Ron Paul owns Fox News in attempted hit piece regarding donation

Ron Paul owns Fox News in attempted hit piece regarding donation

Related
Screw Yahoo and the MSM. This is the front page headline they decide to use?
---
Hit piece by Neil Cavuto of Fox News against Ron Paul. Ron Paul completely dominates the conversation and owns Cavuto.

Added: December 19, 2007


Posted in Submitted by mparent7777 on Thu, 2007-12-20 20:35.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Here's the donation from Don Black of Stormfront. We should scour that site for dodgy contributors to the Hillary and Giuliani campaigns and then demand answers from the MSM as to why they've chosen to exclusively target Ron Paul (rhetorical question if there ever was one). It's absolutely ridiculous.

Look, John McCain has accepted a contribution from Marilyn Manson! Will he give it back or are we to assume that he digs that shit?

Crimes of Zion | Thu, 2007-12-20 21:36

And Mitt Romney has happily accepted $2,300 from David Duke. Let's lynch him!


Mitt Romney's 2008 Campaign Finance Team

Crimes of Zion | Thu, 2007-12-20 21:51

..and what about the endless millions from the military industrial complex, and all the corporate fascists; likely none or not much of that went to Dr. Paul!! lol

..how many of the people who vote actually know enough about economics to predict what will happen to the economy with the gold standard today?

..i really like the libertarian and anti-war positions RP espouses.. remember what GWB said right before 9/11? do you think he meant it?

..Ron Paul cannot do this all by himself, even if we all sent him our last dollars; HE WILL REQUIRE MASSiVE POPULAR -PRACTICAL- SUPPORT. Sort of like TACTICAL, when you march on DC and NY; right Masher!

..and get that ghoul!!!!

Grim Reaper | Thu, 2007-12-20 22:29
mparent7777 | Fri, 2007-12-21 00:53

.. collective IQ 101..

Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 01:05

From one o' the Chimp and the Parrot's favorite websites: http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/

2006: Haaretz reported on a case of technology, academia and physical courage converging to protect the history of the Jewish people. Emory University is planning to translate a professor's Web site on Holocaust denial into Arabic, Farsi and other languages common to countries where anti-Semitic views are widespread. Professor Deborah Lipstadt, who runs the site Holocaust Denial on Trial (www.hdot.org), said she hopes the translations will provide resources to people who have no historical accounts of the Holocaust in their native tongue. "I'm convinced that there are people in predominantly Muslim countries, especially in the Middle East, who are being inundated with Holocaust deniers' claims and don't know that the deniers are fabricating and distorting," she said in a news release. Robert Paul, dean of Emory College, said the university is creating a $2 million endowment to help enhance the Web site. The site's stance on anti-Semitic views could create some security concerns for the university, he said. "That's always a threat, but that's the risk you take in a free society," he said in a telephone interview. Emory is located in Atlanta, Georgia, the same city from which Jimmy Carter sent forth his comparison of Israel with the Apartheid of South Africa.

Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 01:18
mparent7777 | Fri, 2007-12-21 01:33
Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 01:40

"His book, Moses and Civilization: The Meaning Behind Freud's Myth (Yale University press, 1996), received the Heinz Hartmann Award in Psychoanalysis, the L. Bryce Boyer Award in Psychological Anthropology, and the National Jewish Book Award in the area of Jewish Thought."

Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 01:48

You're hallucinating, Nobladder.

Step away from the booze, and go sleep it off.

mparent7777 | Fri, 2007-12-21 02:00

.. and so is Les and Mrs. Paul, and any other surnamed Paul you've ever heard of.. unless I am mistaken..

Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 02:02

..is not about Paul's 'race', it's about the American PEOPLE, and by extension; THE WORLD.

it iS WHETHER:

a. Ron Paul's monetary policy will be sound; benefit the people, the ELite (or not) and/or just start another war.

b. Ron Paul can actually get nominated, let alone elected!

c. Ron Paul's policies will result in the gutting of commie social programs, (which are a kind of a band-aid for a disfunctional system) which aren't all bad, given that many fall through the cracks of the corporate-facist crapital_shism.

d. Ron Paul's presidency will result in TRUE PEACE.

