Professor Poseidon is universally acclaimed and recognized as a propounder and ponerous postulator of Lizard Theories,
in which the ‘Lizard Men’ knock down all the ‘Straw Men’...

PROFESSOR P. POSEIDON

As my regular readers will attest, a highly suspicious incident whereby Professor Poseidon most recently dabbled in a devious diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder has been treated at considerable length in a previous post, to which comment has been closed. So I will limit this second phase of my in-depth "Preliminary Investigation" to Professor Poseidons' dubious dabblement in a far-fetched hypothetical area of "lizard theory", wherein the Professor has employed many other tried and true tricks, and I will explain how Professor Poseidon has attempted,
by resorting to character defamation, insinuation, and innuendo -
to stand up, then to knock down, a hypothetical "straw man".

The fact that Professor Poseidon has continued to proffer his online psychiatric evaluations with no prerequisite qualification whatsoever, while lacking any prior certification even vaguely resembling a license to do so, has never deterred him in the least from pursuing his ambitious career objectives and promoting his promising ponerological projects. Various reports to the effect that Professor Poseidon has recently been called to account for serious ethical breaches in the code of permissible psychiatric conduct have not prevented him from continuing to hold forth on his most novel, contemporary and highly controversial specialty -

LIZARD THEORIES

As a matter of fact, when it comes to propounding profound unfounded theories of any kind, Professor Poseidon is widely considered to be without peer. But he has steadfastly refused to subject his own theories to any criticism of his own hypotheses, which might be seen to be somewhat hypothetically hypocritical,
if not, to be more accurate, pathetically hypocritical, at best.

Professor Poseidon has notably been quoted as saying of late-

This alternate "pose" of Professor Poseidon would appear to be more realistic than those above, if only it were remotely possible to pick out a few more picture pieces of Professor Poseidons' pusillanimous puss. It may be more worthwhile to note what IS showing however. His expansive, prominent frontal lobes would suggest a higher intelligence, and possibly an alien form of origin. Or then again, one might simply suppose that Poseidon suffers from a massively swelled head. Yet on a more complimentary note, it is hard to ignore more than a passing resemblance to another reputed internet theoretician, Dr. Peter Wakefield Sault, but that is a mere aesthetical impression, of no consequence.

The "real" Professor Poseidon would no doubt conclusively find that telltale wisp of vanishing hair to be a "dead giveaway", and the spectacles certainly appear to be quite professorial, although the Professor would surely be the first to know, if he was actually making a spectacle of himself. Yet in the absence of such a pronouncement, we must suffice with something more definitive -

"Writing off anyone who claims
to have respect for David Icke
- yet refuses to say why -
would be a sensible policy"

STRAW MAN / LIZARD MAN

Voila ! There we have it ! A virtually spontaneous appearance of Poseidons' legendary Straw Man, complete, right down to his straw colored hair, all except for those penetrating limey eyes, which peg him for a Lizard Man, to boot. How very convenient ! Two for the price of one ! David Icke is not just any straw man from down on the funny farm either. The legendary David Icke is the Straw Man Personified, to whom the Professor has already ably succeeded in associating the person of Jim Kerr ! So thus has a classic 'fait accompli' of discredit by association, and its end result, character defamation, been accomplished with only the slightest effort. But we shall soon see well enough if Mr. Kerr can be "written off" so easily because he has such colossal "respect for David Icke" , and if in fact he does, or doesn't really "refuse to say why". What I propose to prove at this point is that "Jim Kerr, the nutter" , may not be the only notable of note who might ever be perceived as having afforded Mr. Icke any more than a lions' share, or any less than a mere modicum, of respect.
So what, pray tell, might Professor Poseidon wish to profess or propose "would be a sensible policy" which could also apply to
Mr. Ickes', and therefore Mr. Kerrs' outlandish lizard theories ?

