Israel Plans Nuclear Strike on Iran
This is from ICH, taken verbatim from a Times Online article:
By Uzi Mahnaimi, New York and Sarah Baxter, Washington
11/07/07 "The Times" -- - - ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.
Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.
The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.
Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.
“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.
The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.
Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.
Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.
Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.
Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme:
Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment
A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels
A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb
Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.
The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.
Robert Gates, the new US defence secretary, has described military action against Iran as a “last resort”, leading Israeli officials to conclude that it will be left to them to strike.
Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets. Three possible routes have been mapped out, including one over Turkey.
Air force squadrons based at Hatzerim in the Negev desert and Tel Nof, south of Tel Aviv, have trained to use Israel’s tactical nuclear weapons on the mission. The preparations have been overseen by Major General Eliezer Shkedi, commander of the Israeli air force.
Sources close to the Pentagon said the United States was highly unlikely to give approval for tactical nuclear weapons to be used. One source said Israel would have to seek approval “after the event”, as it did when it crippled Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak with airstrikes in 1981.
Scientists have calculated that although contamination from the bunker-busters could be limited, tons of radioactive uranium compounds would be released.
The Israelis believe that Iran’s retaliation would be constrained by fear of a second strike if it were to launch its Shehab-3 ballistic missiles at Israel.
However, American experts warned of repercussions, including widespread protests that could destabilise parts of the Islamic world friendly to the West.
Colonel Sam Gardiner, a Pentagon adviser, said Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the route for 20% of the world’s oil.
Some sources in Washington said they doubted if Israel would have the nerve to attack Iran. However, Dr Ephraim Sneh, the deputy Israeli defence minister, said last month: “The time is approaching when Israel and the international community will have to decide whether to take military action against Iran.”
© Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.
If these "several Israeli military sources" are correct, this is absolute madness.
If they're so scared of a "second Holocaust", why are they in such a rush to create one? Total fucking lunacy.
Note the Times Online's perpetuation of the "wipe Israel off the map" myth.
..the ashkin are crazy enough, just in case anyone hasn't figured that out yet..
THEY ARE THE REAL NUCLEAR THREAT!
..yet, will the dummies believe the lie of assumption that Iran seeks a nuclear bomb?
..the f-ing taliban are more likely to almost take over Pakistan('s bombs), prompting an expansion of warfare to encompass Iran, thus separating it from China!
..whilst the nazios attempt to start war with Syria too, thus triggering a stone age..
..don't even ask me about the future of Turkey and the Caspian Sea region, khusar!
..will shaitan achieve ha'aretz azrael,
..before it sits on the greed zone throne?
BE-GONE!
"Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack."
If anything , all of the bellicose war mongering statements by the Israeli Zionists would make anyone seek some type of nuke, just to prevent the deranged Israeli's from using their arsenal of nukes against a country in Israel's sights.
As for cajoling America into action, what a laugh.
This illegal and immoral act of war is probably being planned in the Pentagon and being overseen by Dick Cheney.
Those three aircraft carrier groups in the Persian Gulf aren't there for fun and sun, they're there for an attack on Iran and it looks like the Zionsts in Tel Aviv and the neoCONs in DC have decided, that since telling lies about Iran isn't scaring people fast enough, that Israel will commit the initial act of aggression against Iran and the US will gladly join in the murder of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people.
Next up on the Israeli target screen? Probably Saudi Arabia.
That is if this act of madness by the Zinoists doesn't morph into WW III and get the entire planet incinerated.
Hogwash.
U.S. has used low grade Nukes in Iraq and Afghanastan.
The date on that original Sunday Times piece is 07 January 2007. It's ten months old.
Just more of the same old saber-rattling from Le petit état merdeux.
israel is not going to nuke anybody, not in the near future anyway. It would be an extraordinary political disaster for them if they did. They would lose all of their self-appointed, phony moral authority and they'd lose their licence to whimper endlessly about "poor little us."
They're not going to give that up. That's the most effective weapon they have. On top of that, by employing nuclear weapons against another country they'd put themselves into a political position where a nuclear attack on israel in the future would be considered fair play and justifiable in the world community.
It would be far more likely to be an 'existential' than 'political' disaster should they unwisely choose to engage in nuclear war. They could kiss goodbye to their vile little state.
You're dead right about this article being ten months old. My girlfriend mumbled something about January as we were reading it, but I didn't notice it.
Why ICH is publishing ten month old articles and sending out email alerts about them is beyond me.
You bet. I've done it myself in the past, I've been tripped up reading pieces that were old while thinking they were current articles. I always check the dates now.
Cheers
Jonny