Presidential candidate Mike Gravel rebukes Hillary Clinton for her evil chortle
For full context with Hillary's response, here's the video link
Related: Hillary Clinton = psycho in the White House (Hillary reputed to be ill-tempered with the penchant for very profane insults towards even the polite greeting people, also a closet anti-Semite)
Mike Gravel authored a blog article titled...
Hillary, War with Iran is No Laughing Matter
One factual error in the op-ed is that Mike Gravel referred to Saudi Arabia as comprised of Shiite Moslem. It is Sunni.
But I hope Sunni will unite with Shiite in the millions to subdue the unreasonably aggressive Western imperialism in the near future. I call this Persian/Pan-Arabic nationalism. The Saudi kingdom - in my opinion - is corrupt with the continuous accumulation of lavish wealth and favoring the West at the expense of the Saudi poor & meek complaint and/or silence over Israel's brutal subjugation of Palestinian and Lebanese populations, so the overthrow may be in order.
Hillary Clinton have demonstrated with irrefutable proof she is as evil as Bush/Cheney administration packed with Straussian Zionist Neoconservatives. Hillary is a demented woman unfit to serve as the president of the United States that will continue the disastrous foreign policy dictated by the State of Israel through the regressive influence of AIPAC, JINSA and AEI.
"I hope Sunni will unite with Shiite in the millions to subdue the unreasonably aggressive Western imperialism in the near future."
I hope that too, but there are challenges. For example, you mentioned that Arabia is Sunni. That's true, but Arabia also has two million Shiites.
Here's an article I read...
From Saudi Arabia's establishment in 1932, its minority Shiite population has been subject to discrimination. Beginning in the early 1990s, with then Crown Prince Abdullah's active support, the Arabian government took steps to improve relations between Sunnis and Shiites, but the measures were modest, and tensions continued to rise.
Sunni tribal warriors have called for Sunnis to suppress Shiites violently, but the Royal Family will not support this. Shiites remain under-represented in official positions, and Shiite students complain of open hostility from Sunni instructors. Jobs in the police and military are rare, and promotion prospects rarer still. While restrictions have loosened, Shiites continue to face obstacles.
Shiites are normally quiet in Arabia, but they were encouraged to challenge the Saudi regime when Iran had its revolution in 1979. Civil disobedience arose. This phase only lasted ten years, but the Shiites still remember the state's heavy-handed response.
Over time, the Shiite leadership gradually moderated its views, recognizing that violence has limited effect. They also wanted to improve ties with the Saudi regime, since the regime does not favor Sunni extremists.
In a 1993 meeting, King Fahd promised Shiite leaders he would relax political restrictions in exchange for Shiites ending active opposition from abroad. Unfortunately, Sunni extremists increased their pressure, thus sustaining tensions.
The Iraq war (starting in 2003) strengthened Shiite aspirations, plus repression from Sunni tribal leaders.
A rising number of Sunni militants have been drawn from Arabia to Iraq, motivated by opposition to the U.S., and to the Shiites' increased role. When these militants return to Arabia, there will be new problems between them and Shiites in Arabia.
King Abdullah tries to avoid conflicts, but moving forward will require a long-term commitment to political and social integration, and to combating domestic hate-speech.
Source:
http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=3678
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is the problem with Gentiles. We're all threatened by zionism, but we are too busy squabbling to unite against zionism. Meanwhile zionists do whatever they can to promote squabbling among us.
Regarding Hillary, she has obvious been chosen as the next President, which means war, war, and more war.
Bush may be leaving office in the near future, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the next administration won't be more of the same, regardless if Democrat or Republican.
I wouldn't be too surprised if the current administration is already ambitiously pulling strings behind the scene to ENSURE the next president will follow in Bush's footsteps concerning policy in the Middle East -- AIPAC obviously has been quite effectively doing its share!
that we will have war in ME and it will spread everywhere..the thing is just set that way as there is no real desire from great powers or majority people to bring justice to the world's oppressed. WAR is inevitable not because we want it but because they want. However this WAR will cause their own demise as well...price will be very high but hey all good things in life are quite expensive...they plot against God but God is a way ahead of all of them...
"Let there be Light!"