To HELL with all you RACIST ASHKENAZIS!!!!
GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!!!!!!!!
This means the AshkeNAZI KhaZars will be more "cautious" launching WWIII. I refer to the US Army/Marines/Navy/Air force as Khazarian, since for all intents and purposes, it is CONTROLLED the 'Jewish' Cabal.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY - More by this author » Last updated at 00:13am on 10th November 2007
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.
By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.
According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.
The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.
One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.
The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.
The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.
And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.
According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.
It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.
Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".
The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.
Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.
Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.
He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.
"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."
In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time.
Hey did everyone see the interview with Larry King.
In the interview, several VERY IMPORTANT POINTS were brought up (ON PURPOSE ha ha)....
_______________________________
1) He "hurt" jerry's feelings by stating the FACT his show got canceled (regardless of all the PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT HE GOT).
Jerry was so red-faced and had his "feelings hurt" that he went into a tirade of:
"Do you know who I am????
Do you know who I am????
Do you know who I am????"
Then Larry King (LK) replies:
"Jewish, Brooklin"
Then jerry "the jew" just shut up, end of story.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now think about that. A natural answer would be something like, "I know who you are, you're jerry springer (oops) I mean jerry seinfield....yadda yadda ya"
But LK just said two simple words, "jewish, brooklin".
Now, why would jerry be so content with that simple answer such that he shut himself up?!?!!
Hint hint --- basically it means that "yeah, I understand, 'jews' run the world" and "I know where you came from, a 'tough jewish' kid from the tough streets of brooklin that made a name for himself"
_______________________________
2) When LK interviewed the "Dalai Lama" (TM), he asked him if his "holy bastardness" believed in God (TM)?
Now, I know for X-ians, Khazars (jews) and Muslims, the belief/assumption in an all powerful/potent/etc "GOD" is a given.
But, with Buddhism, all sentient beings are 'equal' such that we all (animate and inanimate objects alike) are bound by illusion and samsara.......
So why did the Holy Bastardness stutter and refused to give the TRUE and honest answer?!!!
Instead the "Dalai Lama" said, something of the order: "Buddhism does not believe in God"......
Basically, the Dalai Lama DOES BELIEVE IN A "MAKER".
Basically, like BONO/BOZO/BONER he is a KHAZARIAN PUPPET and believes in a "master race" the "Chosen ones"..... utter BULLSHIT!!!
..they could have taken out a super-carrier, then escaped!
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/consternation
..the Chinese are protecting their interests very well, you see how the kMSM slanders their products with the sentimental "poisoning your children!", yet it is the fascist bastards who go THERE and demand CHEAPER, with NO QC! You get what you pay for, unless you just got ripped off by a fascist.
..it is really too bad for the Tibetans and Taiwanese, the Commiese have no right to these lands.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=LoDqDvbgeXM
brian100track (6 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
to add to that list look up aaron russo he knew before hand
fstkcshp2 (6 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
the point is, dear mr. chomsky, it already leaked out! look at norman mineta. sibel edmonds. etc.
to be a thinker needs to be a socratic stance.
creeg (16 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
I think alot of people would "care" to know the whole story behind JFK and 9/11. I guess you can't be correct in your assumptions all the time Noam Chomsky.
dinnerat942 (1 day ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
Listen at :50-50 sec. I still can't believe what I think I just heard..I think I hear him say he is happy the plane hit the world trade center. What a piece of garbage. He lied about the masacres at Hue in Vietnam...guys is a piece of trash.
wanderings0ul (1 day ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
he said that "it happened that it did hit"
not "i am happy that it did hit"
nealkassanoff (1 day ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
Noam, too many people are wise to 9/11 at this point. To say what you are saying is clearly an act of disinformation. Liar, liar pants on fire.
neothomist1275 (1 day ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
0 Good comment Poor comment
(Reply)
"Confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism - free government is founded in jealousy (suspicion), and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power." -- Jefferson in 'The Kentucky Resolutions'
Grim Reaper quote:
..it is really too bad for the Tibetans and Taiwanese, the Commiese have no right to these lands.
________________________________
GR, no offense, I'm going to make some corrections to your statement.
_______________________________
1) Firstly, referring to Chinese as "commies" is really short sighted, as it shows lack of understanding of history.
First point -- the chinese INVENTED money, they INVENTED the market economy (why do you see chinese people around the world so entrepreneural?!!!).
Second point -- "communism" and "capitalism" are both EMPTY NAMES. Both were the product of Khazarian "Ideology". During the 19th century and 20th century (in particularly the 20th century) the spread of "different (but really the same) ideologies" were used to "motivate", brainwash and control the masses.
Case in point, Karl Marx was ORDERED by the ROTHSCHILD to write the Communist Manifesto, which did not have his name authored until several decades AFTER he wrote it.....
Secondly, "Chinese Socialism" is just a name. Left or Right is basically Left Puppet or Right Puppet of the Ashkenazis.
______________________________
2) Let's start with the REALLY EASY one first. Taiwan.
So what's the history behind Taiwan?!??
China is THE WORLDS OLDEST LIVING CIVILIZATION, CULTURE, AND LANGUAGE --- bar none!
Chinese is also (and have been for at least the last 5,000 YEARS!!!!) a diverse MULTI-ETHNIC, MULT-CULTURAL, MULT-LANGUAGE(dialect) nation.
China literally means "Middle Kingdom". This alludes to the fact that China was the center of the world for the last 10,000 years.
Taiwan, is ALSO multi-ethnic. The SAME ETHNIC GROUPS AS IN CHINA! Taiwan has some "native aboriginals" before the "native chinese" (however you define this) moved to Taiwan, during the civil war when THE WESTERN NATIONS (USA, England, France, Porugal, Spain, etc) WERE ATTEMPTING (and fortunately failed) TO CAUSE DIVISION in order to take it over......
....... much like in Iraq at the moment.
So in terms of history, the "aboriginals" of Taiwan were ALL ORIGINALLY FROM CHINA.
China is ONE nation -- ONE people (diverse of course) -- and the same people are attempting to "divide and conquer" as usual.
______________________________
3) Lastly, on Tibet. Tibet has historical, cultural, religious. and GENETIC DIRECT LINKS to China.
It's NOT like North america where the LAND WAS STOLEN FROM THE "INDIANS" (natives, aboriginals).
It's NOT like New Zealand where the LAND WAS STOLEN FROM THE "INDIANS" (natives, aboriginals).
It's NOT like Australia where the LAND WAS STOLEN FROM THE "INDIANS" (natives, aboriginals).
In fact, you can't tell a "Tibetan" from a "Chinese" most of the time, since they share the MUCH of the same genes, and lineage.
The WHOLE PART OF CHINA (up to Mongolia and Siberia) is TECHNICALLY, IN REALITY CHINA.
Russia began its "Eastern Expansion" only about 350 years ago.
Russia really ended at the Urals Mountain Range.
Normally HUGE physical barriers cause a restriction in movement, hence India and China being ANCIENT neighbors, look very different.
The same is with the Ural Mountain Range, so when people divide "Europe" from "Asia" the Ural Mountain Range is effectively used.
I can't believe he said this...
Unbelievable. This guy has to be part of a controlled opposition.
He's too smart to believe the bullshit he's peddling.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
Something HUGE is going to happen. Why BLATANTLY EXPOSED all of their "Best" agents:
- Noam Chompsky - exposes himself as Khazarian agent
- Alex Jones - exposed "death-cult-jones" dis-information agent
- Amy Goodman - exposed Zionist "Gatekeeper"
- Michael Moore - exposed "gun-control-so-we-can't-resist-the-upcoming-"CLAMPDOWN""
and "Ayerabes-did-911" MEDIA DARLING.
Why do "they" feel its okay to have their precious agents make so many OBVIOUS claims?!?!!!
I've got the feeling, it's because, like in a game of poker/blackjack, it's near the end of the game --- no need to hide cards...
..... what that means to us, is "end-of-times", aka Armaegedan.
______________________________
new
Noam Chomsky on 9/11 and JFK
I can't believe he said this...
Even if it were true [that twin towers were brought down by controlled demolition] - which is extremely unlikely - who cares? it doesn't have any significance...
It's [a little] like the massive amount of energy [expended] trying to figure out who killed JFK - who knows? who cares?[!!]
I mean plenty of people get killed all the time, why does it matter that one of them happened to be john f. kennedy? [??]
If there was some reason to believe there was a high level conspiracy then it might be interesting. But, the evidence against that is overwhelming.[!!!]
Unbelievable. This guy has to be part of a controlled opposition.
He's too smart to believe the bullshit he's peddling.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
qrswave | Sun, 2007-11-11 06:24
..i do not contest any of the facts about China, but the commies were instrumental in the situations involving Tibet and Taiwan; peoples who wanted nothing to do with communist rule, let alone different tribes or groups taking over, however similar.
..you are also right of course, about all the political left/rite commie/bullcrappy + lies = war.
..ALL the racial subgroups predate 10,000 years ago, call their civilizations what you will.
Chomsky is an admitted Zionist, and was a Zionist youth leader. He even considered moving to Israel when he was younger. He has always been in favor of a “Jewish homeland” in Palestine. As he wrote in his book Peace in the Middle East (1974 p. 49-51), "Perhaps this personal history distorts my perspective.” He says all Israeli atrocities have been done in the service of US interests. He refuses to apply the word “apartheid” to Israel, refuses to support any boycott of Israel, and refuses to debate Jeffrey Blankfort. He writes, “It is convenient in the US, and the West, to blame Israel and particularly Sharon, but that is unfair and hardly honest.” (Znet, April 2, 2002) He says early Zionists were genuinely interested in peacefully sharing the land with the Palestinian Arabs, and only opted for a state in 1942 in the wake of the “holocaust.” He admires Ben Gurion. He dismisses all talk of the Israel lobby. Writing in Z Magazine, he attacked Mearsheimer and Walt’s notions as empty.
Jeffrey Blankfort (whose parents were Israeli Jews) is a longtime critic of Chomsly. Blankfort says, “The war in Iraq was conceived by the neo-cons and the pro-Israeli lobby to benefit Israel, and to elevate Israel to a very important position in the Middle East. This is what was called for in the document of the Project for a New American Century or PNAC. And even though a number of prominent people, politicians as well as military people, have said that this was a war for Israel, the anti-war movement will not consider that at all. The only segment of the American society that is pushing the US administration to confront Iran happens to be the Jewish lobby.”
(http://peacepalestine.blogspot.com/2006/02/jeffrey-blankfort-interview-m... )
Chomsky will have none of this. He’s a Zionist, and always has been. He admits it.
He has seduced his followers into believing that Israel is a mere pawn of U.S. imperialism.
Thank you for making very clear and concise Chomsky's loyalties. I once liked the guy because my dad likes him.
In fact, Chomsky was in our city for a speaking engagement at the University. Probably in the summer somewhere. My dad wanted to go, but I refused.
So we didn't go.
I told my dad it wouldn't be worth it, after some things I have read about chomsky. I think the real reason why my dad was easy to dissuade was the cost of this lecture. Quite a chunk per person.
And so why should we go when some of that money will go to iz -ray - al?
Shame on my dad.
Chomsky makes many valid points regarding U.S. imperialism. Unfortunately, like most Jews he sees Israel as a “victim” or a “pawn” of the imperialist game. He maintains this rhetoric even when he documents Israeli atrocities, as in his 1983 book The Fateful Triangle.
Chomsky also favors a “two-state” solution, which is absurd, since it would perpetuate Israeli atrocities. Any talk of a “two-state” solution is a ruse to conceal Zionist supremacism.
Chomsky will debate sociopaths like Alan Dershowitz, but he will not debate true anti-Zionist Jews like Jeffrey Blankfort. He will not discuss the Israel lobby. He will not discuss the role of private central banking (which is largely controlled by Zionist Jews). In one sense, Chomsky's entire project is a scheme to deflect attention away from Zionist supremacism.
Michel Chossudovsky (in Canada) is another Jewish example. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/ ) He’s great at dissecting imeprialist agression, but he will not discuss Israel.
Likewise, Norm Finkelstein doesn’t like how his fellow Jews have exploited the “holocaust,” but he remains a Zionist.
I think it’s okay to read these writers, so long as we remember that their loyalties are to Israel.
Imperialism would exist with or without Israel. However, Israel has become so central to today’s imperialism that imperialism can no longer be discussed without mentioning Israel’s role.
Anyone who refuses to discuss Israel is not a true anti-imperialist, or anti-globalist, or anti-militarist. This includes Chomsky.
..what it really boils down to is that practical-zionism (ie: a "Jewish" state) is a racial-supremacist, colonial-apartheid-dictatorship practicing slow genocide upon the rightful inhabitants of Palestine, including REAL Semites!