The Reasons Americans Equate Truth with Racism and Hate
Why are Americans so fearful of speaking the truth today? Or, maybe, the better question is: what occurred in the past to completely stifle our voices?
Historian William Linds' paper entitled, "The Origins of Political Correctness," states, "It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious."
Lind states that if we look at political correctness from an historical point, we quickly learn that it is Cultural Marxism, which basically is the melding of Freudism and Marxism and it's premise was just as workers were oppressed under capitalism, so under Western culture, everyone lived in a constant state of psychological repression. "Liberating" everyone from that repression became one of cultural Marxism's main goals. He also indicates that every man involved in bringing this ideology to our shores were all Jewish.
Linda Kimball's paper on "Cultural Marxism" breaks down the origins of this hideous ideology further explaining its disastrous affects on America. In it she states that cultural marxism and political correctness are disguised in modern times as Multiculturalism.
Both authors indicate that these changes began, not in the 60's, but actually in the 1930's, when two Marxist-theorists - Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary - concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist (Jewish) new world order.
In 1933, the Frankfort School, formerly known as the Institute for Social Reseach, was established at Columbia University after its founders fled Nazi Germany after Hilter came to power. In addition to Gramsci was music critic Theodor Adorno, psychologist Erich Fromm, sociologist Wilhelm Reich and professor Herbert Marcuse. Its original strategy to destroy America could only be accomplished by infiltrating and subverting cultural institutions, since it was known that Americans steeped in traditions of freedom and liberty would never succumb to a frontal assault and be used as cannon fodder in a bloody revolution.
Gramsci concluded that Christianity's dominance in the West had corrupted the workers class and it would have to be de-Christianized by a "long march through the culture." His battleground would be the culture itself starting with the traditional family, then completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science and history. His new proletariat would be women, criminals, and racial minorities. He stated that the social and cultural order must be radically transformed and turned completely upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.
The school would go on to patent "Critical Theory" accurately defined as destructive criticism of all the main elements of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention, and conservatism."
Herbert Marcuse, who stayed behind in America after WWII, favored "polymorphous perversion," which Freud theorized that humans are born with unfocused sexual libidinal drives, deriving sexual pleasure from any part of the body. The objects and modes of sexual satisfaction are multifarious, directed at every object that might provide pleasure. This theory was radically interjected into the 60's sexual revolution with staggering effects that are still with us today.
Consequently, additional intellectual firepower was added to cement cultural Marxism's base: 'authoritarian personality.' This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds America's traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist. Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists. By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America's traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.
To poison American society further, the Frankfort School said history was determined by which groups, defined as men, women, races, religions, etc., had power or "dominance" over other groups. Certain groups, especially white males, were labeled "oppressors," while other groups were defined as "victims." Victims were automatically good, oppressors bad, just by what group they came from, regardless of individual behavior. They incorporated into their cultural Marxism what Nietzsche called the "transvaluation of all values." What that means, in plain English, is that all the old sins become virtues, and all the old virtues become sins. Homosexuality is a fine and good thing, but anyone who thinks men and women should have different social roles is an evil "fascist." That is what political correctness now teaches children in public schools all across America. (The Frankfurt School wrote about American public education. It said it did not matter if school children learned any skills or any facts. All that mattered was that they graduate from the schools with the right "attitudes" on certain questions.)
Herbert Marcuse became a "guru," of sorts, during the student rebellion in the 60's, and unfortunately, it provided him with an historic opportunity by injecting the Frankfort School's cultural Marxism into the baby-boom generation. My Generation! Of course, we did not understand what it really was. As was true from the Institute's beginning, Marcuse and the few other people "in the know" did not advertise that political correctness and multi-culturalism were a form of Marxism. But the effect was devastating: a whole generation of Americans, especially the university-educated elite, absorbed cultural Marxism as their own, accepting a poisonous ideology that sought to destroy America's traditional culture and Christian faith. That generation, which runs every elite institution in America, now wages a ceaseless war on all traditional beliefs and institutions. They have largely won that war. Most of America's traditional culture lies in ruins.
Cultural Marxism, under the disguise of multiculturalism, is the primary reason why Americans equate any truth with racism or hate. It is a ridiculous, poisonous, destructive ideology that we must eradicate, forever, in this country. However, a full frontal assault on the various institutions and organizations that defend it would end in our defeat. They are prepared and heavily fortified, now with the full cooperation of the United States government and para-military police forces behind them.
We, are but a small voice, however, hope reigns supreme. We must divorce ourselves from the poison that has undermined our culture and stolen our freedom, our voices and our liberty; as Gramsci laid it out so long ago, to undertake a "long march through the institutions." Our counter-strategy would be a long march to create new institutions defined by America's traditional value system. Patience is the virture that will eventually liberate us from the tyranny of every Marxist philosophy that now pervades our nation.