Grim Reaper | Fri, 2007-12-21 02:32

I repeat: Ron Paul is jewish. And so are the chimp of zion and mparrot. I verily believe these assertions to be demonstrable points of fact.

Nobodaddy | Fri, 2007-12-21 02:45

and interesting too (perhaps even relevant), but keep in mind that people should be judged by their actions, not what egg they hatched from! ;P lol

i'm still skeptical, but i see no other viable alternative yet.

Note that neither repugnicrites nor demonicrites have officially selected their nominees for anti-christ yet.

Grim Reaper | Fri, 2007-12-21 04:08

I've just received an email from my dear old friend Mr. Dkembe Mtumbo Nobodaddy, who informs me that he has been 'blocked or banned' subsequent to the writing of the above words-- he believes by one or other of the persons cited, but possibly by the site's owner his or herself.

He asked me to tell you "vale"-- vale.

Nonesuch | Fri, 2007-12-21 04:36

Does anyone know what Paul's plans are regarding the Fed? Is he planning to cut it loose and establish a central bank to be part of the government? Because that's the only situation that the currency bench mark becomes important in economic planning.

If I understand it correctly, when gold (or any precious metals) is the bench mark, the central bank can print money only to the amount of gold it actually holds. If a foreign bank keeps the control of the printing, interest rate, and the economy, then why does it matter what 'their' money is based on?

If the Fed is going to remain the Fed, does the president have the authority to change 'their' monetary system? What if they say no? And if they say 'fine', isn't it exactly what we should 'not' be doing anyways?

Even if we establish a central bank, we don't have any gold to back our money. Would then we buy insurance (not the actual-stolen-gold) from those foreign banks who have the gold to guarantee our money? That would be exactly what we are doing now.
Just pondering!

Kats | Fri, 2007-12-21 04:47

While I'm here, I might as well point out that Ron Paul probably DOES own part of FOX-TV-- literally.

Nonesuch | Fri, 2007-12-21 05:03
mparent7777 | Fri, 2007-12-21 05:19

Kats. As always, not only are your comments informative, your questions are too. :)

I think we can keep the Federal Reserve, but not as a private for-profit entity that we must borrow our own money from. A central bank can work so long as it’s fully transparent and accountable, subject to audits, regulated by enforceable law, and staffed by elected representatives. Such a bank would have certain dangers. For example a president could twist the economy in any way desired. Therefore the terms of elected representatives would have to differ from the presidential terms, just as the Supreme Court does (although I would not recommend lifetime appointments as with the Supreme Court).

“Does anyone know what Paul's plans are regarding the Fed? Is he planning to cut it loose and establish a central bank to be part of the government? Because that's the only situation that the currency bench mark becomes important in economic planning.”

I don’t think anyone knows. I doubt Ron Paul himself knows. He just knows we must dump the Fed in its current form. Unfortunately Paul clings to the bizarre notion of a “gold standard," which allowed banksters to gain a monopoly in the first place. The “gold standard” thing is a nostalgic fantasy of a world that never existed in the first place. It’s part of the general human urge to imagine a “golden age” in the past. Such delusions only survive so long as we don’t look at them too closely. They're especially popular among older people like Ron Paul (age 72). That's not a jab at ron Paul. I'm saying it's natural to imagine that everything was "better" in the past. As Will Rogers said, "Things ain't what they used to be -- and probably never were."

The real question is simple: who shall make monetary policy -- a secret organization like the Fed, or the people through elected government?

“If I understand it correctly, when gold (or any precious metals) is the bench mark, the central bank can print money only to the amount of gold it actually holds. If a foreign bank keeps the control of the printing, interest rate, and the economy, then why does it matter what 'their' money is based on?”

It doesn’t matter what money is based on. Gold is a traded commodity, which means its price is subject to speculation and manipulation. Thus, any monetary system based on gold would be subject to speculation and manipulation. If we based our money on gold, we’d have a bunch of James Bond Goldfingers running around, fixing everything for their own gain.

