for 300 years, in which West Africans were bought or even kidnapped and endured deplorable conditions until the end of the trade. Africans in North America would continue to suffer negative social conditioning and enforced disgenics until being dumped onto an alien world and expected to cope on their own, leading to an on-going, reciprocal racial war that reached its head in the 1950’s and 60’s, and still is only know starting to be resolved.
[edit] Foundation in Anglo Colonialism
Supremacism has likely existed unofficially at many times in history (usually ethnic in nature, the idea of race was not well defined then). What we know of as racism appeared following the Enlightenment, wherein biologists were busy attempting to catalogue and categorize life. Also, England was establishing itself as the main power in the world since the 1600’s, continually expanding its influence East and West (which was set back by the insurrection in the American colonies), all the time under the backing and control of the Rothschild crime network. It is possible then that white supremacism began in earnest as a justification for British colonization. As with the reassurances from the Dutch-Jewish Chuts, England now had the right to the spoils of the whole world on loan by the Rothschilds.
White supremacy as a general idea was first expressed by British empiricist and pro-monarchist David Hume, who wrote that the white race was superior to other races because of their creativity (and within the white race, the Anglo British ethnic was the superior). Hume claimed that though other races could adapt to civilization, only the white man was capable of producing it (at the time, there where arguments about whether or not slavery was immoral, so we could see this as Humes attempt to justify it). These attitudes would become the main position of all white supremacists.
Another British, the Germanophile Huston Stuart Chamberlain, wrote a book called The Institution of the 19th Century, in which he makes similar claims about the white man being the source and preserver of culture, giving him the inherent function of governing over all the other races. Chamberlain differed in his Germanophilia, which led him to treason, backing the Germans during WWI.
One interesting movement worth mentioning is British-Israelism, a Christian sect which claims that Anglos were the lost tribes of Israel through some mostly errant cross-etymologies of Hebrew and English (the latter having many words from German origin). These theories would serve as yet one more justification of Anglo-Saxon entitlement to exploit the rest of the world, in which it was the Englishman’s destiny and in fact his duty to conquer and tame the nations for God’s sake (it should be noted that the lineage for Ham was extended to include Asians and Aborigines, an obvious attempt to justify their eventual enslavement as well, also, we can compare this whole manifest destiny theories to Zionism itself, here we see White and Jewish supremacy fused into one as both are now distantly related and thus share right to the land of Israel). This would someday be mated with the theories of Nazi Alfred Rosenberg to create the Christian Identity cult which ironically take a decidedly anti-Semitic twist, claiming the Jews to be the descendents of the serpent (recall the Cabbalistic theory about Cain and blacks) and tricked whites into bestiality to produce the races (a similar belief is held on the other end of the spectrum in the black Nation of Islam cult, which claims the white man to be the mating of black men with animals by a warlock named “Yacoob”, obviously a reference to Jacob thus representative of the Jews).
In time, two new names would emerge from within England to stir the Anglo establishment with a new, scientific justification for their dominion of the world.
[edit] Charles Darwin and Francis Galton
The most significant figures in racial supremacism, especially white supremacism, were Charles Darwin and his cousin Francis Galton.
Charles Darwin, inspired by the works of fossil experts such a Georges Couvier who had coined the term extinction, had come up with his theory of evolution and natural selection to explain the diversity of life in naturalistic terms: That genetics was an ever changing process and that over time, enough changes in the correct combinations in context to environmental conditions would produce entirely new species. According to Darwin, natural selection, or the competition of creatures to withstand and master their environment, was the determining factor to the diversity within a given climate.
This theory would be taken to the realm of social engineering by Francis Galton, who claimed that many diseases and anti-social tendencies were in fact hereditary traits, and predicted that careless breeding would lead to a genetic disaster which would lead to eventual human extinction. Thus the Eugenics movement spread throughout the Anglo world with laws passed concerning reproductive privileges and sterilization.
