The Origins of Christian Zionism
The notion that the Christian world, the western world or even the whole world is standing against Islam or Islamic countries, is a Zionist plot.
Atheists tell us Christians, that it´s a bit unfair to disown our own offspring, or in this case the Christians Zionists, if we don´t like their actions.
But then, if we can prove, that they are changelings, laid into our cradle by enemies of Christianity, we have every right to tell the world, that those kids are not ours, but theirs:
British Lords, Homeless Folks, and a Phony Bible
by Charles E. Carlson
We Hold These Truths June 23, 2006
The State of Israel controls every gate into the Gaza Strip. One such gate called Rafah connects the tiny land with the Egyptian Sinai. But to get there you must cross a kilometer wide Israeli zone, and if you’re lucky enough to be allowed passage to Gaza it is with Israel’s permission; your passport shows you have entered Israel, not Palestine. Only yesterday two unnamed swimmers tried to bypass this checkpoint and were shot in the water by the crew of an Israeli Navy ship.
But an even more strange right of passage is practiced inside America’s churches.
For when you enter what is referred to generically as an evangelical church you are probably about to partake in a Zionist controlled religion as distant from traditional Christianity as is Pharisaism.
British Lord Balfour provided a forged deed for the State of Israel to enter Arab land. And at almost the same hour he wrote his famous letter, the new dispensational church movement in America was being hijacked for the specific purpose of blessing world Zionism.
Dispensationalism, or evangelicalism, as it is often called, has its roots in and owes its success to British nobles who were, for the most part, above religion and called each other “Lord.” Both Israel and dispensational Christianity received their baptismal blessings from the British Crown.
There is no nation of Palestine today, nor was there one in 1917 when it was gifted to the world Zionist movement. It would be more accurate to call the Arab lands “Occupied Philistia,” the historic land of the Philistines. From a religious point of view one could also dub Israel “Phariseeland” recognizing the decline of its spiritualism.
But the British chose the name “Palestine” and Lord Balfour referred to it as the “homeland for the Jewish people” when he, represented the Crown of England, he made this strange land deed to English Lord, <>Lionel Walter Rothschild<> in a letter, known ever since as the Balfour Declaration. It states:
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely, Arthur James Balfour
Barron Rothschild was the most prominent Jew in England, chosen to communicate the good news to the world Zionism organization (the Company) then headed by a Russian Zionist named Chaim Weizmann. There was also no state called Israel at that time, which makes this land grant so unique in history. It might be likened to the US Congress granting California to the Church of England. Congress does not own California; the World Zionist Federation was not a state, but a company.
This British gift of someone else’s land was the beginning of the endless wars with Arabs on one side, pitted against Jews, Zionist-Christians, and the US Government on the other side. It is one of the most lopsided miss-matches in the history of genocide, equivalent to a staged Roman slaughter of humans by lions. The question that must be asked is:
Why do professing Christians allow themselves to be drawn into an unscriptural shedding of innocent blood, not to mention land theft?
American “Christians” provide the margin of victory for Zionism. They alone provided the moral excuse for the slaughter, and in so doing it stands against everything we are taught in Jesus' words about the absolute obligation to protect the “least of our brothers.”
The war in the Mideast, as anyone with one eye can see, is an indecent mismatch beyond civilized imagination. It is understandable that Jewish synagogues might support it, but why do Christian Churches stand for brutality against the weak? Answer: Because it is required by their “religion.” We will continue to examine how this was arranged.
The Balfour Declaration was not enough to make the State of Israel a political reality in a world dominated by a substantially Biblically aware America. Zionism’s founders stated they needed broad American support else their venture would fail.
The USA was the new, great world power, even if most Americans did not yet know it. Most Americans rightly respected Arab culture in the first half of the 20th Century. Mr. Weizmann faced no small public relations trick. Winning Christians to support the tribe that calls itself by the name of those who tormented and killed Jesus Christ required a radical change in Christian doctrine.
The new, Zionist-friendly Christianity was hatched from eggs laid by its European predecessors, primarily Edwin Ervin and John Nelson Darby. Its purpose was (unknown to its followers) to make Zionist land theft biblically legal and morally acceptable.
To do this Zionists needed a rewritten Bible that would make the State of Israel a necessary precursor to the imminent return of Christ to planet earth. The idea was to make Jesus Christ’s return to earth imminent, and to make Jesus' return to earth dependant upon the Jew’s return to the land of the Philistines first. All world Zionism had to do was write such a bible and sell it to enough Christ followers.
The neo-Christian-Zionists would at first simply accept the erroneous notion that the Bible predicted a political state of Israel in Palestine. As time went on those who accepted it would be taught to accept mass deportation and murder of the Arabs to secure the real estate upon which Christ would someday (very soon) set up an early rule called a “Millennial kingdom.”