Money has been based on gold, salt, rice, livestock, all kinds of things, but it need not be based on anything. A fiat currency can work if control is public and transparent. Indeed, with the right structures, a fiat currency is the best thing of all, since it encourages everyone to have confidence in a system that everyone has a personal stake in. Under the current system, everyone just tries to survive, while they hope the system doesn’t eat them.

“If the Fed is going to remain the Fed, does the president have the authority to change 'their' monetary system? What if they say no? And if they say 'fine', isn't it exactly what we should 'not' be doing anyways?”

The President has no authority over monetary policy. He can make requests, but the Fed is not obliged to honor them. The Fed has sole, secret, monopolistic control over monetary policy.

“Even if we establish a central bank, we don't have any gold to back our money.”

That’s right. And if we retain fractional reserve banking (instead of dumping it like we should) then whoever has an ounce of gold can lend out ten ounces worth of paper, and use that paper to buy all the gold.

“Would we then buy insurance (not the actual-stolen-gold) from those foreign banks who have the gold to guarantee our money? That would be exactly what we are doing now.”

Yes it would. As long as the Fed remains private and secret, we will have increasing problems.

Ultimately the villain is not just the Fed, but western culture itself, which is based on arrogance, consumerism, and the need to constantly expand like a pyramid scheme. This can only lead to collapse. Either the system will collapse by itself, or it will be violently overthrown when poverty and suffering become intolerable. Either way, we’re talking about unimaginable pain.

In any case, we MUST dump the Fed in its current form.

Abdul Alhazred | Fri, 2007-12-21 06:38

James Bond Goldfingers lol
Kats asks the right questions,
and you write the answers!

Get ready to fight for it!

Grim Reaper | Fri, 2007-12-21 07:58

I ask such questions because some times I feel left in the dust when every body else is hotly contesting who said what on which network. I cut loose all networks that cost me even a penny. Its a while that I decided to end my agony of resisting throwing the remote at the tv; that if I get screwed, then I should get paid, not me paying the screwer. I am not that desperate yet!

Overall I think americans are like prisoners in a big concentration camp that has a lot of gates. Presidential election times are like outdoors exercise times when the inmates come out side to breath and work out. To make sure no one can scape, the private security company puts a strong guard at outside of each gate. These guards should meet the requirements of the gates : the size, uphill, downhill, type of inmates, etc.

Presidential candidates are those guards. We have gender minority, religious minority, racial minority, environmentalist, rebel, urbanite, country boy, etc. Aside from their eclectic snake oil sales pitches, what all have in common is one thing : keep the inmates where they are.

If there is anyone who might have ulterior tendencies, most likely can't be in the hire of the private security company.

Kats | Fri, 2007-12-21 09:22

..and what about the endless millions from the military industrial complex, and all the corporate fascists; likely none or not much of that went to Dr. Paul!! lol

Spot on Grim, that was exactly my point. You can bet on all the board members and stock-holders of Boeing, Halliburton, Northrop, GE, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon et al (the real criminals) putting their campaign contributions into Hillary's pocket, being that she's the biggest warmonger of them all.

Crimes of Zion | Fri, 2007-12-21 10:34

Here's a list of Raytheon employees and their contributions.

6 out of 31 donors contributed to Ron Paul;
5 out of 31 donors contributed to Hillary Clinton;
1 out of 31 donors contributed to Giuliani.

A revolt from within!

Crimes of Zion | Fri, 2007-12-21 10:56

I've just received an email from my dear old friend Mr. Dkembe Mtumbo Nobodaddy,

So now Nobodaddy is a Kenyan by the name of Dkembe Mtumbo? I thought his name was Steve Crist?

Crimes of Zion | Fri, 2007-12-21 11:22

Looks like the ghoouil isn't very popular!!!
I wonder where all his wartime 9/11 support went??? SiC

Grim Reaper | Fri, 2007-12-21 12:25

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator