Attention All Readers

I am sick and tired of the bullshit that's been going on at WUFYS since the day the subject of DBS came up at this site.

From now on, these are the ground rules and anyone who doesn't like it can leave.

Those who don't leave and insist on breaking the rules will be banned.

    1. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS.

      Going forward, any post published for the main purpose of attacking another person will be deleted along with any comments that might be posted underneath it.

      Anyone whose comments consist mainly of personal attacks will be banned from the site.

      There will be no exceptions made for anyone.

    2. NO DISCUSSION of DBS, EH, or CB's credibility.

      You can refer to their posts, but you can't include their names in the post title or question their personal credibility.

      You can however, question the veracity of any particular claim by presenting evidence that that particular claim is false.

      You cannot launch personal attacks on people who question the veracity of a claim made by DBS, CB, EH, or anyone else for that matter.

These rules will be expanded as necessary.

All the bullshit that has already transpired at WUFYS will remain up (unless their authors delete them) as a testament to what pushed me over the edge.

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I NEVER BANNED GEEEZ.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

qrswave | Sun, 2007-09-30 19:42

that someone else had banned him.

He's now free to post, as everyone else is - within the above guidelines.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

qrswave | Sun, 2007-09-30 19:47

..you have been very patient with the relentless bullsh*t posts, and you are the best arbiter that i can think of!
..it's been way too relentless to be normal, that's for sure!

Grim Reaper | Sun, 2007-09-30 20:05

sorry, I just assumed it was you that banned geeez. I didn't know there was anyone else with the authority to do that. And I agree with Grim, thanks for all that you do.

Crimes of Zion | Sun, 2007-09-30 20:26

and I completely support this ban as its cause was utterly unproductive and detrimental to the credibility of posters. This kind of ban is not infringing on our freedom to express our views on any topic which does not relate to personality assassination. Good on you sis.

"Let there be Light!"

Traveller | Sun, 2007-09-30 20:56

The worse part of this site since I arrived are these bs attacks

Stick to the info
and let us decide for ourselves

__________________________
Og's Radio Shows
http://radioconcen.wordpress.com/ognir/

Ognir | Sun, 2007-09-30 21:34

I agree - qrswave is the best arbiter. A "zero tolerance" policy will lead to a more productive use of time for all. Most importantly, qrswave will not be placed in such an unenviable position of having to be fair to all "sides" when posters are almost mortal enemies, even though ironically they are supposed to be on the same side. Voluntary restraint was only a partial solution, since even minor disputes could easily flare up into full scale attacks.

I did say in this comment only yesterday that we ought to try to get along.

As the new policy was introduced, it was about 15 hours since my last post, and the personal attacks were still ongoing :-)

Poseidon | Sun, 2007-09-30 22:38

I don't mind profane language IN THE PROPER CONTEXT....it has to mean something.

To just throw smut around just for the sake of throwing it around is so dull and useless, a major turn off.

Use it with meaning, real meaning, pertaining to a point, or don't use it at all.

As for blue humor, that's not funny or amusing! - just plain SICK and DEPRAVED.

Rhiannon | Sun, 2007-09-30 23:58

.. and I will not be surprised if they cease to post here altogether, now you've essentially closed down the avenue of their very purposeful attacks.

If the fellows whose 'names cannot be mentioned' and are the subject of this blog have been so virulently and viciously assailed by one party, fiercely and determinedly defended by another, while yet another less or ill-informed party essentially strides the fence, it is because they've strictly told the truth, expressed their honest opinions, and have gone straight for the eyes while doing so.. as it must be..

Ineptly and insufficiently expressed, but that's not just my opinion, it happens to comprise a point of a fact.

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-10-01 01:58

I just see that damage this lot has done to this venue.

Everyone needs to bring a level of restraint to EVERY attempt to discuss matters. All this heated/strange/false logic use is not doing Bean one to help events.

Me? I see the Americans Pulling all the stops and doing another no inspection "Quick turnaround" Shuttle launch.

I would look into this month early launch. I think i will clean my VCR and Crack a new tape for this one.

The World never stops. Only your attention of it wanes.