In the meantime, the next time you are called a fascist or a racist for speaking truth; label your attacker as a "Marxist" and watch for the reaction. You might be surprised.
References:
The Origins of Political Correctness
The Four Horsemen of the Frankfort School
Also watch William Lind's video "The History of Political Correctness" on Google
I have to mull it over further, but one statement that strikes me as being profoundly descriptive of what's happened to American culture:
"[T]hey incorporated into their cultural Marxism what Nietzsche called the "transvaluation of all values." What that means, in plain English, is that all the old sins become virtues, and all the old virtues become sins."
One other thing is that the reason the battle to rid ourselves of this venom is so dangerous is that it has already been introduced into our minds and the minds of our children.
They've succeeded in implanting within us irreconcilable values. That's why we see so many suicides among youth today.
In essence we ARE the enemy.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
USA!! NUMBER ONE!!
WOOOOOO!!
I'll try to say something more in a minute..
"This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds America's traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist. Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists. By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America's traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help."
To cut a long story short, I find it hard to disagree with any of the above statements.
How else can you explain the willingness of American soldiers to go over and kill hagis?
I've read Marcuse, I've read Fromm, I've read Reich. Say what you want about them, but at least they didn't kill people, or condone the killing of people.
in both your arguments.
that's why I didn't want to reply to the thesis of the post without thinking it out carefully.
I can't reply now, but I want to say that the author (of the article) makes some good points but misses what I think are crucial facts that results in inaccurate assumptions about the problem and its solution.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
after re-reading it for the umpteenth time, I realized that I failed to further explain the correlations between racism and hate to cultural marxism and political correctness in American society.
I'm still a bumbling novice writer. My apologies.
You can't blame everything on cultural marxism and political correctness. Forget about Marxism, most of the worlds problems are the result of capitalism and the culture of capitalism. And political correctness is with us because, well, most of us have come to the conclusion that it just ain't nice to lynch black people, y'know?
Read Fromm's To Have Or To Be or his The Sane Society and then tell me he's part of the grand plan to attain complete mastery over the gentiles.
This is a very important topic and thanks to ww for reading and summarizing the articles. I read only two of them so far. I agree with general thought process and critical analysis of the issue.
In the past, invaders who intended to own new territories for good, destroyed the cultural identity of the defeated nations AFTER the take over. Modern invaders have decide to do this BEFORE the take over. British historian Sir Kenneth Clark said civilizations came to dominance based on different merits. But they all collapsed for the same reason: loss of faith in their own value systems.
The authors suffer from one flaw though. They point to 'isms' as the enemy and shy away from discussing who the 'ists' are. This might be their own 'political correctness' they have not liberated themselves from yet.
'Isms' are ideas and you cannot fight ideas, because ideas won't fight you back. Ideas are hologram enemies that you will exhaust yourself fighting them without making a difference, unless you look for the 'projecters' of the holograms.
We cannot be unappreciative to those who point out the 'traps' in our way. But if we only preoccupy ourselves with avoiding the traps and not look for the 'hunter', we endlessly will have to worry about new traps.
Marxism/communism, racism, feminism, homosexualism, warm mongerism (global warming), globalism, multiculturism, ... are all traps after traps set up by the same hunter. We just can't keep dismantling traps after traps.
Whitewraith, thanks for this excellent post. I agree with almost all of it, but for reasons I will describe, I prefer not to include capitalism among the things that Zionists want to destroy,
I know you use the term “cultural Marxism,” and I’ll get to that in a moment, but first, I note that actual Maxism – in practice, anyway – is not anti-Capitalist. It is anti-competition. Both Capitalism and Communism seek a monopoly in order to eliminate competition. Capitalism is a monopoly held by the corporation. Communism is a monopoly held by the State. Both are tyrannical. Both are attractive to Zionists, who cannot survive without a monopoly of one kind or another. This includes ideological monopolies, such as the holocaust hoax, which gives Zionists a monopoly on “victimhood.” Of course, Zionist control of the media, the legal profession, the banking profession, much of the medical profession, and so on are well known.
However, I can agree with your use of the term ”cultural Marxism,” since Marxism holds that humans are products of their social environment. Marxism dismisses objective physical factors such as gender, race, land etc. It says humans and their values are entirely malleable. It promotes a delusion that twists logic, and creates bizarre cults.
Marxism in practice is a Jewish invention, as you note. Jews have always sought to pump their venom into people’s minds when people are children. In this way, Jews and Marxists create their victims’ entire worldview. To question Zionism is to challenge a person’s entire cosmology, which makes people so uncomfortable that they violently resist the truth. Hence radical Marxist revolutions seek to wipe out adults, and “re-educate” children. An example is the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, which turned children against their parents, and liquidated almost 3 million people. Even today, radical Marxist movements, such as the Kurdish PEJAK (against Iran) are militantly feminist. So is the anti-Iranian MEK cult, which began as a Marxist student movement in Iran.