"There are outlandish theories,
such as REPTOIDS and CRYPTO-JEWS,
which do not have evidence to support them,
but cannot be conclusively ruled out"

Could it ever conceivably be construed as duplicitous, to decry "outlandish" theories, whilst in the very same breath decreeing that they can never be ruled out ? The answer is conclusively NO, because our duplicitous Professor has been very careful to cover his lizard tracks, by reinstating his all-inclusive, inconclusive conclusion as a final judgement. So how now does it behoove the Professor to castigate Mr. Icke, and by association, Mr. Kerr, for entertaining theories that "cannot be conclusively ruled out" ? Has he already assumed Mr. Kerr to be a nutter because he respects Mr. Icke, a nutjob, without knowing if Mr. Kerr ever gave a hoot or a holler for his theories, "yet refuses to say why" ? ? All he appears to be capable of doing, with all his circuitous logic,
is chasing his own tail in endless circles, and repeating the same old harangadang, like the repetitive spiel of a snake-oil salesman-

"As for the "lizard" theories, I don't believe them
but they cannot be completely ruled out"
( apart from the shape-shifting nonsense
which is beyond the laws of physics )

How bizarre, that Professor Poseidon would eventually adopt identical tactics to those played against Planet Quo / Jim Kerr in the NOLAJBS forum, to set him up as another of his endless chorus line of straw men. It was the shack-up roach motel of NOLAJBS where these cheap sideshow tactics first originated - with some of Poseidons' nefarious friends. But how could it matter any longer how the war started, after Professor Poseidon was already hitting the Big Time in the Straw Man Business ?

In addition to setting up straw men, now he was doing double duty as a Reptilian Apologist, as well as impersonating an Interstellar Anthropologist. Professor Poseidon was now quite fully prepared to go out on a limb so far as to unequivocally state-

"The lizard theories must relate to the idea
of a cold-blooded, ruthless, soulless tribe"

"There's nothing wrong with researching lizard theories"
"but there should be some evidence"
"Aliens from interstellar space is a more likely scenario
compared to dinosaurs evolving into humanoid form"

As one might gather from these suppositions and posturing postulations, it's suddenly perfectly alright to investigate such preposterous propositions. But not in the case of David Icke or Jim Kerr. Far be it from the Ponerous Professor to proffer any further advice without first consulting his personal "Ouiji Witch", instead of Credo Mutwa. But again we seem to be finding out the hard way that Poseidons' double standards can only apply in his case, and at days end, he can't be at all concerned about his own credibility in the least. He's in the straw man business now, remember ? The less credibility the better for that nefarious enterprise. He knows his real gig is to knock down the message - by knocking down the messenger he set up to be a straw man.

WE ARE THE HOLLOW MEN
WE ARE THE STUFFED MEN

LEANING TOGETHER - HEADPIECE FILLED WITH STRAW

In the following perfect example from over a year ago, to expand even further on vindications of his "lizard" theories, he has chosen again to employ his selfsame personal favorite rhetorical fallacy- a "straw man" defense – to apply in the case of David Icke, which is automatic, and henceforth by a time-honoured technique of instant transference by unfavorable association, to the respective countenance of each of two of his greatest arch-rivals, of whom he has hardly ever given this forum blessed relief in the entire past year, and who I will gratefully allow Poseidon to name by name, as I have always attempted to forego that excruciating pleasure at any cost, or at the cost of salvaging this fine forum. But as this bloody con`troversy has been the very lifeblood of Poseidons' existence in these parts, since he festooned himself with it last year, after the Bollyn incident, it would be most unfair to request that he likewise forego that dubious honour. Therefore -

---"David Icke seems to have been selected as a fall guy ---
{ read straw man, same difference } to propagate a lot of truthful ideas about a conspiracy, but mixed with disinformation ( either the "shape-shifting" part, or the "lizards" too ), after he had been discredited by the "son of God" remark. In fact, when David talks about that, he says it was as if a part of him was watching detached, as if to say "Oh no, what have I just said?"! In the 9/11 truth movement, Zionists used the opposite approach with two of their operatives: Christopher Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid. The idea was that those two would first establish a good reputation as exposers of Zionist / Israel's crimes, and would then go into a self-destruct mode. As with Icke, disinformation was sprinkled amongst the truths, so that it would be easy to knock down arguments based on Hufschmid and Bollyn."