STOP and Think about that for all this distraction is necessary. You have been distracted for a reason.. i would find out WHY.

Power plants in space? Nuclear power plants in space???

Look into it America. Something has the NASA breaking all the rules to launch the shuttle this early.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Mon, 2007-10-01 02:37

In other words (because I know my language can often be crabbed and ambiguous) the 'nameless' parties tell the truth, &c.-- and our 'common' enemy simply cannot allow that, but will oppose it through every means they deem necessary or find at their disposal. As for my comment about some people who will undoubtedly surcease posting, it had to do with those whose clear raison d'etre might no longer find an outlet here, although I'm sure they'll find some other veracities they'll attempt to turn upon their heads, &c.

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-10-01 02:45

".. You know, you don't have to be bought and paid for by the Zionists to be helping them-- you don't need to be bought and paid for by them to be aiding them. If you've been sold a line of bullcrap and you've bought it hook, line and sinker and you're out there re-selling it, you're as damaging or more damaging than the people being paid-- keep that in mind, &c."--
http://iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_30Mar2007.html

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-10-01 04:32

Yikes! I hope it's needless to point out that very much sympathize with your position Qrswave, and find your solution eminently reasonable, under the circumstances, &c. Also, if I myself suddenly cease to post, it sadly has to do (and it hurts me to confess) with personal problems and domestic issues-- mostly revolving around $$$ and &c. I do wish I had been/ could be more lucid and helpful here, now and in the past; but there's always tomorrow to look forward to (an' if I live to see it come and pass). Thanks, and Always.

Nobodaddy | Mon, 2007-10-01 04:43

I never participated in the food fights on the threads referred to, but it distressed me to see all the wasted effort by some very talented posters.

Time to get to the important work at hand.

Claymoremind | Mon, 2007-10-01 08:37

..the times that try men's souls. Qrswave, I appreciate your interest in keeping the " B.S. " to a minimum, but at the price of 'free speach' ? I see you are a protector of the " honor " of DBS, EH, and CB. ...but no mention of the honor of God, His Son, or His Mother. Will the demands and ban threat also cover the Holy Family and their honor ? If that is so, then at least you could be considered to be even handed in your use of censorship. It is after all your site...but don't forget it's Satan's world...and if we are to have any hope for eternal life we are going to need to get close to God's Word. And if I don't get "banned" a metamorphosis will be necessary... for our adversary is growing in power and influence..daily. Peace. (ps) someone once typed a comment/blog about posters who could " be anything they wanted to be on the internet " no...that's not true for those who fear God and seek to do His Will. But I answer; why not strive to be who God wants us to be?

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

Jesse | Mon, 2007-10-01 09:24

Michael means " who is like unto God "?
Jesse means " God is "!
Saint Michael is my patron Saint.
Saint Michael is also my guardian Angel.
Deo Gratias!

---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary

Jesse | Mon, 2007-10-01 09:44

Please, pick one handle and stick to it so as not to confuse people.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

qrswave | Mon, 2007-10-01 09:53

Was that someone else named mparent and is mparent an admin?

Who is an admin here anyway?

thanks,
geeez

geeez | Mon, 2007-10-01 21:36

Is Marc Parent an admin for wufys?
Is that who banned me?
Who else who posts here is an admin?

geeez | Tue, 2007-10-02 06:16

Now i see the wisdom of a cloaked Admin force. (: I Frickin love it!

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Tue, 2007-10-02 12:33

I have been trying to figure out why QRS lets people drive traffic to another site.

Neither will answer wether the person in question is an admin, whom I also believe to be the one who banned me.

My first exchange with this person was very strange, him acting like he'd talked with me before, yet my never having done it. It was just like THX1178 poster. Same weird shit.

Also, banning someone because you dont want people to know you have special priviledges is quite cowardly IMO. and dis-ingenuous.

I for one would like to know what sites are in the fellowship ring.

Anyway Masher - go read some science fiction and STFU...I have my reasons.

geeez | Tue, 2007-10-02 17:20

How About YOU Shut the Frack up K.

Stooge.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Tue, 2007-10-02 19:13

..yah, i'd have to agree with masher on this one; geeez, all you do is whine!