I agree that Jews use political correctness to break up the solidarity of non-Jews.
I also agree that Freudianism reflects the standard Jewish fascination with nastiness, scatological humor, and anything that opposes what non-Jewish people regard as sacred. Once again, as in all cases, this is designed to break up non-Jewish society so Jews may reign supreme. It is also a product of sheer Zionist indulgence in filth for its own sake, as we see in the Talmud.
Political correctness keeps the hated Goyim confused and tied up in lawsuits. For example, California’s governor Schwarzenegar has signed a bill (written by the militant Jewish lesbian) that allows male students to enter female locker rooms, if male students dress like women. The new law requires all California textbooks to be re-written. Since California is the nation’s largest textbook market, and since Jews control the textbook publishing industry, all textbooks in the USA will be rewritten so they promote homosexuality, cross-dressing, transgenderism, and so on. The new California law requires all educational materials in public schools to have these changes, even materials given to kindergarten students.
Again and again, it’s all part of the Jewish plan to break up our solidarity, and Jews easily find people who will turn against their own kind in return for power and special favors.
You wrote, ” In the meantime, the next time you are called a fascist or a racist for speaking truth; label your attacker as a "Marxist" and watch for the reaction. You might be surprised.”
In my experience, people will simply say, “No I’m not a Marxist, and you are still wrong.”
I agree with erosoplier that to a large extent, non-Jewish people brought this on themselves by victimizing Blacks and Native Americans. This oppression opened the door to Zionist toxin. Jews owned many of the ships that brought African slaves to the New World, yet Jews never tire of promoting Black victimhood, plus legislation against “hate crimes.” It’s all designed to keep non-Jews at each other’s throats.
Non-Jews readily play into this game, usually because of their own selfishness or confusion. White Americans hate being called “racist,” yet they support Zionists, who are behind the “racist” canard. “Christian” evangelicals are radically anti-homosexual, yet they radically support Zionists, who are radically pro-homosexual. Most women dislike militant feminism, yet they claim to have been victims from the dawn of time. “Anti-globalists” oppose corporate tyranny, yet they refuse to discuss the Israel lobby, or the Federal Reserve.
The truth is simple. Tyranny, monopolies, Zionism, and racism (of all kinds) are evil. So are Jewish stratagems to keep the Goyim divided. So are pure Capitalism and pure Communism.
Moan about political correctness all you want, but the fact is if American society were to toe the line of political correctness more, and act out less, it would never find itself bombing the innocent people of far away nations again.
That would be a good thing.
America stopped walking the path of liberalism the day it started bombing Afghanistan. Accuse America of degeneracy, but don't blame it on liberalism - America no longer walks the path of liberalism. It's degeneracy is the result of laziness, not liberalism. To point the finger at liberalism is itself lazy.
I have to think about this,
"...if we look at political correctness from an historical point, we quickly learn that it is Cultural Marxism, which basically is the melding of Freudism and Marxism and it's premise was just as workers were oppressed under capitalism, so under Western culture, everyone lived in a constant state of psychological repression. "Liberating" everyone from that repression became one of cultural Marxism's main goals. He also indicates that every man involved in bringing this ideology to our shores were all Jewish..."
I'm sorry, but this is just so vague I can't understand exactly what is being claimed.
What is this "political correctness?" I have always thought that this term is used to somehow polish up political positions like the desire to lynch blacks, or the urge to incinerate jews, or the thought it would be a good thing to put your penis in little boy's backsides. The idea is that it's only a silly prejudice held by hippies that you would be against these desires, urges, or thoughts. The upshot is that if you only see that "political correctness" is a prejudice, then you will go on to see that these desires, urges, and thoughts can't be such bad things.
If I'm urging "political correctness," then I have a problem, these people tell me,... I have the problem that I think there's something really objectively wrong with stringing up blacks, or gassing jews, or poking little boys. It is only our leftist prejudiced society that holds that these practices are problematical. The objectors to political correctness, apparently, see nothing wrong with these desires, urges, and thoughts.
Or do I have that wrong? And so, if I have that wrong how can Whitewraith race through what he's arguing so quickly. He makes himself seem to be defending the desire to string up blacks, or gas jews, or poke boys, because its such a bad thing to promote "political correctness." I can't get beyond this, though.
I take it Whitewraith wants to argue that there are no objective truths, and so anyone's political preferences are just that, preferences and mere opinions.
Well, I'm not someone to shut up about stringing up blacks, gassing Jews, or poking six year olds, because someone argues its a mere prejudice to say so.
Take this business about marxism. The idea there is that the rich have been stealing from the poor and killing anyone who objects because that's just what the rich do. Does whitewraith say this is false, that the rich don't do this, or does he just say that we shouldn't mind because to be concerned about it is just a Jewish idea.
What kind of nonsense is that?