There we have it again in a nutshell, with whipped cream on top, from the poison pen of Professor Poseidon, another perfect encapsulization of an archetypal "straw man fallacy" in action. The Professor is so proficient with his devious device that he can destroy whole journalistic reputations with but a finger twitch and a tapdance on his computer keyboard. He never really needs to make his allegations stick. All he has to do is plant little kernels of uncertainty and doubt, instead of truth and faith, until they spring forth into a figurative field of straw, from which any number of straw men can be created, stood up, and then knocked down.

So how would the Mad Hatter, Mr. Kerr, propose to expound about Poseidons' ponerous practice of destroying reputations ? -

"I begin by my challenging Poseidon on his support for a journalist who claims that Arabs carried out the 9-11 attacks. I tell him that he is a disgrace and a traitor to the anti-Zionist movement. I don't care what anyone says - when a supposed anti-Zionist consistently tries to destroy the reputation and research of an honest journalist who is, without question, THE best 9-11 researcher around, then defends another who would have us believe that Arabs did 9-11, then that 'anti-Zionist' is, as far as I am concerned --

- A TRAITOR TO THE MOVEMENT

I am inclined to most heartily concur with Mr. Kerrs' opinion. What Professor Poseidon can't seem to comprehend somehow, with his boundless store of empirical knowledge, and his rabid antizionism, is that if he can sit in his bully bench and convict someone else of being a Zionist Agent, by the very same token, someone else can accuse him of being Peter Wakefield Sault. So it makes no difference if he is Captain Ahab or Moby Dick, the same rules must apply to every player in his 'Defame Game' Should any casual reader ever happen to visit the preceding 'Sault lick', it might be passing strange to get a whiff of the 'Sault'

"I think it is, at the very least, irresponsible of you to link to such propaganda, especially in view of the publicly expressed policy quoted above, without also advising readers of the legal fallacy ( the 'straw man' argument ) etc."

How odd, to unearth such similarities of substance and of style.
Should I now proofread Arthur Koestlers' 'Roots of Coincidence' ? Or how about just one more perfect example, out of innumerable occasions when we have heard Professor Poseidon to proclaim the most wonderful efficacy of a perennial straw man at this site ?

"Firstly, anyone with more than a passing familiarity with the case will see that premise 1) is false. Bollyn was posing as an "anti-Zionist" in order to set himself up as a straw man who could be knocked down, and, by extension, the case for Zionist involvement in 9/11 with which he had closely aligned himself. But in any case, even if 1) were true, the causal fallacy still applies" ( There's that fallacy word again )
excerpted from "Bollyn: the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy"

Why yes, of course, Professor, Bollyn had nothing better to do than to set himself up to be knocked down, but by whom ? Professor Poseidon ? How perfectly logical ! Why didn't I ever think of that ? And as if that weren't enough proof, next we have not one, but both the fall guy and the straw man - Astounding ! -

"If BAC is employed in the cover-up and Bollyn was already an agent in 2002, BAC should have been briefed that Bollyn's role was as a fall guy or strawman to be knocked down. Alternatively, BAC could find deliberately placed clues" excerpted from "Ouiji Witch" Astrology Rag - Signs of the Times

Truthfully, the Professor would have been much happier to see Straw Man Bollyn go directly to jail, and he has unequivocally said so, although he would certainly have us believe otherwise. So he "would not rule out the possibility that Bollyn is genuine", in the same circuitous fashion as his contention that certain lizard theories "cannot be conclusively ruled out"- correct ? Although Professor Poseidon would be thrilled to furnish us with countless more examples of his matchless powers of deduction, in order to avoid any unwarranted clutching or sucking at straws,
I must return at this point to the major thrust of my investigation.