..Qrs doesn't want to arbitrate at all, believing in FREE SPEECH, but many have abused this priviledge; thus now your bullsh*t in put in check.

..still the best unwilling arbitrator that i know of!

STOP WHINING!

Grim Reaper | Wed, 2007-10-03 04:41

not even curious as to why they wont answer?

Jones answers (with bs.. but he answers)

The defunct duo sort of answer some things (with bs).

but only silence concerning this parent question ..and trying to get an answer is whining?

Wouldnt you like to know if the admins of other sites were running this one as well, and which ones they were?

personally im tired of being conned, and all i want to know a couple of little things, which should be known anyway, on this self-described free speech, open, truth seeking cyber-outpost.

Funny how "trust us, we are the good guys" isnt good enough for the govt, but it is good enough for some fuckin blog on the internet.

its just two little questions.
very strange.
and you truth champions and your satisfaction with no response at all.
haha.. yes - we're doomed.
we are all doomed.
geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez
(pronnounced 'jeez')

geeez | Wed, 2007-10-03 07:32
geeez | Wed, 2007-10-03 07:35

what difference is there if I know who administrator is or not. I don't know either are whining or are just pissed off for some previous inter-wars on this blog and I don't really want to know. I complained several times about this infighting between bloggers but mostly it was ignored and finally rule was imposed to stop this wasting of energy and space on this blog. Why should I care who mparent is or is not. If writes something that I disagree with I will comment on it without personally insulting him and that is what we all should be doing. I would disagree with bans on this blog on basis of fights on other blogs because that would be unethical and against freedom of speech but I am fully behind ban to personal insults between bloggers on this site. There is no such thing as absolute freedom neither here or in the universe. You like it or not our freedoms are limited by other's freedoms. Having that in mind let us be decent and avoid using mean and rude word directed at other bloggers irrelevant what they believe and stand for. We may disagree and even insult certain ideologies and political stands but not the person itself. Thats all I have to comment on this topic.

"Let there be Light!"

Traveller | Wed, 2007-10-03 18:31

I don't know

what difference is there if I know who administrator is or not. I don't know either are whining or are just pissed off for some previous inter-wars on this blog and I don't really want to know. I complained several times about this infighting between bloggers but mostly it was ignored and finally rule was imposed to stop this wasting of energy and space on this blog. Why should I care who mparent is or is not. If writes something that I disagree with I will comment on it without personally insulting him and that is what we all should be doing. I would disagree with bans on this blog on basis of fights on other blogs because that would be unethical and against freedom of speech but I am fully behind ban to personal insults between bloggers on this site. There is no such thing as absolute freedom neither here or in the universe. You like it or not our freedoms are limited by other's freedoms. Having that in mind let us be decent and avoid using mean and rude word directed at other bloggers irrelevant what they believe and stand for. We may disagree and even insult certain ideologies and political stands but not the person itself. Thats all I have to comment on this topic.

"Let there be Light!"
Traveller | Wed, 2007-10-03 18:31

I am not trying to find real names, locations, etc.

I am asking two simple questions about a blog I read.
1- Who posting herein is an admin?
2- Is the mparent7777 poster an admin?

(actually one question if the first one gets answered)

Thats it. Whenever first asking it, I simply asked.

And I find it strange, that most of the zealous questioners of all things politic, who post on this blog, havent the inclination to wonder who is in control of this blog.

Youre interested in who is in control of your money, your govts, your foreign policies, your television, your radio, your religious groups, etc... but not who is in control of this place where you post things you dont say to your neighbors.

You dont find a disconnect there?
I do.

And no matter how you phrase it, or spin it, one can look back at the beginnings of the question posed, and see that I originally simply asked a question, normally and without "infighting", or whatever it is you wish to paint MY question as.

And it is a fair question.

Which handles on this blog, are admins?

Simple, fair, and strangely unanswered for the past month. During that time, my account was deleted for a while.

OTHER blogs will tell you if you ask. Why wont this one?

geeez | Wed, 2007-10-03 18:59

unclesam wakeup

It ain't racism when it's the truth!

by Grim Reaper

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator