something is odd about that case but then again lots of Jews were sacrificed in Europe during WWII so you can't be sure what was going on in their particular case. Some of them seem to be expendable so it seems. Electric chair is very inhumane way to execute anyone because it amounts to torture before death ensues. Foe or friend nobody deserves torture.

"Let there be Light!"

..thomas edison invented the electric chair to demonize Nikolai Tesla's AC power, because edison the opportunist had designs on DC powering New York and the world, which was a useless idea..

In 1887, Edison began a series of bizarre experiments at his West Orange lab, shocking unwanted dogs, cats and even a circus elephant to death with AC to prove that the current was deadly stuff.

Tesla's supreme intellect makes edison seem like the sheckel shill that he is!

Who knows, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg may have actually gotten what they deserved, regardless of whether they stepped on the devil's toe or not..

However, only a truly evil demon would electrocute animals for his own demented ego!
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/pet/topsy.html

http://www.voltini.com/id25.htm

video:
http://www.voltini.com/HTMLobj-371/edisonelephant.mpeg

Yeah, I’ve read a great deal about Tesla over the years. His time with Edison shows what kind of person Edison was.

When Tesla came to the USA, his first job was in Edison’s lab, where Tesla worked 16 hours a day, seven days a week. Edison was irritable, tyrannical, and half deaf.

One day Tesla offered to design 16 different types of Edison generators so they would have increased output with decreased operating costs. Edison offered to pay Tesla $50,000 if Tesla succeeded. It took Tesla a year to complete the work, and the successful new designs brought patents that made Edison even richer. But when Tesla asked for the $50,000, Edison reneged on his promise, and offered to raise Tesla’s pay by 50 cents a day.

That was the end of their relationship. After that, a rivalry grew between them.

Edison has been called “the greatest inventor who ever lived” because he got more than 2,000 patents.

Nonsense.

First, Edison had many lawyer friends that quickly patented every lame idea Edison had. Most of those 2,000 patents were for worthless gizmos.

Second, many of Edison’s best ideas came from workers in Edison’s lab, not from Edison. (Tesla was an example.) But Edison got all the credit for others’ work.

J.P. Morgan helped Edison set up the General Electric Company. Then Edison used Morgan’s attorneys to weasel out of paying for the use of Tesla’s own patents.

Edison was a scumbag. During the second half of his career, he spent more time sabotaging his competitors (and stealing their ideas) that he did inventing things.

Only a very sick MF like Edison would electrocute animals in an attempt to discredit a business rival.

He was a psychopath, brutalised by his father and determined to exact revenge on others. One look at his legacy shows that.

The Sea Dreamer

You should not ignore the historical context. The control of the government of the U.S.A. had not at that time passed in its entirety into alien, or, if you prefer, dual-loyalty hands. For example, there was trenchant opposition to the U.S.A.'s recognition of Israel, in 1948, by second and third tier levels at the State Department. This opposition was only made ineffective by the direct intervention of Pres. Truman.

The Rosenbergs (at whose trial a Jewish judge presided, I believe) had imperilled by treason the existence of the U.S.A. at a time when all, emphasise all, true Americans considered that peril to be deadly, and threatening. Hence, needs of national security, in the truest sense of that word, overcame ethnic loyalties.

You will recall that these events took place toward the beginning of the Cold War, Truman's forty year war. That the outcomes would be different today, goes without saying.

Similarly, Pollard passed nuclear weapons classified information to a certain middle eastern country, which information was then passed on to the Soviet Union, to the further imperilment of the national security of the U.S.A., at a time when that phrase retained some real meaning.

Suffice to say that if Rosenbergs/Pollard happened today, all would be alive, and none in prison.

As is well known, the Bolsheviks were backed by the Rothschilds. The Soviet elite was almost entirely Jewish. However, Trotsky was preferred by the Zionists as a successor to Lenin, but was upstaged by Stalin because he fell sick around the time Lenin died. Stalin was a Jew and did cooperate with the Zionists during WWII, but was apparently not cooperative both before and after WWII. It is known that Zionists in the US Government helped the Russians with nuclear technology during WWII. But I think such official assistance would have stopped after the war, once Stalin started being difficult again.