In the dispensational scheme, Zionists were to be allowed the role of custodianship of the land until Jesus decided he needed it, at which time the Israeli Jews would be out of luck, out of land again, and would be slaughtered as well.
This unhappy ending for world Judaism did not worry the Zionists because it served their purpose, and they did not believe it anyway.
It was perfected in the Scofield Reference Bible, and it is also precisely the message that is sold in tens of millions of pulp fiction, “Left Behind” books written by Tim Lahaye’s enterprises, as well as by a thousand other similar “rapture” and Armageddon authors over the last 90 years.
Lord Balfour’s and Lord Rothschild’s role in creating this new, Israel-friendly christian-like cult was spawned and fed through the English Crown’s influence over Oxford University Press, supposedly a part of Oxford University, but a useful political tool for the Crown it seems.
In 1908 Oxford was the most prestigious publishing company in England. Just how the Crown went about making decisions for Oxford University Press is beyond this study.
Lord Rothschild and his banking friends and family had the financial clout to support and promote the upstart religion and sell it to 70 million Americans.
Oxford University Press promoted Scofield’s book to the seminaries and bible colleges of America. Later it was disclosed that Oxford owned the book and still does. Scofieldism is also Rothschildism; both had an incalculable negative influence on traditional Christianity.
Dispensationalism is the label provided from Cyrus I. Scofield’s seven “dispensations,” the first being found in the footnotes on page 4 (1967 Edition).
The excuse for the conquest of what We Hold These Truths and the Bible calls the “Land of the Philistines” is found in Scofield footnote on page 251 called the “Palestinian Covent”; and in footnotes to the book of Genesis (12:3), wherein the promise of a Christ-child is converted into a shabby future land swindle to justify the theft of the present day Arab lands.
This was caused to happen in 1947, some 3000 years after Abram is said to have had his conversation with God about fathering a great tribe.
The Scofield Reference Bible is the transparent bible forgery for changing fundamental Christianity into Rothschild’s Zionism.
Today it shamefully dominates the bible colleges and seminaries, beginning with the Moody Bible Institute and Dallas Theological Seminary and pulpits of evangelical churches of America.
We Hold These Truths has already explained the most necessary details of the heresy verse by verse and line by heretical line. We need not take space here, but will point you to the inventory of papers by this author.
Most will be convinced that Cyrus I. Scofield was acting under the influence of World Zionism when he wrote his infamous book (if in fact someone else did not write it for him). Scofield probably did not know he was the first Zionist-Christian to corrupt the work of Christ’s ministries.
Followers of Christ should not fear confrontation with religious leaders backed by We Hold These Truths' presentation. It has worked in hundreds of tests; we all but guaranty that pastor have no logical answer your questions. The Litmus test question each leader should be asked is:
“Pastor, do you teach that the present day State of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophesy?”
There is only one correct answer; and that is “No.” But our Serial War problem does center on Israel. We Hold These Truths' purpose is to make this confrontation with your church so simple that any layman can do it. Only when we, who claim to follow Christ, learn to confront the errant churches will respect for life be restored within our society. It will rekindle the spark of decency, and it might even please God.
CHOOSE LIFE NOT WAR
WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS & STRAIT GATE MINISTRIES
--------------------
http://www.peacebytruth.com/main.php
Can you see the main page at:
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/
I see only a blank page.
but a couple of days back I could not access the site for a whole day.
It sometimes happens
” It would be more accurate to call the Arab lands “Occupied Philistia,” the historic land of the Philistines.”
Yes, Americans might not realize that most Arabs use the term “Philistine," not the British term "Palestine."
"Scofield probably did not know he was the first Zionist-Christian to corrupt the work of Christ’s ministries."
This is a surprising statement, since the rest of the post is correct about the zionist plot. Scofield was not a Christian. He was a very well-connected zionist Jew, working for zionist Jew organizations. He wrote his "reference bible" at a time when the USA was becoming a powerful nation. In those days there were many immigrants from Europe with different ideas of what Christianity was. Scofield took that opportunity to implant zionist lies into his "reference bible." Today's evangelicals adopt his lies because they are cowards who think that if they grovel enough, they will be loved by zionist Jews. They have no clue of how much zionists despise them. To zionists, they are useful idiots.
As a zionist Jew, Scofield became closely associated with Samuel Untermeyer, who later became chairman of the American Jewish Committee, plus president of the American League of Jewish Patriots, plus chairman of the Non-sectarian Anti-Nazi League. Untermeyer personally blackmailed President Wilson into accepting the Federal Reserve, and chose the next Supreme Court Justice —Louis Brandeis (another zionist Jew). Later, Untermeyer launched World War II -- for it was Untermeyer who called for a global boycott against Deutschland.
