CCTV proves police lied: de Menezes behaved normally before being murdered
The murder scene. Jean Charles de Menezes ‘ body in a puddle of blood after police pumped seven slugs into him.
http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/cctv-proves-police-lied-de...
The cops claimed Jean Charles de Menezes was wearing a bulky coat to hide a bomb. But they lied. He was wearing a light denim jacket. They said he was running away, jumping turnstiles. But they lied. He walked nonchalantly like everyone else, completely unsuspecting that he was about to be murdered by a bloodthirsty gang of Israeli-trained London cops, who lie, lie and lie some more. The entire operation was a lie from it’s inception, through its execution and into its continuing subsequent whitewashing and coverup.
They could have easily detained him outside the station, which is the logical thing to do with a “suicide bomber” to prevent catastrophe, but the “controllers” purposely stalled to allow their prey to end up down in the tube where he could be properly dispatched out of the light of day. They say it was a “botched operation”, but the way these thugs operate, I doubt there was any mistake made on the part of the controllers. It was just another deception. They meant to have him killed to make an example out of him. In other words, “We have the power of life over death. We decide when you live and when you die. We are the new overlords. And best of all, we’re untouchable! hahahahaha!”
9/11 is a proven lie, another Hollywood production for an ignorant dumbed-down public. So was 7/7, yet another false-flag operation, with simultaneous drills in exactly the same three stations, designed to get people to surrender their liberties for “security” from the loving Big Brother global fascist state.
So, will you believe what they say now about Mr de Menezes? They are still lying you know, and won’t stop lying about this crime probably for the rest of their lives. And for their loyalty and devotion to the job, they will get their medals of dishonor, their elevation in the masonic lodge and maybe even knighthoods. Mmm, wouldn’t that be nice?
And since these disgusting lying cops are now the new gods, whose boots must now be licked with complete subservience, they will maintain immunity from prosecution just as murdering troops, commanders and mercenaries in Iraq keep getting off virtually scott-free for gunning down entire families in their homes, on the sidewalks and in their cars. British police now have shoot-to-kill powers of anyone suspected of being a terrorist and de Menezes will not be the last to die like this. How would you like it if this happened to your dear sweet son, or your loving brother? No matter who you are, you must see the total absurdity, criminal brutality and injustice of this heinous event and you must speak out against it. If not, then don’t cry when they kill or maim your own loved ones.
This type of garbage will just go on and on, getting worse and worse unless people wake up and realize that all of their freedoms are being stripped from them by a neofeudal elite, unrestrained by traditional values like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Stop them now, before we are all microchipped, because by then, it will be just about too late.
PW
. . .
On the escalator, the killers stalk their prey (JC), moments from his death
CCTV reveals Menezes’ final moments
Telegraph | Oct 9, 2007
By James Macintyre
Jean Charles de Menezes was shown picking up a morning paper and walking calmly through Stockwell Tube station in the moments before he was shot dead on the Underground by police, in CCTV footage released last night.
Contrary to reports at the time, Menezes – who had been mistaken by police for a suicide bomber – was not running and did not jump over the ticket barriers, the newly released footage clearly showed.
The first images of Menezes in the build-up to his death came after a police officer present at the shooting described the “shocking” moments that the innocent Brazilian was pinned down and then shot seven times in the head. The surveillance officer, codenamed Ivor, told the Old Bailey that the incident – which came in the aftermath of an attempted “second wave” of attacks on the Tube following the 7 July bombings in 2005 – was distressing to passengers on the Northern Line train.
Ivor described how he moved into action “instinctively” after Menezes got up from his seat. He told the jury: “I grabbed Menezes, wrapping both my arms around the torso, pinning his arms against his side, pushing him back to the seat with the right-hand side of my head against the right-hand side of his torso, pinning him to the seat.
“He appeared to stiffen up. He was not in a natural sitting position but he was back in the seat where he had been sitting. After a few moments I felt his head turn towards me. I was aware of a CO19 officer kneeling on the seat to my left. I heard a gunshot very close to my left ear and was hit by a shockwave of a gun being discharged.”
At one point, the officer said, he was apparently mistaken for a suspect himself amid chaotic scenes in which he found himself with a gun being turned on him. “I was aware that the long-barrelled weapon was levelled at my chest and the barrel of a gun was at my head,” he said. “Given this, I held out my hands and shouted ‘police’.”
By chance, the plain-clothes officer was dressed “virtually identically” to Menezes in jeans, a denim jacket and trainers. He was then dragged away from the scene before putting his black police cap on.
“I could hear several gunshots and shouting and screaming, but nothing more specific,” Ivor said. “The scene was extremely violent, extremely noisy and obviously distressing.
“Members of the public were emptying the carriage, obviously in distress. There was a lot of gunsmoke. It was obviously a shocking incident.”
The officer described the immediate thinking that led to his decision to accost Menezes. “Given the nature of the subject we were deployed against, I had to make an assessment within seconds. I was concerned that his hands may come together and instinctively pinned his hands to his side.
“I was obviously concerned that he may be carrying arms or had explosives in his possession which could be a threat to the public on the carriage.”
Police had waited outside Menezes’s home in Scotia Road, south London – an address that, according to police, had been connected to the 21 July attempted bomber Hussain Osman – before following him on to two buses and then into Stockwell Tube station.
The police were uncertain as to the identity of Menezes. Ivor told the court: “I requested via my radio whether or not Menezes should be detained. I received the reply that I should wait.”
He added: “I was certainly in a position to effect some sort of detention of Menezes.”
The Office of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police denies a single charge of exposing the public to risk in breach of health and safety legislation.
The hearing is set to continue today.
. . .
... than is alluded to by the mainstream media. It was clearly not a case of mistaken identity. It was a hit. If he really was suspected of carrying a bomb, the last thing the officers would do is tackle him, let alone shoot him in the head at point-blank range up to seven times.
The possible reasons for this cold-blooded murder are myriad, the most plausible being that Jean Charles, as an electrician, had done some work for London Underground prior to 7/7 and knew more than he should do about the false-flag nature of what transpired on that day.
The 'power surge' claims initially made by London Transport to explain what was happening on 7/7 indicate that the power system on London Underground could have had a role to play in triggering the explosive devices that wreaked havoc in the train carriages.
The de Menezes shooting was clearly a deliberate murder. There were eleven shots in all: seven to the head, one bullet hit his shoulder, and three missed altogether and lodged in the carriage. The killers knew full well there was not the slightest risk of an explosion.
However, I believe the killing was merely part of a propaganda exercise to promote the concept of "suicide bombers", following on from the opportunity afforded to the government by the copycat 'attacks' by political protesters with their fake bombs on July 21. Surely the government would have had its own operatives for wiring jobs, and in any case, London 7/7 was an outside job. Everything points to Israel.
The explosions would have caused power surges after the rails were shorted by metal debris. The Mossad would have employed timers to trigger their plastic explosives on the undercarriages.
It was about July 1, 2005, that Israel discovered Egypt and British Gas had struck a secret deal behind its back, in which Gaza gas would be sold to Egypt. On July 7, Britain was hit by its biggest terror attack since Lockerbie in 1988. On July 23, Sharm al-Sheikh was hit by Egypt's biggest terror attack for eight years.