Though not inherently racist in the classical sense (though it is flawed in scope, assuming genetics to be a static thing), Eugenics proved to fit very well with racists as a means of explaining once and for all in a scientific manner their prejudices. Supremacists especially clung to the idea of evolution since it proved to them that they were indeed superior.
[edit] Adolf Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg
White Supremacism as is commonly known was a mixing of Huston Chamberlain’s philosophy with the Theosophy cult by an excommunicated Cistercian monk named Rudolph Lanz, who published a tabloid called Ostara (or “Spring”) which talked about white people being descended from a race of extraterrestrial supermen who fell to Earth and became corrupted. Added to this were new and unprecedented ideas about a “Jewish race” which was itself of supernatural origin as well and was locked into a bitter conspiracy exclusively against the Aryan man for control of the universe, and that modernization and progressivism was some magical Jewish weapon (there is little doubt that much of these caricatures were inspired by the religious war waged between the Jews and the Catholics, where Judaism was essentially portrayed as a form of Satanism).
This bizarre mythology got into the hands of a disaffected young Adolf Hitler, who had experienced WWI. In Mein Kompf, Hitler would describe these very same English ideas about white patronage and his attempt to use military force to make Germany the capital of a world wide racial aristocracy and rid the world of an amassing Jewish Communist dictatorship (there was some truth in this belief given the Soviet dictatorship was top-heavy with Jews, though the beliefs of Lenin and his source, Karl Marx, seem to suggest Communism as an internal struggle within the Jewish community, where Communists like Lenin honestly fancied themselves as liberating goyim from their capitalist brethren in a sort of temporary Jewish patronage).
This led to Hitler seizing power over a demoralized German population desperate for guidance. The stage would be set for a war in which Germany would displace and murder millions of people, including its own citizens, until being utterly devastated by the allies and forever humiliated. The research of those such as Lenni Brenner and Jim Condit Jr. strongly suggests that the Third Reich was made possible partially by the aid of right-wing Zionists such as the revisionist Irgun and Stern Gang, who congruently wanted Jews out of Europe and into Palestine. There is also suggestions of Rothschild influence through Jacob Schiff and Warburg, who financed the Germans even after fleeing to the USA (the apparent intent being to restructuring Europe into a unified economic region and ensure Anglo global supremacy).
[edit] Neo-Nazism
WWII had resulted in the wholesale destruction of Europe, and the death and displacement of millions. Meanwhile back in America, the Red Scare had struck terror into the hearts of Americans as the Soviet Union aggressively staked out territory, eventually possessing a third of the world by the end of the Korean War. On top of this, racial tensions began rising as blacks began demanding better treatment under Jim Crow (a particularly awkward social arrangement similar to Apartheid or the Hindu caste system, which demanded strict segregation between the races within a close proximity, and as can be guessed, blacks had to live dependently under a system run by and mostly for a white majority with few self-governorship privileges for blacks, naturally allowing for a wide margin for abuse by the dominant group). How the civil rights movement began is uncertain because there are some like Douglass Reed who claims to the contrary, that while segregation was a fact, blacks were not initially interested in integration but simply requested better treatment and more autonomy (as expressed by the likes of Malcolm X, who demanded that blacks be allowed to own their own state), some even claiming it to be a Communist conspiracy to suck minorities into its Vanguard. Either way, these tensions were very useful to the Zionists to exploit in their attempt at controlling America, as they took the opportunity to resurrect the bogey of Nazism from it’s still fresh carcass. Out of nowhere came George Lincoln Rockwell who began the American Nazi Party, (it is an interesting matter of fact that he was born in a Jewish neighborhood nad infact graduated from Hebron College, an upscale school reserved for Jews according to Judicial-Inc.biz biography of him). Rockwell used shouting and rhetoric to whip his followers into a frenzy against minorities, making a spectacle of themselves. It is also from here that Nazi ideology invaded the defunct Ku Klux Klan, which initially distrusted any non-Anglo interests, including Teutonic Germans, but were now forced to from a mutual dislike of non-white minorities. From Rockwell would come numerous small and mostly insignificant Neo-Nazi cults, all of which promoted an irrational, ineffectual hatred towards most if not all non-whites and a self-destructive paranoid victim mentality wherein these groups could justify what ultimately amounts to a form of emotional masturbation as practiced by countless other political and religious fringe-groups.
