U.S Army study of MOSSAD
Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
It calls Israel's armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza [and the West Bank]. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission."
The Washington Times September 10, 2001
U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study
Author: Rowan Scarborough; THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Located at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., the School for Advanced Military Studies is both a training ground and a think tank for some of the Army's brightest officers. Officials say the Army chief of staff, and sometimes the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ask SAMS to develop contingency plans for future military operations. During the 1991 Persian Gulf war, SAMS personnel helped plan the coalition ground attack that avoided a strike up the middle of Iraqi positions and instead executed a "left hook" that routed the enemy in 100 hours.
The cover page for the recent SAMS project said it was done for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But Maj. Chris Garver, a Fort Leavenworth spokesman, said the study was not requested by Washington.
"This was just an academic exercise," said Maj. Garver. "They were trying to take a current situation and get some training out of it."
The exercise was done by 60 officers dubbed "Jedi Knights," as all second-year SAMS students are nicknamed.
The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first year of a peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for U.S. troops from both sides.
It calls Israel's armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza [and the West Bank]. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission. Very unlikely to fire on American forces. Fratricide a concern especially in air space management."
Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
Note: This is from the WT's archives, which required payment to get the article. Not complaining about the money spent--well worth it--just saying that it will be impossible to cross check without paying them some federal reserve notes.
For those in pursuit of the truth, here's the WT archive search page. Don't believe me, check for yourself for only $2.95..
Here's another link to cross check this article.
Hmmm. Guess that makes the U.S. Army "Anti-Semitic?"
Which the Zionists want to fix by sending off our kids to die fighting another war for Israel, against Iran.
This is an interesting article. I have my doubts about it means. For example, does it mean that the US Military is aware of who actually did 911? Or was article a shot across the bow to warn the Israeli's not to interfere with the US internally? The article would have been more useful if it told us how the Mossad would deceive the American people! ONE THING IS CLEAR Maj. Chris Garver HAS MOVED UP THE RANKS! Lt Col Christopher Garver, is now spokesman for US forces in Iraq. Recently he was quoted in a story were the US Military were to utilize U-TUBE as a way to spread positive information.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6639401.stm
the SAMS report is one of those classics that everyone on earth should know about.
LAV - that's a pretty good catch. Did you just recognize his name? Or did you google it?
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
I did a little research on Chris Garver and found that he has been promoted since 911. Moveover, Lieutenant Colonel Chris Garver has become a military spokesperson in Iraq. So one might conclude that Garver's link to pre-911 Mossad disclosure had no effect on his career. I would suggest that you read the BCC article. After reading sveral articles, I concluded that Garver is some sort of military propagandist. So what dies did say about the 911 article?
"For example, does it mean that the US Military is aware of who actually did 911?"
The article was published on 9/10/2001.
What a coincidence.
The date of the article suggest that the Military was at the very least aware that the Mossad could attempt such a plot well before 911. However, it is also obvious that the Military has kept very tight lipped over this issue. The question for me has always been why would the Military do this? Graver who was the quoted spokesperson for the article has been promoted since that time into a high profile position! Surely he must be aware of the implications?
Military was in on it (at least some of most powerful elite) otherwise how explain their folded hands during 911 drama. However those with desire of advancing in rank will know when to "stand down" so to speak. They have been requested for help on 911 but they were obedient soldiers. I was in army and I know what it means to be self opinionated. Its in the least very politically unpopular. This thing on 911 could not have been pulled out without powerful man in military having in mind that apart from NSA, FBI and CIA military has its own monitoring apparatus for rapid detection and response especially in air attacks. Remember guys who stopped six nukes well that says a lot about their self opinion and also how expensive in military that can be.
"Let there be Light!"