Nevertheless, the non-cooperative Jews running the Soviet Union did have contacts with American Jews, and it is probable that these contacts were used for espionage. I think that the espionage of the Rosenbergs was probably not sanctioned by the Zionist NWO. That's why they had to pay the price.

It is also likely that the Korean war was an entrapment scheme. Korea was deliberately left undefended to tempt the Soviets to attack. The attack was then used as an excuse to declare war on the non-cooperative Stalin. But the Korean war ultimately became a stalemate. Stalin used to be paranoid about being poisoned by NWO agents. Stalin's successor, Khrushchev, apparently had a more cordial relationship with the NWO.

Such entrapment schemes have been used again and again by the Zionist NWO. Examples are Hitler's invasion of Poland after the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and Saddam's invasion of Kuwait.

Thanks for your comment.

I agree with what you say (except--wasn't it mainly China that helped North Korea, not the USSR? China did send a lot of troops to Korea.)

In my post I say I SUPECT that the Rosenbergs stepped on Jewish toes. Something about the case doesn't add up. I think we have not been told the whole story. Even the wikipedia zionists do not defend the Rosenbergs, or Pollard.

That seems odd to me, when just about every other Jew is a "victim of rampant anti-Semitisim."

Stalin was very much involved in the Korean war. See http://www.alternativeinsight.com/Korean_War.html

Eisenhower's reaction to the Korean war is interesting. See http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=62491

Regards, kk

I find Eisenhower’s speech confusing. Is he for the Korean War, or against it? He talks about a “crusade.” I’m confused.

Some web sites say Eisenhower was Jewish. (Example: http://judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm )

If Eisenhower was Jewish, it would explain his oft-repeated quotes about how much he hated Germans. It would also give weight to your argument that Eisenhower cooperated with Stalin regarding Korea.

Eisenhower’s death camps also suggest he was Jewish…

In his book In Other Losses (1989), Canadian writer James Bacque says Eisenhower deliberately caused the death of 790,000 German captives in internment camps through disease, starvation and cold from 1944 to 1949. In similar French camps some 250,000 more are said to have perished. The Red Cross had plenty of food, but Eisenhower would not let them into the German POW death camps. Switzerland was deprived of its status as "Protecting Power." To justify all this, German POW's were reclassified as "Disarmed Enemy Forces,” (or as Bush would call them, “illegal combatants”). Bacque laid the blame on Eisenhower, saying Germans were kept on starvation rations even though there was no food shortage in Europe in 1945-1946.

The Soviets also had death camps for Germans. In the book, Crimes And Mercies (2003), Bacque described the deaths of hundreds of thousands of German soldiers and civilians held in Soviet captivity, and possibly up to two million civilians who died in the mass expulsions of Germans from East Prussia, Pomerania, western Poland, Silesia, the Sudetenland and Romania.

There are other articles about Eisenhower’s death camps.

For example, see

http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/us_war_crimes/Eisenho...

++++++++++++++

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/eisenhowers-death-camps-a...

++++++++++++++

http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/us_war_crimes/us_war_...

++++++++++++++

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower_and_German_POWs

Yes, Eisenhower was Jewish. Regarding Eisenhower's speech, he laments that the inadequate measures to defend Korea caused the crisis.

Most American leaders, Eisenhower included, have to follow orders from the NWO. They are sometimes willing collaborators, and sometimes unwilling collaborators. Sometimes they may collaborate for some time and then rebel, causing them to be suicided or accidented.

Often, they may not understand the larger strategy that underlies the orders they have been given. Sometimes they may follow orders they don't fully understand, but only grudgingly. This may have been the situation in the case of Eisenhower at the time of the Korean problem. Its very difficulyt to tell for sure.

This does not minimize his culpability regarding his treatment of the German POWs. But humans are complex, I guess. People change, and nobody is 100% good or 100% evil.

You say nobody is 100 % evil.

Perhaps you are correct, but I think zionists, warmongers, and such come pretty damn close to 100%. (Just my opinion.)

By the way, I think Patton didn't like Jews (but I can't cite evidence of that). If so, it might explain some of the friction he had with Eisenhower.

And hey -- regarding "Eisen"-hower, isn't the prefix "Eisen" a common Jewish prefix? Or am I mistaken? Like "Eisenstein."