As soon as Neo Nazism arrived into the scene there have been other organizations offering to aid the FBI in combating them. As it turned out, many of these groups were either Communist or Zionist fronts who were even caught faking hate-crimes. There has also been a trend for Anti-Racist organizations to week out Crypto-Nazis (which can be anyone whom talks about Israel or bankers).
[edit] Overview: White Supremacy and Zionism
As we have already seen, White Supremacism was aided from the beginning by Jewish supremacists capitalizing on their mutual feelings towards the rest of the world, and when White Supremacism became vigorously anti-Semitic, Zionists took advantage of the opportunity to drive their fellow Jews into Palestine and retain control over law enforcement.
Of all the weapons Zionism has had in its arsenal, the single most powerful has been hate laws promising to combat racism and the social stigma associated with anything associated with Nazism, and by far, the advent of Neo-Nazism, it’s distorted reactionary racial doctrines, and it’s monopolization of the issue of Jewish conspiracies has been the singularly greatest obstacle to dealing rationally and effectively with the issue of the Israeli lobby’s undue influence in America.
It is not too hard to realize the fact that many of these cults are actually Zionist fronts whose job is to spread Pavlovian disinfo to discouraging normal people from pursuing the subject altogether whilst encouraging their more unstable members to be ineffective and disruptive, and collecting the names and addresses of some honest, inquisitive people who sign up to simply learn about these subjects.
White Supremacism has also helped the Zionists more directly as the driving force of Anglo Colonialism, through which Zionism can exert its own influence all over the world while having access to the largest military forces on Earth.
The way I see it, zionists had no problem with the Afro-Centric movement – at first. Indeed, Jews like Jacob Schiff (a Rothschild agent) helped finance the NAACP. The NAACP did not get its first black (non-Jewish) president until 1975.
Between World Wars I and II, the NAACP focused on stopping the lynching of Blacks.
By the late 1950s and early 1960s, Blacks began to seek equal rights.
Prominent groups in this struggle included …
–The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
–The Congress of Racial Equality
–The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (led by Martin Luther King).
Jews provided 75% of the funding for these groups.
One of Dr. King’s chief speechwriters was Stanley Levison (Jew). Levison also handled King’s finances, and acted as King’s strategist. In fact, Levison was one of Dr. King’s two closest advisors (the other being Andrew Young).
In the early 1960s, Black professors started to teach African American studies. Most of their first students were Jewish.
So far so good.
Then came the Vietnam War, with a military draft. Blacks comprised about 12% of the U.S. population, but far more than that among drafted soldiers.
American Blacks took a second look at their affairs. They studied the Palestinians. They began to resist the Vietnam war. They told the Jews, “Thanks for all your help, but we’ll take it from here.” They started to emphasize self-reliance. They entered colleges as students and teachers, and took over the study the Black experience. They also felt they should control their own organizations. They expelled Jews from SNCC, CORE, and other such groups.
Jews immediately set out to take revenge against Blacks for getting freedom. In 1968, Jews defeated the efforts of Brooklyn Blacks to control the education of their own children (the Ocean Hill-Brownsville affair). Jews also gave quiet support to white racist movements. (As usual, the Jews used one group of Gentiles to attack another group.)
In 1977, major Jewish organizations intruded themselves as “friends of the court” into the Bakke case to defeat affirmative action. White Gentiles applauded this, not realizing that Jews practice their own affirmative action by only hiring other Jews.
In 1976, Presient Carter made Andrew Young his U.N. ambassador. When Young met with a PLO representative in an attempt to broker peace, Jews forced Carter to fire Young.
In 1979, Black Organizations held a summit meeting to condemn the treatment of Andrew Young. They issued a “Declaration of Independence” against external (i.e. Jewish) control of Black organizations. That same year, the overthrow of the Shah in Iran eclipsed the war between Blacks and Jews, but friction continued “underground.”
In 1980 a writer named Arthur Jensen claimed that Blacks are genetically inferior in Commentary magazine (published by the American Jewish Committee, a Zionist group).
Commentary said Jensen was protected by the First Amendment. (Which does not aply to any questioing of israel, of course.)
Blacks took another look at the Talmud with its myth of Hamm, which says that Blacks are cursed for all eternity. It says God hated Africans so much that God made them black, and condemned them forever to be slaves (”hewers of wood and drawers of water”).
This helped spark the rise of the Nation Of Islam.
In 1990, professor Michael Levin of the Jewish City College in New York said, “On average, blacks are significantly less intelligent than whites.” (New York Times, April 20, 1990)
Again Blacks protested. Again Jews said the First Amendment protected Levin’s views.
Also in 1990, Nelson Mandela visited New York when South African apartheid was under pressure. Jewish elements threatened to disrupt Mandela’s appearances.
In the early 1990s, Jews withdrew most of their financing from the NAACP, and prevented Jesse Jackson from becoming president of the NAACP (1993).
By 1999, the NAACP was forced to cut its staff down to 50 people. However, its National Voter Fund launched a major offensive in 2000 that caused about 10.5 million Blacks to vote against W. Bush.
In response, Bush became the first U.S. President in almost seventy years to decline an invitation to speak at the NAACP.
The Jewish campaign against Blacks continued. In October 2004, the Internal Revenue Service challenged the NAACP’s tax-exempt status, because president Julian Bond criticized W. Bush at an NAACP Convention.
Then the Iraq invasion bogged down. Americans became unhappy. Bush and his zionist masters needed all the support they could get. Therefore the IRS backed off from the NAACP. Bush spoke at an NAACP convention for the first time, hoping to get Black support for Republicans.
Then we had Hurricane Katrina, which revealed to the whole world how Blacks are treated in the USA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thus, from my viewpoint, the Jewish assault on the “Afro-Centric” movement serves two purposes.
1) To take revenge against Blacks because Blacks became independent
2) To sucker White Gentiles into hating Black Gentiles.
(a bit 'off-topic', I know, but posted in the hope that it might assist our understandings and in supporting our brothers and sisters of every race who merely want to bring an end to evil, &c. Poorly expressed but heartfelt, as per usual, &c.
black people do not need white scholars and Zionist Jews speaking and defining history for us. African Centered scholars and movement have no ulterior motives or political agenda other than rescuing our history from the lies and distortions giving to us by white America.
This statement doesnt bother me, but I would like to say, that I havent lied to you.
I didnt write or authorize or publish the textbooks, or the shows, or the anything else.
I think the only way a multicultural coalition is going to defeat these people is by banding together like a rainbow, not a mosaic. This pie-in-the-sky "we are the world, we are the children" crap is for dumbasses.
The enemy bands together by race because the cohesiveness is valuable and makes them stronger. They dont want us to do the same, for the same reasons. You guys who view the world like a benetton commercial are espousing exactly what they want you to.
Sticking with your own isnt hatred, its comfort and familiarity. It is strength.
Preaching the opposite is LIES.
period.
doesnt matter if it sounds 'bad' to you.
doesnt matter what you were 'taught'.
LIES.
i believe he has shown himself to be, by his own actions, a bullshitter extraordinaire.
He's gone ladies and gentlemen.
Elvis has left the building.
Hes full of shit, as are his musings (which probably arent even his own) on the subject of Nationalists who happen to be white.
Whatever Mr. 'theyve killed and abducted him' has to say or said previously should be viewed in the same light as the rest of his zionist aiding bullshit he pawned off as the opposite.
geez said:
"I think the only way a multicultural coalition is going to defeat these people is by banding together like a rainbow, not a mosaic."
Though, I think that both routes are possible and both have their risks, I agree that the rainbow approach is a faster and easier way to find strength in eachother than the multicultural mosaic approach.
I insist however that multicultural dialogue must continue with great urgency and that different groups remain vigilant against continuous efforts to pit each group against the others.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
In light of Eric Hufschmid's posts at his self-named site since their (DBS & EH) rift, particularly EH's critique of CB's piece of today (Sep12), I think it's clear who the main antagonist was, and it should not surprise me at this point (for the afore-cited reason alone) if EH had CB and DBS at each other's throats, as it were, &c. Anyway, I myself would have been forced to give IATW over if Daryl had allowed such a flimsy critique as that on his site, &c. Now, whether Eric's half-mad, mad, over-fervid, wholly disingenuous, or none of the above, I cannot say-- though I would like to believe it is the very latter, or else the first. Vale.
i see shiftyness in all of em, and I will say that DBS got the shaft.. but he was an eager active member beforehand and did participate in theatrical cons and charachter assasination he himself knew to be bullshit.
ill read a bollyn peice, and hold it suspect afterwards. the other two, especially hufschmid.. no.
i couldnt if i tried.
to me theyre all gone.
well, that's cool geeez-- we're all entitled to our opinions, as they say. But I am tending to believe that Eric's a little over-zealous (p'haps for sheer effect), unless he was slinging both S & B a line of BS the whole while (an uncomfortable thought indeed). And maybe they were falling for 't, or got caught up in it. We're all.. er.. most of us are only human, after all..
with all do respect Fahim, you mean so-called Jewish scholar approval.
Peace.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire
This is where most free thinkers either do not understand history or are in denial. The Zionist Jew wears many ethnic and racial identities.
In America those of the Khazars and Ashkenazi strain that originated in Eastern Europe has the ability to blend into Gentile White society and communities in America and throughout world. Thus, at times it is difficult to distinguish them from the dominant white society.
He at times cleverly claims white as his ethnic identification and he at times claim Semitic origin as his race (but the Ashkenazi and Khazars are not Semites) what ever is convenient for him at that time.
So in North America (U.S) we live in a "Pigementocracy" where as privileges and rewards are afforded based on race. The Zionist Jews uses his white skin to maneuver in America. So we have to classify the Caucasian and the Zionist Jew at times under one ethnic classification because often the Caucasian race and all races are used as their cannon fodder.
But I am smart enough to know that they are not the same people, but they use the Caucasian because racially (skin color) because they can blend so well and carry out their objectives and go undetected.
Lastly, I reject being called a "black supremacists”---I just have a difficult time separating the Caucasian Zionist from Caucasians in general, THEY LOOK SO MUCH ALIKE AND IN MANY CASES THEY HAVE THE SAME AGENDA.
The profanity that some of those that post on my article are a clear indication of emotional responses that lacks the ability to debate intelligently.
I joined this site because I appreciated the gamut of ideals that were being discussed, but the ignorance I read from those that posted a response to me bog is either inconsistent with site objective or either as much as things change, they still remain the same.
WE ALL CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE------I LOVE IDEALS! INTELLIGENT IDEALS
This is a really good post.
I need to re-read it again to serve my memory.
And thx1138....
excellent commentary as usual!
And please don't leave on account of the KNOBS who speak to you out of spite.
Absolute truth. And I certainly understand how races outside the caucasian race can misunderstand or 'mix' the two together due to the Jews camoflouging technique (which you described perfectly).
The funny thing to me is, they (so called jews), do this to cause friction between whites, blacks, brown and yellow races, while all the while sitting back and enjoying the chaos and friction they have caused. We (goy), must rise above this skullduggery and see through the ploy. It is a difficult thing to do, but we can do it.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" Voltaire
______________________________
"Hey you,... White House,..charade you are!" Pink Floyd