LAST STRAW of a LIZARD MAN

Formerly, I had discovered that Professor Peter Plum Poseidon was engaged in perpetrating a hideous and wanton slur against Mr. Kerr, in the form of a deliberately deviated diagnosis of "Narcissistic Personality Disorder", whereby he mortally insulted Mr. Kerrs' memory of his dead father. Realizing that the Professor would typically profess it to be naught but a harmless innuendo, and knowing full well this crime was mere childs' play for the ponerous Poseidon, I fully expected him to return to the scene of his crime at any given moment, with another freshly concocted calumnious campaign. I didn't turn my back before he was back again, working the ropes, pushing the straw, and stuffing it in everyones' mouth but his own. Never content with the damage inflicted in his first attack, he was now intent on working his 'Armless Friend angle into the ground, with another hatchet job -

determined to make the most of the mud his ruthless cohorts from NOLAJBS had already flung, to ridicule Mr. Kerrs' disability, by goading him and insulting him in the most loathsome manner, to "show us the stump, Kerr", and continuing to impugn the overall sanity of Mr. Kerr at every available opportunity, by incessantly insinuating that he is a "nutter", who is suffering from NPD, Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I must confess in all my born days I have hardly ever witnessed a more reptilian revelation of debased psychology than I have in this case. By reverting back to the devious device of his old tried and true 'straw man' tricks, the Professor and his collaborateurs have already stooped as low as they can possibly go, groveling on their yellow bellies like lizards in a mudpatch. For an end to my patience, Poseidons' "Armless Friend" prank would prove to be the very last straw.

LAST STRAW of a STRAW MAN

Lest it become a proverbial straw that broke the camels' back, and because much of this unauthorized second phase of my investigation is necessarily internal and private, the larger public could now perhaps be less concerned as to its eventual findings. The prime perpetrators have long since been identified, and all that remains is to determine what constitutes the full extent of their crimes, and remaining sphere of influence. However, since specific charges of practicing internet psychiatry without a license are still pending in this case, the larger public would be further well advised to beware of any such perpetrators as these, who might be continuing to operate in that greater sphere, until such time as they are inevitably brought to their just desserts.

For those who would love nothing better than to piss and moan about this supposed ongoing "crapfest", I might cordially invite them at this point, after indulging a morbid curiosity and perusing most of my observations, to simply take their ravenous interest somewhere else on the smorgasboard of this forum or elsewhere. I am not here to spoonfeed mental infants who want to believe that truth is a pretty or an easy thing. As a matter of fact it is more often unredeemingly ugly and all but impossible to extract. One might reasonably inquire wherefore I should trouble myself - to speak the Kings' English about such insufferable hypocrisy, without lapsing into profanity, as Mr. Kerr has been known to do on occasion, when suitably provoked, which is almost always. But in order to expedite the posting of this article with due haste, before succumbing to utter disgust and summarily heaving it onto a bonfire of vanities, I hereby attempt a brief closing summation.

A moot question comes to mind - What's in this for Poseidon ? How could his concerted activities be justified over time, unless there is indeed a shilling or two to be had from his own shillery ? Or does an overindulgence in his phenomenal intellectual conceit provide its own ultimate reward ? Mindful of every known quantity in the known universe but the inordinate amount of permanent damage he has already done, he doggedly persists in his dogmatical diametric diatribes of pure unadulterated whale puke. Perhaps that precious commodity will prove to be the real payoff for Poseidon, which he can use to stink up his other oceans with even more of his perfidious lies. He ponerously pontificates about coming down on the other side of his Great "Ideological Divide", without divulging that his great divide consists of an entire length of the Great Ideal Crack between his scrotum and his rectum. One shudders to think what might have been accomplished if the Professor, with his considerable talents, had chosen to align himself with some of his competitors, instead of ruthlessly plagiarizing their work, and superseding every one of their accomplishments with his own supposed solutions. But now, more to the purpose of this essay, comes a point at which Poseidons' unfounded insults to David Icke, and to Jim Kerr, must come to a grinding halt. A screeching, grinding halt.

---

THE LAW IS AN ASS AND YOU ARE MADE OF STRAW

Although that phrase "the law is an ass" is found in Dickens, I'm quite sure the Professor, with his all-encompassing command of contemporary literature, could provide us with a notable name for the notable "nutjob" who made the following pronouncements -

"Okay, let's cut straight to the chase. Our 'countries' have been officially bankrupt since the 1930s and you are paying taxes, going to court, and applying for licences on behalf of a fictitious entity that does not exist, except in theory... our
'government' is not a government, it's a private corporation.

I can't help but wonder if qrswave, or THX 1138, our resident interlocutors on world banking fraud, would consider those remarks to be ravings of a lunatic "nutjob". Sounds rather straightforward and consistent to me, but banking is not my forte.
It even sounds like something they might have said themselves.

They enslave the people in their law of contracts by creating a fictional entity using our names written in all UPPER CASE. When we are born they use the birth certificate to form an account in trust and create the fictional UPPER CASE ENTITY or 'STRAW MAN'. Black's Law 6th Edition defines a straw man as: A front; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principle may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some other purpose etc.

I'm quite certain the Professor, being a preeminent world authority on the "straw man fallacy", was already quite well aware of all this legal mumbo-jumbo, yet I must confess that I sure wasn't.

Another definition is: "a man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety." - So this is the way the fraud is played. They create a fictitious 'straw man' trust at birth and the trust uses the newly born's name in all uppercase. If the free sovereign is called, say, john bloggs - all lower case - the trust is called JOHN BLOGGS. Uppercase documents contract us with the corporation ( government ) to stand surety for the 'straw man' trust. What they do is trick us into standing surety for the trust and becoming liable for its commercial operations and debts. This is done by us signing their documents, applying for licences, etc.

That has to be some of the most invaluable info I’ve ever seen ! At this point, I begin to be exceedingly intrigued... I'm actually beginning to learn something. How could I ever begin to write this article without such essential background ? I'm so ashamed to realize the Professor knew all this already, but I sure didn't !

STRAW MAN SYSTEM

---

If you are going to take on the 'straw man' system you really need to know your stuff, or someone guiding you does, because every word has legal meaning and many words have meanings that are not apparent in their every day usage. Also, the location where you speak to people, whether you shake their hand, and other 'contractual acceptances', are traps to tie you up in 'straw man' law.

Sounds like sound legal advice to me ! And to think I was going to write the final book on this subject - "Diary of a Straw Man" ! What a final irony it is, to find Poseidons' very own personal Straw Man Personified, who he stood up for a scarecrow nutjob to scare off all the rest of his straw men, turned out to be a legal authority on a very real dilemma of being exploited as a straw man ! Which is not to mention my own singular satisfaction in finally discovering that one reason Mr. Kerr might have had considerable respect for Icke, but refused to say why, was a barely known fact that Mr. Jim Kerr had been the only webmaster to ever publish Mr. Ickes' informational article, ( which had absolutely nothing to do with lizard men ) along with numerous other invaluable references on the world banking fraud. Should the Professor have more designs for making a straw man of Mr. Jim Kerr, he would be rather hard put, to say the least. Mr. Jim has been onto his half ass game from the very beginning.

So now Professor Poseidon, if I might yet presume to paraphrase Charles Dickens, without plagiarizing W.S. Gilbert in the process - I would propose a more fitting title for David Ickes' article to be -

---

THE LAW IS MADE OF STRAW AND YOU ARE AN ASS !

---

this has been a
Team Quasimodo
( Me, Myself and I )
Production

Posted in

• david icke
• jim kerr
• lizard theories
• poseidon
• satire
• straw man fallacy

• quasimodo's blog