Untermeyer introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and the Rothschild banker Jacob Schiff. These people financed Scofield's research trips to Oxford, and arranged the publication and distribution of his “reference bible.”
It is impossible to overstate the influence of Cyrus Scofield on twentieth-century Christian beliefs. The Scofield Bible is the standard reference work in virtually all Christian ministries and divinity schools. It is singularly responsible for the Christian belief that the Hebrew Prophecies describe the kingdom of Jesus' Second Coming, when in fact the Prophecies describe a zionist New World Order. And it is precisely because Christians persist in this belief that they remain blind to the reality of Zion.
Scofield served as the Jewish agent by which the Zionists paralyzed Christianity, while they prepared America for the final zionist conquest, which has now been accomplished.
Onward Christian terrorists!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Internet is full of articles about this. Here are a few of many references….
http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/2007/Jan-Mar/NL2007Jan-Mar1.htm
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/scofield.htm
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/scofield.htm
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/index.html
Further evidence of this being a zionist plot concerns the word “Crown,” which controlled the Oxford University press. Abraham Makow says the “crown” does not refer to the Queen, or the monarchy. It refers to the "City of London,” an enclave in the heart of the main city. It is run by the Bank of England, which is a private corporation like the U.S. Federal Reserve. It is a sovereign state within a state. As the "Vatican of the financial world," the City is not subject to British law. On the contrary, the bankers dictate to the British Parliament.
Source:
http://savethemales.ca/000447.html
It is the "crown" that oversaw the publication of Scofield's lies, which have turned "Christian" zionists into mindless zombies that serve the Beast.
The plan worked beautifully.
actual evidence, that Scofield was Jewish to begin with.
He was a con-man who treated his family badly, divorced his wife,left his kids, had a mistress and remarried someone else.
In later life he seemed to have met up with Jewish Zionists.
As for the "crown". It seems to me rather, that it is a confederation between the old British blood aristocracy and the new Jewish money aristrocracy.
If you read the history of the Rothschilds you will see, that they were not accepted right away within the European upper classes. And they had a mighty chip on their shoulders because of it.
Jews had little power within the British Empire before the take-over of the London stock exchange by Jacob Rothschild after the battle of Waterloo in 1815.
That was the beginning of the Rothschild financial Empire and their ascendancy into the British aristocracy.
A lot of the important names in the elite are still Anglo-Saxon and not Jewish.
Yes, I’m trying to get solid verification on Scofield, one way or the other. I once had a Jewish landlord once whose name was Scofield. I suppose it’s possible that Cryrus Scofield could have formed relationships with top-level zionists even if he was NOT Jewish. I’m trying to find out what his mother’s family name was.
By the way, you claim that, “Jews had little power within the British Empire before the take-over of the London stock exchange by Jacob Rothschild after the battle of Waterloo in 1815.”
Some biographies of Jacob Rothschild make that claim, but I find it very hard to believe. When Jews were expelled from England in 1290, and from other places in Europe at other times, do you think this was because of sheer “anti-Semitism” and nothing else? I think it’s more plausible that Jews were often removed because they got too much power. And since you use the general term “Jews,” I take you to mean that 1815 was a magic year for all Jews, not just the Rothschilds. Again, I find that doubtful. Did moneychangers, goldsmiths, and powerful Jewish bankers not appear until after 1815? Many sources claim that Jewish money was behind the East India Company, which had operated for almost 200 years before 1815.
After the American war of Independence, Alexander Hamilton (whose mother was Jewish) pushed for a private central bank in the USA, such as we have today. I've read some sources that claim Hamilton was guided, in part, by Jewish banking interests in England. Again, that was well before 1815.
Did Jacob Rothschild himself have no power before 1815? I know he made a killing in the London stock market, but surely he was not powerless before then. Did no other Jew have power beside him?
All told, I find it very hard to believe that "Jews had little power in England before 1815."
But that’s just my opinion. You could be right about Scofield, though.
I know from sources I have read in the last few years, that Jews indeed had a lot of influence in Poland and Spain during long periods of history.
The Jewish elite worked, for instance, closely with the Polish Christian aristocracy in the oppression and exploitation of the Polish peasantry.
When the Jewish administrators and lease-holders wanted to expand their influence into the areas of the Ukrainian Cossacks, it brought on the terrible anti-Jewish massacres in the area.
In Spain, Sephardic Jews had come with the Islamic Moors and where, after the Christian kings had reconquered the country, alleged to have plotted to bring the Moors back, which in turn brought on the Spanish Inquisition.
The allegations by the way were made by Jewish converts to Christianity.
The British, however, had their own problems with elitism and supremacism. They started their Empire and "manifest destiny" well before the Rothschilds came into the picture.
http://www.whtt.org/show/
---------------------------------------
To Jesus Through Mary